Amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction: indications and outcomes

Background:  The amniotic membrane is a useful tool in the management of several ocular surface diseases. Despite numerous studies, standardization of the use of the membrane and of outcome measures is lacking. Herein, the authors’ results of amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) in ocular surface...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical & experimental ophthalmology 2007-03, Vol.35 (2), p.140-147
Hauptverfasser: Maharajan, V Senthil, Shanmuganathan, Vijay, Currie, Alison, Hopkinson, Andrew, Powell-Richards, April, Dua, Harminder S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 147
container_issue 2
container_start_page 140
container_title Clinical & experimental ophthalmology
container_volume 35
creator Maharajan, V Senthil
Shanmuganathan, Vijay
Currie, Alison
Hopkinson, Andrew
Powell-Richards, April
Dua, Harminder S
description Background:  The amniotic membrane is a useful tool in the management of several ocular surface diseases. Despite numerous studies, standardization of the use of the membrane and of outcome measures is lacking. Herein, the authors’ results of amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) in ocular surface reconstruction against defined outcome measures are reported. Methods:  A retrospective case study of 74 consecutive procedures (58 patients) performed against predefined outcome measures. The cases were divided into three groups. Group A AMT in the presence of stem cell loss (32 procedures), Group B AMT without stem cell loss (24 procedures) and Group C AMT for conjunctival reconstruction (18 procedures). The outcomes were evaluated against defined criteria based on the purpose (patch or graft) and objective for use of the membrane. Results were analysed by defining the outcomes as success, partial success or failure. Results:  Unequivocal success of the procedure was observed in 22% in Group A, 62.5% in Group B and 50% in Group C. AMT was significantly more successful in the presence of functioning stem cells (P = 0.01). In Group A acute and subacute cases (less than 3 months) needed more procedures compared with chronic cases (P = 0.02). In Group C, results were comparatively worse when AMT was used in progressive cicatrizing conditions. Conclusion:  Use of AMT can be associated with a significant number of failures. It provides a useful alternative for specific indications where its use should be encouraged. It is important to define criteria for success in order to accurately evaluate efficacy.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01408.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70274866</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70274866</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4558-d712d30a4ebbf1c9f3ae5fdf691bf897584c1731e01ecb7630c32d1a12ac7cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFv2yAUx9G0amm7fYWJ0252wWBwJu1QRWlaKUpUqdpOE8L4IZHZJgNbTb59cRJ113GAJ_H7Px4_hDAlOU3rbpdTzotsTiTNC0JETignVX74gK7fLz5easEJn6GbGHeEkLJg4hOaUclEwcvyGv2-73rnB2dwB10ddA94SHvct7of9OB8j60P2Jux1QHHMVhtAAcwvo9DGM1EfMeub5w50RHrvsF-HIzvIH5GV1a3Eb5czlv08rB8WTxm6-3qaXG_zkwaosoaSYuGEc2hri01c8s0lLaxYk5rW81lWXGTRqZAKJhaCkYMKxqqaaGNNJbdom_ntvvg_44QB9W5aKBNfwA_RiVJIXklRAKrM2iCjzGAVfvgOh2OihI1mVU7NUlTk0A1mVUns-qQol8vb4x1B82_4EVlAn6cgVfXwvG_G6vFcjtVKZ-d8y4OcHjP6_BHCclkqX5tVurnI18z9rxRC_YGu0KYzA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70274866</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction: indications and outcomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Maharajan, V Senthil ; Shanmuganathan, Vijay ; Currie, Alison ; Hopkinson, Andrew ; Powell-Richards, April ; Dua, Harminder S</creator><creatorcontrib>Maharajan, V Senthil ; Shanmuganathan, Vijay ; Currie, Alison ; Hopkinson, Andrew ; Powell-Richards, April ; Dua, Harminder S</creatorcontrib><description>Background:  The amniotic membrane is a useful tool in the management of several ocular surface diseases. Despite numerous studies, standardization of the use of the membrane and of outcome measures is lacking. Herein, the authors’ results of amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) in ocular surface reconstruction against defined outcome measures are reported. Methods:  A retrospective case study of 74 consecutive procedures (58 patients) performed against predefined outcome measures. The cases were divided into three groups. Group A AMT in the presence of stem cell loss (32 procedures), Group B AMT without stem cell loss (24 procedures) and Group C AMT for conjunctival reconstruction (18 procedures). The outcomes were evaluated against defined criteria based on the purpose (patch or graft) and objective for use of the membrane. Results were analysed by defining the outcomes as success, partial success or failure. Results:  Unequivocal success of the procedure was observed in 22% in Group A, 62.5% in Group B and 50% in Group C. AMT was significantly more successful in the presence of functioning stem cells (P = 0.01). In Group A acute and subacute cases (less than 3 months) needed more procedures compared with chronic cases (P = 0.02). In Group C, results were comparatively worse when AMT was used in progressive cicatrizing conditions. Conclusion:  Use of AMT can be associated with a significant number of failures. It provides a useful alternative for specific indications where its use should be encouraged. It is important to define criteria for success in order to accurately evaluate efficacy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1442-6404</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1442-9071</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01408.