Back and Pelvic Pain in an Underserved United States Pregnant Population: A Preliminary Descriptive Survey

Abstract Objective The objective of this study was to identify the prevalence of back pain and treatment satisfaction in a population of low-socioeconomic pregnant women. Methods This study used a cross-sectional design to determine the prevalence of self-reported musculoskeletal pain in pregnancy f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics 2007-02, Vol.30 (2), p.130-134
Hauptverfasser: Skaggs, Clayton D., DC, Prather, Heidi, DO, Gross, Gilad, MD, George, James W., DC, Thompson, Paul A., PhD, Nelson, D. Michael, MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 134
container_issue 2
container_start_page 130
container_title Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics
container_volume 30
creator Skaggs, Clayton D., DC
Prather, Heidi, DO
Gross, Gilad, MD
George, James W., DC
Thompson, Paul A., PhD
Nelson, D. Michael, MD, PhD
description Abstract Objective The objective of this study was to identify the prevalence of back pain and treatment satisfaction in a population of low-socioeconomic pregnant women. Methods This study used a cross-sectional design to determine the prevalence of self-reported musculoskeletal pain in pregnancy for 599 women. Women completed an author-generated musculoskeletal survey in the second trimester of their pregnancy that addressed pain history, duration, location, and intensity, as well as activities of daily living, treatment frequency, and satisfaction with treatment. Results Sixty-seven percent of the total population reported musculoskeletal pain, and nearly half presented with a multi-focal pattern of pain that involved 2 or more sites. Twenty-one percent reported severe pain intensity rated on a numerical rating scale. Eighty percent of women experiencing pain slept less than 4 hours per night and 75% of these women took pain medications. Importantly, 85% of the women surveyed perceived that they had not been offered treatment for their musculoskeletal disorders. Conclusion Multi-focal musculoskeletal pain in pregnancy was prevalent in this underserved patient population. The pain in this population negatively affected sleep and treatment appeared inadequate.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.12.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70209763</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0161475406003320</els_id><sourcerecordid>70209763</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-2a1607e856c87eae6c7dc83feedc1115ebc9226e2d189b5d349f4b8c39f1d5d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtr3DAUhUVpSSaPP9BF0ao7O3rYsh1CIUmTtBDowCRroZGuixxbdiV5YP59ZWag0EVAcIU453D0XYQ-U5JTQsVVl3fDFHNGiMgpywmpP6AVLTnLRFmLj2iVRDQrqrI4RWchdISQhjf1CTqlFWek4sUKdXdKv2HlDF5Dv7Mar5V1OB3l8Ksz4AP4HZh0tzGNTVQRAl57-O2Ui3g9TnOvoh3dNb5dnns7WKf8Hn-HoL2dot0B3swpY3-BPrWqD3B5nOfo9fHh5f5H9vzr6ef97XOmU9WYMUUFqaAuha4rUCB0ZXTNWwCjKaUlbHXDmABmaN1sS8OLpi22teZNS01pKD9HXw-5kx__zBCiHGzQ0PfKwTgHWRFGmkrwJGQHofZjCB5aOXk7pPKSErkQlp1cCMuFsKRMJsLJ9OWYPm8HMP8sR6RJcHMQQPrjzoKXQVtwGoz1oKM0o30__9t_dt1bZ7Xq32APoRtn7xI9SWVIBrlZdrysmAhCeKrA_wJFEqKt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70209763</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Back and Pelvic Pain in an Underserved United States Pregnant Population: A Preliminary Descriptive Survey</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Skaggs, Clayton D., DC ; Prather, Heidi, DO ; Gross, Gilad, MD ; George, James W., DC ; Thompson, Paul A., PhD ; Nelson, D. Michael, MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Skaggs, Clayton D., DC ; Prather, Heidi, DO ; Gross, Gilad, MD ; George, James W., DC ; Thompson, Paul A., PhD ; Nelson, D. Michael, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective The objective of this study was to identify the prevalence of back pain and treatment satisfaction in a population of low-socioeconomic pregnant women. Methods This study used a cross-sectional design to determine the prevalence of self-reported musculoskeletal pain in pregnancy for 599 women. Women completed an author-generated musculoskeletal survey in the second trimester of their pregnancy that addressed pain history, duration, location, and intensity, as well as activities of daily living, treatment frequency, and satisfaction with treatment. Results Sixty-seven percent of the total population reported musculoskeletal pain, and nearly half presented with a multi-focal pattern of pain that involved 2 or more sites. Twenty-one percent reported severe pain intensity rated on a numerical rating scale. Eighty percent of women experiencing pain slept less than 4 hours per night and 75% of these women took pain medications. Importantly, 85% of the women surveyed perceived that they had not been offered treatment for their musculoskeletal disorders. Conclusion Multi-focal musculoskeletal pain in pregnancy was prevalent in this underserved patient population. The pain in this population negatively affected sleep and treatment appeared inadequate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-4754</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.12.