The last 11 years of Molteno implantation at the University of Cape Town. Refining our indications and surgical technique

Aims To analyse outcomes, factors influencing surgical success, and surgical technique of Molteno implantation over the past 11 years in order to identify ways of improving long-term control. Methods Retrospective interventional review of case records of all consecutive patients undergoing Molteno i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Eye (London) 2008-01, Vol.22 (1), p.18-25
Hauptverfasser: Woodcock, M G L, Richards, J C, Murray, A D N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 25
container_issue 1
container_start_page 18
container_title Eye (London)
container_volume 22
creator Woodcock, M G L
Richards, J C
Murray, A D N
description Aims To analyse outcomes, factors influencing surgical success, and surgical technique of Molteno implantation over the past 11 years in order to identify ways of improving long-term control. Methods Retrospective interventional review of case records of all consecutive patients undergoing Molteno implantation at Groote Schuur Hospital between 1/1/1991 and 31/12/2002. Data were recorded on an MSAccess™ database and processed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves and life table analysis. Results We analysed 162 consecutive single-phase Molteno tube implantation procedures on 157 eyes of 148 patients with mean follow-up of 2.9 years. Intraocular pressure (IOP) dropped from a mean of 43.3 at booking to 19.1 at final follow-up. Overall ‘complete success’ was achieved in 30% and ‘partial success’ in 16%. A high preoperative IOP was a significant predictor of a high postoperative pressure. Pseudophakic patients had significantly better postoperative pressure control. Neovascular glaucoma was a risk factor for poor pressure control. Race, gender, previous surgery, uveitis, and trauma did not influence surgical outcome. Follow-up adjusted incidence of 2.4 cases of endophthalmitis per patient year was unexpectedly high. Tubes that migrated had been secured with absorbable sutures in 4/5 cases. Conclusions In this study, high preoperative IOPs were probably a significant contributing factor to relatively poor postoperative pressure control. Addressing this issue may aid in improving outcomes in future surgery. The high postoperative pressure outcomes suggest that single plate Molteno implantation is not an ideal way of achieving low target pressure in third world glaucoma patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/sj.eye.6702473
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70215123</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70215123</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-b7e3009c29951e39a784db8dbc96423b3492a3ddcb2a4d99edd7c07326134b443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtr3DAUhUVpaKZpt921iEK7s6OXLWsZhvQBKYUyge6MLF1PNHjkqSQ3-N9Xk3ETKHQl0P3OuY-D0BtKSkp4cxl3JcxQ1pIwIfkztKJC1kUlKvEcrYiqSMEY-3mOXsa4IyQXJXmBzmktZdMwvkLz5g7woGPClOIZdIh47PG3cUjgR-z2h0H7pJMbPdYJpwzfevcbQnRpPpJrfQC8Ge99iX9A77zzWzxOATtvnXnQRay9xXEK2_wx4ATmzrtfE7xCZ70eIrxe3gt0--l6s_5S3Hz__HV9dVOYqmlS0UnghCjDlKoocKVlI2zX2M6oWjDecaGY5taajmlhlQJrpSGSs5py0QnBL9DHk-8hjLltTO3eRQNDXgzGKbb5crSijGfw_T_gLm_i82wtow1XKjfMUHmCTBhjDNC3h-D2OswtJe0xkTbu2pxIuySSBe8W16nbg33Clwgy8GEBdMwH6oP2xsVHjhHOM3nkLk9czCW_hfA03n9bvz0pvE5TgEfLv_U_v7KudQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218399964</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The last 11 years of Molteno implantation at the University of Cape Town. Refining our indications and surgical technique</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Woodcock, M G L ; Richards, J C ; Murray, A D N</creator><creatorcontrib>Woodcock, M G L ; Richards, J C ; Murray, A D N</creatorcontrib><description>Aims To analyse outcomes, factors influencing surgical success, and surgical technique of Molteno implantation over the past 11 years in order to identify ways of improving long-term control. Methods Retrospective interventional review of case records of all consecutive patients undergoing Molteno implantation at Groote Schuur Hospital between 1/1/1991 and 31/12/2002. Data were recorded on an MSAccess™ database and processed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves and life table analysis. Results We analysed 162 consecutive single-phase Molteno tube implantation procedures on 157 eyes of 148 patients with mean follow-up of 2.9 years. Intraocular pressure (IOP) dropped from a mean of 43.3 at booking to 19.1 at final follow-up. Overall ‘complete success’ was achieved in 30% and ‘partial success’ in 16%. A high preoperative IOP was a significant predictor of a high postoperative pressure. Pseudophakic patients had significantly better postoperative pressure control. Neovascular glaucoma was a risk factor for poor pressure control. Race, gender, previous surgery, uveitis, and trauma did not influence surgical outcome. Follow-up adjusted incidence of 2.4 cases of endophthalmitis per patient year was unexpectedly high. Tubes that migrated had been secured with absorbable sutures in 4/5 cases. Conclusions In this study, high preoperative IOPs were probably a significant