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17362455</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Publishing Asia</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Amnion - transplantation ; amniotic membrane ; Child ; conjunctiva ; Conjunctival Diseases - diagnosis ; Conjunctival Diseases - surgery ; cornea ; Corneal Diseases - diagnosis ; Corneal Diseases - surgery ; Epithelial Cells - pathology ; Female ; Fluorophotometry ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; ocular surface ; outcome measure ; Retrospective Studies ; Stem Cells - pathology ; Suture Techniques ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Clinical &amp; experimental ophthalmology, 2007-03, Vol.35 (2), p.140-147</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4558-d712d30a4ebbf1c9f3ae5fdf691bf897584c1731e01ecb7630c32d1a12ac7cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4558-d712d30a4ebbf1c9f3ae5fdf691bf897584c1731e01ecb7630c32d1a12ac7cf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1442-9071.2006.01408.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1442-9071.2006.01408.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17362455$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maharajan, V Senthil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shanmuganathan, Vijay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Currie, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkinson, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell-Richards, April</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dua, Harminder S</creatorcontrib><title>Amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction: indications and outcomes</title><title>Clinical &amp; experimental ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Background:  The amniotic membrane is a useful tool in the management of several ocular surface diseases. Despite numerous studies, standardization of the use of the membrane and of outcome measures is lacking. Herein, the authors’ results of amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) in ocular surface reconstruction against defined outcome measures are reported. Methods:  A retrospective case study of 74 consecutive procedures (58 patients) performed against predefined outcome measures. The cases were divided into three groups. Group A AMT in the presence of stem cell loss (32 procedures), Group B AMT without stem cell loss (24 procedures) and Group C AMT for conjunctival reconstruction (18 procedures). The outcomes were evaluated against defined criteria based on the purpose (patch or graft) and objective for use of the membrane. Results were analysed by defining the outcomes as success, partial success or failure. Results:  Unequivocal success of the procedure was observed in 22% in Group A, 62.5% in Group B and 50% in Group C. AMT was significantly more successful in the presence of functioning stem cells (P = 0.01). In Group A acute and subacute cases (less than 3 months) needed more procedures compared with chronic cases (P = 0.02). In Group C, results were comparatively worse when AMT was used in progressive cicatrizing conditions. Conclusion:  Use of AMT can be associated with a significant number of failures. It provides a useful alternative for specific indications where its use should be encouraged. It is important to define criteria for success in order to accurately evaluate efficacy.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Amnion - transplantation</subject><subject>amniotic membrane</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>conjunctiva</subject><subject>Conjunctival Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Conjunctival Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>cornea</subject><subject>Corneal Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Corneal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Epithelial Cells - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorophotometry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>ocular surface</subject><subject>outcome measure</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stem Cells - pathology</subject><subject>Suture Techniques</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1442-6404</issn><issn>1442-9071</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEFv2yAUx9G0amm7fYWJ0252wWBwJu1QRWlaKUpUqdpOE8L4IZHZJgNbTb59cRJ113GAJ_H7Px4_hDAlOU3rbpdTzotsTiTNC0JETignVX74gK7fLz5easEJn6GbGHeEkLJg4hOaUclEwcvyGv2-73rnB2dwB10ddA94SHvct7of9OB8j60P2Jux1QHHMVhtAAcwvo9DGM1EfMeub5w50RHrvsF-HIzvIH5GV1a3Eb5czlv08rB8WTxm6-3qaXG_zkwaosoaSYuGEc2hri01c8s0lLaxYk5rW81lWXGTRqZAKJhaCkYMKxqqaaGNNJbdom_ntvvg_44QB9W5aKBNfwA_RiVJIXklRAKrM2iCjzGAVfvgOh2OihI1mVU7NUlTk0A1mVUns-qQol8vb4x1B82_4EVlAn6cgVfXwvG_G6vFcjtVKZ-d8y4OcHjP6_BHCclkqX5tVurnI18z9rxRC_YGu0KYzA</recordid><startdate>200703</startdate><enddate>200703</enddate><creator>Maharajan, V Senthil</creator><creator>Shanmuganathan, Vijay</creator><creator>Currie, Alison</creator><creator>Hopkinson, Andrew</creator><creator>Powell-Richards, April</creator><creator>Dua, Harminder S</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Asia</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200703</creationdate><title>Amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction: indications and outcomes</title><author>Maharajan, V Senthil ; Shanmuganathan, Vijay ; Currie, Alison ; Hopkinson, Andrew ; Powell-Richards, April ; Dua, Harminder S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4558-d712d30a4ebbf1c9f3ae5fdf691bf897584c1731e01ecb7630c32d1a12ac7cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Amnion - transplantation</topic><topic>amniotic membrane</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>conjunctiva</topic><topic>Conjunctival Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Conjunctival Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>cornea</topic><topic>Corneal Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Corneal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Epithelial Cells - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorophotometry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>ocular surface</topic><topic>outcome measure</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stem Cells - pathology</topic><topic>Suture Techniques</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maharajan, V Senthil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shanmuganathan, Vijay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Currie, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkinson, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell-Richards, April</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dua, Harminder S</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical &amp; experimental ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maharajan, V Senthil</au><au>Shanmuganathan, Vijay</au><au>Currie, Alison</au><au>Hopkinson, Andrew</au><au>Powell-Richards, April</au><au>Dua, Harminder S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction: indications and outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Clinical &amp; experimental ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2007-03</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>140</spage><epage>147</epage><pages>140-147</pages><issn>1442-6404</issn><eissn>1442-9071</eissn><abstract>Background:  The amniotic membrane is a useful tool in the management of several ocular surface diseases. Despite numerous studies, standardization of the use of the membrane and of outcome measures is lacking. Herein, the authors’ results of amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) in ocular surface reconstruction against defined outcome measures are reported. Methods:  A retrospective case study of 74 consecutive procedures (58 patients) performed against predefined outcome measures. The cases were divided into three groups. Group A AMT in the presence of stem cell loss (32 procedures), Group B AMT without stem cell loss (24 procedures) and Group C AMT for conjunctival reconstruction (18 procedures). The outcomes were evaluated against defined criteria based on the purpose (patch or graft) and objective for use of the membrane. Results were analysed by defining the outcomes as success, partial success or failure. Results:  Unequivocal success of the procedure was observed in 22% in Group A, 62.5% in Group B and 50% in Group C. AMT was significantly more successful in the presence of functioning stem cells (P = 0.01). In Group A acute and subacute cases (less than 3 months) needed more procedures compared with chronic cases (P = 0.02). In Group C, results were comparatively worse when AMT was used in progressive cicatrizing conditions. Conclusion:  Use of AMT can be associated with a significant number of failures. It provides a useful alternative for specific indications where its use should be encouraged. It is important to define criteria for success in order to accurately evaluate efficacy.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Asia</pub><pmid>17362455</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01408.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1442-6404
ispartof Clinical & experimental ophthalmology, 2007-03, Vol.35 (2), p.140-147
issn 1442-6404
1442-9071
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70274866
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Amnion - transplantation
amniotic membrane
Child
conjunctiva
Conjunctival Diseases - diagnosis
Conjunctival Diseases - surgery
cornea
Corneal Diseases - diagnosis
Corneal Diseases - surgery
Epithelial Cells - pathology
Female
Fluorophotometry
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
ocular surface
outcome measure
Retrospective Studies
Stem Cells - pathology
Suture Techniques
Treatment Outcome
title Amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction: indications and outcomes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T15%3A45%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Amniotic%20membrane%20transplantation%20for%20ocular%20surface%20reconstruction:%20indications%20and%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20&%20experimental%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Maharajan,%20V%20Senthil&rft.date=2007-03&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=140&rft.epage=147&rft.pages=140-147&rft.issn=1442-6404&rft.eissn=1442-9071&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01408.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70274866%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70274866&rft_id=info:pmid/17362455&rfr_iscdi=true