Use of the Palliative Outcome Scale in Argentina: A Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation Study
Abstract Although measuring outcomes is essential to ensuring palliative care effectiveness, there is an absence of properly validated measures in many countries. We undertook a cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Palliative Outcome Scale (POS) into a Spanish (Argentina) language and cul...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of pain and symptom management 2008-02, Vol.35 (2), p.188-202 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 202 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 188 |
container_title | Journal of pain and symptom management |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Eisenchlas, Jorge H., MD, MSc Harding, Richard, BSc, MSc, PhD, DipSW Daud, María Laura, MD Pérez, Marisa, MD De Simone, Gustavo G., MD, MSc Higginson, Irene J., BMedSci, BMBS, FFPHM, PhD, FRCP |
description | Abstract Although measuring outcomes is essential to ensuring palliative care effectiveness, there is an absence of properly validated measures in many countries. We undertook a cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Palliative Outcome Scale (POS) into a Spanish (Argentina) language and cultural context. The methodology used a sequence of phases: 1) verification of conceptual equivalence (literature review, professional interviews, and patient focus groups); 2) multiple translations; 3) committee review; and 4) field testing. Psychometric analysis entailed evaluation of quantitative content validity, construct validity, staff and patients' ratings comparison, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness to change. Conceptual equivalence was achieved. Multiple changes were introduced after the translations and field testing in 65 patients and 20 professionals. Content validity was high for all but one item. Construct validity against a validated quality-of-life measure (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life C-30) was confirmed (rho = 0.74, P < 0.0005). There was acceptable agreement between staff and patients (Cohen's weighted kappa >0.3) for 5/10, 8/10, and 6/9 items at each of three time-point evaluations and good correlation for all but one item (Spearman coefficient >0.7). Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's alpha = 0.68–0.69 and 0.66–0.73) for patient and staff ratings, respectively, and test-retest reliability showed very high agreement for every item (>0.80). The Argentine POS showed adequate responsiveness to change, although significant difference was reached for only 3 out of 10 items for patients and staff, respectively. Completion of the POS did not take more than 12 and 6 minutes for patients and staff, respectively. This study indicates that the Argentine POS is a valid and reliable measure of palliative care outcomes with advanced cancer patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.02.045 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70244725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0885392407005970</els_id><sourcerecordid>70244725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-f1641dc83d73c4b2d41e9c6abd80e54e0be5b4aa0e94220cd519d910be02bfa83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt2L1DAUxYso7rj6L0h80LfWmzT98kEYil-wsMK4voY0udXUNB2TdGH-e1NmUPHJp5Bwzrk3P06WvaBQUKD166mYjtK4cJpn6QoG0BTACuDVg2xH26bM64qWD7MdtG2Vlx3jV9mTECYAqMq6fJxd0RZaVlbdLhvuApJlJPE7ks_SWiOjuUdyu0a1zEgOSlokxpG9_4YuGiffkD3p_RJC3q82rl5astfyGJNvcUQ6Tb5Ka_T5eoirPj3NHo3SBnx2Oa-zu_fvvvQf85vbD5_6_U2uqqaJ-UhrTrVqS92Uig9Mc4qdquWgW8CKIwxYDVxKwI4zBkpXtNMdTc_AhlG25XX26px79MvPFUMUswkKrZUOlzWIBhjnDauSsDsL1fYPj6M4ejNLfxIUxAZYTOIvwGIDLICJBDh5n1-GrMOM-o_zQjQJXl4EMiR4o5dOmfBbx4BCw9stqD_rMCG5N-hFUAadQm08qij0Yv5rnbf_pChrnEmDf-AJw7Ss3iXmgoqQDOKwNWIrBDSpC10D5S8QxLT_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70244725</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of the Palliative Outcome Scale in Argentina: A Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation Study</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Eisenchlas, Jorge H., MD, MSc ; Harding, Richard, BSc, MSc, PhD, DipSW ; Daud, María Laura, MD ; Pérez, Marisa, MD ; De Simone, Gustavo G., MD, MSc ; Higginson, Irene J., BMedSci, BMBS, FFPHM, PhD, FRCP</creator><creatorcontrib>Eisenchlas, Jorge H., MD, MSc ; Harding, Richard, BSc, MSc, PhD, DipSW ; Daud, María Laura, MD ; Pérez, Marisa, MD ; De Simone, Gustavo G., MD, MSc ; Higginson, Irene J., BMedSci, BMBS, FFPHM, PhD, FRCP</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Although measuring outcomes is essential to ensuring palliative care effectiveness, there is an absence of properly validated measures in many countries. We undertook a cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Palliative Outcome Scale (POS) into a Spanish (Argentina) language and cultural context. The methodology used a sequence of phases: 1) verification of conceptual equivalence (literature review, professional interviews, and patient focus groups); 2) multiple translations; 3) committee review; and 4) field testing. Psychometric analysis entailed evaluation of quantitative content validity, construct validity, staff and patients' ratings comparison, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness to change. Conceptual equivalence was achieved. Multiple changes were introduced after the translations and field testing in 65 patients and 20 professionals. Content validity was high for all but one item. Construct validity against a validated quality-of-life measure (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life C-30) was confirmed (rho = 0.74, P < 0.0005). There was acceptable agreement between staff and patients (Cohen's weighted kappa >0.3) for 5/10, 8/10, and 6/9 items at each of three time-point evaluations and good correlation for all but one item (Spearman coefficient >0.7). Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's alpha = 0.68–0.69 and 0.66–0.73) for patient and staff ratings, respectively, and test-retest reliability showed very high agreement for every item (>0.80). The Argentine POS showed adequate responsiveness to change, although significant difference was reached for only 3 out of 10 items for patients and staff, respectively. Completion of the POS did not take more than 12 and 6 minutes for patients and staff, respectively. This study indicates that the Argentine POS is a valid and reliable measure of palliative care outcomes with advanced cancer patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-3924</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6513</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.02.045</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18082359</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anesthesia & Perioperative Care ; Argentina ; Biological and medical sciences ; cross-cultural ; Culture ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical Audit - methods ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods ; outcome measures ; Pain Medicine ; Palliative care ; Palliative Care - standards ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Quality of Life ; Reproducibility of Results ; Spanish ; validation</subject><ispartof>Journal of pain and symptom management, 2008-02, Vol.35 (2), p.188-202</ispartof><rights>U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee</rights><rights>2008 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-f1641dc83d73c4b2d41e9c6abd80e54e0be5b4aa0e94220cd519d910be02bfa83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-f1641dc83d73c4b2d41e9c6abd80e54e0be5b4aa0e94220cd519d910be02bfa83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.02.045$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20107485$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18082359$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eisenchlas, Jorge H., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harding, Richard, BSc, MSc, PhD, DipSW</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daud, María Laura, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez, Marisa, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Simone, Gustavo G., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higginson, Irene J., BMedSci, BMBS, FFPHM, PhD, FRCP</creatorcontrib><title>Use of the Palliative Outcome Scale in Argentina: A Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation Study</title><title>Journal of pain and symptom management</title><addtitle>J Pain Symptom Manage</addtitle><description>Abstract Although measuring outcomes is essential to ensuring palliative care effectiveness, there is an absence of properly validated measures in many countries. We undertook a cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Palliative Outcome Scale (POS) into a Spanish (Argentina) language and cultural context. The methodology used a sequence of phases: 1) verification of conceptual equivalence (literature review, professional interviews, and patient focus groups); 2) multiple translations; 3) committee review; and 4) field testing. Psychometric analysis entailed evaluation of quantitative content validity, construct validity, staff and patients' ratings comparison, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness to change. Conceptual equivalence was achieved. Multiple changes were introduced after the translations and field testing in 65 patients and 20 professionals. Content validity was high for all but one item. Construct validity against a validated quality-of-life measure (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life C-30) was confirmed (rho = 0.74, P < 0.0005). There was acceptable agreement between staff and patients (Cohen's weighted kappa >0.3) for 5/10, 8/10, and 6/9 items at each of three time-point evaluations and good correlation for all but one item (Spearman coefficient >0.7). Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's alpha = 0.68–0.69 and 0.66–0.73) for patient and staff ratings, respectively, and test-retest reliability showed very high agreement for every item (>0.80). The Argentine POS showed adequate responsiveness to change, although significant difference was reached for only 3 out of 10 items for patients and staff, respectively. Completion of the POS did not take more than 12 and 6 minutes for patients and staff, respectively. This study indicates that the Argentine POS is a valid and reliable measure of palliative care outcomes with advanced cancer patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anesthesia & Perioperative Care</subject><subject>Argentina</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>cross-cultural</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Audit - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</subject><subject>outcome measures</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Palliative Care - standards</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Spanish</subject><subject>validation</subject><issn>0885-3924</issn><issn>1873-6513</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkt2L1DAUxYso7rj6L0h80LfWmzT98kEYil-wsMK4voY0udXUNB2TdGH-e1NmUPHJp5Bwzrk3P06WvaBQUKD166mYjtK4cJpn6QoG0BTACuDVg2xH26bM64qWD7MdtG2Vlx3jV9mTECYAqMq6fJxd0RZaVlbdLhvuApJlJPE7ks_SWiOjuUdyu0a1zEgOSlokxpG9_4YuGiffkD3p_RJC3q82rl5astfyGJNvcUQ6Tb5Ka_T5eoirPj3NHo3SBnx2Oa-zu_fvvvQf85vbD5_6_U2uqqaJ-UhrTrVqS92Uig9Mc4qdquWgW8CKIwxYDVxKwI4zBkpXtNMdTc_AhlG25XX26px79MvPFUMUswkKrZUOlzWIBhjnDauSsDsL1fYPj6M4ejNLfxIUxAZYTOIvwGIDLICJBDh5n1-GrMOM-o_zQjQJXl4EMiR4o5dOmfBbx4BCw9stqD_rMCG5N-hFUAadQm08qij0Yv5rnbf_pChrnEmDf-AJw7Ss3iXmgoqQDOKwNWIrBDSpC10D5S8QxLT_</recordid><startdate>20080201</startdate><enddate>20080201</enddate><creator>Eisenchlas, Jorge H., MD, MSc</creator><creator>Harding, Richard, BSc, MSc, PhD, DipSW</creator><creator>Daud, María Laura, MD</creator><creator>Pérez, Marisa, MD</creator><creator>De