The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
Abstract Much of biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalizability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical epidemiology 2008-04, Vol.61 (4), p.344-349 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 349 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 344 |
container_title | Journal of clinical epidemiology |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | von Elm, Erik Altman, Douglas G Egger, Matthias Pocock, Stuart J Gøtzsche, Peter C Vandenbroucke, Jan P |
description | Abstract Much of biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalizability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case–control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case–control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the web sites of PLoS Medicine , Annals of Internal Medicine , and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70351922</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0895435607004362</els_id><sourcerecordid>2734527791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-7c723931a03d8c8ce47f0d3211f106d770721f663961e8466ec3e8837e885f073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkt2O0zAQhSMEYsvCK6wsIRBcJMzEje3sBQJW5UdaqdK2XFtZZ9J1SeNgJyv1GXhpHLVQsTfceGTpm-MzPpMkFwgZAop322xrWttRb7McQGaIGYB6lMxQSZUWZY6PkxmoskjnvBBnybMQtgAoQRZPkzNUHHlRqFnya31HbDV46jbDHXW227BY2Q31zg_TzTVseRvI31eDdV3VRnisLQVmO7bobU0761q32bM3q_XN8tPiLQtDNdCOuuGSbcYITDYDa5xn_qT6j2Q4SD5PnjRVG-jFsZ4n3z8v1ldf0-vll29XH69TU5R8SKWROS85VsBrZZShuWyg5jligyBqGWfMsRGClwJJzYUgw0kpLuNRNCD5efL6oNt793OkMOidDYbaturIjUFL4AWWeR7Blw_ArRt9dBw0AudYglAYKXGgjHcheGp07-2u8vsI6SksvdV_wtJTWBpRx7Bi48VRfrzdUX1qO6YTgVdHoAqmahtfdcaGv1wO0aWSReQ-HDiKv3ZvyetgLHWGauvJDLp29v9e3j-QmCgbX_1BewqnuXXINejVtFrTZoEEmHOR89-Z78uE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1033190681</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>von Elm, Erik ; Altman, Douglas G ; Egger, Matthias ; Pocock, Stuart J ; Gøtzsche, Peter C ; Vandenbroucke, Jan P</creator><creatorcontrib>von Elm, Erik ; Altman, Douglas G ; Egger, Matthias ; Pocock, Stuart J ; Gøtzsche, Peter C ; Vandenbroucke, Jan P ; for the STROBE Initiative ; STROBE Initiative</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Much of biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalizability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case–control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case–control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the web sites of PLoS Medicine , Annals of Internal Medicine , and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-4356</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18313558</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Case-Control Studies ; Cohort analysis ; Cohort Studies ; Consensus ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Documentation ; Epidemiologic Research Design ; Epidemiology ; General aspects ; Guidelines as Topic ; Humans ; Information Dissemination - methods ; Internal Medicine ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Missing data ; Observation - methods ; Observational studies ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Scandals ; Statistical methods ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2008-04, Vol.61 (4), p.344-349</ispartof><rights>The authors</rights><rights>2007 The authors</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-7c723931a03d8c8ce47f0d3211f106d770721f663961e8466ec3e8837e885f073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-7c723931a03d8c8ce47f0d3211f106d770721f663961e8466ec3e8837e885f073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435607004362$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20192875$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18313558$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>von Elm, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altman, Douglas G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egger, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pocock, Stuart J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gøtzsche, Peter C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandenbroucke, Jan P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the STROBE Initiative</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STROBE Initiative</creatorcontrib><title>The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies</title><title>Journal of clinical epidemiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Abstract Much of biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalizability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case–control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case–control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the web sites of PLoS Medicine , Annals of Internal Medicine , and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Documentation</subject><subject>Epidemiologic