Diagnosis of Gallbladder Diseases by Contrast-Enhanced Phase-Inversion Harmonic Ultrasonography

Abstract We evaluated the usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography(US) for detecting and differentiating gallbladder lesions. Contrast-enhanced coded phase-inversion harmonic US was performed on 90 patients with gallbladder abnormalities. After administering Levovist®, we observed the gallbla...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ultrasound in medicine & biology 2007-03, Vol.33 (3), p.353-361
Hauptverfasser: Inoue, Tatsuo, Kitano, Masayuki, Kudo, Masatoshi, Sakamoto, Hiroki, Kawasaki, Toshihiko, Yasuda, Chikao, Maekawa, Kiyoshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 361
container_issue 3
container_start_page 353
container_title Ultrasound in medicine & biology
container_volume 33
creator Inoue, Tatsuo
Kitano, Masayuki
Kudo, Masatoshi
Sakamoto, Hiroki
Kawasaki, Toshihiko
Yasuda, Chikao
Maekawa, Kiyoshi
description Abstract We evaluated the usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography(US) for detecting and differentiating gallbladder lesions. Contrast-enhanced coded phase-inversion harmonic US was performed on 90 patients with gallbladder abnormalities. After administering Levovist®, we observed the gallbladders in real time. Contrast-enhanced coded phase-inversion harmonic ultrasonography was compared with B-mode US and contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CT) with regard to the sensitivity and specificity in depicting the elevated gallbladder lesions. Furthermore, we assessed how the vascular patterns of the elevated gallbladder lesions depicted by contrast-enhanced US correlated with the diagnosis. Contrast-enhanced US efficiently discriminated true lesions from biliary sludge, unlike B-mode US. Consequently, contrast-enhanced US was more specific (100%) than B-mode US (81%), although their sensitivities were similar (98% and 96%, respectively). Contrast-enhanced US was also more sensitive that contrast-enhanced CT (98% versus 79%), although the two methods were equally sensitive (100% versus 95%). We classified the vascular patterns of the abnormalities depicted by contrast-enhanced US in the 90 cases into types 1 to 4, which represent branch-like, heterogeneous, homogeneous, and avascular patterns, respectively. All type 1 and 2 lesions were over 10 mm in size while most (88%) type 3 lesions were 10 mm or less in size. While the majority of carcinomas (86%) were type 1 or 2, three benign lesions also showed these patterns. Thus, the vascular pattern may simply reflect the size of the lesion and therefore its usefulness in diagnosing gallbladder lesions may be limited. Nevertheless, contrast-enhanced US is clearly superior to the other techniques in discriminating biliary sludge from other lesions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.09.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70212309</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0301562906018503</els_id><sourcerecordid>70212309</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-97a7da6081cafb8a60412f4ad72c6f571392a8ddd169ae0c14a22f7866cdcb313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUGLFDEQhYMo7rj6F6Tx4K3bSjKTdHsQZGbdXVhQ0AVvoTpJ72TMJGPSvTD_3rQzoHjylIJ69V7lK0LeUGgoUPFu10x-TJj31vQuNgxANNA1APwJWdBWdjXr6PenZAEcaL0SrLsgL3LeAYAUXD4nF1SyttRiQdTG4UOI2eUqDtU1et97NMamauOyxWxz1R-rdQxz4FhfhS0GbU31ZVt69W14tCm7GKobTPsYnK7uf68WQ3xIeNgeX5JnA_psX53fS3L_6erb-qa--3x9u_54V-sl52PdSZQGBbRU49C3pVpSNizRSKbFsJKUdwxbYwwVHVrQdImMDbIVQhvdc8ovyduT7yHFn5PNo9q7rK33GGycspLAKOPQFeH7k1CnmHOygzokt8d0VBTUjFft1N941YxXQacK3jL8-pwy9aX9Z_TMswg2J4Etf310NqmsnZ2JuWT1qEx0_5fz4R8b7V2hi_6HPdq8i1MKhaaiKjMF6ut86PnOIIC2q2LwCwmiqXM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70212309</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnosis of Gallbladder Diseases by Contrast-Enhanced Phase-Inversion Harmonic Ultrasonography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Inoue, Tatsuo ; Kitano, Masayuki ; Kudo, Masatoshi ; Sakamoto, Hiroki ; Kawasaki, Toshihiko ; Yasuda, Chikao ; Maekawa, Kiyoshi</creator><creatorcontrib>Inoue, Tatsuo ; Kitano, Masayuki ; Kudo, Masatoshi ; Sakamoto, Hiroki ; Kawasaki, Toshihiko ; Yasuda, Chikao ; Maekawa, Kiyoshi</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract We evaluated the usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography(US) for detecting and differentiating gallbladder