Use of the Palliative Outcome Scale in Argentina: A Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation Study

Abstract Although measuring outcomes is essential to ensuring palliative care effectiveness, there is an absence of properly validated measures in many countries. We undertook a cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Palliative Outcome Scale (POS) into a Spanish (Argentina) language and cul...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pain and symptom management 2008-02, Vol.35 (2), p.188-202
Hauptverfasser: Eisenchlas, Jorge H., MD, MSc, Harding, Richard, BSc, MSc, PhD, DipSW, Daud, María Laura, MD, Pérez, Marisa, MD, De Simone, Gustavo G., MD, MSc, Higginson, Irene J., BMedSci, BMBS, FFPHM, PhD, FRCP
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 202
container_issue 2
container_start_page 188
container_title Journal of pain and symptom management
container_volume 35
creator Eisenchlas, Jorge H., MD, MSc
Harding, Richard, BSc, MSc, PhD, DipSW
Daud, María Laura, MD
Pérez, Marisa, MD
De Simone, Gustavo G., MD, MSc
Higginson, Irene J., BMedSci, BMBS, FFPHM, PhD, FRCP
description Abstract Although measuring outcomes is essential to ensuring palliative care effectiveness, there is an absence of properly validated measures in many countries. We undertook a cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Palliative Outcome Scale (POS) into a Spanish (Argentina) language and cultural context. The methodology used a sequence of phases: 1) verification of conceptual equivalence (literature review, professional interviews, and patient focus groups); 2) multiple translations; 3) committee review; and 4) field testing. Psychometric analysis entailed evaluation of quantitative content validity, construct validity, staff and patients' ratings comparison, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness to change. Conceptual equivalence was achieved. Multiple changes were introduced after the translations and field testing in 65 patients and 20 professionals. Content validity was high for all but one item. Construct validity against a validated quality-of-life measure (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life C-30) was confirmed (rho = 0.74, P < 0.0005). There was acceptable agreement between staff and patients (Cohen's weighted kappa >0.3) for 5/10, 8/10, and 6/9 items at each of three time-point evaluations and good correlation for all but one item (Spearman coefficient >0.7). Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's alpha = 0.68–0.69 and 0.66–0.73) for patient and staff ratings, respectively, and test-retest reliability showed very high agreement for every item (>0.80). The Argentine POS showed adequate responsiveness to change, although significant difference was reached for only 3 out of 10 items for patients and staff, respectively. Completion of the POS did not take more than 12 and 6 minutes for patients and staff, respectively. This study indicates that the Argentine POS is a valid and reliable measure of palliative care outcomes with advanced cancer patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.02.045
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70244725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0885392407005970</els_id><sourcerecordid>70244725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-f1641dc83d73c4b2d41e9c6abd80e54e0be5b4aa0e94220cd519d910be02bfa83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt2L1DAUxYso7rj6L0h80LfWmzT98kEYil-wsMK4voY0udXUNB2TdGH-e1NmUPHJp5Bwzrk3P06WvaBQUKD166mYjtK4cJpn6QoG0BTACuDVg2xH26bM64qWD7MdtG2Vlx3jV9mTECYAqMq6fJxd0RZaVlbdLhvuApJlJPE7ks_SWiOjuUdyu0a1zEgOSlokxpG9_4YuGiffkD3p_RJC3q82rl5astfyGJNvcUQ6Tb5Ka_T5eoirPj3NHo3SBnx2Oa-zu_fvvvQf85vbD5_6_U2uqqaJ-UhrTrVqS92Uig9Mc4qdquWgW8CKIwxYDVxKwI4zBkpXtNMdTc_AhlG25XX26px79MvPFUMUswkKrZUOlzWIBhjnDauSsDsL1fYPj6M4ejNLfxIUxAZYTOIvwGIDLICJBDh5n1-GrMOM-o_zQjQJXl4EMiR4o5dOmfBbx4BCw9stqD_rMCG5N-hFUAadQm08qij0Yv5rnbf_pChrnEmDf-AJw7Ss3iXmgoqQDOKwNWIrBDSpC10D5S8QxLT_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70244725</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of the Palliative Outcome Scale in Argentina: A Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation Study</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Eisenchlas, Jorge H., MD, MSc ; Harding, Richard, BSc, MSc, PhD, DipSW ; Daud, María Laura, MD ; Pérez, Marisa, MD ; De Simone, Gustavo G., MD, MSc ; Higginson, Irene J., BMedSci, BMBS, FFPHM, PhD, FRCP</creator><creatorcontrib>Eisenchlas, Jorge