Back and Pelvic Pain in an Underserved United States Pregnant Population: A Preliminary Descriptive Survey
Abstract Objective The objective of this study was to identify the prevalence of back pain and treatment satisfaction in a population of low-socioeconomic pregnant women. Methods This study used a cross-sectional design to determine the prevalence of self-reported musculoskeletal pain in pregnancy f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics 2007-02, Vol.30 (2), p.130-134 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 134 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 130 |
container_title | Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Skaggs, Clayton D., DC Prather, Heidi, DO Gross, Gilad, MD George, James W., DC Thompson, Paul A., PhD Nelson, D. Michael, MD, PhD |
description | Abstract Objective The objective of this study was to identify the prevalence of back pain and treatment satisfaction in a population of low-socioeconomic pregnant women. Methods This study used a cross-sectional design to determine the prevalence of self-reported musculoskeletal pain in pregnancy for 599 women. Women completed an author-generated musculoskeletal survey in the second trimester of their pregnancy that addressed pain history, duration, location, and intensity, as well as activities of daily living, treatment frequency, and satisfaction with treatment. Results Sixty-seven percent of the total population reported musculoskeletal pain, and nearly half presented with a multi-focal pattern of pain that involved 2 or more sites. Twenty-one percent reported severe pain intensity rated on a numerical rating scale. Eighty percent of women experiencing pain slept less than 4 hours per night and 75% of these women took pain medications. Importantly, 85% of the women surveyed perceived that they had not been offered treatment for their musculoskeletal disorders. Conclusion Multi-focal musculoskeletal pain in pregnancy was prevalent in this underserved patient population. The pain in this population negatively affected sleep and treatment appeared inadequate. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.12.008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70209763</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0161475406003320</els_id><sourcerecordid>70209763</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-2a1607e856c87eae6c7dc83feedc1115ebc9226e2d189b5d349f4b8c39f1d5d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtr3DAUhUVpSSaPP9BF0ao7O3rYsh1CIUmTtBDowCRroZGuixxbdiV5YP59ZWag0EVAcIU453D0XYQ-U5JTQsVVl3fDFHNGiMgpywmpP6AVLTnLRFmLj2iVRDQrqrI4RWchdISQhjf1CTqlFWek4sUKdXdKv2HlDF5Dv7Mar5V1OB3l8Ksz4AP4HZh0tzGNTVQRAl57-O2Ui3g9TnOvoh3dNb5dnns7WKf8Hn-HoL2dot0B3swpY3-BPrWqD3B5nOfo9fHh5f5H9vzr6ef97XOmU9WYMUUFqaAuha4rUCB0ZXTNWwCjKaUlbHXDmABmaN1sS8OLpi22teZNS01pKD9HXw-5kx__zBCiHGzQ0PfKwTgHWRFGmkrwJGQHofZjCB5aOXk7pPKSErkQlp1cCMuFsKRMJsLJ9OWYPm8HMP8sR6RJcHMQQPrjzoKXQVtwGoz1oKM0o30__9t_dt1bZ7Xq32APoRtn7xI9SWVIBrlZdrysmAhCeKrA_wJFEqKt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70209763</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Back and Pelvic Pain in an Underserved United States Pregnant Population: A Preliminary Descriptive Survey</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Skaggs, Clayton D., DC ; Prather, Heidi, DO ; Gross, Gilad, MD ; George, James W., DC ; Thompson, Paul A., PhD ; Nelson, D. Michael, MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Skaggs, Clayton D., DC ; Prather, Heidi, DO ; Gross, Gilad, MD ; George, James W., DC ; Thompson, Paul A., PhD ; Nelson, D. Michael, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective The objective of this study was to identify the prevalence of back pain and treatment satisfaction in a population of low-socioeconomic pregnant women. Methods This study used a cross-sectional design to determine the prevalence of self-reported musculoskeletal pain in pregnancy for 599 women. Women completed an author-generated musculoskeletal survey in the second trimester of their pregnancy that addressed pain history, duration, location, and intensity, as well as activities of daily living, treatment frequency, and satisfaction with treatment. Results Sixty-seven percent of the total population reported musculoskeletal pain, and nearly half presented with a multi-focal pattern of pain that involved 2 or more sites. Twenty-one percent reported severe pain intensity rated on a numerical rating scale. Eighty percent of women experiencing pain slept less than 4 hours per night and 75% of these women took pain medications. Importantly, 85% of the women surveyed perceived that they had not been offered treatment for their musculoskeletal disorders. Conclusion Multi-focal musculoskeletal pain in pregnancy was prevalent in this underserved patient population. The pain in this population negatively affected sleep and treatment appeared inadequate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-4754</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.12.