lesions. Contrast-enhanced coded phase-inversion harmonic US was performed on 90 patients with gallbladder abnormalities. After administering Levovist®, we observed the gallbladders in real time. Contrast-enhanced coded phase-inversion harmonic ultrasonography was compared with B-mode US and contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CT) with regard to the sensitivity and specificity in depicting the elevated gallbladder lesions. Furthermore, we assessed how the vascular patterns of the elevated gallbladder lesions depicted by contrast-enhanced US correlated with the diagnosis. Contrast-enhanced US efficiently discriminated true lesions from biliary sludge, unlike B-mode US. Consequently, contrast-enhanced US was more specific (100%) than B-mode US (81%), although their sensitivities were similar (98% and 96%, respectively). Contrast-enhanced US was also more sensitive that contrast-enhanced CT (98% versus 79%), although the two methods were equally sensitive (100% versus 95%). We classified the vascular patterns of the abnormalities depicted by contrast-enhanced US in the 90 cases into types 1 to 4, which represent branch-like, heterogeneous, homogeneous, and avascular patterns, respectively. All type 1 and 2 lesions were over 10 mm in size while most (88%) type 3 lesions were 10 mm or less in size. While the majority of carcinomas (86%) were type 1 or 2, three benign lesions also showed these patterns. Thus, the vascular pattern may simply reflect the size of the lesion and therefore its usefulness in diagnosing gallbladder lesions may be limited. Nevertheless, contrast-enhanced US is clearly superior to the other techniques in discriminating biliary sludge from other lesions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-5629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-291X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.09.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17280766</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Contrast Media - administration &amp; dosage ; Contrast-enhanced US ; Differential diagnosis ; Female ; Gallbladder ; Gallbladder - blood supply ; Gallbladder - diagnostic imaging ; Gallbladder Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Gallbladder Neoplasms - blood supply ; Gallbladder Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Male ; Microbubbles ; Middle Aged ; Polyps - diagnostic imaging ; Polysaccharides - administration &amp; dosage ; Radiology ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Ultrasonography - methods</subject><ispartof>Ultrasound in medicine &amp; biology, 2007-03, Vol.33 (3), p.353-361</ispartof><rights>World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine &amp; Biology</rights><rights>2007 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine &amp; Biology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-97a7da6081cafb8a60412f4ad72c6f571392a8ddd169ae0c14a22f7866cdcb313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-97a7da6081cafb8a60412f4ad72c6f571392a8ddd169ae0c14a22f7866cdcb313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.09.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17280766$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Inoue, Tatsuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitano, Masayuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kudo, Masatoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawasaki, Toshihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasuda, Chikao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maekawa, Kiyoshi</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnosis of Gallbladder Diseases by Contrast-Enhanced Phase-Inversion Harmonic Ultrasonography</title><title>Ultrasound in medicine &amp; biology</title><addtitle>Ultrasound Med Biol</addtitle><description>Abstract We evaluated the usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography(US) for detecting and differentiating gallbladder lesions. Contrast-enhanced coded phase-inversion harmonic US was performed on 90 patients with gallbladder abnormalities. After administering Levovist®, we observed the gallbladders in real time. Contrast-enhanced coded phase-inversion harmonic ultrasonography was compared with B-mode US and contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CT) with regard to the sensitivity and specificity in depicting the elevated gallbladder lesions. Furthermore, we assessed how the