Validity of Self-Reports of Return for Routine Repeat Screening in an Ovarian Cancer Screening Program
Cancer screening research relies on reliable and valid measurement of cancer screening behavior. Self-reports of screening constitute a cost-effective approach to measuring screening behavior; however, demonstration of suitable validity of these self-reports is critical. We evaluated the validity of...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention biomarkers & prevention, 2007-03, Vol.16 (3), p.490-493 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 493 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 490 |
| container_title | Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention |
| container_volume | 16 |
| creator | LYKINS, Emily L. B PAVLIK, Edward L ANDRYKOWSKI, Michael A |
| description | Cancer screening research relies on reliable and valid measurement of cancer screening behavior. Self-reports of screening
constitute a cost-effective approach to measuring screening behavior; however, demonstration of suitable validity of these
self-reports is critical. We evaluated the validity of self-report of return for repeat, routine, annual transvaginal sonography
(TVS) screening for ovarian cancer. Participants ( n = 535) in a university-based ovarian cancer screening program for asymptomatic, average risk women completed a telephone
interview 18 months following an initial, baseline TVS screening test. Self-reports of return for a repeat, routine ovarian
cancer screening test since baseline were obtained and compared with objective records of repeat screening from the screening
program database. Overall agreement of self-reports and objective records of ovarian cancer screening was 97.57% ( κ = 0.94). Sensitivity was 0.98, specificity was 0.96, positive predictive value was 0.98, and negative predictive value was
0.96. The month of last screening was accurately identified by 80% of participants. It was concluded the validity of self-reports
of TVS screening for ovarian cancer is very high and may even exceed the validity of self-reports of participation in breast,
cervical, and colorectal cancer screening over similar recall periods. Consequently, self-reports of TVS screening may serve
as a cost-effective substitute for more objective methods of assessing TVS screening behavior. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers
Prev 2007;16(3):490–3) |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0433 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70288957</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70288957</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-d4d12913ef606b12c060667c9a49ead951b44da4b94dfb9476d15051e8824b883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkU1v1DAQhi0EoqXlJ4ByAU4pdvx9RKsClSq12hauluOMd42yyTJOQP33ddhF7cWvPX7GIz0m5B2jF4xJ85lRKWtrlby4vL2qqaqp4PwFOWWSm1prKV-W_X_mhLzJ-RelVFspX5MTprluGiFOSfzp-9Sl6aEaY3UHfazXsB9xyst5DdOMQxVHrNbjPKUBSmkPfqruAgIMadhUaaj8UN388ZhKrvwQAJ9d3-K4Qb87J6-i7zO8PeYZ-fH18n71vb6--Xa1-nJdB67sVHeiY41lHKKiqmVNoCWVDtYLC76zkrVCdF60VnSxLFp1TFLJwJhGtMbwM_Lx8O4ex98z5MntUg7Q936Acc5O08YYK3UB5QEMOOaMEN0e087jg2PULYLdIs8t8lwR7Khyi-DS9_44YG530D11HY0W4MMR8Dn4PmIxkvITZ_TyDQv36cBt02b7NyG48M8dQgaPYeuYctwJS_kjO2yRGQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70288957</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity of Self-Reports of Return for Routine Repeat Screening in an Ovarian Cancer Screening Program</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Association for Cancer Research</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>LYKINS, Emily L. B ; PAVLIK, Edward L ; ANDRYKOWSKI, Michael A</creator><creatorcontrib>LYKINS, Emily L. B ; PAVLIK, Edward L ; ANDRYKOWSKI, Michael A</creatorcontrib><description>Cancer screening research relies on reliable and valid measurement of cancer screening behavior. Self-reports of screening
constitute a cost-effective approach to measuring screening behavior; however, demonstration of suitable validity of these
self-reports is critical. We evaluated the validity of self-report of return for repeat, routine, annual transvaginal sonography
(TVS) screening for ovarian cancer. Participants ( n = 535) in a university-based ovarian cancer screening program for asymptomatic, average risk women completed a telephone
interview 18 months following an initial, baseline TVS screening test. Self-reports of return for a repeat, routine ovarian
cancer screening test since baseline were obtained and compared with objective records of repeat screening from the screening
program database. Overall agreement of self-reports and objective records of ovarian cancer screening was 97.57% ( κ = 0.94). Sensitivity was 0.98, specificity was 0.96, positive predictive value was 0.98, and negative predictive value was
0.96. The month of last screening was accurately identified by 80% of participants. It was concluded the validity of self-reports
of TVS screening for ovarian cancer is very high and may even exceed the validity of self-reports of participation in breast,
