The Assessment of Depression Inventory (ADI): an appraisal of validity in an outpatient sample
In this study we examined the validity of the Assessment of Depression Inventory (ADI) using outpatient participants. The ADI Depression scale (Dep) was compared to three other measures used to assess depression: Beck Depression Inventory–II (BDI‐II), Zung Self‐Rating Depression Scale (ZSDS), and Pe...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Depression and anxiety 2008-01, Vol.25 (1), p.64-68 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 68 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 64 |
| container_title | Depression and anxiety |
| container_volume | 25 |
| creator | Mogge, Neil L. Steinberg, Joel S. Fremouw, William Messer, Julia |
| description | In this study we examined the validity of the Assessment of Depression Inventory (ADI) using outpatient participants. The ADI Depression scale (Dep) was compared to three other measures used to assess depression: Beck Depression Inventory–II (BDI‐II), Zung Self‐Rating Depression Scale (ZSDS), and Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). Correlations between the ADI and these three measures were significant. An analysis of the discriminant ability of the ADI Dep scale resulted in sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive power, negative predictive power, hit rate, and area under the curve (92.3%) that were supportive of the scale's effectiveness. The ADI Feigning scale (Fg) was compared to the six PAI validity scales. The Fg scale correlated significantly with the PAI Negative Impression Management (NIM) and Positive Impression Management (PIM) scales, and the Malingering (MAL) and Defensive (DEF) indexes. Directionality was as would be predicted. The ADI did not correlate with the two PAI validity scales derived by discriminant analysis function. Depression and Anxiety 0:1–5, 2007. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/da.20247 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70242485</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21221841</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4537-4037c2c70cb61755f34a63a0572a61830bf7d710abe33fafd80a36c9679873813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0ctqGzEUBmBRGppbIU9QZlWcxThHl5E03Rk7jg0mIeCQXcXxjIaonVulsRu_fcax06xKu9Lt44ejn5ALCkMKwK5yHDJgQn0gJzRhEEueio_9HlIaCybTY3Iawg8A0KmGT-SYKqoVF_qEfF8-2WgUgg2hsnUXNUU0sa3vj66po3m96S8bv40Go8n88luEdYRt69EFLHd2g6XLXbeNXL17a9Zdi53bBQWs2tKek6MCy2A_H9Yz8jC9Xo5n8eLuZj4eLeJMJFzFArjKWKYgW0mqkqTgAiVHSBRDSTWHVaFyRQFXlvMCi1wDcpmlUqX9HJryM_J1n9v65tfahs5ULmS2LLG2zToY1f8OEzr5J2SUMaoF_Q9IQVMmezjYw8w3IXhbmNa7Cv3WUDC7dkyO5rWdnn45ZK5Xlc3f4aGOHsR78NuVdvvXIDMZvQUevAudff7j0f80UnGVmMfbGzOe3k8Xs9nYLPgLuTCk4w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21108126</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Assessment of Depression Inventory (ADI): an appraisal of validity in an outpatient sample</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Mogge, Neil L. ; Steinberg, Joel S. ; Fremouw, William ; Messer, Julia</creator><creatorcontrib>Mogge, Neil L. ; Steinberg, Joel S. ; Fremouw, William ; Messer, Julia</creatorcontrib><description>In this study we examined the validity of the Assessment of Depression Inventory (ADI) using outpatient participants. The ADI Depression scale (Dep) was compared to three other measures used to assess depression: Beck Depression Inventory–II (BDI‐II), Zung Self‐Rating Depression Scale (ZSDS), and Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). Correlations between the ADI and these three measures were significant. An analysis of the discriminant ability of the ADI Dep scale resulted in sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive power, negative predictive power, hit rate, and area under the curve (92.3%) that were supportive of the scale's effectiveness. The ADI Feigning scale (Fg) was compared to the six PAI validity scales. The Fg scale correlated significantly with the PAI Negative Impression Management (NIM) and Positive Impression Management (PIM) scales, and the Malingering (MAL) and Defensive (DEF) indexes. Directionality was as would be predicted. The ADI did not correlate with the two PAI validity scales derived by discriminant analysis function. Depression and Anxiety 0:1–5, 2007. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1091-4269</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6394</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/da.20247</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17187348</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Ambulatory Care ; Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis ; Depressive Disorder, Major - psychology ; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ; Discriminant Analysis ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Personality Inventory - statistics & numerical data ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics & numerical data ; Psychometrics ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Depression and anxiety, 2008-01, Vol.25 (1), p.64-68</ispartof><rights>2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4537-4037c2c70cb61755f34a63a0572a61830bf7d710abe33fafd80a36c9679873813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4537-4037c2c70cb61755f34a63a0572a61830bf7d710abe33fafd80a36c9679873813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fda.20247$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fda.20247$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,4009,27902,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17187348$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mogge, Neil L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinberg, Joel S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fremouw, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messer, Julia</creatorcontrib><title>The Assessment of Depression Inventory (ADI): an appraisal of validity in an outpatient sample</title><title>Depression and anxiety</title><addtitle>Depress. Anxiety</addtitle><description>In this study we examined the validity of the Assessment of Depression Inventory (ADI) using outpatient participants. The ADI Depression scale (Dep) was compared to three other measures used to assess depression: Beck Depression Inventory–II (BDI‐II), Zung Self‐Rating Depression Scale (ZSDS), and Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). Correlations between the ADI and these three measures were significant. An analysis of the discriminant ability of the ADI Dep scale resulted in sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive power, negative predictive power, hit rate, and area under the curve (92.3%) that were supportive of the scale's effectiveness. The ADI Feigning scale (Fg) was compared to the six PAI validity scales. The Fg scale correlated significantly with the PAI Negative Impression Management (NIM) and Positive Impression Management (PIM) scales, and the Malingering (MAL) and Defensive (DEF) indexes. Directionality was as would be predicted. The ADI did not correlate with the two PAI validity scales derived by discriminant analysis function. Depression and Anxiety 0:1–5, 2007. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Ambulatory Care</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder, Major - psychology</subject><subject>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</subject><subject>Discriminant Analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Personality Inventory - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>1091-4269</issn><issn>1520-6394</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0ctqGzEUBmBRGppbIU9QZlWcxThHl5E03Rk7jg0mIeCQXcXxjIaonVulsRu_fcax06xKu9Lt44ejn5ALCkMKwK5yHDJgQn0gJzRhEEueio_9HlIaCybTY3Iawg8A0KmGT-SYKqoVF_qEfF8-2WgUgg2hsnUXNUU0sa3vj66po3m96S8bv40Go8n88luEdYRt69EFLHd2g6XLXbeNXL17a9Zdi53bBQWs2tKek6MCy2A_H9Yz8jC9Xo5n8eLuZj4eLeJMJFzFArjKWKYgW0mqkqTgAiVHSBRDSTWHVaFyRQFXlvMCi1wDcpmlUqX9HJryM_J1n9v65tfahs5ULmS2LLG2zToY1f8OEzr5J2SUMaoF_Q9IQVMmezjYw8w3IXhbmNa7Cv3WUDC7dkyO5rWdnn45ZK5Xlc3f4aGOHsR78NuVdvvXIDMZvQUevAudff7j0f80UnGVmMfbGzOe3k8Xs9nYLPgLuTCk4w</recordid><startdate>200801</startdate><enddate>200801</enddate><creator>Mogge, Neil L.</creator><creator>Steinberg, Joel S.</creator><creator>Fremouw, William</creator><creator>Messer, Julia</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200801</creationdate><title>The Assessment of Depression Inventory (ADI): an appraisal of validity in an outpatient sample</title><author>Mogge, Neil L. ; Steinberg, Joel S. ; Fremouw, William ; Messer, Julia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4537-4037c2c70cb61755f34a63a0572a61830bf7d710abe33fafd80a36c9679873813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Ambulatory Care</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder, Major - psychology</topic><topic>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</topic><topic>Discriminant Analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Personality Inventory - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mogge, Neil L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinberg, Joel S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fremouw, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messer, Julia</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Depression and anxiety</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mogge, Neil L.</au><au>Steinberg, Joel S.</au><au>Fremouw, William</au><au>Messer, Julia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Assessment of Depression Inventory (ADI): an appraisal of validity in an outpatient sample</atitle><jtitle>Depression and anxiety</jtitle><addtitle>Depress. Anxiety</addtitle><date>2008-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>64</spage><epage>68</epage><pages>64-68</pages><issn>1091-4269</issn><eissn>1520-6394</eissn><abstract>In this study we examined the validity of the Assessment of Depression Inventory (ADI) using outpatient participants. The ADI Depression scale (Dep) was compared to three other measures used to assess depression: Beck Depression Inventory–II (BDI‐II), Zung Self‐Rating Depression Scale (ZSDS), and Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). Correlations between the ADI and these three measures were significant. An analysis of the discriminant ability of the ADI Dep scale resulted in sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive power, negative predictive power, hit rate, and area under the curve (92.3%) that were supportive of the scale's effectiveness. The ADI Feigning scale (Fg) was compared to the six PAI validity scales. The Fg scale correlated significantly with the PAI Negative Impression Management (NIM) and Positive Impression Management (PIM) scales, and the Malingering (MAL) and Defensive (DEF) indexes. Directionality was as would be predicted. The ADI did not correlate with the two PAI validity scales derived by discriminant analysis function. Depression and Anxiety 0:1–5, 2007. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>17187348</pmid><doi>10.1002/da.20247</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1091-4269 |
| ispartof | Depression and anxiety, 2008-01, Vol.25 (1), p.64-68 |
| issn | 1091-4269 1520-6394 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70242485 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Ambulatory Care Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis Depressive Disorder, Major - psychology Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Discriminant Analysis Female Humans Male Middle Aged Personality Inventory - statistics & numerical data Predictive Value of Tests Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics & numerical data Psychometrics Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity |
| title | The Assessment of Depression Inventory (ADI): an appraisal of validity in an outpatient sample |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T23%3A21%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Assessment%20of%20Depression%20Inventory%20(ADI):%20an%20appraisal%20of%20validity%20in%20an%20outpatient%20sample&rft.jtitle=Depression%20and%20anxiety&rft.au=Mogge,%20Neil%20L.&rft.date=2008-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=64&rft.epage=68&rft.pages=64-68&rft.issn=1091-4269&rft.eissn=1520-6394&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/da.20247&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21221841%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21108126&rft_id=info:pmid/17187348&rfr_iscdi=true |