vascular patterns of the elevated gallbladder lesions depicted by contrast-enhanced US correlated with the diagnosis. Contrast-enhanced US efficiently discriminated true lesions from biliary sludge, unlike B-mode US. Consequently, contrast-enhanced US was more specific (100%) than B-mode US (81%), although their sensitivities were similar (98% and 96%, respectively). Contrast-enhanced US was also more sensitive that contrast-enhanced CT (98% versus 79%), although the two methods were equally sensitive (100% versus 95%). We classified the vascular patterns of the abnormalities depicted by contrast-enhanced US in the 90 cases into types 1 to 4, which represent branch-like, heterogeneous, homogeneous, and avascular patterns, respectively. All type 1 and 2 lesions were over 10 mm in size while most (88%) type 3 lesions were 10 mm or less in size. While the majority of carcinomas (86%) were type 1 or 2, three benign lesions also showed these patterns. Thus, the vascular pattern may simply reflect the size of the lesion and therefore its usefulness in diagnosing gallbladder lesions may be limited. Nevertheless, contrast-enhanced US is clearly superior to the other techniques in discriminating biliary sludge from other lesions.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Contrast Media - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Contrast-enhanced US</subject><subject>Differential diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gallbladder</subject><subject>Gallbladder - blood supply</subject><subject>Gallbladder - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Gallbladder Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Gallbladder Neoplasms - blood supply</subject><subject>Gallbladder Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microbubbles</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Polyps - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Polysaccharides - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Ultrasonography - methods</subject><issn>0301-5629</issn><issn>1879-291X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUGLFDEQhYMo7rj6F6Tx4K3bSjKTdHsQZGbdXVhQ0AVvoTpJ72TMJGPSvTD_3rQzoHjylIJ69V7lK0LeUGgoUPFu10x-TJj31vQuNgxANNA1APwJWdBWdjXr6PenZAEcaL0SrLsgL3LeAYAUXD4nF1SyttRiQdTG4UOI2eUqDtU1et97NMamauOyxWxz1R-rdQxz4FhfhS0GbU31ZVt69W14tCm7GKobTPsYnK7uf68WQ3xIeNgeX5JnA_psX53fS3L_6erb-qa--3x9u_54V-sl52PdSZQGBbRU49C3pVpSNizRSKbFsJKUdwxbYwwVHVrQdImMDbIVQhvdc8ovyduT7yHFn5PNo9q7rK33GGycspLAKOPQFeH7k1CnmHOygzokt8d0VBTUjFft1N941YxXQacK3jL8-pwy9aX9Z_TMswg2J4Etf310NqmsnZ2JuWT1qEx0_5fz4R8b7V2hi_6HPdq8i1MKhaaiKjMF6ut86PnOIIC2q2LwCwmiqXM</recordid><startdate>20070301</startdate><enddate>20070301</enddate><creator>Inoue, Tatsuo</creator><creator>Kitano, Masayuki</creator><creator>Kudo, Masatoshi</creator><creator>Sakamoto, Hiroki</creator><creator>Kawasaki, Toshihiko</creator><creator>Yasuda, Chikao</creator><creator>Maekawa, Kiyoshi</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070301</creationdate><title>Diagnosis of Gallbladder Diseases by Contrast-Enhanced Phase-Inversion Harmonic Ultrasonography</title><author>Inoue, Tatsuo ; Kitano, Masayuki ; Kudo, Masatoshi ; Sakamoto, Hiroki ; Kawasaki, Toshihiko ; Yasuda, Chikao ; Maekawa, Kiyoshi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-97a7da6081cafb8a60412f4ad72c6f571392a8ddd169ae0c14a22f7866cdcb313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Contrast Media - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Contrast-enhanced US</topic><topic>Differential diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gallbladder</topic><topic>Gallbladder - blood supply</topic><topic>Gallbladder - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Gallbladder Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Gallbladder Neoplasms - blood supply</topic><topic>Gallbladder Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microbubbles</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Polyps - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Polysaccharides - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Ultrasonography - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Inoue, Tatsuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitano, Masayuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kudo, Masatoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawasaki, Toshihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasuda, Chikao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maekawa, Kiyoshi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ultrasound