cervical, and colorectal cancer screening over similar recall periods. Consequently, self-reports of TVS screening may serve
as a cost-effective substitute for more objective methods of assessing TVS screening behavior. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers
Prev 2007;16(3):490–3)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1055-9965</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0433</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17372244</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: American Association for Cancer Research</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; cancer control ; cancer screening ; Female ; Female genital diseases ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic ; Kentucky ; Mass Screening - psychology ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; ovarian cancer ; Ovarian Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Ovarian Neoplasms - psychology ; Patient Compliance ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Self Disclosure ; self-report ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tumors ; Ultrasonography ; validity</subject><ispartof>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention, 2007-03, Vol.16 (3), p.490-493</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-d4d12913ef606b12c060667c9a49ead951b44da4b94dfb9476d15051e8824b883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-d4d12913ef606b12c060667c9a49ead951b44da4b94dfb9476d15051e8824b883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3343,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18700074$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17372244$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>LYKINS, Emily L. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAVLIK, Edward L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ANDRYKOWSKI, Michael A</creatorcontrib><title>Validity of Self-Reports of Return for Routine Repeat Screening in an Ovarian Cancer Screening Program</title><title>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention</title><addtitle>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</addtitle><description>Cancer screening research relies on reliable and valid measurement of cancer screening behavior. Self-reports of screening
constitute a cost-effective approach to measuring screening behavior; however, demonstration of suitable validity of these
self-reports is critical. We evaluated the validity of self-report of return for repeat, routine, annual transvaginal sonography
(TVS) screening for ovarian cancer. Participants ( n = 535) in a university-based ovarian cancer screening program for asymptomatic, average risk women completed a telephone
interview 18 months following an initial, baseline TVS screening test. Self-reports of return for a repeat, routine ovarian
cancer screening test since baseline were obtained and compared with objective records of repeat screening from the screening
program database. Overall agreement of self-reports and objective records of ovarian cancer screening was 97.57% ( κ = 0.94). Sensitivity was 0.98, specificity was 0.96, positive predictive value was 0.98, and negative predictive value was
0.96. The month of last screening was accurately identified by 80% of participants. It was concluded the validity of self-reports
of TVS screening for ovarian cancer is very high and may even exceed the validity of self-reports of participation in breast,
cervical, and colorectal cancer screening over similar recall periods. Consequently, self-reports of TVS screening may serve
as a cost-effective substitute for more objective methods of assessing TVS screening behavior. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers
Prev 2007;16(3):490–3)</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>cancer control</subject><subject>cancer screening</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female genital diseases</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Kentucky</subject><subject>Mass Screening - psychology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>ovarian cancer</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Patient Compliance</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Self Disclosure</subject><subject>self-report</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>validity</subject><issn>1055-9965</issn><issn>1538-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkU1v1DAQhi0EoqXlJ4ByAU4pdvx9RKsClSq12hauluOMd42yyTJOQP33ddhF7cWvPX7GIz0m5B2jF4xJ85lRKWtrlby4vL2qqaqp4PwFOWWSm1prKV-W_X_mhLzJ-RelVFspX5MTprluGiFOSfzp-9Sl6aEaY3UHfazXsB9xyst5DdOMQxVHrNbjPKUBSmkPfqruAgIMadhUaaj8UN388ZhKrvwQAJ9d3-K4Qb87J6-i7zO8PeYZ-fH18n71vb6--Xa1-nJdB67sVHeiY41lHKKiqmVNoCWVDtYLC76zkrVCdF60VnSxLFp1TFLJwJhGtMbwM_Lx8O4ex98z5MntUg7Q936Acc5O08YYK3UB5QEMOOaMEN0e087jg2PULYLdIs8t8lwR7Khyi-DS9_44YG530D11HY0W4MMR8Dn4PmIxkvITZ_TyDQv36cBt02b7NyG48M8dQgaPYeuYctwJS_kjO2yRGQ</recordid><startdate>20070301</startdate><enddate>20070301</enddate><creator>LYKINS, Emily L. B</creator><creator>PAVLIK, Edward L</creator><creator>ANDRYKOWSKI, Michael A</creator><general>American Association for Cancer