Logistic support service improves processes and outcomes of diabetes care in general practice

Background. Guidelines for type 2 diabetes care in general practice are well known and accepted, but the implementation falls short. Objective. To implement these guidelines by introducing a diabetes support service (DSS) to support the care delivered by the GP. Methods. A controlled, non-randomised...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Family practice 2007-02, Vol.24 (1), p.20-25
Hauptverfasser: Meulepas, Marianne A., Braspenning, Jozé CC, de Grauw, Wim J., Lucas, Annelies EM, Harms, Luc, Akkermans, Reinier P., Grol, Richard PTM
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 25
container_issue 1
container_start_page 20
container_title Family practice
container_volume 24
creator Meulepas, Marianne A.
Braspenning, Jozé CC
de Grauw, Wim J.
Lucas, Annelies EM
Harms, Luc
Akkermans, Reinier P.
Grol, Richard PTM
description Background. Guidelines for type 2 diabetes care in general practice are well known and accepted, but the implementation falls short. Objective. To implement these guidelines by introducing a diabetes support service (DSS) to support the care delivered by the GP. Methods. A controlled, non-randomised study with delayed intervention in the control group; 78 GPs (n = 51 for the intervention and n = 21 for the control group) in the south of the Netherlands and 613 of their type 2 diabetic patients participated. Data were collected on the frequency, content and results of the check-ups (fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, cholesterol, cholesterol/HDL ratio, triglycerides, creatinine, blood pressure, fundus photography, foot examination, body mass index and smoking status) for 3 years. The year before signing up with the DSS was taken for the pre-measurements and after 2 years of DSS the post-measurements took place. The effect of the DSS was analysed in a mixed model with repeated measurement covariance structure. Results. At baseline the intervention and control group did not differ in control frequency and outcome (HbA1c). After the intervention the percentage of patients that attended four or more quarterly check-ups (with at least testing of fasting blood glucose or HbA1c) increased from 59 to 78%. In contrast, the frequency of check-ups in the control group remained constant. This effect was significant. The HbA1c remained the same in the intervention group while there was a significant deterioration in the HbA1c in the control group. Conclusion. Simple logistic support by the DSS proved to have the capacity to implement type 2 diabetes guidelines in general practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/fampra/cml055
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70263777</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/fampra/cml055</oup_id><sourcerecordid>70263777</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-fa1c24f84e4ae14a171e886319893892d1437733bef9cb19da5df52cb007b42e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtr3TAQRkVJaW7SLLstJouQjRs9LWtZ8my5oYQ8KIUiZHkcnNqWI9mh_fed4EsL2WSlEZw50sxHyAdGPzFqxFHj-jG6I993VKk3ZMVkQXPOudkiK8oLkXMmim2yk9IDpVRrpd-RbaapNlzRFfm5DvdtmlqfpXkcQ5yyBPGp9ZC16A1PkDI8PKSElRvqLMyTDz1eQpPVratgwtq7iA1Ddg8DRNdhi_PohPfkbeO6BHubc5fcnp3eHF_k62_nX44_r3MvlZnyxjHPZVNKkA6YdEwzKMtCMFMaURpeMym0FqKCxviKmdqpulHcVzhQJTmIXXKwePGvjzOkyfZt8tB1boAwJ6ufN6FR8RqoNK6uZAzB_RfgQ5jjgENYZozi1EiOUL5APoaUIjR2jG3v4h_LqH1Oxy7p2CUd5D9upHPVQ_2f3sSBwOEChHl81bV5G9OD3_9gF3_ZQgut7MX3H_bk-upS3lzd2a_iL01RqlU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199520942</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Logistic support service improves processes and outcomes of diabetes care in general practice</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Meulepas, Marianne A. ; Braspenning, Jozé CC ; de Grauw, Wim J. ; Lucas, Annelies EM ; Harms, Luc ; Akkermans, Reinier P. ; Grol, Richard PTM</creator><creatorcontrib>Meulepas, Marianne A. ; Braspenning, Jozé CC ; de Grauw, Wim J. ; Lucas, Annelies EM ; Harms, Luc ; Akkermans, Reinier P. ; Grol, Richard PTM</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Guidelines for type 2 diabetes care in general practice are well known and accepted, but the implementation falls short. Objective. To implement these guidelines by introducing a diabetes support service (DSS) to support the care delivered by the GP. Methods. A controlled, non-randomised study with delayed intervention in the control group; 78 GPs (n = 51 for the intervention and n = 21 for the control group) in the south of the Netherlands and 613 of their type 2 diabetic patients participated. Data were collected on the frequency, content and results of the check-ups (fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, cholesterol, cholesterol/HDL ratio, triglycerides, creatinine, blood pressure, fundus photography, foot examination, body mass index and smoking status) for 3 years. The year before signing up with the DSS was taken for the pre-measurements and after 2 years of DSS the post-measurements took place. The effect of the DSS was analysed in a mixed model with repeated measurement covariance structure. Results. At baseline the intervention and control group did not differ in control frequency and outcome (HbA1c). After the intervention the percentage of patients that attended four or more quarterly check-ups (with at least testing of fasting blood glucose or HbA1c) increased from 59 to 78%. In contrast, the frequency of check-ups in the control group remained constant. This effect was significant. The HbA1c remained the same in the intervention group while there was a significant deterioration in the HbA1c in the control group. Conclusion. Simple logistic support by the DSS proved to have the capacity to implement type 2 diabetes guidelines in general practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0263-2136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2229</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cml055</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17079250</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FAPREH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Aged ; Ambulatory monitoring ; Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors ; Blood Glucose - analysis ; Blood Pressure ; Cholesterol - blood ; Clinical guidelines ; Diabetes Complications - classification ; Diabetes Complications - diagnosis ; Diabetes Complications - prevention &amp; control ; diabetes mellitus ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - blood ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - diagnosis ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine - utilization ; Family Practice - organization &amp; administration ; Family Practice - standards ; Female ; General practice ; Glycated Hemoglobin A - analysis ; Guideline Adherence ; Hematologic Tests - utilization ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Netherlands ; Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) ; Primary Health Care - organization &amp; administration ; Primary Health Care - standards ; Quality of care ; quality of health care ; Reminder Systems ; Support services ; Type 2 diabetes mellitus ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Family practice, 2007-02, Vol.24 (1), p.20-25</ispartof><rights>The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org 2007</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Feb 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-fa1c24f84e4ae14a171e886319893892d1437733bef9cb19da5df52cb007b42e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17079250$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meulepas, Marianne A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braspenning, Jozé CC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Grauw, Wim J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Annelies EM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harms, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akkermans, Reinier P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grol, Richard PTM</creatorcontrib><title>Logistic support service improves processes and outcomes of diabetes care in general practice</title><title>Family practice</title><addtitle>Fam Pract</addtitle><description>Background. Guidelines for type 2 diabetes care in general practice are well known and accepted, but the implementation falls short. Objective. To implement these guidelines by introducing a diabetes support service (DSS) to support the care delivered by the GP. Methods. A controlled, non-randomised study with delayed intervention in the control group; 78 GPs (n = 51 for the intervention and n = 21 for the control group) in the south of the Netherlands and 613 of their type 2 diabetic patients participated. Data were collected on the frequency, content and results of the check-ups (fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, cholesterol, cholesterol/HDL ratio, triglycerides, creatinine, blood pressure, fundus photography, foot examination, body mass index and smoking status) for 3 years. The year before signing up with the DSS was taken for the pre-measurements and after 2 years of DSS the post-measurements took place. The effect of the DSS was analysed in a mixed model with repeated measurement covariance structure. Results. At baseline the intervention and control group did not differ in control frequency and outcome (HbA1c). After the intervention the percentage of patients that attended four or more quarterly check-ups (with at least testing of fasting blood glucose or HbA1c) increased from 59 to 78%. In contrast, the frequency of check-ups in the control group remained constant. This effect was significant. The HbA1c remained the same in the intervention group while there was a significant deterioration in the HbA1c in the control group. Conclusion. Simple logistic support by the DSS proved to have the capacity to implement type 2 diabetes guidelines in general practice.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Ambulatory monitoring</subject><subject>Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors</subject><subject>Blood Glucose - analysis</subject><subject>Blood Pressure</subject><subject>Cholesterol - blood</subject><subject>Clinical guidelines</subject><subject>Diabetes Complications - classification</subject><subject>Diabetes Complications - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diabetes Complications - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - blood</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic Tests, Routine - utilization</subject><subject>Family Practice - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Family Practice - standards</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General practice</subject><subject>Glycated Hemoglobin A - analysis</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence</subject><subject>Hematologic Tests - utilization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>quality of health care</subject><subject>Reminder Systems</subject><subject>Support services</subject><subject>Type 2 diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0263-2136</issn><issn>1460-2229</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtr3TAQRkVJaW7SLLstJouQjRs9LWtZ8my5oYQ8KIUiZHkcnNqWI9mh_fed4EsL2WSlEZw50sxHyAdGPzFqxFHj-jG6I993VKk3ZMVkQXPOudkiK8oLkXMmim2yk9IDpVRrpd-RbaapNlzRFfm5DvdtmlqfpXkcQ5yyBPGp9ZC16A1PkDI8PKSElRvqLMyTDz1eQpPVratgwtq7iA1Ddg8DRNdhi_PohPfkbeO6BHubc5fcnp3eHF_k62_nX44_r3MvlZnyxjHPZVNKkA6YdEwzKMtCMFMaURpeMym0FqKCxviKmdqpulHcVzhQJTmIXXKwePGvjzOkyfZt8tB1boAwJ6ufN6FR8RqoNK6uZAzB_RfgQ5jjgENYZozi1EiOUL5APoaUIjR2jG3v4h_LqH1Oxy7p2CUd5D9upHPVQ_2f3sSBwOEChHl81bV5G9OD3_9gF3_ZQgut7MX3H_bk-upS3lzd2a_iL01RqlU</recordid><startdate>20070201</startdate><enddate>20070201</enddate><creator>Meulepas, Marianne A.</creator><creator>Braspenning, Jozé CC</creator><creator>de Grauw, Wim J.</creator><creator>Lucas, Annelies EM</creator><creator>Harms, Luc</creator><creator>Akkermans, Reinier P.