Amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction: indications and outcomes
Background: The amniotic membrane is a useful tool in the management of several ocular surface diseases. Despite numerous studies, standardization of the use of the membrane and of outcome measures is lacking. Herein, the authors’ results of amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) in ocular surface...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical & experimental ophthalmology 2007-03, Vol.35 (2), p.140-147 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 147 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 140 |
container_title | Clinical & experimental ophthalmology |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Maharajan, V Senthil Shanmuganathan, Vijay Currie, Alison Hopkinson, Andrew Powell-Richards, April Dua, Harminder S |
description | Background: The amniotic membrane is a useful tool in the management of several ocular surface diseases. Despite numerous studies, standardization of the use of the membrane and of outcome measures is lacking. Herein, the authors’ results of amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) in ocular surface reconstruction against defined outcome measures are reported.
Methods: A retrospective case study of 74 consecutive procedures (58 patients) performed against predefined outcome measures. The cases were divided into three groups. Group A AMT in the presence of stem cell loss (32 procedures), Group B AMT without stem cell loss (24 procedures) and Group C AMT for conjunctival reconstruction (18 procedures). The outcomes were evaluated against defined criteria based on the purpose (patch or graft) and objective for use of the membrane. Results were analysed by defining the outcomes as success, partial success or failure.
Results: Unequivocal success of the procedure was observed in 22% in Group A, 62.5% in Group B and 50% in Group C. AMT was significantly more successful in the presence of functioning stem cells (P = 0.01). In Group A acute and subacute cases (less than 3 months) needed more procedures compared with chronic cases (P = 0.02). In Group C, results were comparatively worse when AMT was used in progressive cicatrizing conditions.
Conclusion: Use of AMT can be associated with a significant number of failures. It provides a useful alternative for specific indications where its use should be encouraged. It is important to define criteria for success in order to accurately evaluate efficacy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01408.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70274866</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70274866</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4558-d712d30a4ebbf1c9f3ae5fdf691bf897584c1731e01ecb7630c32d1a12ac7cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFv2yAUx9G0amm7fYWJ0252wWBwJu1QRWlaKUpUqdpOE8L4IZHZJgNbTb59cRJ113GAJ_H7Px4_hDAlOU3rbpdTzotsTiTNC0JETignVX74gK7fLz5easEJn6GbGHeEkLJg4hOaUclEwcvyGv2-73rnB2dwB10ddA94SHvct7of9OB8j60P2Jux1QHHMVhtAAcwvo9DGM1EfMeub5w50RHrvsF-HIzvIH5GV1a3Eb5czlv08rB8WTxm6-3qaXG_zkwaosoaSYuGEc2hri01c8s0lLaxYk5rW81lWXGTRqZAKJhaCkYMKxqqaaGNNJbdom_ntvvg_44QB9W5aKBNfwA_RiVJIXklRAKrM2iCjzGAVfvgOh2OihI1mVU7NUlTk0A1mVUns-qQol8vb4x1B82_4EVlAn6cgVfXwvG_G6vFcjtVKZ-d8y4OcHjP6_BHCclkqX5tVurnI18z9rxRC_YGu0KYzA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70274866</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction: indications and outcomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Maharajan, V Senthil ; Shanmuganathan, Vijay ; Currie, Alison ; Hopkinson, Andrew ; Powell-Richards, April ; Dua, Harminder S</creator><creatorcontrib>Maharajan, V Senthil ; Shanmuganathan, Vijay ; Currie, Alison ; Hopkinson, Andrew ; Powell-Richards, April ; Dua, Harminder S</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The amniotic membrane is a useful tool in the management of several ocular surface diseases. Despite numerous studies, standardization of the use of the membrane and of outcome measures is lacking. Herein, the authors’ results of amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) in ocular surface reconstruction against defined outcome measures are reported.
Methods: A retrospective case study of 74 consecutive procedures (58 patients) performed against predefined outcome measures. The cases were divided into three groups. Group A AMT in the presence of stem cell loss (32 procedures), Group B AMT without stem cell loss (24 procedures) and Group C AMT for conjunctival reconstruction (18 procedures). The outcomes were evaluated against defined criteria based on the purpose (patch or graft) and objective for use of the membrane. Results were analysed by defining the outcomes as success, partial success or failure.
