Logistic support service improves processes and outcomes of diabetes care in general practice
Background. Guidelines for type 2 diabetes care in general practice are well known and accepted, but the implementation falls short. Objective. To implement these guidelines by introducing a diabetes support service (DSS) to support the care delivered by the GP. Methods. A controlled, non-randomised...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Family practice 2007-02, Vol.24 (1), p.20-25 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 25 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 20 |
container_title | Family practice |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Meulepas, Marianne A. Braspenning, Jozé CC de Grauw, Wim J. Lucas, Annelies EM Harms, Luc Akkermans, Reinier P. Grol, Richard PTM |
description | Background. Guidelines for type 2 diabetes care in general practice are well known and accepted, but the implementation falls short. Objective. To implement these guidelines by introducing a diabetes support service (DSS) to support the care delivered by the GP. Methods. A controlled, non-randomised study with delayed intervention in the control group; 78 GPs (n = 51 for the intervention and n = 21 for the control group) in the south of the Netherlands and 613 of their type 2 diabetic patients participated. Data were collected on the frequency, content and results of the check-ups (fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, cholesterol, cholesterol/HDL ratio, triglycerides, creatinine, blood pressure, fundus photography, foot examination, body mass index and smoking status) for 3 years. The year before signing up with the DSS was taken for the pre-measurements and after 2 years of DSS the post-measurements took place. The effect of the DSS was analysed in a mixed model with repeated measurement covariance structure. Results. At baseline the intervention and control group did not differ in control frequency and outcome (HbA1c). After the intervention the percentage of patients that attended four or more quarterly check-ups (with at least testing of fasting blood glucose or HbA1c) increased from 59 to 78%. In contrast, the frequency of check-ups in the control group remained constant. This effect was significant. The HbA1c remained the same in the intervention group while there was a significant deterioration in the HbA1c in the control group. Conclusion. Simple logistic support by the DSS proved to have the capacity to implement type 2 diabetes guidelines in general practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/fampra/cml055 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70263777</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/fampra/cml055</oup_id><sourcerecordid>70263777</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-fa1c24f84e4ae14a171e886319893892d1437733bef9cb19da5df52cb007b42e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtr3TAQRkVJaW7SLLstJouQjRs9LWtZ8my5oYQ8KIUiZHkcnNqWI9mh_fed4EsL2WSlEZw50sxHyAdGPzFqxFHj-jG6I993VKk3ZMVkQXPOudkiK8oLkXMmim2yk9IDpVRrpd-RbaapNlzRFfm5DvdtmlqfpXkcQ5yyBPGp9ZC16A1PkDI8PKSElRvqLMyTDz1eQpPVratgwtq7iA1Ddg8DRNdhi_PohPfkbeO6BHubc5fcnp3eHF_k62_nX44_r3MvlZnyxjHPZVNKkA6YdEwzKMtCMFMaURpeMym0FqKCxviKmdqpulHcVzhQJTmIXXKwePGvjzOkyfZt8tB1boAwJ6ufN6FR8RqoNK6uZAzB_RfgQ5jjgENYZozi1EiOUL5APoaUIjR2jG3v4h_LqH1Oxy7p2CUd5D9upHPVQ_2f3sSBwOEChHl81bV5G9OD3_9gF3_ZQgut7MX3H_bk-upS3lzd2a_iL01RqlU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199520942</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Logistic support service improves processes and outcomes of diabetes care in general practice</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Meulepas, Marianne A. ; Braspenning, Jozé CC ; de Grauw, Wim J. ; Lucas, Annelies EM ; Harms, Luc ; Akkermans, Reinier P. ; Grol, Richard PTM</creator><creatorcontrib>Meulepas, Marianne A. ; Braspenning, Jozé CC ; de Grauw, Wim J. ; Lucas, Annelies EM ; Harms, Luc ; Akkermans, Reinier P. ; Grol, Richard PTM</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Guidelines for type 2 diabetes care in general practice are well known and accepted, but the implementation falls short. Objective. To implement these guidelines by introducing a diabetes support service (DSS) to support the care delivered by the GP. Methods. A controlled, non-randomised study with delayed intervention in the control group; 78 GPs (n = 51 for the intervention and n = 21 for the control group) in the south of the Netherlands and 613 of their type 2 diabetic patients participated. Data were collected on the frequency, content and results of the check-ups (fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, cholesterol, cholesterol/HDL ratio, triglycerides, creatinine, blood pressure, fundus photography, foot examination, body mass index and smoking status) for 3 years. The year before signing up with the DSS was taken for the pre-measurements and after 2 years of DSS the post-measurements took place. The effect of the DSS was analysed in a mixed model with repeated measurement covariance structure. Results. At baseline the intervention and control group did not differ in control frequency and outcome (HbA1c). After the intervention the percentage of patients that attended four or more quarterly check-ups (with at least testing of fasting blood glucose or HbA1c) increased from 59 to 78%. In contrast, the frequency of check-ups in the control group remained constant. This effect was significant. The HbA1c remained the same in the intervention group while there was a significant deterioration in the HbA1c in the control group. Conclusion. Simple logistic support by the DSS proved to have the capacity to implement type 2 diabetes guidelines in general practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0263-2136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2229</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cml055</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17079250</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FAPREH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Aged ; Ambulatory monitoring ; Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors ; Blood Glucose - analysis ; Blood Pressure ; Cholesterol - blood ; Clinical guidelines ; Diabetes Complications - classification ; Diabetes Complications - diagnosis ; Diabetes Complications - prevention & control ; diabetes mellitus ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - blood ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - diagnosis ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine - utilization ; Family Practice - organization & administration ; Family Practice - standards ; Female ; General practice ; Glycated Hemoglobin A - analysis ; Guideline Adherence ; Hematologic Tests - utilization ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Netherlands ; Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) ; Primary Health Care - organization & administration ; Primary Health Care - standards ; Quality of care ; quality of health care ; Reminder Systems ; Support services ; Type 2 diabetes mellitus ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Family practice, 2007-02, Vol.24 (1), p.20-25</ispartof><rights>The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org 2007</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Feb 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-fa1c24f84e4ae14a171e886319893892d1437733bef9cb19da5df52cb007b42e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17079250$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meulepas, Marianne A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braspenning, Jozé CC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Grauw, Wim J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Annelies EM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harms, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akkermans, Reinier P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grol, Richard PTM</creatorcontrib><title>Logistic support service improves processes and outcomes of diabetes care in general practice</title><title>Family practice</title><addtitle>Fam Pract</addtitle><description>Background. Guidelines for type 2 diabetes care in general practice are well known and accepted, but the implementation falls short. Objective. To implement these guidelines by introducing a diabetes support service (DSS) to support the care delivered by the GP. Methods. A controlled, non-randomised study with delayed intervention in the control group; 78 GPs (n = 51 for the intervention and n = 21 for the control group) in the south of the Netherlands and 613 of their type 2 diabetic patients participated. Data were collected on the frequency, content and results of the check-ups (fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, cholesterol, cholesterol/HDL ratio, triglycerides, creatinine, blood pressure, fundus photography, foot examination, body mass index and smoking status) for 3 years. The year before signing up with the DSS was taken for the pre-measurements and after 2 years of DSS the post-measurements took place. The effect of the DSS was analysed in a mixed model with repeated measurement covariance structure. Results. At baseline the intervention and control group did not differ in control frequency and outcome (HbA1c). After the intervention the percentage of patients that attended four or more quarterly check-ups (with at least testing of fasting blood glucose or HbA1c) increased from 59 to 78%. In contrast, the frequency of check-ups in the control group remained constant. This effect was significant. The HbA1c remained the same in the intervention group while there was a significant deterioration in the HbA1c in the control group. Conclusion. Simple logistic support by the DSS proved to have the capacity to implement type 2 diabetes guidelines in general practice.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Ambulatory monitoring</subject><subject>Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors</subject><subject>Blood Glucose - analysis</subject><subject>Blood Pressure</subject><subject>Cholesterol - blood</subject><subject>Clinical guidelines</subject><subject>Diabetes Complications - classification</subject><subject>Diabetes Complications - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diabetes Complications - prevention & control</subject><subject>diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - blood</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic Tests, Routine - utilization</subject><subject>Family Practice - organization & administration</subject><subject>Family Practice - standards</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General practice</subject><subject>Glycated Hemoglobin A - analysis</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence</subject><subject>Hematologic Tests - utilization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - organization & administration</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>quality of health care</subject><subject>Reminder Systems</subject><subject>Support services</subject><subject>Type 2 diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0263-2136</issn><issn>1460-2229</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtr3TAQRkVJaW7SLLstJouQjRs9LWtZ8my5oYQ8KIUiZHkcnNqWI9mh_fed4EsL2WSlEZw50sxHyAdGPzFqxFHj-jG6I993VKk3ZMVkQXPOudkiK8oLkXMmim2yk9IDpVRrpd-RbaapNlzRFfm5DvdtmlqfpXkcQ5yyBPGp9ZC16A1PkDI8PKSElRvqLMyTDz1eQpPVratgwtq7iA1Ddg8DRNdhi_PohPfkbeO6BHubc5fcnp3eHF_k62_nX44_r3MvlZnyxjHPZVNKkA6YdEwzKMtCMFMaURpeMym0FqKCxviKmdqpulHcVzhQJTmIXXKwePGvjzOkyfZt8tB1boAwJ6ufN6FR8RqoNK6uZAzB_RfgQ5jjgENYZozi1EiOUL5APoaUIjR2jG3v4h_LqH1Oxy7p2CUd5D9upHPVQ_2f3sSBwOEChHl81bV5G9OD3_9gF3_ZQgut7MX3H_bk-upS3lzd2a_iL01RqlU</recordid><startdate>20070201</startdate><enddate>20070201</enddate><creator>Meulepas, Marianne A.</creator><creator>Braspenning, Jozé CC</creator><creator>de Grauw, Wim J.</creator><creator>Lucas, Annelies EM</creator><creator>Harms, Luc</creator><creator>Akkermans, Reinier P.