Comparison of silicone and polypropylene Ahmed glaucoma valves: two-year follow-up

To compare the safety and efficacy of silicone and polypropylene Ahmed glaucoma drainage devices. We studied a retrospective consecutive case series of 91 eyes of 81 patients who were implanted with Ahmed valves by a single surgeon (R.M.S.). The first 43 eyes received polypropylene (model S2) valves...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of ophthalmology 2007-04, Vol.42 (2), p.227-232
Hauptverfasser: Mackenzie, Paul J, Schertzer, Robert M, Isbister, Carolyn M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 232
container_issue 2
container_start_page 227
container_title Canadian journal of ophthalmology
container_volume 42
creator Mackenzie, Paul J
Schertzer, Robert M
Isbister, Carolyn M
description To compare the safety and efficacy of silicone and polypropylene Ahmed glaucoma drainage devices. We studied a retrospective consecutive case series of 91 eyes of 81 patients who were implanted with Ahmed valves by a single surgeon (R.M.S.). The first 43 eyes received polypropylene (model S2) valves; the remaining 48 eyes received silicone (model FP7) valves. Data collection included demographics, type of glaucoma, and sequential measurement of clinical characteristics. The mean outcome measures were visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), number of antiglaucoma medications, and postoperative complications. Data were collected on day 1; weeks 1, 2-3, and 6; months 3-4, 6, and 12; and last visit. Mean follow-up was 27.1 months for the polypropylene valve and 20.1 months for the silicone valve. Mean decrease in IOP at 1 year was significantly greater in the silicone group than in the polypropylene group (t test, p < 0.005); however, this difference disappeared at 2 years. There were no differences between the groups in visual acuity, number of antiglaucoma medications, bleb needlings with 5-fluorouracil, or minor complications. A greater number of serious complications, including valve failures, occurred in the polypropylene group than in the silicone group, and this difference could not be accounted for by the longer follow-up in the polypropylene group. At 2 years follow-up, 82% of patients with silicone valves and 72% of patients with polypropylene valves continued to achieve greater than 30% IOP reduction. Both the silicone and polypropylene Ahmed valves significantly reduced IOP over 2 years. The silicone valve was associated with fewer serious complications.
doi_str_mv 10.3129/canjophthalmol.i07-032
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70318313</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70318313</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c247t-aae1dddc47b8129dcf8750d1fcba11b1708aadd75e9ee93fd5a9af4951cb663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kM9LwzAcxXNQ3Jz-CyMnb5lJky6ptzF0CgNBvZdv88N1pE1s2o3-9xacpwePx-N9HkJLRlecZcWjhvYY4qE_gG-CX9VUEsqzKzSnlCoimMpm6DalI6WcS7G-QTMmeZEpIeboYxuaCF2dQouDw6n2tQ6txdAaHIMfYxfi6O3kbA6NNfjbw6BDA_gE_mTTE-7PgYwWOuyC9-FMhniHrh34ZO8vukCfL89f21eyf9-9bTd7ojMhewJgmTFGC1mpicJop2RODXO6AsYqJqkCMEbmtrC24M7kUIATRc50tV7zBXr4a50W_gw29WVTJ229h9aGIZWScqY441NweQkO1URQxq5uoBvL_w_4LzSWYq0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70318313</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of silicone and polypropylene Ahmed glaucoma valves: two-year follow-up</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Mackenzie, Paul J ; Schertzer, Robert M ; Isbister, Carolyn M</creator><creatorcontrib>Mackenzie, Paul J ; Schertzer, Robert M ; Isbister, Carolyn M</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the safety and efficacy of silicone and polypropylene Ahmed glaucoma drainage devices. We studied a retrospective consecutive case series of 91 eyes of 81 patients who were implanted with Ahmed valves by a single surgeon (R.M.S.). The first 43 eyes received polypropylene (model S2) valves; the remaining 48 eyes received silicone (model FP7) valves. Data collection included demographics, type of glaucoma, and sequential measurement of clinical characteristics. The mean outcome measures were visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), number of antiglaucoma medications, and postoperative complications. Data were collected on day 1; weeks 1, 2-3, and 6; months 3-4, 6, and 12; and last visit. Mean follow-up was 27.1 months for the polypropylene valve and 20.1 months for the silicone valve. Mean decrease in IOP at 1 year was significantly greater in the silicone group than in the polypropylene group (t test, p &lt; 0.005); however, this difference disappeared at 2 years. There were no differences between the groups in visual acuity, number of antiglaucoma medications, bleb needlings with 5-fluorouracil, or minor complications. A greater number of serious complications, including valve failures, occurred in the