Cervical Cancer Screening Rates in the United States and the Potential Impact of Implementation of Screening Guidelines

The remarkable success achieved in cervical cancer prevention is largely attributable to cervical cytology screening, also known as the Papanicolaou (Pap) test. The American Cancer Society (ACS) revised screening guidelines for Pap testing in 2002. The impact of these changes on future numbers of Pa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:CA: a cancer journal for clinicians 2007-03, Vol.57 (2), p.105-111
Hauptverfasser: Solomon, Diane, Breen, Nancy, McNeel, Timothy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 111
container_issue 2
container_start_page 105
container_title CA: a cancer journal for clinicians
container_volume 57
creator Solomon, Diane
Breen, Nancy
McNeel, Timothy
description The remarkable success achieved in cervical cancer prevention is largely attributable to cervical cytology screening, also known as the Papanicolaou (Pap) test. The American Cancer Society (ACS) revised screening guidelines for Pap testing in 2002. The impact of these changes on future numbers of Pap tests has not been assessed. Using National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data to determine historical screening patterns, we extrapolate the numbers of Pap tests that would be performed through 2010, under 5 different scenarios of implementation of screening guidelines. From 1993 to 2003, there was a steady increase in the number of Pap tests, with an estimated 65.6 million Pap tests performed in 2003. Approximately two thirds of women born after 1930 reported having been screened within the previous year, and 85% within the previous 3 years. Fifteen percent of Pap tests were performed in hysterectomized women, most of whom, according to current guidelines, should not be screened. Based on population projections, if screening behavior remains unchanged, 75 million Pap tests will be performed in 2010. Full compliance with ACS guidelines would approximately halve the total number of tests to 34 million. Potentially, with more appropriate allocation of resources according to guidelines, all women could be screened and the total number of Pap tests reduced, despite projected increases in the population.
doi_str_mv 10.3322/canjclin.57.2.105
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_24P</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70313353</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1247684491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4515-5507f739d5b126aa37394adb6dbb062dbd22ee0f9ddf8c265869dfb326f843223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1v1DAUtBCILoUfwAVFHDggZfFHHGePqwhKpUogSs-WY790vXKcxXa66r_HaZZW6oWTn0cz80ZvEHpP8JoxSr9o5ffaWb_mYk3XBPMXaEV4RcuqqdlLtMIYi3JDGT9Db2Lc4_kvxGt0RgTLcCNW6NhCuLNauaJVXkMornUA8NbfFr9UglhYX6QdFDfeJjDFdXoAlTcP6M8xgU82qy-Hg9KpGPt5cjBkWCU7-hl5sryYrIEcGOJb9KpXLsK703uObr59_d1-L69-XFy226tSV5zwknMs-hzW8I7QWimW50qZrjZdh2tqOkMpAO43xvSNpjVv6o3pO0brvqnyidg5-rT4HsL4Z4KY5GCjBueUh3GKUmBGGOMsEz8-I-7HKficTVJCNhgzzDOJLCQdxhgD9PIQ7KDCvSRYzpXIf5VILiTN6Kz5cDKeugHMk-LUQSbUC-FoHdz_31G22227OH9ehDt7uzvaADIOyrm8h2TV6OdDP8b4Czbcqhs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211900305</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cervical Cancer Screening Rates in the United States and the Potential Impact of Implementation of Screening Guidelines</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><creator>Solomon, Diane ; Breen, Nancy ; McNeel, Timothy</creator><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Diane ; Breen, Nancy ; McNeel, Timothy</creatorcontrib><description>The remarkable success achieved in cervical cancer prevention is largely attributable to cervical cytology screening, also known as the Papanicolaou (Pap) test. The American Cancer Society (ACS) revised screening guidelines for Pap testing in 2002. The impact of these changes on future numbers of Pap tests has not been assessed. Using National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data to determine historical screening patterns, we extrapolate the numbers of Pap tests that would be performed through 2010, under 5 different scenarios of implementation of screening guidelines. From 1993 to 2003, there was a steady increase in the number of Pap tests, with an estimated 65.6 million Pap tests performed in 2003. Approximately two thirds of women born after 1930 reported having been screened within the previous year, and 85% within the previous 3 years. Fifteen percent of Pap tests were performed in hysterectomized women, most of whom, according to current guidelines, should