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17320734</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Analgesics - therapeutic use ; Back Pain - drug therapy ; Back Pain - epidemiology ; Comorbidity ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Health Surveys ; Humans ; Medically Underserved Area ; Missouri - epidemiology ; Parity ; Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data ; Pelvic Pain - drug therapy ; Pelvic Pain - epidemiology ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology ; Prevalence ; Recurrence ; Sleep Wake Disorders - epidemiology ; Socioeconomic Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics, 2007-02, Vol.30 (2), p.130-134</ispartof><rights>National University of Health Sciences</rights><rights>2007 National University of Health Sciences</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-2a1607e856c87eae6c7dc83feedc1115ebc9226e2d189b5d349f4b8c39f1d5d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-2a1607e856c87eae6c7dc83feedc1115ebc9226e2d189b5d349f4b8c39f1d5d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475406003320$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17320734$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Skaggs, Clayton D., DC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prather, Heidi, DO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, Gilad, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George, James W., DC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Paul A., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, D. Michael, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Back and Pelvic Pain in an Underserved United States Pregnant Population: A Preliminary Descriptive Survey</title><title>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics</title><addtitle>J Manipulative Physiol Ther</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective The objective of this study was to identify the prevalence of back pain and treatment satisfaction in a population of low-socioeconomic pregnant women. Methods This study used a cross-sectional design to determine the prevalence of self-reported musculoskeletal pain in pregnancy for 599 women. Women completed an author-generated musculoskeletal survey in the second trimester of their pregnancy that addressed pain history, duration, location, and intensity, as well as activities of daily living, treatment frequency, and satisfaction with treatment. Results Sixty-seven percent of the total population reported musculoskeletal pain, and nearly half presented with a multi-focal pattern of pain that involved 2 or more sites. Twenty-one percent reported severe pain intensity rated on a numerical rating scale. Eighty percent of women experiencing pain slept less than 4 hours per night and 75% of these women took pain medications. Importantly, 85% of the women surveyed perceived that they had not been offered treatment for their musculoskeletal disorders. Conclusion Multi-focal musculoskeletal pain in pregnancy was prevalent in this underserved patient population. The pain in this population negatively affected sleep and treatment appeared inadequate.</description><subject>Analgesics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Back Pain - drug therapy</subject><subject>Back Pain - epidemiology</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medically Underserved Area</subject><subject>Missouri - epidemiology</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Pelvic Pain - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pelvic Pain - epidemiology</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Sleep Wake Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><issn>0161-4754</issn><issn>1532-6586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtr3DAUhUVpSSaPP9BF0ao7O3rYsh1CIUmTtBDowCRroZGuixxbdiV5YP59ZWag0EVAcIU453D0XYQ-U5JTQsVVl3fDFHNGiMgpywmpP6AVLTnLRFmLj2iVRDQrqrI4RWchdISQhjf1CTqlFWek4sUKdXdKv2HlDF5Dv7Mar5V1OB3l8Ksz4AP4HZh0tzGNTVQRAl57-O2Ui3g9TnOvoh3dNb5dnns7WKf8Hn-HoL2dot0B3swpY3-BPrWqD3B5nOfo9fHh5f5H9vzr6ef97XOmU9WYMUUFqaAuha4rUCB0ZXTNWwCjKaUlbHXDmABmaN1sS8OLpi22teZNS01pKD9HXw-5kx__zBCiHGzQ0PfKwTgHWRFGmkrwJGQHofZjCB5aOXk7pPKSErkQlp1cCMuFsKRMJsLJ9OWYPm8HMP8sR6RJcHMQQPrjzoKXQVtwGoz1oKM0o30__9t_dt1bZ7Xq32APoRtn7xI9SWVIBrlZdrysmAhCeKrA_wJFEqKt</recordid><startdate>20070201</startdate><enddate>20070201</enddate><creator>Skaggs, Clayton D., DC</creator><creator>Prather, Heidi, DO</creator><creator>Gross, Gilad, MD</creator><creator>George, James W., DC</creator><creator>Thompson, Paul A., PhD</creator><creator>Nelson, D. Michael, MD, PhD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070201</creationdate><title>Back and Pelvic Pain in an Underserved United States Pregnant Population: A Preliminary Descriptive Survey</title><author>Skaggs, Clayton D., DC ; Prather, Heidi, DO ; Gross, Gilad, MD ; George, James W., DC ; Thompson, Paul A., PhD ; Nelson, D. Michael, MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-2a1607e856c87eae6c7dc83feedc1115ebc9226e2d189b5d349f4b8c39f1d5d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Analgesics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Back Pain - drug therapy</topic><topic>Back Pain - epidemiology</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medically Underserved Area</topic><topic>Missouri - epidemiology</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Pelvic Pain - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pelvic Pain - epidemiology</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Sleep Wake Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Skaggs, Clayton D., DC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prather, Heidi, DO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, Gilad, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George, James W., DC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Paul A., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, D. Michael, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Skaggs, Clayton D., DC</au><au>Prather, Heidi, DO</au><au>Gross, Gilad, MD</au><au>George, James W., DC</au><au>Thompson, Paul A., PhD</au><au>Nelson, D. Michael, MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Back and Pelvic Pain in an Underserved United States Pregnant Population: A Preliminary Descriptive Survey</atitle><jtitle>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>J Manipulative Physiol Ther</addtitle><date>2007-02-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>130</spage><epage>134</epage><pages>130-134</pages><issn>0161-4754</issn><eissn>1532-6586</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective The objective of this study was to identify the prevalence of back pain and treatment satisfaction in a population of low-socioeconomic pregnant women. Methods This study used a cross-sectional design to determine the prevalence of self-reported musculoskeletal pain in pregnancy for 599 women. Women completed an author-generated musculoskeletal survey in the second trimester of their pregnancy that addressed pain history, duration, location, and intensity, as well as activities of daily living, treatment frequency, and satisfaction with treatment. Results Sixty-seven percent of the total population reported musculoskeletal pain, and nearly half presented with a multi-focal pattern of pain that involved 2 or more sites. Twenty-one percent reported severe pain intensity rated on a numerical rating scale. Eighty percent of women experiencing pain slept less than 4 hours per night and 75% of these women took pain medications. Importantly, 85% of the women surveyed perceived that they had not been offered treatment for their musculoskeletal disorders. Conclusion Multi-focal musculoskeletal pain in pregnancy was prevalent in this underserved patient population. The pain in this population negatively affected sleep and treatment appeared inadequate.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>17320734</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.12.008</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0161-4754 |
ispartof | Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics, 2007-02, Vol.30 (2), p.130-134 |
issn | 0161-4754 1532-6586 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70209763 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Analgesics - therapeutic use Back Pain - drug therapy Back Pain - epidemiology Comorbidity Cross-Sectional Studies Female Health Surveys Humans Medically Underserved Area Missouri - epidemiology Parity Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data Pelvic Pain - drug therapy Pelvic Pain - epidemiology Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Pregnancy Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology Prevalence Recurrence Sleep Wake Disorders - epidemiology Socioeconomic Factors |
title | Back and Pelvic Pain in an Underserved United States Pregnant Population: A Preliminary Descriptive Survey |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T20%3A33%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Back%20and%20Pelvic%20Pain%20in%20an%20Underserved%20United%20States%20Pregnant%20Population:%20A%20Preliminary%20Descriptive%20Survey&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20manipulative%20and%20physiological%20therapeutics&rft.au=Skaggs,%20Clayton%20D.,%20DC&rft.date=2007-02-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=130&rft.epage=134&rft.pages=130-134&rft.issn=0161-4754&rft.eissn=1532-6586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.12.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70209763%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70209763&rft_id=info:pmid/17320734&rft_els_id=S0161475406003320&rfr_iscdi=true |