Changing Trends and Allergens in the Patch Test Standard Series: A Mayo Clinic 5-Year Retrospective Review, January 1, 2001, Through December 31, 2005
OBJECTIVE To present and interpret results of patch testing with the Mayo Clinic standard series over 5 years. DESIGN Retrospective study. A standardized patch testing technique was used. Data were recorded on a standardized computer program from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2005, and analyzed....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of dermatology (1960) 2008-01, Vol.144 (1), p.67-72 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 72 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 67 |
container_title | Archives of dermatology (1960) |
container_volume | 144 |
creator | Davis, Mark D. P Scalf, Leigh Ann Yiannias, James A Cheng, Janet F el-Azhary, Rokea A Rohlinger, Audrey L Farmer, Sara A Fett, Debra D Johnson, Janis S Linehan, Diane L. Nordberg Richardson, Donna M Schroeter, Arnold L Connolly, Suzanne M |
description | OBJECTIVE To present and interpret results of patch testing with the Mayo Clinic standard series over 5 years. DESIGN Retrospective study. A standardized patch testing technique was used. Data were recorded on a standardized computer program from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2005, and analyzed. SETTING Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS Patients who were referred for patch testing. INTERVENTION Patch testing with the “standard series,” ie, a standard series of allergens used by most clinicians to identify the most common offending allergens in patients with allergic contact dermatitis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Number of patients patch tested, allergens used over this period, and rates of allergic patch test reactions to allergens. RESULTS A total of 3854 patients (mean age, 55.1 years; age range, 6.2-99.4 years; 2576 female [66.8%]) were tested. All dermatologists in the department performed patch testing. The mean number of allergens included was 69.3 (range, 6-87). There were 2664 patients with at least 1 positive reaction (69.1%) and 1933 with 2 or more positive reactions (50.2%). Metals, fragrances, topical antibiotics, preservatives, and individual allergens used in hair-care products, topical corticosteroids, glues, plastics, and rubber were still the most common allergen groups associated with allergic patch test reactions. CONCLUSIONS We describe the structure of the patch testing service at our referral center. Ongoing analysis of our patch test reaction rates allows us to recommend broad, clinically relevant, and up-to-date allergens for testing.Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(1):67-72--> |
doi_str_mv | 10.1001/archdermatol.2007.2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70220653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>419296</ama_id><sourcerecordid>70220653</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a247t-44c942644c73dae13d081c8dc5c65e49b8d272d4c2a1db3235bece100c8420513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd1u1DAQhS0EotvCAyAk5Bt61Sz-TWLuVsu_ikB0keAqmtizG6PEWeykqC_C8-JqV4U7bjyy5jvHnjmEPOVsyRnjLyDazmEcYBr7pWCsWop7ZMG1rAtZanGfLBhjsjB19e2EnKb0I4tEXYuH5ITXghlesQX5ve4g7HzY0U3E4BKF4Oiq7zHuMCTqA506pJ9hsh3dYJro1ZQJiI5eYfSYXtIV_Qg3I133PnhLdfEdIdIvOMUx7dFO_hrz7drjrwv6AcIM8YbyC5r_m89NF8d519FXaHFoMVJ5aOlH5MEW-oSPj_WMfH3zerN-V1x-evt-vbosQKhqKpSyRokyl0o6QC4dq7mtndW21KhMWztRCaesAO5aKaRu80t5e7ZWgmkuz8j5wXcfx59znq8ZfLLY9xBwnFNTMSFYqeV_wexmlOYmg_IA2ryAFHHb7KMf8tQNZ81tbs2_uTW3uTUiq54d7ed2QPdXcwwqA8-PACQL_TZCsD7dcdmGGSNV5p4cOBjgrqu4EaaUfwDFwalo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20594519</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changing Trends and Allergens in the Patch Test Standard Series: A Mayo Clinic 5-Year Retrospective Review, January 1, 2001, Through December 31, 2005</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><creator>Davis, Mark D. P ; Scalf, Leigh Ann ; Yiannias, James A ; Cheng, Janet F ; el-Azhary, Rokea A ; Rohlinger, Audrey L ; Farmer, Sara A ; Fett, Debra D ; Johnson, Janis S ; Linehan, Diane L. Nordberg ; Richardson, Donna M ; Schroeter, Arnold L ; Connolly, Suzanne M</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, Mark D. P ; Scalf, Leigh Ann ; Yiannias, James A ; Cheng, Janet F ; el-Azhary, Rokea A ; Rohlinger, Audrey L ; Farmer, Sara A ; Fett, Debra D ; Johnson, Janis S ; Linehan, Diane L. Nordberg ; Richardson, Donna M ; Schroeter, Arnold L ; Connolly, Suzanne M</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE To present and interpret results of patch testing with the Mayo Clinic standard series over 5 years. DESIGN Retrospective study. A standardized patch testing technique was used. Data were recorded on a standardized