Ultrasound-guided shoulder injections in the treatment of subacromial bursitis
To investigate the treatment effectiveness between ultrasound-guided and blind injection techniques in the treatment of subacromial bursitis. A total of 40 patients with sonographic confirmation of subacromial bursitis were recruited into this study. These patients were divided into blind and ultras...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation 2006-01, Vol.85 (1), p.31-35 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 35 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 31 |
| container_title | American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation |
| container_volume | 85 |
| creator | Chen, Max J L Lew, Henry L Hsu, Tsz-Ching Tsai, Wen-Chung Lin, Wei-Ching Tang, Simon F T Lee, Ya-Chen Hsu, Rex C H Chen, Carl P C |
| description | To investigate the treatment effectiveness between ultrasound-guided and blind injection techniques in the treatment of subacromial bursitis.
A total of 40 patients with sonographic confirmation of subacromial bursitis were recruited into this study. These patients were divided into blind and ultrasound-guided injection groups. The shoulder abduction range of motion was compared before injections and 1 wk after the completion of injections in both groups.
The shoulder abduction range of motion before injection in the blind injection group was 71.03 +/- 12.38 degrees and improved to 100 +/- 18.18 degrees 1 wk after the injection treatments. However, the improvement did not reveal significant statistical differences (P > 0.05). The shoulder abduction range of motion before injection in the ultrasound-guided injection group was 69.05 +/- 14.72 degrees and improved to 139.29 +/- 20.14 degrees 1 wk after the injection treatments (P < 0.05).
Ultrasound may be used as an adjuvant tool in guiding the needle accurately into the inflamed subacromial bursa. The ultrasound-guided injection technique can result in significant improvement in shoulder abduction range of motion as compared with the blind injection technique in treating patients with subacromial bursitis. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/01.phm.0000184158.85689.5e |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70203133</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70203133</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-7f9ff109ce325b38e6345368c4d96b191ce2686a6542987083c3285d7c3c890c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkDlPAzEQhV2ACAT-AlpR0O1ir9cXHYq4pAgaUlte7yxxtEfwUfDvMRAp07wp3pt5-hC6IbgiWIk7TKr9dqxwHiIbwmQlGZeqYnCCzrFUTakIYQt0EcIue5ii4gwtCKdMsIafo7fNEL0Jc5q68jO5DroibOc0dOALN-3ARjdPIa9F3EIRPZg4whSLuS9Cao318-jMULTJBxdduESnvRkCXB10iTZPjx-rl3L9_vy6eliXlhIRS9Grvs_9LdCatVQCpw2jXNqmU7wlilioueSGs6ZWUmBJLa0l64SlVips6RLd_t_d-_krQYh6dMHCMJgJ5hS0wDWmhNJsvP835qYheOj13rvR-G9NsP4lqDHRmaA-EtR_BDWDHL4-fEntCN0xesBHfwCzXXBi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70203133</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ultrasound-guided shoulder injections in the treatment of subacromial bursitis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Chen, Max J L ; Lew, Henry L ; Hsu, Tsz-Ching ; Tsai, Wen-Chung ; Lin, Wei-Ching ; Tang, Simon F T ; Lee, Ya-Chen ; Hsu, Rex C H ; Chen, Carl P C</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Max J L ; Lew, Henry L ; Hsu, Tsz-Ching ; Tsai, Wen-Chung ; Lin, Wei-Ching ; Tang, Simon F T ; Lee, Ya-Chen ; Hsu, Rex C H ; Chen, Carl P C</creatorcontrib><description>To investigate the treatment effectiveness between ultrasound-guided and blind injection techniques in the treatment of subacromial bursitis.
A total of 40 patients with sonographic confirmation of subacromial bursitis were recruited into this study. These patients were divided into blind and ultrasound-guided injection groups. The shoulder abduction range of motion was compared before injections and 1 wk after the completion of injections in both groups.
The shoulder abduction range of motion before injection in the blind injection group was 71.03 +/- 12.38 degrees and improved to 100 +/- 18.18 degrees 1 wk after the injection treatments. However, the improvement did not reveal significant statistical differences (P > 0.05). The shoulder abduction range of motion before injection in the ultrasound-guided injection group was 69.05 +/- 14.72 degrees and improved to 139.29 +/- 20.14 degrees 1 wk after the injection treatments (P < 0.05).