H., MD, MSc ; Harding, Richard, BSc, MSc, PhD, DipSW ; Daud, María Laura, MD ; Pérez, Marisa, MD ; De Simone, Gustavo G., MD, MSc ; Higginson, Irene J., BMedSci, BMBS, FFPHM, PhD, FRCP</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Although measuring outcomes is essential to ensuring palliative care effectiveness, there is an absence of properly validated measures in many countries. We undertook a cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Palliative Outcome Scale (POS) into a Spanish (Argentina) language and cultural context. The methodology used a sequence of phases: 1) verification of conceptual equivalence (literature review, professional interviews, and patient focus groups); 2) multiple translations; 3) committee review; and 4) field testing. Psychometric analysis entailed evaluation of quantitative content validity, construct validity, staff and patients' ratings comparison, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness to change. Conceptual equivalence was achieved. Multiple changes were introduced after the translations and field testing in 65 patients and 20 professionals. Content validity was high for all but one item. Construct validity against a validated quality-of-life measure (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life C-30) was confirmed (rho = 0.74, P &lt; 0.0005). There was acceptable agreement between staff and patients (Cohen's weighted kappa &gt;0.3) for 5/10, 8/10, and 6/9 items at each of three time-point evaluations and good correlation for all but one item (Spearman coefficient &gt;0.7). Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's alpha = 0.68–0.69 and 0.66–0.73) for patient and staff ratings, respectively, and test-retest reliability showed very high agreement for every item (&gt;0.80). The Argentine POS showed adequate responsiveness to change, although significant difference was reached for only 3 out of 10 items for patients and staff, respectively. Completion of the POS did not take more than 12 and 6 minutes for patients and staff, respectively. This study indicates that the Argentine POS is a valid and reliable measure of palliative care outcomes with advanced cancer patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-3924</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6513</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.02.045</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18082359</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anesthesia &amp; Perioperative Care ; Argentina ; Biological and medical sciences ; cross-cultural ; Culture ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical Audit - methods ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods ; outcome measures ; Pain Medicine ; Palliative care ; Palliative Care - standards ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Quality of Life ; Reproducibility of Results ; Spanish ; validation</subject><ispartof>Journal of pain and symptom management, 2008-02, Vol.35 (2), p.188-202</ispartof><rights>U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee</rights><rights>2008 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-f1641dc83d73c4b2d41e9c6abd80e54e0be5b4aa0e94220cd519d910be02bfa83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-f1641dc83d73c4b2d41e9c6abd80e54e0be5b4aa0e94220cd519d910be02bfa83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.02.045$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20107485$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18082359$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eisenchlas, Jorge H., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harding, Richard, BSc, MSc, PhD, DipSW</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daud, María Laura, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez, Marisa, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Simone, Gustavo G., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higginson, Irene J., BMedSci, BMBS, FFPHM, PhD, FRCP</creatorcontrib><title>Use of the Palliative Outcome Scale in Argentina: A Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation Study</title><title>Journal of pain and symptom management</title><addtitle>J Pain Symptom Manage</addtitle><description>Abstract Although measuring outcomes is essential to ensuring palliative care effectiveness, there is an absence of properly validated measures in many countries. We undertook a cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Palliative Outcome