computer program from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2005, and analyzed. SETTING Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS Patients who were referred for patch testing. INTERVENTION Patch testing with the “standard series,” ie, a standard series of allergens used by most clinicians to identify the most common offending allergens in patients with allergic contact dermatitis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Number of patients patch tested, allergens used over this period, and rates of allergic patch test reactions to allergens. RESULTS A total of 3854 patients (mean age, 55.1 years; age range, 6.2-99.4 years; 2576 female [66.8%]) were tested. All dermatologists in the department performed patch testing. The mean number of allergens included was 69.3 (range, 6-87). There were 2664 patients with at least 1 positive reaction (69.1%) and 1933 with 2 or more positive reactions (50.2%). Metals, fragrances, topical antibiotics, preservatives, and individual allergens used in hair-care products, topical corticosteroids, glues, plastics, and rubber were still the most common allergen groups associated with allergic patch test reactions. CONCLUSIONS We describe the structure of the patch testing service at our referral center. Ongoing analysis of our patch test reaction rates allows us to recommend broad, clinically relevant, and up-to-date allergens for testing.Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(1):67-72--></description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-987X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-3652</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/archdermatol.2007.2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18209170</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARDEAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Academic Medical Centers ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Age Distribution ; Aged ; Allergens ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Cohort Studies ; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - diagnosis ; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - epidemiology ; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - immunology ; Dermatology ; Female ; Forecasting ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Patch Tests - standards ; Patch Tests - trends ; Probability ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Severity of Illness Index ; Sex Distribution</subject><ispartof>Archives of dermatology (1960), 2008-01, Vol.144 (1), p.67-72</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamadermatology/articlepdf/10.1001/archdermatol.2007.2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamadermatology/fullarticle/10.1001/archdermatol.2007.2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,314,780,784,3340,4024,27923,27924,27925,76489,76492</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20009934$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18209170$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, Mark D. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scalf, Leigh Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yiannias, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Janet F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>el-Azhary, Rokea A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohlinger, Audrey L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farmer, Sara A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fett, Debra D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Janis S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linehan, Diane L. Nordberg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Donna M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeter, Arnold L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Suzanne M</creatorcontrib><title>Changing Trends and Allergens in the Patch Test Standard Series: A Mayo Clinic 5-Year Retrospective Review, January 1, 2001, Through December 31, 2005</title><title>Archives of dermatology (1960)</title><addtitle>Arch Dermatol</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE To present and interpret results of patch testing with the Mayo Clinic standard series over 5 years. DESIGN Retrospective study. A standardized patch testing technique was used. Data were recorded on a standardized computer program from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2005, and analyzed. SETTING Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS Patients who were referred for patch testing. INTERVENTION Patch testing with the “standard series,” ie, a standard series of allergens used by most clinicians to identify the most common offending allergens in patients with allergic contact dermatitis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Number