Why Do Implicit and Explicit Attitude Tests Diverge? The Role of Structural Fit

Implicit and explicit attitude tests are often weakly correlated, leading some theorists to conclude that implicit and explicit cognition are independent. Popular implicit and explicit tests, however, differ in many ways beyond implicit and explicit cognition. The authors examined in 4 studies wheth...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of personality and social psychology 2008-01, Vol.94 (1), p.16-31
Hauptverfasser: Payne, B. Keith, Burkley, Melissa A, Stokes, Mark B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 31
container_issue 1
container_start_page 16
container_title Journal of personality and social psychology
container_volume 94
creator Payne, B. Keith
Burkley, Melissa A
Stokes, Mark B
description Implicit and explicit attitude tests are often weakly correlated, leading some theorists to conclude that implicit and explicit cognition are independent. Popular implicit and explicit tests, however, differ in many ways beyond implicit and explicit cognition. The authors examined in 4 studies whether correlations between implicit and explicit tests were influenced by the similarity in task demands (i.e., structural fit) and, hence, the processes engaged by each test. Using an affect misattribution procedure, they systematically varied the structural fit of implicit and explicit tests of racial attitudes. As test formats became more similar, the implicit-explicit correlation increased until it became higher than in most previous research. When tests differ in structure, they may underestimate the relationship between implicit and explicit cognition. The authors propose a solution that uses procedures to maximize structural fit.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.16
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70185408</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1425865141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a570t-fdc00815bd3fef6b5407321a7d4668bfe2f43f5d874123c28e196203e49f9fad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0l1rFDEUBuAgit1Wf4A3EpR6N2tOvnMlpR9aKBR0xcuQzSR2yuzONJkR99-bYYcVvHCvQsiT94RzgtAbIEsgTH0khNKKCeBLw5ewBPkMLcAwUwED8RwtDucn6DTnR0IIF5S-RCegQZliFuj-x8MOX3X4dtO3jW8G7LY1vv49by6GoRnGOuBVyEPGV82vkH6GT3j1EPDXrg24i_jbkEY_jMm1-KYZXqEX0bU5vJ7XM_T95np1-aW6u_98e3lxVzmhyFDF2hOiQaxrFkOUa8GJYhScqrmUeh0DjZxFUWvFgTJPdQAjKWGBm2iiq9kZ-rDP7VP3NJbX2U2TfWhbtw3dmK0ioEuoPgolSGmAwlEoFKUKJD0KmdRSGEUKfPcPfOzGtC1tKVU5N5oT-T9EidHAtVQFwR751OWcQrR9ajYu7SwQO30FO43aTqO2hluwMAW_nYPH9SbUf2_Msy_gfAYue9fG5La-yQdXuq0FZZN7v3eud7bPO-_S0Pg2FJr7Q7k_GWXD4w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614498406</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why Do Implicit and Explicit Attitude Tests Diverge? The Role of Structural Fit</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Payne, B. Keith ; Burkley, Melissa A ; Stokes, Mark B</creator><creatorcontrib>Payne, B. Keith ; Burkley, Melissa A ; Stokes, Mark B</creatorcontrib><description>Implicit and explicit attitude tests are often weakly correlated, leading some theorists to conclude that implicit and explicit cognition are independent. Popular implicit and explicit tests, however, differ in many ways beyond implicit and explicit cognition. The authors examined in 4 studies whether correlations between implicit and explicit tests were influenced by the similarity in task demands (i.e., structural fit) and, hence, the processes engaged by each test. Using an affect misattribution procedure, they systematically varied the structural fit of implicit and explicit tests of racial attitudes. As test formats became more similar, the implicit-explicit correlation increased until it became higher than in most previous research. When tests differ in structure, they may underestimate the relationship between implicit and explicit cognition. The authors propose a solution that uses procedures to maximize structural fit.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.16</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18179315</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPSPB2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Alcohol Drinking ; Analysis of Variance ; Associative memory ; Attitude ; Attitude Measures ; Attitude tests ; Attitudes ; Behavior. Attitude ; Behavioral Research - methods ; Beliefs ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Correlation analysis ; Emotions ; Explicit memory ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Implicit beliefs ; Male ; Measurement ; Prejudice ; Psychological Tests ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Questionnaires ; Racial and Ethnic Attitudes ; Racial attitudes ; Racial Relations ; Reproducibility of Results ; Role ; Social Cognition ; Social Conformity ; Social Perception ; Social psychology ; Truth Disclosure</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality and social psychology, 2008-01, Vol.94 (1), p.16-31</ispartof><rights>2008 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2008 APA, all rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jan 2008</rights><rights>2008, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a570t-fdc00815bd3fef6b5407321a7d4668bfe2f43f5d874123c28e196203e49f9fad3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4010,27904,27905,27906,30980,30981,33755,33756</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20385235$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18179315$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Payne, B. Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burkley, Melissa A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stokes, Mark B</creatorcontrib><title>Why Do Implicit and Explicit Attitude Tests Diverge? The Role of Structural Fit</title><title>Journal of personality and social psychology</title><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><description>Implicit and explicit attitude tests are often weakly correlated, leading some theorists to conclude that implicit and explicit cognition are independent. Popular implicit and explicit tests, however, differ in many ways beyond implicit and explicit cognition. The authors examined in 4 studies whether correlations between implicit and explicit tests were influenced by the similarity in task demands (i.e., structural fit) and, hence, the processes engaged by each test. Using an affect misattribution procedure, they systematically varied the structural fit of implicit and explicit tests of racial attitudes. As test formats became more similar, the implicit-explicit correlation increased until it became higher than in most previous research. When tests differ in structure, they may underestimate the relationship between implicit and explicit cognition. The authors propose a solution that uses procedures to maximize structural fit.