not be screened. Based on population projections, if screening behavior remains unchanged, 75 million Pap tests will be performed in 2010. Full compliance with ACS guidelines would approximately halve the total number of tests to 34 million. Potentially, with more appropriate allocation of resources according to guidelines, all women could be screened and the total number of Pap tests reduced, despite projected increases in the population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-9235</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-4863</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.57.2.105</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17392387</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CAMCAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: Am Cancer Soc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Cervical cancer ; Disease prevention ; Female ; Guidelines ; Guidelines as Topic ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Health Surveys ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; Medical screening ; Middle Aged ; Oncology ; Papanicolaou Test ; United States ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Vaginal Smears - utilization ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 2007-03, Vol.57 (2), p.105-111</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2007 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Mar/Apr 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4515-5507f739d5b126aa37394adb6dbb062dbd22ee0f9ddf8c265869dfb326f843223</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.3322%2Fcanjclin.57.2.105$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.3322%2Fcanjclin.57.2.105$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1413,11544,27906,27907,45556,45557,46034,46458</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.3322%2Fcanjclin.57.2.105$$EView_record_in_Wiley-Blackwell$$FView_record_in_$$GWiley-Blackwell</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17392387$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breen, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNeel, Timothy</creatorcontrib><title>Cervical Cancer Screening Rates in the United States and the Potential Impact of Implementation of Screening Guidelines</title><title>CA: a cancer journal for clinicians</title><addtitle>CA Cancer J Clin</addtitle><description>The remarkable success achieved in cervical cancer prevention is largely attributable to cervical cytology screening, also known as the Papanicolaou (Pap) test. The American Cancer Society (ACS) revised screening guidelines for Pap testing in 2002. The impact of these changes on future numbers of Pap tests has not been assessed. Using National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data to determine historical screening patterns, we extrapolate the numbers of Pap tests that would be performed through 2010, under 5 different scenarios of implementation of screening guidelines. From 1993 to 2003, there was a steady increase in the number of Pap tests, with an estimated 65.6 million Pap tests performed in 2003. Approximately two thirds of women born after 1930 reported having been screened within the previous year, and 85% within the previous 3 years. Fifteen percent of Pap tests were performed in hysterectomized women, most of whom, according to current guidelines, should not be screened. Based on population projections, if screening behavior remains unchanged, 75 million Pap tests will be performed in 2010. Full compliance with ACS guidelines would approximately halve the total number of tests to 34 million. Potentially, with more appropriate allocation of resources according to guidelines, all women could be screened and the total number of Pap tests reduced, despite projected increases in the population.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Papanicolaou Test</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Vaginal Smears - utilization</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0007-9235</issn><issn>1542-4863</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU1v1DAUtBCILoUfwAVFHDggZfFHHGePqwhKpUogSs-WY790vXKcxXa66r_HaZZW6oWTn0cz80ZvEHpP8JoxSr9o5ffaWb_mYk3XBPMXaEV4RcuqqdlLtMIYi3JDGT9Db2Lc4_kvxGt0RgTLcCNW6NhCuLNauaJVXkMornUA8NbfFr9UglhYX6QdFDfeJjDFdXoAlTcP6M8xgU82qy-Hg9KpGPt5cjBkWCU7-hl5sryYrIEcGOJb9KpXLsK703uObr59_d1-L69-XFy226tSV5zwknMs-hzW8I7QWimW50qZrjZdh2tqOkMpAO43xvSNpjVv6o3pO0brvqnyidg5-rT4HsL4Z4KY5GCjBueUh3GKUmBGGOMsEz8-I-7HKficTVJCNhgzzDOJLCQdxhgD9PIQ7KDCvSRYzpXIf5VILiTN6Kz5cDKeugHMk-LUQSbUC-FoHdz_31G22227OH9ehDt7uzvaADIOyrm8h2TV6OdDP8b4Czbcqhs</recordid><startdate>20070301</startdate><enddate>20070301</enddate><creator>Solomon, Diane</creator><creator>Breen, Nancy</creator><creator>McNeel, Timothy</creator><general>Am