Results: Unequivocal success of the procedure was observed in 22% in Group A, 62.5% in Group B and 50% in Group C. AMT was significantly more successful in the presence of functioning stem cells (P = 0.01). In Group A acute and subacute cases (less than 3 months) needed more procedures compared with chronic cases (P = 0.02). In Group C, results were comparatively worse when AMT was used in progressive cicatrizing conditions.
Conclusion: Use of AMT can be associated with a significant number of failures. It provides a useful alternative for specific indications where its use should be encouraged. It is important to define criteria for success in order to accurately evaluate efficacy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1442-6404</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1442-9071</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01408.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17362455</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Publishing Asia</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Amnion - transplantation ; amniotic membrane ; Child ; conjunctiva ; Conjunctival Diseases - diagnosis ; Conjunctival Diseases - surgery ; cornea ; Corneal Diseases - diagnosis ; Corneal Diseases - surgery ; Epithelial Cells - pathology ; Female ; Fluorophotometry ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; ocular surface ; outcome measure ; Retrospective Studies ; Stem Cells - pathology ; Suture Techniques ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Clinical & experimental ophthalmology, 2007-03, Vol.35 (2), p.140-147</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4558-d712d30a4ebbf1c9f3ae5fdf691bf897584c1731e01ecb7630c32d1a12ac7cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4558-d712d30a4ebbf1c9f3ae5fdf691bf897584c1731e01ecb7630c32d1a12ac7cf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1442-9071.2006.01408.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1442-9071.2006.01408.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17362455$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maharajan, V Senthil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shanmuganathan, Vijay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Currie, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkinson, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell-Richards, April</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dua, Harminder S</creatorcontrib><title>Amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction: indications and outcomes</title><title>Clinical & experimental ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Background: The amniotic membrane is a useful tool in the management of several ocular surface diseases. Despite numerous studies, standardization of the use of the membrane and of outcome measures is lacking. Herein, the authors’ results of amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) in ocular surface reconstruction against defined outcome measures are reported.
Methods: A retrospective case study of 74 consecutive procedures (58 patients) performed against predefined outcome measures. The cases were divided into three groups. Group A AMT in the presence of stem cell loss (32 procedures), Group B AMT without stem cell loss (24 procedures) and Group C AMT for conjunctival reconstruction (18 procedures). The outcomes were evaluated against defined criteria based on the purpose (patch or graft) and objective for use of the membrane. Results were analysed by defining the outcomes as success, partial success or failure.
Results: Unequivocal success of the procedure was observed in 22% in Group A, 62.5% in Group B and 50% in Group C. AMT was significantly more successful in the presence of functioning stem cells (P = 0.01). In Group A acute and subacute cases (less than 3 months) needed more procedures compared with chronic cases (P = 0.02). In Group C, results were comparatively worse when AMT was used in progressive cicatrizing conditions.
Conclusion: Use of AMT can be associated with a significant number of failures. It provides a useful alternative for specific indications where its use should be encouraged. It is important to define criteria for success in order to accurately evaluate efficacy.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Amnion - transplantation</subject><subject>amniotic membrane</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>conjunctiva</subject><subject>Conjunctival Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Conjunctival Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>cornea</subject><subject>Corneal Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Corneal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Epithelial Cells - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorophotometry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>ocular surface</subject><subject>outcome measure</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stem Cells - pathology</subject><subject>Suture Techniques</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1442-6404</issn><issn>1442-9071</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEFv2yAUx9G0amm7fYWJ0252wWBwJu1QRWlaKUpUqdpOE8L4IZHZJgNbTb59cRJ113GAJ_H7Px4_hDAlOU3rbpdTzotsTiTNC0JETignVX74gK7fLz5easEJn6GbGHeEkLJg4hOaUclEwcvyGv2-73rnB2dwB10ddA94SHvct7of9OB8j60P2Jux1QHHMVhtAAcwvo9DGM1EfMeub5w50RHrvsF-HIzvIH5GV1a3Eb5czlv08rB8WTxm6-3qaXG_zkwaosoaSYuGEc2hri01c8s0lLaxYk5rW81lWXGTRqZAKJhaCkYMKxqqaaGNNJbdom_ntvvg_44QB9W5aKBNfwA_RiVJIXklRAKrM2iCjzGAVfvgOh2OihI1mVU7NUlTk0A1mVUns-qQol8vb4x1B82_4EVlAn6cgVfXwvG_G6vFcjtVKZ-d8y4OcHjP6_BHCclkqX5tVurnI18z9rxRC_YGu0KYzA</recordid><startdate>200703</startdate><enddate>200703</enddate><creator>Maharajan, V