polypropylene group than in the silicone group, and this difference could not be accounted for by the longer follow-up in the polypropylene group. At 2 years follow-up, 82% of patients with silicone valves and 72% of patients with polypropylene valves continued to achieve greater than 30% IOP reduction. Both the silicone and polypropylene Ahmed valves significantly reduced IOP over 2 years. The silicone valve was associated with fewer serious complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-4182</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3129/canjophthalmol.i07-032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17392844</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Aged ; Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use ; Biocompatible Materials ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Glaucoma - drug therapy ; Glaucoma - physiopathology ; Glaucoma - surgery ; Glaucoma Drainage Implants ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure - drug effects ; Intraocular Pressure - physiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Polypropylenes ; Postoperative Complications ; Prosthesis Implantation ; Retrospective Studies ; Silicone Elastomers ; Visual Acuity - physiology</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of ophthalmology, 2007-04, Vol.42 (2), p.227-232</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c247t-aae1dddc47b8129dcf8750d1fcba11b1708aadd75e9ee93fd5a9af4951cb663</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17392844$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mackenzie, Paul J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schertzer, Robert M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isbister, Carolyn M</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of silicone and polypropylene Ahmed glaucoma valves: two-year follow-up</title><title>Canadian journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Can J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>To compare the safety and efficacy of silicone and polypropylene Ahmed glaucoma drainage devices. We studied a retrospective consecutive case series of 91 eyes of 81 patients who were implanted with Ahmed valves by a single surgeon (R.M.S.). The first 43 eyes received polypropylene (model S2) valves; the remaining 48 eyes received silicone (model FP7) valves. Data collection included demographics, type of glaucoma, and sequential measurement of clinical characteristics. The mean outcome measures were visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), number of antiglaucoma medications, and postoperative complications. Data were collected on day 1; weeks 1, 2-3, and 6; months 3-4, 6, and 12; and last visit. Mean follow-up was 27.1 months for the polypropylene valve and 20.1 months for the silicone valve. Mean decrease in IOP at 1 year was significantly greater in the silicone group than in the polypropylene group (t test, p &lt; 0.005); however, this difference disappeared at 2 years. There were no differences between the groups in visual acuity, number of antiglaucoma medications, bleb needlings with 5-fluorouracil, or minor complications. A greater number of serious complications, including valve failures, occurred in the polypropylene group than in the silicone group, and this difference could not be accounted for by the longer follow-up in the polypropylene group. At 2 years follow-up, 82% of patients with silicone valves and 72% of patients with polypropylene valves continued to achieve greater than 30% IOP reduction. Both the silicone and polypropylene Ahmed valves significantly reduced IOP over 2 years. The silicone valve was associated with fewer serious complications.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Glaucoma - drug therapy</subject><subject>Glaucoma - physiopathology</subject><subject>Glaucoma - surgery</subject><subject>Glaucoma Drainage Implants</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraocular Pressure - drug effects</subject><subject>Intraocular Pressure - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Polypropylenes</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Prosthesis Implantation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Silicone Elastomers</subject><subject>Visual Acuity - physiology</subject><issn>0008-4182</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kM9LwzAcxXNQ3Jz-CyMnb5lJky6ptzF0CgNBvZdv88N1pE1s2o3-9xacpwePx-N9HkJLRlecZcWjhvYY4qE_gG-CX9VUEsqzKzSnlCoimMpm6DalI6WcS7G-QTMmeZEpIeboYxuaCF2dQouDw6n2tQ6txdAaHIMfYxfi6O3kbA6NNfjbw6BDA_gE_mTTE-7PgYwWOuyC9-FMhniHrh34ZO8vukCfL89f21eyf9-9bTd7ojMhewJgmTFGC1mpicJop2RODXO6AsYqJqkCMEbmtrC24M7kUIATRc50tV7zBXr4a50W_gw29WVTJ229h9aGIZWScqY441NweQkO1URQxq5uoBvL_w_4LzSWYq0</recordid><startdate>200704</startdate><enddate>200704</enddate><creator>Mackenzie, Paul J</creator><creator>Schertzer, Robert M</creator><creator>Isbister, Carolyn