Research Design</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Dissemination - methods</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Missing data</subject><subject>Observation - methods</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Scandals</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>0895-4356</issn><issn>1878-5921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkt2O0zAQhSMEYsvCK6wsIRBcJMzEje3sBQJW5UdaqdK2XFtZZ9J1SeNgJyv1GXhpHLVQsTfceGTpm-MzPpMkFwgZAop322xrWttRb7McQGaIGYB6lMxQSZUWZY6PkxmoskjnvBBnybMQtgAoQRZPkzNUHHlRqFnya31HbDV46jbDHXW227BY2Q31zg_TzTVseRvI31eDdV3VRnisLQVmO7bobU0761q32bM3q_XN8tPiLQtDNdCOuuGSbcYITDYDa5xn_qT6j2Q4SD5PnjRVG-jFsZ4n3z8v1ldf0-vll29XH69TU5R8SKWROS85VsBrZZShuWyg5jligyBqGWfMsRGClwJJzYUgw0kpLuNRNCD5efL6oNt793OkMOidDYbaturIjUFL4AWWeR7Blw_ArRt9dBw0AudYglAYKXGgjHcheGp07-2u8vsI6SksvdV_wtJTWBpRx7Bi48VRfrzdUX1qO6YTgVdHoAqmahtfdcaGv1wO0aWSReQ-HDiKv3ZvyetgLHWGauvJDLp29v9e3j-QmCgbX_1BewqnuXXINejVtFrTZoEEmHOR89-Z78uE</recordid><startdate>20080401</startdate><enddate>20080401</enddate><creator>von Elm, Erik</creator><creator>Altman, Douglas G</creator><creator>Egger, Matthias</creator><creator>Pocock, Stuart J</creator><creator>Gøtzsche, Peter C</creator><creator>Vandenbroucke, Jan P</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080401</creationdate><title>The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies</title><author>von Elm, Erik ; Altman, Douglas G ; Egger, Matthias ; Pocock, Stuart J ; Gøtzsche, Peter C ; Vandenbroucke, Jan P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-7c723931a03d8c8ce47f0d3211f106d770721f663961e8466ec3e8837e885f073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Documentation</topic><topic>Epidemiologic Research Design</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Dissemination - methods</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Missing data</topic><topic>Observation - methods</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Scandals</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>von Elm, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altman, Douglas G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egger, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pocock, Stuart J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gøtzsche, Peter C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandenbroucke, Jan P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the STROBE Initiative</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STROBE Initiative</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>von Elm, Erik</au><au>Altman, Douglas G</au><au>Egger, Matthias</au><au>Pocock, Stuart J</au><au>Gøtzsche, Peter C</au><au>Vandenbroucke, Jan P</au><aucorp>for the STROBE Initiative</aucorp><aucorp>STROBE Initiative</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2008-04-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>344</spage><epage>349</epage><pages>344-349</pages><issn>0895-4356</issn><eissn>1878-5921</eissn><abstract>Abstract Much of biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalizability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case–control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case–control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the web sites of PLoS Medicine , Annals of Internal Medicine , and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>18313558</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0895-4356 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2008-04, Vol.61 (4), p.344-349 |
issn | 0895-4356 1878-5921 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70351922 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Case-Control Studies Cohort analysis Cohort Studies Consensus Cross-Sectional Studies Documentation Epidemiologic Research Design Epidemiology General aspects Guidelines as Topic Humans Information Dissemination - methods Internal Medicine Medical sciences Miscellaneous Missing data Observation - methods Observational studies Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Scandals Statistical methods Variables |
title | The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T20%3A40%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Strengthening%20the%20Reporting%20of%20Observational%20Studies%20in%20Epidemiology%20(STROBE)%20statement:%20guidelines%20for%20reporting%20observational%20studies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20epidemiology&rft.au=von%20Elm,%20Erik&rft.aucorp=for%20the%20STROBE%20Initiative&rft.date=2008-04-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=344&rft.epage=349&rft.pages=344-349&rft.issn=0895-4356&rft.eissn=1878-5921&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2734527791%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1033190681&rft_id=info:pmid/18313558&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0895435607004362&rfr_iscdi=true |