Physical limitations and perceived quality of care among family medicine patients
Objective: To assess how physical limitations relate to patient satisfaction with the quality of medical care among family medicine patients, after adjustment for self-rated overall health and other patient characteristics. Design: A telephone survey of family medicine patients, linked with informat...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical rehabilitation 2008-03, Vol.22 (3), p.283-287 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 287 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 283 |
| container_title | Clinical rehabilitation |
| container_volume | 22 |
| creator | Rohrer, James E Wilkinson, John M Barnes, Darryl E Adamson, Steven C |
| description | Objective: To assess how physical limitations relate to patient satisfaction with the quality of medical care among family medicine patients, after adjustment for self-rated overall health and other patient characteristics.
Design: A telephone survey of family medicine patients, linked with information extracted from medical records.
Setting: A large family medicine department in Rochester, Minnesota.
Subjects: Patient ratings of quality were linked to medical records for 674 adult patients.
Results: Adjusting for self-rated overall health status and other confounders using multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that having physical limitations was inversely and independently related to excellent perceived quality (adjusted odds ratio = 0.56, P= 0.035).
Conclusions: In our sample of family medicine patients, people with physical limitations experience a disparity in perceived quality of care. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0269215507081577 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70310290</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0269215507081577</sage_id><sourcerecordid>70310290</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-109a1dbf471fae34cef07b8c2306d402075dd7a012fea83538e467cb8b1299243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3ePcniwVt09iPZzVGKX1BQQc9hs5mtW_LRZhMh_96UFgoFT3OY531neAi5ZnDPmFIPwJOUszgGBZrFSp2QKZNKRaCVOCXT7Tra7ifkIoQVAGgu2TmZMM11LEU8JZ8fP0Pw1pS09JXvTOebOlBTF3SNrUX_iwXd9Kb03UAbR61pkZqqqZfUmcqXA62w8NbXSNdjFusuXJIzZ8qAV_s5I9_PT1_z12jx_vI2f1xEViS8ixikhhW5k4o5g0JadKBybbmApJDAQcVFoQww7tBoEQuNMlE21znjacqlmJG7Xe-6bTY9hi6rfLBYlqbGpg-ZAsGApzCCt0fgqunbevwt4wBKcK35CMEOsm0TQosuW7e-Mu2QMci2rrNj12PkZt_b56OFQ2AvdwSiHRDMEg9H_y38AxZUhY4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>200732882</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physical limitations and perceived quality of care among family medicine patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Rohrer, James E ; Wilkinson, John M ; Barnes, Darryl E ; Adamson, Steven C</creator><creatorcontrib>Rohrer, James E ; Wilkinson, John M ; Barnes, Darryl E ; Adamson, Steven C</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To assess how physical limitations relate to patient satisfaction with the quality of medical care among family medicine patients, after adjustment for self-rated overall health and other patient characteristics.
Design: A telephone survey of family medicine patients, linked with information extracted from medical records.
Setting: A large family medicine department in Rochester, Minnesota.
Subjects: Patient ratings of quality were linked to medical records for 674 adult patients.
Results: Adjusting for self-rated overall health status and other confounders using multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that having physical limitations was inversely and independently related to excellent perceived quality (adjusted odds ratio = 0.56, P= 0.035).
Conclusions: In our sample of family medicine patients, people with physical limitations experience a disparity in perceived quality of care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-2155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0873</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0269215507081577</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18285435</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Activities of Daily Living ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Age ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Body Mass Index ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Disability ; Disabled Persons - psychology ; Disabled Persons - statistics & numerical data ; Family Practice - standards ; Female ; Gender ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Marital status ; Medical records ; Medicine ; Middle Aged ; Minnesota ; Obesity ; Overweight ; Patient Satisfaction ; Polls & surveys ; Quality of Health Care ; Regression analysis</subject><ispartof>Clinical rehabilitation, 2008-03, Vol.22 (3), p.283-287</ispartof><rights>SAGE Publications © Mar 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-109a1dbf471fae34cef07b8c2306d402075dd7a012fea83538e467cb8b1299243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-109a1dbf471fae34cef07b8c2306d402075dd7a012fea83538e467cb8b1299243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0269215507081577$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0269215507081577$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,21818,27923,27924,30998,43620,43621</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18285435$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rohrer, James E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnes, Darryl E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamson, Steven C</creatorcontrib><title>Physical limitations and perceived quality of care among family medicine patients</title><title>Clinical rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Clin Rehabil</addtitle><description>Objective: To assess how physical limitations relate to patient satisfaction with the quality of medical care among family medicine patients, after adjustment for self-rated overall health and other patient characteristics.