contributing factor to relatively poor postoperative pressure control. Addressing this issue may aid in improving outcomes in future surgery. The high postoperative pressure outcomes suggest that single plate Molteno implantation is not an ideal way of achieving low target pressure in third world glaucoma patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-222X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5454</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702473</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16778823</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EYEEEC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; clinical-study ; Female ; Glaucoma - surgery ; Glaucoma and intraocular pressure ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure - physiology ; Laboratory Medicine ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Miscellaneous ; Molteno Implants - standards ; Ophthalmology ; Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology ; Prosthesis Design - standards ; Retrospective Studies ; South Africa ; Statistics as Topic ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology ; Treatment Outcome ; Visual Acuity</subject><ispartof>Eye (London), 2008-01, Vol.22 (1), p.18-25</ispartof><rights>Royal College of Ophthalmologists 2008</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Jan 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-b7e3009c29951e39a784db8dbc96423b3492a3ddcb2a4d99edd7c07326134b443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-b7e3009c29951e39a784db8dbc96423b3492a3ddcb2a4d99edd7c07326134b443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/sj.eye.6702473$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/sj.eye.6702473$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20337783$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16778823$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Woodcock, M G L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, A D N</creatorcontrib><title>The last 11 years of Molteno implantation at the University of Cape Town. Refining our indications and surgical technique</title><title>Eye (London)</title><addtitle>Eye</addtitle><addtitle>Eye (Lond)</addtitle><description>Aims To analyse outcomes, factors influencing surgical success, and surgical technique of Molteno implantation over the past 11 years in order to identify ways of improving long-term control. Methods Retrospective interventional review of case records of all consecutive patients undergoing Molteno implantation at Groote Schuur Hospital between 1/1/1991 and 31/12/2002. Data were recorded on an MSAccess™ database and processed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves and life table analysis. Results We analysed 162 consecutive single-phase Molteno tube implantation procedures on 157 eyes of 148 patients with mean follow-up of 2.9 years. Intraocular pressure (IOP) dropped from a mean of 43.3 at booking to 19.1 at final follow-up. Overall ‘complete success’ was achieved in 30% and ‘partial success’ in 16%. A high preoperative IOP was a significant predictor of a high postoperative pressure. Pseudophakic patients had significantly better postoperative pressure control. Neovascular glaucoma was a risk factor for poor pressure control. Race, gender, previous surgery, uveitis, and trauma did not influence surgical outcome. Follow-up adjusted incidence of 2.4 cases of endophthalmitis per patient year was unexpectedly high. Tubes that migrated had been secured with absorbable sutures in 4/5 cases. Conclusions In this study, high preoperative IOPs were probably a significant contributing factor to relatively poor postoperative pressure control. Addressing this issue may aid in improving outcomes in future surgery. The high postoperative pressure outcomes suggest that single plate Molteno implantation is not an ideal way of achieving low target pressure in third world glaucoma patients.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>clinical-study</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glaucoma - surgery</subject><subject>Glaucoma and intraocular pressure</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraocular Pressure - physiology</subject><subject>Laboratory Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Molteno Implants - standards</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design - standards</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>South Africa</subject><subject>Statistics as Topic</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><issn>0950-222X</issn><issn>1476-5454</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtr3DAUhUVpaKZpt921iEK7s6OXLWsZhvQBKYUyge6MLF1PNHjkqSQ3-N9Xk3ETKHQl0P3OuY-D0BtKSkp4cxl3JcxQ1pIwIfkztKJC1kUlKvEcrYiqSMEY-3mOXsa4IyQXJXmBzmktZdMwvkLz5g7woGPClOIZdIh47PG3cUjgR-z2h0H7pJMbPdYJpwzfevcbQnRpPpJrfQC8Ge99iX9A77zzWzxOATtvnXnQRay9xXEK2_wx4ATmzrtfE7xCZ70eIrxe3gt0--l6s_5S3Hz__HV9dVOYqmlS0UnghCjDlKoocKVlI2zX2M6oWjDecaGY5taajmlhlQJrpSGSs5py0QnBL9DHk-8hjLltTO3eRQNDXgzGKbb5crSijGfw_T_gLm_i82wtow1XKjfMUHmCTBhjDNC3h-D2OswtJe0xkTbu2pxIuySSBe8W16nbg33Clwgy8GEBdMwH6oP2xsVHjhHOM3nkLk9czCW_hfA03n9bvz0pvE5TgEfLv_U_v7KudQ</recordid><startdate>20080101</startdate><enddate>20080101</enddate><creator>Woodcock, M