in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Inoue, Tatsuo</au><au>Kitano, Masayuki</au><au>Kudo, Masatoshi</au><au>Sakamoto, Hiroki</au><au>Kawasaki, Toshihiko</au><au>Yasuda, Chikao</au><au>Maekawa, Kiyoshi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnosis of Gallbladder Diseases by Contrast-Enhanced Phase-Inversion Harmonic Ultrasonography</atitle><jtitle>Ultrasound in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle><addtitle>Ultrasound Med Biol</addtitle><date>2007-03-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>353</spage><epage>361</epage><pages>353-361</pages><issn>0301-5629</issn><eissn>1879-291X</eissn><abstract>Abstract We evaluated the usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography(US) for detecting and differentiating gallbladder lesions. Contrast-enhanced coded phase-inversion harmonic US was performed on 90 patients with gallbladder abnormalities. After administering Levovist®, we observed the gallbladders in real time. Contrast-enhanced coded phase-inversion harmonic ultrasonography was compared with B-mode US and contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CT) with regard to the sensitivity and specificity in depicting the elevated gallbladder lesions. Furthermore, we assessed how the vascular patterns of the elevated gallbladder lesions depicted by contrast-enhanced US correlated with the diagnosis. Contrast-enhanced US efficiently discriminated true lesions from biliary sludge, unlike B-mode US. Consequently, contrast-enhanced US was more specific (100%) than B-mode US (81%), although their sensitivities were similar (98% and 96%, respectively). Contrast-enhanced US was also more sensitive that contrast-enhanced CT (98% versus 79%), although the two methods were equally sensitive (100% versus 95%). We classified the vascular patterns of the abnormalities depicted by contrast-enhanced US in the 90 cases into types 1 to 4, which represent branch-like, heterogeneous, homogeneous, and avascular patterns, respectively. All type 1 and 2 lesions were over 10 mm in size while most (88%) type 3 lesions were 10 mm or less in size. While the majority of carcinomas (86%) were type 1 or 2, three benign lesions also showed these patterns. Thus, the vascular pattern may simply reflect the size of the lesion and therefore its usefulness in diagnosing gallbladder lesions may be limited. Nevertheless, contrast-enhanced US is clearly superior to the other techniques in discriminating biliary sludge from other lesions.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>17280766</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.09.003</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-5629
ispartof Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2007-03, Vol.33 (3), p.353-361
issn 0301-5629
1879-291X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70212309
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Contrast Media - administration & dosage
Contrast-enhanced US
Differential diagnosis
Female
Gallbladder
Gallbladder - blood supply
Gallbladder - diagnostic imaging
Gallbladder Diseases - diagnostic imaging
Gallbladder Neoplasms - blood supply
Gallbladder Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Humans
Image Enhancement - methods
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
Male
Microbubbles
Middle Aged
Polyps - diagnostic imaging
Polysaccharides - administration & dosage
Radiology
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Ultrasonography - methods
title Diagnosis of Gallbladder Diseases by Contrast-Enhanced Phase-Inversion Harmonic Ultrasonography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T14%3A01%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnosis%20of%20Gallbladder%20Diseases%20by%20Contrast-Enhanced%20Phase-Inversion%20Harmonic%20Ultrasonography&rft.jtitle=Ultrasound%20in%20medicine%20&%20biology&rft.au=Inoue,%20Tatsuo&rft.date=2007-03-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=353&rft.epage=361&rft.pages=353-361&rft.issn=0301-5629&rft.eissn=1879-291X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.09.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70212309%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70212309&rft_id=info:pmid/17280766&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0301562906018503&rfr_iscdi=true