Scale (POS) into a Spanish (Argentina) language and cultural context. The methodology used a sequence of phases: 1) verification of conceptual equivalence (literature review, professional interviews, and patient focus groups); 2) multiple translations; 3) committee review; and 4) field testing. Psychometric analysis entailed evaluation of quantitative content validity, construct validity, staff and patients' ratings comparison, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness to change. Conceptual equivalence was achieved. Multiple changes were introduced after the translations and field testing in 65 patients and 20 professionals. Content validity was high for all but one item. Construct validity against a validated quality-of-life measure (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life C-30) was confirmed (rho = 0.74, P &lt; 0.0005). There was acceptable agreement between staff and patients (Cohen's weighted kappa &gt;0.3) for 5/10, 8/10, and 6/9 items at each of three time-point evaluations and good correlation for all but one item (Spearman coefficient &gt;0.7). Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's alpha = 0.68–0.69 and 0.66–0.73) for patient and staff ratings, respectively, and test-retest reliability showed very high agreement for every item (&gt;0.80). The Argentine POS showed adequate responsiveness to change, although significant difference was reached for only 3 out of 10 items for patients and staff, respectively. Completion of the POS did not take more than 12 and 6 minutes for patients and staff, respectively. This study indicates that the Argentine POS is a valid and reliable measure of palliative care outcomes with advanced cancer patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anesthesia &amp; Perioperative Care</subject><subject>Argentina</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>cross-cultural</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Audit - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</subject><subject>outcome measures</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Palliative Care - standards</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Spanish</subject><subject>validation</subject><issn>0885-3924</issn><issn>1873-6513</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkt2L1DAUxYso7rj6L0h80LfWmzT98kEYil-wsMK4voY0udXUNB2TdGH-e1NmUPHJp5Bwzrk3P06WvaBQUKD166mYjtK4cJpn6QoG0BTACuDVg2xH26bM64qWD7MdtG2Vlx3jV9mTECYAqMq6fJxd0RZaVlbdLhvuApJlJPE7ks_SWiOjuUdyu0a1zEgOSlokxpG9_4YuGiffkD3p_RJC3q82rl5astfyGJNvcUQ6Tb5Ka_T5eoirPj3NHo3SBnx2Oa-zu_fvvvQf85vbD5_6_U2uqqaJ-UhrTrVqS92Uig9Mc4qdquWgW8CKIwxYDVxKwI4zBkpXtNMdTc_AhlG25XX26px79MvPFUMUswkKrZUOlzWIBhjnDauSsDsL1fYPj6M4ejNLfxIUxAZYTOIvwGIDLICJBDh5n1-GrMOM-o_zQjQJXl4EMiR4o5dOmfBbx4BCw9stqD_rMCG5N-hFUAadQm08qij0Yv5rnbf_pChrnEmDf-AJw7Ss3iXmgoqQDOKwNWIrBDSpC10D5S8QxLT_</recordid><startdate>20080201</startdate><enddate>20080201</enddate><creator>Eisenchlas, Jorge H., MD, MSc</creator><creator>Harding, Richard, BSc, MSc, PhD, DipSW</creator><creator>Daud, María Laura, MD</creator><creator>Pérez, Marisa, MD</creator><creator>De Simone, Gustavo G., MD, MSc</creator><creator>Higginson, Irene J., BMedSci, BMBS, FFPHM, PhD, FRCP</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080201</creationdate><title>Use of the Palliative Outcome Scale in Argentina: A Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation Study</title><author>Eisenchlas, Jorge H., MD, MSc ; Harding, Richard, BSc, MSc, PhD, DipSW ; Daud, María Laura, MD ; Pérez, Marisa, MD ; De Simone, Gustavo G., MD, MSc ; Higginson, Irene J., BMedSci, BMBS, FFPHM, PhD, FRCP</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-f1641dc83d73c4b2d41e9c6abd80e54e0be5b4aa0e94220cd519d910be02bfa83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anesthesia &amp; Perioperative Care</topic><topic>Argentina</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>cross-cultural</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Audit - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</topic><topic>outcome measures</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Palliative Care - standards</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Spanish</topic><topic>validation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eisenchlas, Jorge H., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harding, Richard, BSc, MSc, PhD, DipSW</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daud, María