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17320734</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Analgesics - therapeutic use ; Back Pain - drug therapy ; Back Pain - epidemiology ; Comorbidity ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Health Surveys ; Humans ; Medically Underserved Area ; Missouri - epidemiology ; Parity ; Patient Satisfaction - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Pelvic Pain - drug therapy ; Pelvic Pain - epidemiology ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology ; Prevalence ; Recurrence ; Sleep Wake Disorders - epidemiology ; Socioeconomic Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics, 2007-02, Vol.30 (2), p.130-134</ispartof><rights>National University of Health Sciences</rights><rights>2007 National University of Health Sciences</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-2a1607e856c87eae6c7dc83feedc1115ebc9226e2d189b5d349f4b8c39f1d5d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-2a1607e856c87eae6c7dc83feedc1115ebc9226e2d189b5d349f4b8c39f1d5d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475406003320$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17320734$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Skaggs, Clayton D., DC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prather, Heidi, DO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, Gilad, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George, James W., DC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Paul A., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, D. Michael, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Back and Pelvic Pain in an Underserved United States Pregnant Population: A Preliminary Descriptive Survey</title><title>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics</title><addtitle>J Manipulative Physiol Ther</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective The objective of this study was to identify the prevalence of back pain and treatment satisfaction in a population of low-socioeconomic pregnant women. Methods This study used a cross-sectional design to determine the prevalence of self-reported musculoskeletal pain in pregnancy for 599 women. Women completed an author-generated musculoskeletal survey in the second trimester of their pregnancy that addressed pain history, duration, location, and intensity, as well as activities of daily living, treatment frequency, and satisfaction with treatment. Results Sixty-seven percent of the total population reported musculoskeletal pain, and nearly half presented with a multi-focal pattern of pain that involved 2 or more sites. Twenty-one percent reported severe pain intensity rated on a numerical rating scale. Eighty percent of women experiencing pain slept less than 4 hours per night and 75% of these women took pain medications. Importantly, 85% of the women surveyed perceived that they had not been offered treatment for their musculoskeletal disorders. Conclusion Multi-focal musculoskeletal pain in pregnancy was prevalent in this underserved patient population. The pain in this population negatively affected sleep and treatment appeared inadequate.</description><subject>Analgesics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Back Pain - drug therapy</subject><subject>Back Pain - epidemiology</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medically Underserved Area</subject><subject>Missouri - epidemiology</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Pelvic Pain - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pelvic Pain - epidemiology</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Sleep Wake Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><issn>0161-4754</issn><issn>1532-6586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtr3DAUhUVpSSaPP9BF0ao7O3rYsh1CIUmTtBDowCRroZGuixxbdiV5YP59ZWag0EVAcIU453D0XYQ-U5JTQsVVl3fDFHNGiMgpywmpP6AVLTnLRFmLj2iVRDQrqrI4RWchdISQhjf1CTqlFWek4sUKdXdKv2HlDF5Dv7Mar5V1OB3l8Ksz4AP4HZh0tzGNTVQRAl57-O2Ui3g9TnOvoh3dNb5dnns7WKf8Hn-HoL2dot0B3swpY3-BPrWqD3B5nOfo9fHh5f5H9vzr6ef97XOmU9WYMUUFqaAuha4rUCB0ZXTNWwCjKaUlbHXDmABmaN1sS8OLpi22teZNS01pKD9HXw-5kx__zBCiHGzQ0PfKwTgHWRFGmkrwJGQHofZjCB5aOXk7pPKSErkQlp1cCMuFsKRMJsLJ9OWYPm8HMP8sR6RJcHMQQPrjzoKXQVtwGoz1oKM0o30__9t_dt1bZ7Xq32APoRtn7xI9SWVIBrlZdrysmAhCeKrA_wJFEqKt</recordid><startdate>20070201</startdate><enddate>20070201</enddate><creator>Skaggs, Clayton D., DC</creator><creator>Prather, Heidi, DO</creator><creator>Gross, Gilad, MD</creator><creator>George, James W., DC</creator><creator>Thompson, Paul A., PhD</creator><creator>Nelson, D. Michael, MD, PhD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070201</creationdate><title>Back and Pelvic Pain in an Underserved United States Pregnant