Cancer Soc</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070301</creationdate><title>Cervical Cancer Screening Rates in the United States and the Potential Impact of Implementation of Screening Guidelines</title><author>Solomon, Diane ; Breen, Nancy ; McNeel, Timothy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4515-5507f739d5b126aa37394adb6dbb062dbd22ee0f9ddf8c265869dfb326f843223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Papanicolaou Test</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Vaginal Smears - utilization</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breen, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNeel, Timothy</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>CA: a cancer journal for clinicians</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Solomon, Diane</au><au>Breen, Nancy</au><au>McNeel, Timothy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cervical Cancer Screening Rates in the United States and the Potential Impact of Implementation of Screening Guidelines</atitle><jtitle>CA: a cancer journal for clinicians</jtitle><addtitle>CA Cancer J Clin</addtitle><date>2007-03-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>105</spage><epage>111</epage><pages>105-111</pages><issn>0007-9235</issn><eissn>1542-4863</eissn><coden>CAMCAM</coden><abstract>The remarkable success achieved in cervical cancer prevention is largely attributable to cervical cytology screening, also known as the Papanicolaou (Pap) test. The American Cancer Society (ACS) revised screening guidelines for Pap testing in 2002. The impact of these changes on future numbers of Pap tests has not been assessed. Using National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data to determine historical screening patterns, we extrapolate the numbers of Pap tests that would be performed through 2010, under 5 different scenarios of implementation of screening guidelines. From 1993 to 2003, there was a steady increase in the number of Pap tests, with an estimated 65.6 million Pap tests performed in 2003. Approximately two thirds of women born after 1930 reported having been screened within the previous year, and 85% within the previous 3 years. Fifteen percent of Pap tests were performed in hysterectomized women, most of whom, according to current guidelines, should not be screened. Based on population projections, if screening behavior remains unchanged, 75 million Pap tests will be performed in 2010. Full compliance with ACS guidelines would approximately halve the total number of tests to 34 million. Potentially, with more appropriate allocation of resources according to guidelines, all women could be screened and the total number of Pap tests reduced, despite projected increases in the population.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>Am Cancer Soc</pub><pmid>17392387</pmid><doi>10.3322/canjclin.57.2.105</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0007-9235
ispartof CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 2007-03, Vol.57 (2), p.105-111
issn 0007-9235
1542-4863
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70313353
source Wiley Online Library Open Access
subjects Adult
Aged
Cervical cancer
Disease prevention
Female
Guidelines
Guidelines as Topic
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health Surveys
Humans
Hysterectomy
Medical screening
Middle Aged
Oncology
Papanicolaou Test
United States
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis
Vaginal Smears - utilization
Womens health
title Cervical Cancer Screening Rates in the United States and the Potential Impact of Implementation of Screening Guidelines
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T11%3A07%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_24P&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cervical%20Cancer%20Screening%20Rates%20in%20the%20United%20States%20and%20the%20Potential%20Impact%20of%20Implementation%20of%20Screening%20Guidelines&rft.jtitle=CA:%20a%20cancer%20journal%20for%20clinicians&rft.au=Solomon,%20Diane&rft.date=2007-03-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=111&rft.pages=105-111&rft.issn=0007-9235&rft.eissn=1542-4863&rft.coden=CAMCAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.3322/canjclin.57.2.105&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_24P%3E1247684491%3C/proquest_24P%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211900305&rft_id=info:pmid/17392387&rfr_iscdi=true