Efficacy of three rotary NiTi instruments in removing gutta-percha from root canals
Aim To investigate the ability of three rotary nickel–titanium instruments and hand instrumentation to remove gutta‐percha and sealer. Methodology Sixty freshly extracted human single‐rooted teeth, each with one root canal, were instrumented with K‐files and filled using cold lateral compaction of...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International endodontic journal 2008-03, Vol.41 (3), p.191-196 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 196 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 191 |
| container_title | International endodontic journal |
| container_volume | 41 |
| creator | Taşdemir, T. Er, K. Yildirim, T. Çelik, D. |
| description | Aim To investigate the ability of three rotary nickel–titanium instruments and hand instrumentation to remove gutta‐percha and sealer.
Methodology Sixty freshly extracted human single‐rooted teeth, each with one root canal, were instrumented with K‐files and filled using cold lateral compaction of gutta‐percha and AH Plus (Dentsply Detrey, Konstanz, Germany) sealer. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups of 15 specimens each. Removal of gutta‐percha was performed with the following devices and techniques: ProTaper, R‐Endo, Mtwo and Hedström files. The specimens were rendered transparent and the area of remaining filling material on the root canal wall was measured using a computer image analysis program. Statistical analysis was accomplished by Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U‐tests with Bonferroni correction for the analysis of residual root filling material and working time.
Results The ProTaper group had less filling material inside the root canals than the other groups, but a significant difference was found between only the ProTaper and Mtwo groups (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01335.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70268739</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70268739</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4715-e46a567a1e56f19a52f5b509f907a4b893be69d78ea0a787984581379bfca72c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1v3CAQhlHUKtmk-QsRp97sgDEGDj1U6TYfjdKo3apHhMmQsF3bW8Dt7r8Pzq7Sa-cyI837DOJBCFNS0lzny5KyhhcVV7SsCBEloYzxcnOAZq-LN2hGaM2KSkp-hI5jXBJCOGH0EB1RSSSVtJqh73PnvDV2iweH01MAwGFIJmzxnV947PuYwthBn2KecYBu-OP7R_w4pmSKNQT7ZLALQ5epIWFrerOK79Bblxuc7vsJ-vF5vri4Km6_Xl5ffLwtbC0oL6BuDG-EocAbR5XhleMtJ8opIkzdSsVaaNSDkGCIEVIoWXNJmVCts0ZUlp2g97u76zD8HiEm3floYbUyPQxj1IJUjRRM5aDcBW0YYgzg9Dr4Ln9SU6InoXqpJ2968qYnofpFqN5k9Gz_xth28PAP3BvMgQ-7wF-_gu1_H9bX85tpynyx431MsHnlTfilG8EE1z_vLvWne7lY3Fdf9Df2DEyHk1A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70268739</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of three rotary NiTi instruments in removing gutta-percha from root canals</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Taşdemir, T. ; Er, K. ; Yildirim, T. ; Çelik, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Taşdemir, T. ; Er, K. ; Yildirim, T. ; Çelik, D.</creatorcontrib><description>Aim To investigate the ability of three rotary nickel–titanium instruments and hand instrumentation to remove gutta‐percha and sealer.
Methodology Sixty freshly extracted human single‐rooted teeth, each with one root canal, were instrumented with K‐files and filled using cold lateral compaction of gutta‐percha and AH Plus (Dentsply Detrey, Konstanz, Germany) sealer. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups of 15 specimens each. Removal of gutta‐percha was performed with the following devices and techniques: ProTaper, R‐Endo, Mtwo and Hedström files. The specimens were rendered transparent and the area of remaining filling material on the root canal wall was measured using a computer image analysis program. Statistical analysis was accomplished by Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U‐tests with Bonferroni correction for the analysis of residual root filling material and working time.
Results The ProTaper group had less filling material inside the root canals than the other groups, but a significant difference was found between only the ProTaper and Mtwo groups (P < 0.05). The retreatment time for Mtwo and ProTaper was significantly shorter compared with R‐Endo and manual instrumentation with Hedström files (P < 0.001). R‐Endo was significantly faster than manual instrumentation (P < 0.001).