Research</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070301</creationdate><title>Validity of Self-Reports of Return for Routine Repeat Screening in an Ovarian Cancer Screening Program</title><author>LYKINS, Emily L. B ; PAVLIK, Edward L ; ANDRYKOWSKI, Michael A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-d4d12913ef606b12c060667c9a49ead951b44da4b94dfb9476d15051e8824b883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>cancer control</topic><topic>cancer screening</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female genital diseases</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Kentucky</topic><topic>Mass Screening - psychology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>ovarian cancer</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Patient Compliance</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Self Disclosure</topic><topic>self-report</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LYKINS, Emily L. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAVLIK, Edward L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ANDRYKOWSKI, Michael A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LYKINS, Emily L. B</au><au>PAVLIK, Edward L</au><au>ANDRYKOWSKI, Michael A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validity of Self-Reports of Return for Routine Repeat Screening in an Ovarian Cancer Screening Program</atitle><jtitle>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</addtitle><date>2007-03-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>490</spage><epage>493</epage><pages>490-493</pages><issn>1055-9965</issn><eissn>1538-7755</eissn><abstract>Cancer screening research relies on reliable and valid measurement of cancer screening behavior. Self-reports of screening
constitute a cost-effective approach to measuring screening behavior; however, demonstration of suitable validity of these
self-reports is critical. We evaluated the validity of self-report of return for repeat, routine, annual transvaginal sonography
(TVS) screening for ovarian cancer. Participants ( n = 535) in a university-based ovarian cancer screening program for asymptomatic, average risk women completed a telephone
interview 18 months following an initial, baseline TVS screening test. Self-reports of return for a repeat, routine ovarian
cancer screening test since baseline were obtained and compared with objective records of repeat screening from the screening
program database. Overall agreement of self-reports and objective records of ovarian cancer screening was 97.57% ( κ = 0.94). Sensitivity was 0.98, specificity was 0.96, positive predictive value was 0.98, and negative predictive value was
0.96. The month of last screening was accurately identified by 80% of participants. It was concluded the validity of self-reports
of TVS screening for ovarian cancer is very high and may even exceed the validity of self-reports of participation in breast,
cervical, and colorectal cancer screening over similar recall periods. Consequently, self-reports of TVS screening may serve
as a cost-effective substitute for more objective methods of assessing TVS screening behavior. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers
Prev 2007;16(3):490–3)</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>American Association for Cancer Research</pub><pmid>17372244</pmid><doi>10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0433</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1055-9965 |
| ispartof | Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention, 2007-03, Vol.16 (3), p.490-493 |
| issn | 1055-9965 1538-7755 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70288957 |
| source | MEDLINE; American Association for Cancer Research; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences cancer control cancer screening Female Female genital diseases Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Interviews as Topic Kentucky Mass Screening - psychology Medical sciences Middle Aged Multivariate Analysis ovarian cancer Ovarian Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Ovarian Neoplasms - psychology Patient Compliance Predictive Value of Tests Self Disclosure self-report Sensitivity and Specificity Tumors Ultrasonography validity |
| title | Validity of Self-Reports of Return for Routine Repeat Screening in an Ovarian Cancer Screening Program |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T01%3A45%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity%20of%20Self-Reports%20of%20Return%20for%20Routine%20Repeat%20Screening%20in%20an%20Ovarian%20Cancer%20Screening%20Program&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20epidemiology,%20biomarkers%20&%20prevention&rft.au=LYKINS,%20Emily%20L.%20B&rft.date=2007-03-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=490&rft.epage=493&rft.pages=490-493&rft.issn=1055-9965&rft.eissn=1538-7755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0433&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70288957%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70288957&rft_id=info:pmid/17372244&rfr_iscdi=true |