Design: A telephone survey of family medicine patients, linked with information extracted from medical records.
Setting: A large family medicine department in Rochester, Minnesota.
Subjects: Patient ratings of quality were linked to medical records for 674 adult patients.
Results: Adjusting for self-rated overall health status and other confounders using multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that having physical limitations was inversely and independently related to excellent perceived quality (adjusted odds ratio = 0.56, P= 0.035).
Conclusions: In our sample of family medicine patients, people with physical limitations experience a disparity in perceived quality of care.</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Disabled Persons - psychology</subject><subject>Disabled Persons - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Family Practice - standards</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Marital status</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minnesota</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Overweight</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><issn>0269-2155</issn><issn>1477-0873</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3ePcniwVt09iPZzVGKX1BQQc9hs5mtW_LRZhMh_96UFgoFT3OY531neAi5ZnDPmFIPwJOUszgGBZrFSp2QKZNKRaCVOCXT7Tra7ifkIoQVAGgu2TmZMM11LEU8JZ8fP0Pw1pS09JXvTOebOlBTF3SNrUX_iwXd9Kb03UAbR61pkZqqqZfUmcqXA62w8NbXSNdjFusuXJIzZ8qAV_s5I9_PT1_z12jx_vI2f1xEViS8ixikhhW5k4o5g0JadKBybbmApJDAQcVFoQww7tBoEQuNMlE21znjacqlmJG7Xe-6bTY9hi6rfLBYlqbGpg-ZAsGApzCCt0fgqunbevwt4wBKcK35CMEOsm0TQosuW7e-Mu2QMci2rrNj12PkZt_b56OFQ2AvdwSiHRDMEg9H_y38AxZUhY4</recordid><startdate>200803</startdate><enddate>200803</enddate><creator>Rohrer, James E</creator><creator>Wilkinson, John M</creator><creator>Barnes, Darryl E</creator><creator>Adamson, Steven C</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200803</creationdate><title>Physical limitations and perceived quality of care among family medicine patients</title><author>Rohrer, James E ; Wilkinson, John M ; Barnes, Darryl E ; Adamson, Steven C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-109a1dbf471fae34cef07b8c2306d402075dd7a012fea83538e467cb8b1299243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Disabled Persons - psychology</topic><topic>Disabled Persons - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Family Practice - standards</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Marital status</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minnesota</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Overweight</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rohrer, James E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnes, Darryl E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamson, Steven C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rohrer, James E</au><au>Wilkinson, John M</au><au>Barnes, Darryl E</au><au>Adamson, Steven C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physical limitations and perceived quality of care among family medicine patients</atitle><jtitle>Clinical rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Rehabil</addtitle><date>2008-03</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>283</spage><epage>287</epage><pages>283-287</pages><issn>0269-2155</issn><eissn>1477-0873</eissn><abstract>Objective: To assess how physical limitations relate to patient satisfaction with the quality of medical care among family medicine patients, after adjustment for self-rated overall health and other patient characteristics.
Design: A telephone survey of family medicine patients, linked with information extracted from medical records.
Setting: A large family medicine department in Rochester, Minnesota.
Subjects: Patient ratings of quality were linked to medical records for 674 adult patients.
Results: Adjusting for self-rated overall health status and other confounders using multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that having physical limitations was inversely and independently related to excellent perceived quality (adjusted odds ratio = 0.56, P= 0.035).
Conclusions: In our sample of family medicine patients, people with physical limitations experience a disparity in perceived quality of care.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>18285435</pmid><doi>10.1177/0269215507081577</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0269-2155 |
| ispartof | Clinical rehabilitation, 2008-03, Vol.22 (3), p.283-287 |
| issn | 0269-2155 1477-0873 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70310290 |
| source | MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List |
| subjects | Activities of Daily Living Adolescent Adult Age Aged Aged, 80 and over Body Mass Index Cross-Sectional Studies Disability Disabled Persons - psychology Disabled Persons - statistics & numerical data Family Practice - standards Female Gender Humans Logistic Models Male Marital status Medical records Medicine Middle Aged Minnesota Obesity Overweight Patient Satisfaction Polls & surveys Quality of Health Care Regression analysis |
| title | Physical limitations and perceived quality of care among family medicine patients |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T05%3A09%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physical%20limitations%20and%20perceived%20quality%20of%20care%20among%20family%20medicine%20patients&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Rohrer,%20James%20E&rft.date=2008-03&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=283&rft.epage=287&rft.pages=283-287&rft.issn=0269-2155&rft.eissn=1477-0873&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0269215507081577&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70310290%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=200732882&rft_id=info:pmid/18285435&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0269215507081577&rfr_iscdi=true |