Conclusions Under the experimental conditions, ProTaper left significantly less gutta‐percha and sealer than Mtwo instruments. Complete removal of materials did not occur with any of the instrument systems investigated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-2885</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01335.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18081812</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Dental High-Speed Equipment ; Dental Pulp Cavity - diagnostic imaging ; Dental Pulp Cavity - surgery ; Dentistry ; Gutta-Percha ; Humans ; Nickel - chemistry ; Radiography ; Retreatment - instrumentation ; Root Canal Filling Materials ; root canal retreatment ; Root Canal Therapy - instrumentation ; rotary instruments ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Titanium - chemistry</subject><ispartof>International endodontic journal, 2008-03, Vol.41 (3), p.191-196</ispartof><rights>2007 International Endodontic Journal</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4715-e46a567a1e56f19a52f5b509f907a4b893be69d78ea0a787984581379bfca72c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4715-e46a567a1e56f19a52f5b509f907a4b893be69d78ea0a787984581379bfca72c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2591.2007.01335.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2591.2007.01335.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18081812$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taşdemir, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Er, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yildirim, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çelik, D.</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of three rotary NiTi instruments in removing gutta-percha from root canals</title><title>International endodontic journal</title><addtitle>Int Endod J</addtitle><description>Aim To investigate the ability of three rotary nickel–titanium instruments and hand instrumentation to remove gutta‐percha and sealer.
Methodology Sixty freshly extracted human single‐rooted teeth, each with one root canal, were instrumented with K‐files and filled using cold lateral compaction of gutta‐percha and AH Plus (Dentsply Detrey, Konstanz, Germany) sealer. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups of 15 specimens each. Removal of gutta‐percha was performed with the following devices and techniques: ProTaper, R‐Endo, Mtwo and Hedström files. The specimens were rendered transparent and the area of remaining filling material on the root canal wall was measured using a computer image analysis program. Statistical analysis was accomplished by Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U‐tests with Bonferroni correction for the analysis of residual root filling material and working time.
Results The ProTaper group had less filling material inside the root canals than the other groups, but a significant difference was found between only the ProTaper and Mtwo groups (P < 0.05). The retreatment time for Mtwo and ProTaper was significantly shorter compared with R‐Endo and manual instrumentation with Hedström files (P < 0.001). R‐Endo was significantly faster than manual instrumentation (P < 0.001).
Conclusions Under the experimental conditions, ProTaper left significantly less gutta‐percha and sealer than Mtwo instruments. Complete removal of materials did not occur with any of the instrument systems investigated.</description><subject>Dental High-Speed Equipment</subject><subject>Dental Pulp Cavity - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Dental Pulp Cavity - surgery</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Gutta-Percha</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Nickel - chemistry</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Retreatment - instrumentation</subject><subject>Root Canal Filling Materials</subject><subject>root canal retreatment</subject><subject>Root Canal Therapy - instrumentation</subject><subject>rotary instruments</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Titanium - chemistry</subject><issn>0143-2885</issn><issn>1365-2591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1v3CAQhlHUKtmk-QsRp97sgDEGDj1U6TYfjdKo3apHhMmQsF3bW8Dt7r8Pzq7Sa-cyI837DOJBCFNS0lzny5KyhhcVV7SsCBEloYzxcnOAZq-LN2hGaM2KSkp-hI5jXBJCOGH0EB1RSSSVtJqh73PnvDV2iweH01MAwGFIJmzxnV947PuYwthBn2KecYBu-OP7R_w4pmSKNQT7ZLALQ5epIWFrerOK79Bblxuc7vsJ-vF5vri4Km6_Xl5ffLwtbC0oL6BuDG-EocAbR5XhleMtJ8opIkzdSsVaaNSDkGCIEVIoWXNJmVCts0ZUlp2g97u76zD8HiEm3floYbUyPQxj1IJUjRRM5aDcBW0YYgzg9Dr4Ln9SU6InoXqpJ2968qYnofpFqN5k9Gz_xth28PAP3BvMgQ-7wF-_gu1_H9bX85tpynyx431MsHnlTfilG8EE1z_vLvWne7lY3Fdf9Df2DEyHk1A</recordid><startdate>200803</startdate><enddate>200803</enddate><creator>Taşdemir, T.</creator><creator>Er, K.</creator><creator>Yildirim, T.