Ultrasound may be used as an adjuvant tool in guiding the needle accurately into the inflamed subacromial bursa. The ultrasound-guided injection technique can result in significant improvement in shoulder abduction range of motion as compared with the blind injection technique in treating patients with subacromial bursitis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-9115</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.phm.0000184158.85689.5e</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16357546</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Bursitis - complications ; Bursitis - diagnostic imaging ; Bursitis - drug therapy ; Bursitis - physiopathology ; Drug Combinations ; Female ; Humans ; Injections, Intra-Articular - methods ; Lidocaine - administration & dosage ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Range of Motion, Articular - drug effects ; Shoulder Pain - diagnostic imaging ; Shoulder Pain - drug therapy ; Shoulder Pain - etiology ; Shoulder Pain - physiopathology ; Single-Blind Method ; Steroids - administration & dosage ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonography - methods</subject><ispartof>American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation, 2006-01, Vol.85 (1), p.31-35</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-7f9ff109ce325b38e6345368c4d96b191ce2686a6542987083c3285d7c3c890c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-7f9ff109ce325b38e6345368c4d96b191ce2686a6542987083c3285d7c3c890c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16357546$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Max J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lew, Henry L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Tsz-Ching</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Wen-Chung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Wei-Ching</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Simon F T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Ya-Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Rex C H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Carl P C</creatorcontrib><title>Ultrasound-guided shoulder injections in the treatment of subacromial bursitis</title><title>American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Am J Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>To investigate the treatment effectiveness between ultrasound-guided and blind injection techniques in the treatment of subacromial bursitis.
A total of 40 patients with sonographic confirmation of subacromial bursitis were recruited into this study. These patients were divided into blind and ultrasound-guided injection groups. The shoulder abduction range of motion was compared before injections and 1 wk after the completion of injections in both groups.
The shoulder abduction range of motion before injection in the blind injection group was 71.03 +/- 12.38 degrees and improved to 100 +/- 18.18 degrees 1 wk after the injection treatments. However, the improvement did not reveal significant statistical differences (P > 0.05). The shoulder abduction range of motion before injection in the ultrasound-guided injection group was 69.05 +/- 14.72 degrees and improved to 139.29 +/- 20.14 degrees 1 wk after the injection treatments (P < 0.05).
Ultrasound may be used as an adjuvant tool in guiding the needle accurately into the inflamed subacromial bursa. The ultrasound-guided injection technique can result in significant improvement in shoulder abduction range of motion as compared with the blind injection technique in treating patients with subacromial bursitis.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bursitis - complications</subject><subject>Bursitis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Bursitis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Bursitis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Drug Combinations</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injections, Intra-Articular - methods</subject><subject>Lidocaine - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular - drug effects</subject><subject>Shoulder Pain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Shoulder Pain - drug therapy</subject><subject>Shoulder Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Shoulder Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Steroids - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ultrasonography - methods</subject><issn>0894-9115</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkDlPAzEQhV2ACAT-AlpR0O1ir9cXHYq4pAgaUlte7yxxtEfwUfDvMRAp07wp3pt5-hC6IbgiWIk7TKr9dqxwHiIbwmQlGZeqYnCCzrFUTakIYQt0EcIue5ii4gwtCKdMsIafo7fNEL0Jc5q68jO5DroibOc0dOALN-3ARjdPIa9F3EIRPZg4whSLuS9Cao318-jMULTJBxdduESnvRkCXB10iTZPjx-rl3L9_vy6eliXlhIRS9Grvs_9LdCatVQCpw2jXNqmU7wlilioueSGs6ZWUmBJLa0l64SlVips6RLd_t_d-_krQYh6dMHCMJgJ5hS0wDWmhNJsvP835qYheOj13rvR-G9NsP4lqDHRmaA-EtR_BDWDHL4-fEntCN0xesBHfwCzXXBi</recordid><startdate>200601</startdate><enddate>200601</enddate><creator>Chen, Max J L</creator><creator>Lew, Henry L</creator><creator>Hsu, Tsz-Ching</creator><creator>Tsai, Wen-Chung</creator><creator>Lin, Wei-Ching</creator><creator>Tang, Simon F T</creator><creator>Lee, Ya-Chen</creator><creator>Hsu, Rex C H</creator><creator>Chen, Carl P C</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200601</creationdate><title>Ultrasound-guided