M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200704</creationdate><title>Comparison of silicone and polypropylene Ahmed glaucoma valves: two-year follow-up</title><author>Mackenzie, Paul J ; Schertzer, Robert M ; Isbister, Carolyn M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c247t-aae1dddc47b8129dcf8750d1fcba11b1708aadd75e9ee93fd5a9af4951cb663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Glaucoma - drug therapy</topic><topic>Glaucoma - physiopathology</topic><topic>Glaucoma - surgery</topic><topic>Glaucoma Drainage Implants</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraocular Pressure - drug effects</topic><topic>Intraocular Pressure - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Polypropylenes</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Prosthesis Implantation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Silicone Elastomers</topic><topic>Visual Acuity - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mackenzie, Paul J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schertzer, Robert M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isbister, Carolyn M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mackenzie, Paul J</au><au>Schertzer, Robert M</au><au>Isbister, Carolyn M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of silicone and polypropylene Ahmed glaucoma valves: two-year follow-up</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Can J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2007-04</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>227</spage><epage>232</epage><pages>227-232</pages><issn>0008-4182</issn><abstract>To compare the safety and efficacy of silicone and polypropylene Ahmed glaucoma drainage devices. We studied a retrospective consecutive case series of 91 eyes of 81 patients who were implanted with Ahmed valves by a single surgeon (R.M.S.). The first 43 eyes received polypropylene (model S2) valves; the remaining 48 eyes received silicone (model FP7) valves. Data collection included demographics, type of glaucoma, and sequential measurement of clinical characteristics. The mean outcome measures were visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), number of antiglaucoma medications, and postoperative complications. Data were collected on day 1; weeks 1, 2-3, and 6; months 3-4, 6, and 12; and last visit. Mean follow-up was 27.1 months for the polypropylene valve and 20.1 months for the silicone valve. Mean decrease in IOP at 1 year was significantly greater in the silicone group than in the polypropylene group (t test, p &lt; 0.005); however, this difference disappeared at 2 years. There were no differences between the groups in visual acuity, number of antiglaucoma medications, bleb needlings with 5-fluorouracil, or minor complications. A greater number of serious complications, including valve failures, occurred in the polypropylene group than in the silicone group, and this difference could not be accounted for by the longer follow-up in the polypropylene group. At 2 years follow-up, 82% of patients with silicone valves and 72% of patients with polypropylene valves continued to achieve greater than 30% IOP reduction. Both the silicone and polypropylene Ahmed valves significantly reduced IOP over 2 years. The silicone valve was associated with fewer serious complications.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>17392844</pmid><doi>10.3129/canjophthalmol.i07-032</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-4182
ispartof Canadian journal of ophthalmology, 2007-04, Vol.42 (2), p.227-232
issn 0008-4182
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70318313
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Aged
Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use
Biocompatible Materials
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Glaucoma - drug therapy
Glaucoma - physiopathology
Glaucoma - surgery
Glaucoma Drainage Implants
Humans
Intraocular Pressure - drug effects
Intraocular Pressure - physiology
Male
Middle Aged
Polypropylenes
Postoperative Complications
Prosthesis Implantation
Retrospective Studies
Silicone Elastomers
Visual Acuity - physiology
title Comparison of silicone and polypropylene Ahmed glaucoma valves: two-year follow-up
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T00%3A08%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20silicone%20and%20polypropylene%20Ahmed%20glaucoma%20valves:%20two-year%20follow-up&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Mackenzie,%20Paul%20J&rft.date=2007-04&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=227&rft.epage=232&rft.pages=227-232&rft.issn=0008-4182&rft_id=info:doi/10.3129/canjophthalmol.i07-032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70318313%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70318313&rft_id=info:pmid/17392844&rfr_iscdi=true