Laura, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez, Marisa, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Simone, Gustavo G., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higginson, Irene J., BMedSci, BMBS, FFPHM, PhD, FRCP</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pain and symptom management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eisenchlas, Jorge H., MD, MSc</au><au>Harding, Richard, BSc, MSc, PhD, DipSW</au><au>Daud, María Laura, MD</au><au>Pérez, Marisa, MD</au><au>De Simone, Gustavo G., MD, MSc</au><au>Higginson, Irene J., BMedSci, BMBS, FFPHM, PhD, FRCP</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of the Palliative Outcome Scale in Argentina: A Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pain and symptom management</jtitle><addtitle>J Pain Symptom Manage</addtitle><date>2008-02-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>188</spage><epage>202</epage><pages>188-202</pages><issn>0885-3924</issn><eissn>1873-6513</eissn><abstract>Abstract Although measuring outcomes is essential to ensuring palliative care effectiveness, there is an absence of properly validated measures in many countries. We undertook a cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Palliative Outcome Scale (POS) into a Spanish (Argentina) language and cultural context. The methodology used a sequence of phases: 1) verification of conceptual equivalence (literature review, professional interviews, and patient focus groups); 2) multiple translations; 3) committee review; and 4) field testing. Psychometric analysis entailed evaluation of quantitative content validity, construct validity, staff and patients' ratings comparison, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness to change. Conceptual equivalence was achieved. Multiple changes were introduced after the translations and field testing in 65 patients and 20 professionals. Content validity was high for all but one item. Construct validity against a validated quality-of-life measure (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life C-30) was confirmed (rho = 0.74, P &lt; 0.0005). There was acceptable agreement between staff and patients (Cohen's weighted kappa &gt;0.3) for 5/10, 8/10, and 6/9 items at each of three time-point evaluations and good correlation for all but one item (Spearman coefficient &gt;0.7). Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's alpha = 0.68–0.69 and 0.66–0.73) for patient and staff ratings, respectively, and test-retest reliability showed very high agreement for every item (&gt;0.80). The Argentine POS showed adequate responsiveness to change, although significant difference was reached for only 3 out of 10 items for patients and staff, respectively. Completion of the POS did not take more than 12 and 6 minutes for patients and staff, respectively. This study indicates that the Argentine POS is a valid and reliable measure of palliative care outcomes with advanced cancer patients.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>18082359</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.02.045</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-3924
ispartof Journal of pain and symptom management, 2008-02, Vol.35 (2), p.188-202
issn 0885-3924
1873-6513
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70244725
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anesthesia & Perioperative Care
Argentina
Biological and medical sciences
cross-cultural
Culture
Female
Humans
Male
Medical Audit - methods
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods
outcome measures
Pain Medicine
Palliative care
Palliative Care - standards
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Quality of Life
Reproducibility of Results
Spanish
validation
title Use of the Palliative Outcome Scale in Argentina: A Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T10%3A32%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20the%20Palliative%20Outcome%20Scale%20in%20Argentina:%20A%20Cross-Cultural%20Adaptation%20and%20Validation%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pain%20and%20symptom%20management&rft.au=Eisenchlas,%20Jorge%20H.,%20MD,%20MSc&rft.date=2008-02-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=188&rft.epage=202&rft.pages=188-202&rft.issn=0885-3924&rft.eissn=1873-6513&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.02.045&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70244725%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70244725&rft_id=info:pmid/18082359&rft_els_id=S0885392407005970&rfr_iscdi=true