shoulder injections in the treatment of subacromial bursitis</title><author>Chen, Max J L ; Lew, Henry L ; Hsu, Tsz-Ching ; Tsai, Wen-Chung ; Lin, Wei-Ching ; Tang, Simon F T ; Lee, Ya-Chen ; Hsu, Rex C H ; Chen, Carl P C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-7f9ff109ce325b38e6345368c4d96b191ce2686a6542987083c3285d7c3c890c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bursitis - complications</topic><topic>Bursitis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Bursitis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Bursitis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Drug Combinations</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injections, Intra-Articular - methods</topic><topic>Lidocaine - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular - drug effects</topic><topic>Shoulder Pain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Shoulder Pain - drug therapy</topic><topic>Shoulder Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Shoulder Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Steroids - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ultrasonography - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Max J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lew, Henry L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Tsz-Ching</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Wen-Chung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Wei-Ching</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Simon F T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Ya-Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Rex C H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Carl P C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Max J L</au><au>Lew, Henry L</au><au>Hsu, Tsz-Ching</au><au>Tsai, Wen-Chung</au><au>Lin, Wei-Ching</au><au>Tang, Simon F T</au><au>Lee, Ya-Chen</au><au>Hsu, Rex C H</au><au>Chen, Carl P C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ultrasound-guided shoulder injections in the treatment of subacromial bursitis</atitle><jtitle>American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>2006-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>31</spage><epage>35</epage><pages>31-35</pages><issn>0894-9115</issn><abstract>To investigate the treatment effectiveness between ultrasound-guided and blind injection techniques in the treatment of subacromial bursitis.
A total of 40 patients with sonographic confirmation of subacromial bursitis were recruited into this study. These patients were divided into blind and ultrasound-guided injection groups. The shoulder abduction range of motion was compared before injections and 1 wk after the completion of injections in both groups.
The shoulder abduction range of motion before injection in the blind injection group was 71.03 +/- 12.38 degrees and improved to 100 +/- 18.18 degrees 1 wk after the injection treatments. However, the improvement did not reveal significant statistical differences (P > 0.05). The shoulder abduction range of motion before injection in the ultrasound-guided injection group was 69.05 +/- 14.72 degrees and improved to 139.29 +/- 20.14 degrees 1 wk after the injection treatments (P < 0.05).
Ultrasound may be used as an adjuvant tool in guiding the needle accurately into the inflamed subacromial bursa. The ultrasound-guided injection technique can result in significant improvement in shoulder abduction range of motion as compared with the blind injection technique in treating patients with subacromial bursitis.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>16357546</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.phm.0000184158.85689.5e</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0894-9115 |
| ispartof | American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation, 2006-01, Vol.85 (1), p.31-35 |
| issn | 0894-9115 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70203133 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
| subjects | Adult Aged Bursitis - complications Bursitis - diagnostic imaging Bursitis - drug therapy Bursitis - physiopathology Drug Combinations Female Humans Injections, Intra-Articular - methods Lidocaine - administration & dosage Male Middle Aged Range of Motion, Articular - drug effects Shoulder Pain - diagnostic imaging Shoulder Pain - drug therapy Shoulder Pain - etiology Shoulder Pain - physiopathology Single-Blind Method Steroids - administration & dosage Treatment Outcome Ultrasonography - methods |
| title | Ultrasound-guided shoulder injections in the treatment of subacromial bursitis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-08T08%3A50%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ultrasound-guided%20shoulder%20injections%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20subacromial%20bursitis&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20physical%20medicine%20&%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Chen,%20Max%20J%20L&rft.date=2006-01&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=35&rft.pages=31-35&rft.issn=0894-9115&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.phm.0000184158.85689.5e&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70203133%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70203133&rft_id=info:pmid/16357546&rfr_iscdi=true |