of patients patch tested, allergens used over this period, and rates of allergic patch test reactions to allergens. RESULTS A total of 3854 patients (mean age, 55.1 years; age range, 6.2-99.4 years; 2576 female [66.8%]) were tested. All dermatologists in the department performed patch testing. The mean number of allergens included was 69.3 (range, 6-87). There were 2664 patients with at least 1 positive reaction (69.1%) and 1933 with 2 or more positive reactions (50.2%). Metals, fragrances, topical antibiotics, preservatives, and individual allergens used in hair-care products, topical corticosteroids, glues, plastics, and rubber were still the most common allergen groups associated with allergic patch test reactions. CONCLUSIONS We describe the structure of the patch testing service at our referral center. Ongoing analysis of our patch test reaction rates allows us to recommend broad, clinically relevant, and up-to-date allergens for testing.Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(1):67-72--></description><subject>Academic Medical Centers</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Distribution</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Allergens</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - diagnosis</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - epidemiology</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - immunology</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Patch Tests - standards</subject><subject>Patch Tests - trends</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Sex Distribution</subject><issn>0003-987X</issn><issn>1538-3652</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkd1u1DAQhS0EotvCAyAk5Bt61Sz-TWLuVsu_ikB0keAqmtizG6PEWeykqC_C8-JqV4U7bjyy5jvHnjmEPOVsyRnjLyDazmEcYBr7pWCsWop7ZMG1rAtZanGfLBhjsjB19e2EnKb0I4tEXYuH5ITXghlesQX5ve4g7HzY0U3E4BKF4Oiq7zHuMCTqA506pJ9hsh3dYJro1ZQJiI5eYfSYXtIV_Qg3I133PnhLdfEdIdIvOMUx7dFO_hrz7drjrwv6AcIM8YbyC5r_m89NF8d519FXaHFoMVJ5aOlH5MEW-oSPj_WMfH3zerN-V1x-evt-vbosQKhqKpSyRokyl0o6QC4dq7mtndW21KhMWztRCaesAO5aKaRu80t5e7ZWgmkuz8j5wXcfx59znq8ZfLLY9xBwnFNTMSFYqeV_wexmlOYmg_IA2ryAFHHb7KMf8tQNZ81tbs2_uTW3uTUiq54d7ed2QPdXcwwqA8-PACQL_TZCsD7dcdmGGSNV5p4cOBjgrqu4EaaUfwDFwalo</recordid><startdate>20080101</startdate><enddate>20080101</enddate><creator>Davis, Mark D. P</creator><creator>Scalf, Leigh Ann</creator><creator>Yiannias, James A</creator><creator>Cheng, Janet F</creator><creator>el-Azhary, Rokea A</creator><creator>Rohlinger, Audrey L</creator><creator>Farmer, Sara A</creator><creator>Fett, Debra D</creator><creator>Johnson, Janis S</creator><creator>Linehan, Diane L. Nordberg</creator><creator>Richardson, Donna M</creator><creator>Schroeter, Arnold L</creator><creator>Connolly, Suzanne M</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080101</creationdate><title>Changing Trends and Allergens in the Patch Test Standard Series: A Mayo Clinic 5-Year Retrospective Review, January 1, 2001, Through December 31, 2005</title><author>Davis, Mark D. P ; Scalf, Leigh Ann ; Yiannias, James A ; Cheng, Janet F ; el-Azhary, Rokea A ; Rohlinger, Audrey L ; Farmer, Sara A ; Fett, Debra D ; Johnson, Janis S ; Linehan, Diane L. Nordberg ; Richardson, Donna M ; Schroeter, Arnold L ; Connolly, Suzanne M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a247t-44c942644c73dae13d081c8dc5c65e49b8d272d4c2a1db3235bece100c8420513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Academic Medical Centers</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Distribution</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Allergens</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - diagnosis</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - epidemiology</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - immunology</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Patch Tests - standards</topic><topic>Patch Tests - trends</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Sex Distribution</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, Mark D. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scalf, Leigh Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yiannias, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Janet F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>el-Azhary, Rokea A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohlinger, Audrey L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farmer, Sara A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fett, Debra D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Janis S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linehan, Diane L. Nordberg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Donna M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeter, Arnold