Dinoprostone vaginal slow-release system (Propess®) compared to expectant management in the active treatment of premature rupture of the membranes at term: impact on maternal and fetal outcomes

Background. Retrospective study of 744 women at the Virgen del Camino Hospital in Pamplona concerning two variants for the active treatment of premature rupture of the membranes (PROM). The main purpose of the study was to assess the differences between two variants for the active treatment of PROM...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2008-01, Vol.87 (2), p.195-200
Hauptverfasser: Larrañaga-Azcárate, Carlos, Campo-Molina, Gema, Felicitas Pérez-Rodríguez, Ana, Ezcurdia-Gurpegui, Miguel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background. Retrospective study of 744 women at the Virgen del Camino Hospital in Pamplona concerning two variants for the active treatment of premature rupture of the membranes (PROM). The main purpose of the study was to assess the differences between two variants for the active treatment of PROM at term in pregnant women with negative vaginal-rectal culture screening for Group B Streptococci, and a Bishop test of 4 or less on admission. Methods. Retrospective study of 744 patients with single pregnancy at term, PROM, and Bishop test
ISSN:0001-6349
1600-0412
DOI:10.1080/00016340701837421