</creator><creator>Grol, Richard PTM</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070201</creationdate><title>Logistic support service improves processes and outcomes of diabetes care in general practice</title><author>Meulepas, Marianne A. ; Braspenning, Jozé CC ; de Grauw, Wim J. ; Lucas, Annelies EM ; Harms, Luc ; Akkermans, Reinier P. ; Grol, Richard PTM</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-fa1c24f84e4ae14a171e886319893892d1437733bef9cb19da5df52cb007b42e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Ambulatory monitoring</topic><topic>Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors</topic><topic>Blood Glucose - analysis</topic><topic>Blood Pressure</topic><topic>Cholesterol - blood</topic><topic>Clinical guidelines</topic><topic>Diabetes Complications - classification</topic><topic>Diabetes Complications - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diabetes Complications - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - blood</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic Tests, Routine - utilization</topic><topic>Family Practice - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Family Practice - standards</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General practice</topic><topic>Glycated Hemoglobin A - analysis</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence</topic><topic>Hematologic Tests - utilization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>quality of health care</topic><topic>Reminder Systems</topic><topic>Support services</topic><topic>Type 2 diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meulepas, Marianne A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braspenning, Jozé CC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Grauw, Wim J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Annelies EM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harms, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akkermans, Reinier P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grol, Richard PTM</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Family practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meulepas, Marianne A.</au><au>Braspenning, Jozé CC</au><au>de Grauw, Wim J.</au><au>Lucas, Annelies EM</au><au>Harms, Luc</au><au>Akkermans, Reinier P.</au><au>Grol, Richard PTM</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Logistic support service improves processes and outcomes of diabetes care in general practice</atitle><jtitle>Family practice</jtitle><addtitle>Fam Pract</addtitle><date>2007-02-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>20-25</pages><issn>0263-2136</issn><eissn>1460-2229</eissn><coden>FAPREH</coden><abstract>Background. Guidelines for type 2 diabetes care in general practice are well known and accepted, but the implementation falls short. Objective. To implement these guidelines by introducing a diabetes support service (DSS) to support the care delivered by the GP. Methods. A controlled, non-randomised study with delayed intervention in the control group; 78 GPs (n = 51 for the intervention and n = 21 for the control group) in the south of the Netherlands and 613 of their type 2 diabetic patients participated. Data were collected on the frequency, content and results of the check-ups (fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, cholesterol, cholesterol/HDL ratio, triglycerides, creatinine, blood pressure, fundus photography, foot examination, body mass index and smoking status) for 3 years. The year before signing up with the DSS was taken for the pre-measurements and after 2 years of DSS the post-measurements took place. The effect of the DSS was analysed in a mixed model with repeated measurement covariance structure. Results. At baseline the intervention and control group did not differ in control frequency and outcome (HbA1c). After the intervention the percentage of patients that attended four or more quarterly check-ups (with at least testing of fasting blood glucose or HbA1c) increased from 59 to 78%. In contrast, the frequency of check-ups in the control group remained constant. This effect was significant. The HbA1c remained the same in the intervention group while there was a significant deterioration in the HbA1c in the control group. Conclusion. Simple logistic support by the DSS proved to have the capacity to implement type 2 diabetes guidelines in general practice.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>17079250</pmid><doi>10.1093/fampra/cml055</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0263-2136
ispartof Family practice, 2007-02, Vol.24 (1), p.20-25
issn 0263-2136
1460-2229
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70263777
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Ambulatory monitoring
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors
Blood Glucose - analysis
Blood Pressure
Cholesterol - blood
Clinical guidelines
Diabetes Complications - classification
Diabetes Complications - diagnosis
Diabetes Complications - prevention & control
diabetes mellitus
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - blood
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - diagnosis
Diagnostic Tests, Routine - utilization
Family Practice - organization & administration
Family Practice - standards
Female
General practice
Glycated Hemoglobin A - analysis
Guideline Adherence
Hematologic Tests - utilization
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Netherlands
Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)
Primary Health Care - organization & administration
Primary Health Care - standards
Quality of care
quality of health care
Reminder Systems
Support services
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
United Kingdom
title Logistic support service improves processes and outcomes of diabetes care in general practice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T20%3A25%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Logistic%20support%20service%20improves%20processes%20and%20outcomes%20of%20diabetes%20care%20in%20general%20practice&rft.jtitle=Family%20practice&rft.au=Meulepas,%20Marianne%20A.&rft.date=2007-02-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=20-25&rft.issn=0263-2136&rft.eissn=1460-2229&rft.coden=FAPREH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/fampra/cml055&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70263777%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199520942&rft_id=info:pmid/17079250&rft_oup_id=10.1093/fampra/cml055&rfr_iscdi=true