Simone, Gustavo G., MD, MSc</creator><creator>Higginson, Irene J., BMedSci, BMBS, FFPHM, PhD, FRCP</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080201</creationdate><title>Use of the Palliative Outcome Scale in Argentina: A Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation Study</title><author>Eisenchlas, Jorge H., MD, MSc ; Harding, Richard, BSc, MSc, PhD, DipSW ; Daud, María Laura, MD ; Pérez, Marisa, MD ; De Simone, Gustavo G., MD, MSc ; Higginson, Irene J., BMedSci, BMBS, FFPHM, PhD, FRCP</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-f1641dc83d73c4b2d41e9c6abd80e54e0be5b4aa0e94220cd519d910be02bfa83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anesthesia & Perioperative Care</topic><topic>Argentina</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>cross-cultural</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Audit - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</topic><topic>outcome measures</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Palliative Care - standards</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Spanish</topic><topic>validation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eisenchlas, Jorge H., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harding, Richard, BSc, MSc, PhD, DipSW</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daud, María Laura, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez, Marisa, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Simone, Gustavo G., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higginson, Irene J., BMedSci, BMBS, FFPHM, PhD, FRCP</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pain and symptom management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eisenchlas, Jorge H., MD, MSc</au><au>Harding, Richard, BSc, MSc, PhD, DipSW</au><au>Daud, María Laura, MD</au><au>Pérez, Marisa, MD</au><au>De Simone, Gustavo G., MD, MSc</au><au>Higginson, Irene J., BMedSci, BMBS, FFPHM, PhD, FRCP</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of the Palliative Outcome Scale in Argentina: A Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pain and symptom management</jtitle><addtitle>J Pain Symptom Manage</addtitle><date>2008-02-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>188</spage><epage>202</epage><pages>188-202</pages><issn>0885-3924</issn><eissn>1873-6513</eissn><abstract>Abstract Although measuring outcomes is essential to ensuring palliative care effectiveness, there is an absence of properly validated measures in many countries. We undertook a cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Palliative Outcome Scale (POS) into a Spanish (Argentina) language and cultural context. The methodology used a sequence of phases: 1) verification of conceptual equivalence (literature review, professional interviews, and patient focus groups); 2) multiple translations; 3) committee review; and 4) field testing. Psychometric analysis entailed evaluation of quantitative content validity, construct validity, staff and patients' ratings comparison, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness to change. Conceptual equivalence was achieved. Multiple changes were introduced after the translations and field testing in 65 patients and 20 professionals. Content validity was high for all but one item. Construct validity against a validated quality-of-life measure (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life C-30) was confirmed (rho = 0.74, P < 0.0005). There was acceptable agreement between staff and patients (Cohen's weighted kappa >0.3) for 5/10, 8/10, and 6/9 items at each of three time-point evaluations and good correlation for all but one item (Spearman coefficient >0.7). Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's alpha = 0.68–0.69 and 0.66–0.73) for patient and staff ratings, respectively, and test-retest reliability showed very high agreement for every item (>0.80). The Argentine POS showed adequate responsiveness to change, although significant difference was reached for only 3 out of 10 items for patients and staff, respectively. Completion of the POS did not take more than 12 and 6 minutes for patients and staff, respectively. This study indicates that the Argentine POS is a valid and reliable measure of palliative care outcomes with advanced cancer patients.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>18082359</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.02.045</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0885-3924 |
ispartof | Journal of pain and symptom management, 2008-02, Vol.35 (2), p.188-202 |
issn | 0885-3924 1873-6513 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70244725 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Anesthesia & Perioperative Care Argentina Biological and medical sciences cross-cultural Culture Female Humans Male Medical Audit - methods Medical sciences Middle Aged Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods outcome measures Pain Medicine Palliative care Palliative Care - standards Pharmacology. Drug treatments Quality of Life Reproducibility of Results Spanish validation |
title | Use of the Palliative Outcome Scale in Argentina: A Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T10%3A32%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20the%20Palliative%20Outcome%20Scale%20in%20Argentina:%20A%20Cross-Cultural%20Adaptation%20and%20Validation%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pain%20and%20symptom%20management&rft.au=Eisenchlas,%20Jorge%20H.,%20MD,%20MSc&rft.date=2008-02-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=188&rft.epage=202&rft.pages=188-202&rft.issn=0885-3924&rft.eissn=1873-6513&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.02.045&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70244725%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70244725&rft_id=info:pmid/18082359&rft_els_id=S0885392407005970&rfr_iscdi=true |