</creator><creator>Çelik, D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200803</creationdate><title>Efficacy of three rotary NiTi instruments in removing gutta-percha from root canals</title><author>Taşdemir, T. ; Er, K. ; Yildirim, T. ; Çelik, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4715-e46a567a1e56f19a52f5b509f907a4b893be69d78ea0a787984581379bfca72c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Dental High-Speed Equipment</topic><topic>Dental Pulp Cavity - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Dental Pulp Cavity - surgery</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Gutta-Percha</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Nickel - chemistry</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Retreatment - instrumentation</topic><topic>Root Canal Filling Materials</topic><topic>root canal retreatment</topic><topic>Root Canal Therapy - instrumentation</topic><topic>rotary instruments</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Titanium - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taşdemir, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Er, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yildirim, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çelik, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International endodontic journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taşdemir, T.</au><au>Er, K.</au><au>Yildirim, T.</au><au>Çelik, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of three rotary NiTi instruments in removing gutta-percha from root canals</atitle><jtitle>International endodontic journal</jtitle><addtitle>Int Endod J</addtitle><date>2008-03</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>191</spage><epage>196</epage><pages>191-196</pages><issn>0143-2885</issn><eissn>1365-2591</eissn><abstract>Aim To investigate the ability of three rotary nickel–titanium instruments and hand instrumentation to remove gutta‐percha and sealer.
Methodology Sixty freshly extracted human single‐rooted teeth, each with one root canal, were instrumented with K‐files and filled using cold lateral compaction of gutta‐percha and AH Plus (Dentsply Detrey, Konstanz, Germany) sealer. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups of 15 specimens each. Removal of gutta‐percha was performed with the following devices and techniques: ProTaper, R‐Endo, Mtwo and Hedström files. The specimens were rendered transparent and the area of remaining filling material on the root canal wall was measured using a computer image analysis program. Statistical analysis was accomplished by Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U‐tests with Bonferroni correction for the analysis of residual root filling material and working time.
Results The ProTaper group had less filling material inside the root canals than the other groups, but a significant difference was found between only the ProTaper and Mtwo groups (P < 0.05). The retreatment time for Mtwo and ProTaper was significantly shorter compared with R‐Endo and manual instrumentation with Hedström files (P < 0.001). R‐Endo was significantly faster than manual instrumentation (P < 0.001).
Conclusions Under the experimental conditions, ProTaper left significantly less gutta‐percha and sealer than Mtwo instruments. Complete removal of materials did not occur with any of the instrument systems investigated.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>18081812</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01335.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0143-2885 |
| ispartof | International endodontic journal, 2008-03, Vol.41 (3), p.191-196 |
| issn | 0143-2885 1365-2591 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70268739 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
| subjects | Dental High-Speed Equipment Dental Pulp Cavity - diagnostic imaging Dental Pulp Cavity - surgery Dentistry Gutta-Percha Humans Nickel - chemistry Radiography Retreatment - instrumentation Root Canal Filling Materials root canal retreatment Root Canal Therapy - instrumentation rotary instruments Statistics, Nonparametric Titanium - chemistry |
| title | Efficacy of three rotary NiTi instruments in removing gutta-percha from root canals |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A43%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20three%20rotary%20NiTi%20instruments%20in%20removing%20gutta-percha%20from%20root%20canals&rft.jtitle=International%20endodontic%20journal&rft.au=Ta%C5%9Fdemir,%20T.&rft.date=2008-03&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=196&rft.pages=191-196&rft.issn=0143-2885&rft.eissn=1365-2591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01335.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70268739%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70268739&rft_id=info:pmid/18081812&rfr_iscdi=true |