</creator><creator>Grol, Richard PTM</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070201</creationdate><title>Logistic support service improves processes and outcomes of diabetes care in general practice</title><author>Meulepas, Marianne A. ; Braspenning, Jozé CC ; de Grauw, Wim J. ; Lucas, Annelies EM ; Harms, Luc ; Akkermans, Reinier P. ; Grol, Richard PTM</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-fa1c24f84e4ae14a171e886319893892d1437733bef9cb19da5df52cb007b42e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Ambulatory monitoring</topic><topic>Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors</topic><topic>Blood Glucose - analysis</topic><topic>Blood Pressure</topic><topic>Cholesterol - blood</topic><topic>Clinical guidelines</topic><topic>Diabetes Complications - classification</topic><topic>Diabetes Complications - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diabetes Complications - prevention & control</topic><topic>diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - blood</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic Tests, Routine - utilization</topic><topic>Family Practice - organization & administration</topic><topic>Family Practice - standards</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General practice</topic><topic>Glycated Hemoglobin A - analysis</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence</topic><topic>Hematologic Tests - utilization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - organization & administration</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>quality of health care</topic><topic>Reminder Systems</topic><topic>Support services</topic><topic>Type 2 diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meulepas, Marianne A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braspenning, Jozé CC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Grauw, Wim J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Annelies EM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harms, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akkermans, Reinier P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grol, Richard PTM</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Family practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meulepas, Marianne A.</au><au>Braspenning, Jozé CC</au><au>de Grauw, Wim J.</au><au>Lucas, Annelies EM</au><au>Harms, Luc</au><au>Akkermans, Reinier P.</au><au>Grol, Richard PTM</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Logistic support service improves processes and outcomes of diabetes care in general practice</atitle><jtitle>Family practice</jtitle><addtitle>Fam Pract</addtitle><date>2007-02-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>20-25</pages><issn>0263-2136</issn><eissn>1460-2229</eissn><coden>FAPREH</coden><abstract>Background. Guidelines for type 2 diabetes care in general practice are well known and accepted, but the implementation falls short. Objective. To implement these guidelines by introducing a diabetes support service (DSS) to support the care delivered by the GP. Methods. A controlled, non-randomised study with delayed intervention in the control group; 78 GPs (n = 51 for the intervention and n = 21 for the control group) in the south of the Netherlands and 613 of their type 2 diabetic patients participated. Data were collected on the frequency, content and results of the check-ups (fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, cholesterol, cholesterol/HDL ratio, triglycerides, creatinine, blood pressure, fundus photography, foot examination, body mass index and smoking status) for 3 years. The year before signing up with the DSS was taken for the pre-measurements and after 2 years of DSS the post-measurements took place. The effect of the DSS was analysed in a mixed model with repeated measurement covariance structure. Results. At baseline the intervention and control group did not differ in control frequency and outcome (HbA1c). After the intervention the percentage of patients that attended four or more quarterly check-ups (with at least testing of fasting blood glucose or HbA1c) increased from 59 to 78%. In contrast, the frequency of check-ups in the control group remained constant. This effect was significant. The HbA1c remained the same in the intervention group while there was a significant deterioration in the HbA1c in the control group. Conclusion. Simple logistic support by the DSS proved to have the capacity to implement type 2 diabetes guidelines in general practice.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>17079250</pmid><doi>10.1093/fampra/cml055</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0263-2136 |
ispartof | Family practice, 2007-02, Vol.24 (1), p.20-25 |
issn | 0263-2136 1460-2229 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70263777 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aged Ambulatory monitoring Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors Blood Glucose - analysis Blood Pressure Cholesterol - blood Clinical guidelines Diabetes Complications - classification Diabetes Complications - diagnosis Diabetes Complications - prevention & control diabetes mellitus Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - blood Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - diagnosis Diagnostic Tests, Routine - utilization Family Practice - organization & administration Family Practice - standards Female General practice Glycated Hemoglobin A - analysis Guideline Adherence Hematologic Tests - utilization Humans Male Middle Aged Netherlands Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) Primary Health Care - organization & administration Primary Health Care - standards Quality of care quality of health care Reminder Systems Support services Type 2 diabetes mellitus United Kingdom |
title | Logistic support service improves processes and outcomes of diabetes care in general practice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T20%3A25%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Logistic%20support%20service%20improves%20processes%20and%20outcomes%20of%20diabetes%20care%20in%20general%20practice&rft.jtitle=Family%20practice&rft.au=Meulepas,%20Marianne%20A.&rft.date=2007-02-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=20-25&rft.issn=0263-2136&rft.eissn=1460-2229&rft.coden=FAPREH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/fampra/cml055&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70263777%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199520942&rft_id=info:pmid/17079250&rft_oup_id=10.1093/fampra/cml055&rfr_iscdi=true |