L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Suzanne M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of dermatology (1960)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, Mark D. P</au><au>Scalf, Leigh Ann</au><au>Yiannias, James A</au><au>Cheng, Janet F</au><au>el-Azhary, Rokea A</au><au>Rohlinger, Audrey L</au><au>Farmer, Sara A</au><au>Fett, Debra D</au><au>Johnson, Janis S</au><au>Linehan, Diane L. Nordberg</au><au>Richardson, Donna M</au><au>Schroeter, Arnold L</au><au>Connolly, Suzanne M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Changing Trends and Allergens in the Patch Test Standard Series: A Mayo Clinic 5-Year Retrospective Review, January 1, 2001, Through December 31, 2005</atitle><jtitle>Archives of dermatology (1960)</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Dermatol</addtitle><date>2008-01-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>144</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>67</spage><epage>72</epage><pages>67-72</pages><issn>0003-987X</issn><eissn>1538-3652</eissn><coden>ARDEAC</coden><abstract>OBJECTIVE To present and interpret results of patch testing with the Mayo Clinic standard series over 5 years. DESIGN Retrospective study. A standardized patch testing technique was used. Data were recorded on a standardized computer program from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2005, and analyzed. SETTING Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS Patients who were referred for patch testing. INTERVENTION Patch testing with the “standard series,” ie, a standard series of allergens used by most clinicians to identify the most common offending allergens in patients with allergic contact dermatitis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Number of patients patch tested, allergens used over this period, and rates of allergic patch test reactions to allergens. RESULTS A total of 3854 patients (mean age, 55.1 years; age range, 6.2-99.4 years; 2576 female [66.8%]) were tested. All dermatologists in the department performed patch testing. The mean number of allergens included was 69.3 (range, 6-87). There were 2664 patients with at least 1 positive reaction (69.1%) and 1933 with 2 or more positive reactions (50.2%). Metals, fragrances, topical antibiotics, preservatives, and individual allergens used in hair-care products, topical corticosteroids, glues, plastics, and rubber were still the most common allergen groups associated with allergic patch test reactions. CONCLUSIONS We describe the structure of the patch testing service at our referral center. Ongoing analysis of our patch test reaction rates allows us to recommend broad, clinically relevant, and up-to-date allergens for testing.Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(1):67-72--></abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>18209170</pmid><doi>10.1001/archdermatol.2007.2</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-987X |
ispartof | Archives of dermatology (1960), 2008-01, Vol.144 (1), p.67-72 |
issn | 0003-987X 1538-3652 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70220653 |
source | MEDLINE; American Medical Association Journals |
subjects | Academic Medical Centers Adolescent Adult Age Distribution Aged Allergens Biological and medical sciences Child Cohort Studies Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - diagnosis Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - epidemiology Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - immunology Dermatology Female Forecasting Humans Incidence Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Multivariate Analysis Patch Tests - standards Patch Tests - trends Probability Retrospective Studies Risk Factors Sensitivity and Specificity Severity of Illness Index Sex Distribution |
title | Changing Trends and Allergens in the Patch Test Standard Series: A Mayo Clinic 5-Year Retrospective Review, January 1, 2001, Through December 31, 2005 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T03%3A18%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changing%20Trends%20and%20Allergens%20in%20the%20Patch%20Test%20Standard%20Series:%20A%20Mayo%20Clinic%205-Year%20Retrospective%20Review,%20January%201,%202001,%20Through%20December%2031,%202005&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20dermatology%20(1960)&rft.au=Davis,%20Mark%20D.%20P&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.volume=144&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=67&rft.epage=72&rft.pages=67-72&rft.issn=0003-987X&rft.eissn=1538-3652&rft.coden=ARDEAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/archdermatol.2007.2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70220653%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20594519&rft_id=info:pmid/18209170&rft_ama_id=419296&rfr_iscdi=true |