Population: A Preliminary Descriptive Survey</title><author>Skaggs, Clayton D., DC ; Prather, Heidi, DO ; Gross, Gilad, MD ; George, James W., DC ; Thompson, Paul A., PhD ; Nelson, D. Michael, MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-2a1607e856c87eae6c7dc83feedc1115ebc9226e2d189b5d349f4b8c39f1d5d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Analgesics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Back Pain - drug therapy</topic><topic>Back Pain - epidemiology</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medically Underserved Area</topic><topic>Missouri - epidemiology</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Pelvic Pain - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pelvic Pain - epidemiology</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Sleep Wake Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Skaggs, Clayton D., DC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prather, Heidi, DO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, Gilad, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George, James W., DC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Paul A., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, D. Michael, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Skaggs, Clayton D., DC</au><au>Prather, Heidi, DO</au><au>Gross, Gilad, MD</au><au>George, James W., DC</au><au>Thompson, Paul A., PhD</au><au>Nelson, D. Michael, MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Back and Pelvic Pain in an Underserved United States Pregnant Population: A Preliminary Descriptive Survey</atitle><jtitle>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>J Manipulative Physiol Ther</addtitle><date>2007-02-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>130</spage><epage>134</epage><pages>130-134</pages><issn>0161-4754</issn><eissn>1532-6586</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective The objective of this study was to identify the prevalence of back pain and treatment satisfaction in a population of low-socioeconomic pregnant women. Methods This study used a cross-sectional design to determine the prevalence of self-reported musculoskeletal pain in pregnancy for 599 women. Women completed an author-generated musculoskeletal survey in the second trimester of their pregnancy that addressed pain history, duration, location, and intensity, as well as activities of daily living, treatment frequency, and satisfaction with treatment. Results Sixty-seven percent of the total population reported musculoskeletal pain, and nearly half presented with a multi-focal pattern of pain that involved 2 or more sites. Twenty-one percent reported severe pain intensity rated on a numerical rating scale. Eighty percent of women experiencing pain slept less than 4 hours per night and 75% of these women took pain medications. Importantly, 85% of the women surveyed perceived that they had not been offered treatment for their musculoskeletal disorders. Conclusion Multi-focal musculoskeletal pain in pregnancy was prevalent in this underserved patient population. The pain in this population negatively affected sleep and treatment appeared inadequate.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>17320734</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.12.008</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-4754
ispartof Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics, 2007-02, Vol.30 (2), p.130-134
issn 0161-4754
1532-6586
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70209763
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Analgesics - therapeutic use
Back Pain - drug therapy
Back Pain - epidemiology
Comorbidity
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Health Surveys
Humans
Medically Underserved Area
Missouri - epidemiology
Parity
Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data
Pelvic Pain - drug therapy
Pelvic Pain - epidemiology
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology
Prevalence
Recurrence
Sleep Wake Disorders - epidemiology
Socioeconomic Factors
title Back and Pelvic Pain in an Underserved United States Pregnant Population: A Preliminary Descriptive Survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T20%3A33%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Back%20and%20Pelvic%20Pain%20in%20an%20Underserved%20United%20States%20Pregnant%20Population:%20A%20Preliminary%20Descriptive%20Survey&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20manipulative%20and%20physiological%20therapeutics&rft.au=Skaggs,%20Clayton%20D.,%20DC&rft.date=2007-02-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=130&rft.epage=134&rft.pages=130-134&rft.issn=0161-4754&rft.eissn=1532-6586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.12.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70209763%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70209763&rft_id=info:pmid/17320734&rft_els_id=S0161475406003320&rfr_iscdi=true