Senthil</creator><creator>Shanmuganathan, Vijay</creator><creator>Currie, Alison</creator><creator>Hopkinson, Andrew</creator><creator>Powell-Richards, April</creator><creator>Dua, Harminder S</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Asia</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200703</creationdate><title>Amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction: indications and outcomes</title><author>Maharajan, V Senthil ; Shanmuganathan, Vijay ; Currie, Alison ; Hopkinson, Andrew ; Powell-Richards, April ; Dua, Harminder S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4558-d712d30a4ebbf1c9f3ae5fdf691bf897584c1731e01ecb7630c32d1a12ac7cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Amnion - transplantation</topic><topic>amniotic membrane</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>conjunctiva</topic><topic>Conjunctival Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Conjunctival Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>cornea</topic><topic>Corneal Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Corneal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Epithelial Cells - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorophotometry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>ocular surface</topic><topic>outcome measure</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stem Cells - pathology</topic><topic>Suture Techniques</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maharajan, V Senthil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shanmuganathan, Vijay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Currie, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkinson, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell-Richards, April</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dua, Harminder S</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical & experimental ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maharajan, V Senthil</au><au>Shanmuganathan, Vijay</au><au>Currie, Alison</au><au>Hopkinson, Andrew</au><au>Powell-Richards, April</au><au>Dua, Harminder S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction: indications and outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Clinical & experimental ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2007-03</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>140</spage><epage>147</epage><pages>140-147</pages><issn>1442-6404</issn><eissn>1442-9071</eissn><abstract>Background: The amniotic membrane is a useful tool in the management of several ocular surface diseases. Despite numerous studies, standardization of the use of the membrane and of outcome measures is lacking. Herein, the authors’ results of amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) in ocular surface reconstruction against defined outcome measures are reported.
Methods: A retrospective case study of 74 consecutive procedures (58 patients) performed against predefined outcome measures. The cases were divided into three groups. Group A AMT in the presence of stem cell loss (32 procedures), Group B AMT without stem cell loss (24 procedures) and Group C AMT for conjunctival reconstruction (18 procedures). The outcomes were evaluated against defined criteria based on the purpose (patch or graft) and objective for use of the membrane. Results were analysed by defining the outcomes as success, partial success or failure.
Results: Unequivocal success of the procedure was observed in 22% in Group A, 62.5% in Group B and 50% in Group C. AMT was significantly more successful in the presence of functioning stem cells (P = 0.01). In Group A acute and subacute cases (less than 3 months) needed more procedures compared with chronic cases (P = 0.02). In Group C, results were comparatively worse when AMT was used in progressive cicatrizing conditions.
Conclusion: Use of AMT can be associated with a significant number of failures. It provides a useful alternative for specific indications where its use should be encouraged. It is important to define criteria for success in order to accurately evaluate efficacy.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Asia</pub><pmid>17362455</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01408.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1442-6404 |
ispartof | Clinical & experimental ophthalmology, 2007-03, Vol.35 (2), p.140-147 |
issn | 1442-6404 1442-9071 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70274866 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Amnion - transplantation amniotic membrane Child conjunctiva Conjunctival Diseases - diagnosis Conjunctival Diseases - surgery cornea Corneal Diseases - diagnosis Corneal Diseases - surgery Epithelial Cells - pathology Female Fluorophotometry Humans Male Middle Aged ocular surface outcome measure Retrospective Studies Stem Cells - pathology Suture Techniques Treatment Outcome |
title | Amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction: indications and outcomes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T15%3A45%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Amniotic%20membrane%20transplantation%20for%20ocular%20surface%20reconstruction:%20indications%20and%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20&%20experimental%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Maharajan,%20V%20Senthil&rft.date=2007-03&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=140&rft.epage=147&rft.pages=140-147&rft.issn=1442-6404&rft.eissn=1442-9071&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01408.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70274866%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70274866&rft_id=info:pmid/17362455&rfr_iscdi=true |