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Alcohol Drinking</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Associative memory</subject><subject>Attitude</subject><subject>Attitude Measures</subject><subject>Attitude tests</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Behavior. Attitude</subject><subject>Behavioral Research - methods</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Explicit memory</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implicit beliefs</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Prejudice</subject><subject>Psychological Tests</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Racial and Ethnic Attitudes</subject><subject>Racial attitudes</subject><subject>Racial Relations</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Role</subject><subject>Social Cognition</subject><subject>Social Conformity</subject><subject>Social Perception</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Truth Disclosure</subject><issn>0022-3514</issn><issn>1939-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0l1rFDEUBuAgit1Wf4A3EpR6N2tOvnMlpR9aKBR0xcuQzSR2yuzONJkR99-bYYcVvHCvQsiT94RzgtAbIEsgTH0khNKKCeBLw5ewBPkMLcAwUwED8RwtDucn6DTnR0IIF5S-RCegQZliFuj-x8MOX3X4dtO3jW8G7LY1vv49by6GoRnGOuBVyEPGV82vkH6GT3j1EPDXrg24i_jbkEY_jMm1-KYZXqEX0bU5vJ7XM_T95np1-aW6u_98e3lxVzmhyFDF2hOiQaxrFkOUa8GJYhScqrmUeh0DjZxFUWvFgTJPdQAjKWGBm2iiq9kZ-rDP7VP3NJbX2U2TfWhbtw3dmK0ioEuoPgolSGmAwlEoFKUKJD0KmdRSGEUKfPcPfOzGtC1tKVU5N5oT-T9EidHAtVQFwR751OWcQrR9ajYu7SwQO30FO43aTqO2hluwMAW_nYPH9SbUf2_Msy_gfAYue9fG5La-yQdXuq0FZZN7v3eud7bPO-_S0Pg2FJr7Q7k_GWXD4w</recordid><startdate>200801</startdate><enddate>200801</enddate><creator>Payne, B. Keith</creator><creator>Burkley, Melissa A</creator><creator>Stokes, Mark B</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200801</creationdate><title>Why Do Implicit and Explicit Attitude Tests Diverge? The Role of Structural Fit</title><author>Payne, B. Keith ; Burkley, Melissa A ; Stokes, Mark B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a570t-fdc00815bd3fef6b5407321a7d4668bfe2f43f5d874123c28e196203e49f9fad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Alcohol Drinking</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Associative memory</topic><topic>Attitude</topic><topic>Attitude Measures</topic><topic>Attitude tests</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Behavior. Attitude</topic><topic>Behavioral Research - methods</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Explicit memory</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implicit beliefs</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Prejudice</topic><topic>Psychological Tests</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Racial and Ethnic Attitudes</topic><topic>Racial attitudes</topic><topic>Racial Relations</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Role</topic><topic>Social Cognition</topic><topic>Social Conformity</topic><topic>Social Perception</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Truth Disclosure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Payne, B. Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burkley, Melissa A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stokes, Mark B</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Payne, B. Keith</au><au>Burkley, Melissa A</au><au>Stokes, Mark B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why Do Implicit and Explicit Attitude Tests Diverge? The Role of Structural Fit</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><date>2008-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>16</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>16-31</pages><issn>0022-3514</issn><eissn>1939-1315</eissn><coden>JPSPB2</coden><abstract>Implicit and explicit attitude tests are often weakly correlated, leading some theorists to conclude that implicit and explicit cognition are independent. Popular implicit and explicit tests, however, differ in many ways beyond implicit and explicit cognition. The authors examined in 4 studies whether correlations between implicit and explicit tests were influenced by the similarity in task demands (i.e., structural fit) and, hence, the processes engaged by each test. Using an affect misattribution procedure, they systematically varied the structural fit of implicit and explicit tests of racial attitudes. As test formats became more similar, the implicit-explicit correlation increased until it became higher than in most previous research. When tests differ in structure, they may underestimate the relationship between implicit and explicit cognition. The authors propose a solution that uses procedures to maximize structural fit.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>18179315</pmid><doi>10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.16</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3514
ispartof Journal of personality and social psychology, 2008-01, Vol.94 (1), p.16-31
issn 0022-3514
1939-1315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70185408
source MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Alcohol Drinking
Analysis of Variance
Associative memory
Attitude
Attitude Measures
Attitude tests
Attitudes
Behavior. Attitude
Behavioral Research - methods
Beliefs
Biological and medical sciences
Cognition
Cognition & reasoning
Correlation analysis
Emotions
Explicit memory
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Humans
Implicit beliefs
Male
Measurement
Prejudice
Psychological Tests
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Questionnaires
Racial and Ethnic Attitudes
Racial attitudes
Racial Relations
Reproducibility of Results
Role
Social Cognition
Social Conformity
Social Perception
Social psychology
Truth Disclosure
title Why Do Implicit and Explicit Attitude Tests Diverge? The Role of Structural Fit
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T07%3A58%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20Do%20Implicit%20and%20Explicit%20Attitude%20Tests%20Diverge?%20The%20Role%20of%20Structural%20Fit&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20and%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Payne,%20B.%20Keith&rft.date=2008-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=16-31&rft.issn=0022-3514&rft.eissn=1939-1315&rft.coden=JPSPB2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.16&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1425865141%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614498406&rft_id=info:pmid/18179315&rfr_iscdi=true