G L</creator><creator>Richards, J C</creator><creator>Murray, A D N</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080101</creationdate><title>The last 11 years of Molteno implantation at the University of Cape Town. Refining our indications and surgical technique</title><author>Woodcock, M G L ; Richards, J C ; Murray, A D N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-b7e3009c29951e39a784db8dbc96423b3492a3ddcb2a4d99edd7c07326134b443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>clinical-study</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glaucoma - surgery</topic><topic>Glaucoma and intraocular pressure</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraocular Pressure - physiology</topic><topic>Laboratory Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Molteno Implants - standards</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design - standards</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>South Africa</topic><topic>Statistics as Topic</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Woodcock, M G L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, A D N</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Eye (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Woodcock, M G L</au><au>Richards, J C</au><au>Murray, A D N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The last 11 years of Molteno implantation at the University of Cape Town. Refining our indications and surgical technique</atitle><jtitle>Eye (London)</jtitle><stitle>Eye</stitle><addtitle>Eye (Lond)</addtitle><date>2008-01-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>18</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>18-25</pages><issn>0950-222X</issn><eissn>1476-5454</eissn><coden>EYEEEC</coden><abstract>Aims To analyse outcomes, factors influencing surgical success, and surgical technique of Molteno implantation over the past 11 years in order to identify ways of improving long-term control. Methods Retrospective interventional review of case records of all consecutive patients undergoing Molteno implantation at Groote Schuur Hospital between 1/1/1991 and 31/12/2002. Data were recorded on an MSAccess™ database and processed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves and life table analysis. Results We analysed 162 consecutive single-phase Molteno tube implantation procedures on 157 eyes of 148 patients with mean follow-up of 2.9 years. Intraocular pressure (IOP) dropped from a mean of 43.3 at booking to 19.1 at final follow-up. Overall ‘complete success’ was achieved in 30% and ‘partial success’ in 16%. A high preoperative IOP was a significant predictor of a high postoperative pressure. Pseudophakic patients had significantly better postoperative pressure control. Neovascular glaucoma was a risk factor for poor pressure control. Race, gender, previous surgery, uveitis, and trauma did not influence surgical outcome. Follow-up adjusted incidence of 2.4 cases of endophthalmitis per patient year was unexpectedly high. Tubes that migrated had been secured with absorbable sutures in 4/5 cases. Conclusions In this study, high preoperative IOPs were probably a significant contributing factor to relatively poor postoperative pressure control. Addressing this issue may aid in improving outcomes in future surgery. The high postoperative pressure outcomes suggest that single plate Molteno implantation is not an ideal way of achieving low target pressure in third world glaucoma patients.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>16778823</pmid><doi>10.1038/sj.eye.6702473</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0950-222X
ispartof Eye (London), 2008-01, Vol.22 (1), p.18-25
issn 0950-222X
1476-5454
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70215123
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Biological and medical sciences
clinical-study
Female
Glaucoma - surgery
Glaucoma and intraocular pressure
Humans
Intraocular Pressure - physiology
Laboratory Medicine
Male
Medical sciences
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Miscellaneous
Molteno Implants - standards
Ophthalmology
Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology
Prosthesis Design - standards
Retrospective Studies
South Africa
Statistics as Topic
Surgery
Surgical Oncology
Treatment Outcome
Visual Acuity
title The last 11 years of Molteno implantation at the University of Cape Town. Refining our indications and surgical technique
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A43%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20last%2011%20years%20of%20Molteno%20implantation%20at%20the%20University%20of%20Cape%20Town.%20Refining%20our%20indications%20and%20surgical%20technique&rft.jtitle=Eye%20(London)&rft.au=Woodcock,%20M%20G%20L&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=18-25&rft.issn=0950-222X&rft.eissn=1476-5454&rft.coden=EYEEEC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/sj.eye.6702473&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70215123%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218399964&rft_id=info:pmid/16778823&rfr_iscdi=true