Why Do Implicit and Explicit Attitude Tests Diverge? The Role of Structural Fit
Implicit and explicit attitude tests are often weakly correlated, leading some theorists to conclude that implicit and explicit cognition are independent. Popular implicit and explicit tests, however, differ in many ways beyond implicit and explicit cognition. The authors examined in 4 studies wheth...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of personality and social psychology 2008-01, Vol.94 (1), p.16-31 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 31 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 16 |
container_title | Journal of personality and social psychology |
container_volume | 94 |
creator | Payne, B. Keith Burkley, Melissa A Stokes, Mark B |
description | Implicit and explicit attitude tests are often weakly correlated, leading some theorists to conclude that implicit and explicit cognition are independent. Popular implicit and explicit tests, however, differ in many ways beyond implicit and explicit cognition. The authors examined in 4 studies whether correlations between implicit and explicit tests were influenced by the similarity in task demands (i.e., structural fit) and, hence, the processes engaged by each test. Using an affect misattribution procedure, they systematically varied the structural fit of implicit and explicit tests of racial attitudes. As test formats became more similar, the implicit-explicit correlation increased until it became higher than in most previous research. When tests differ in structure, they may underestimate the relationship between implicit and explicit cognition. The authors propose a solution that uses procedures to maximize structural fit. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.16 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70185408</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1425865141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a570t-fdc00815bd3fef6b5407321a7d4668bfe2f43f5d874123c28e196203e49f9fad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0l1rFDEUBuAgit1Wf4A3EpR6N2tOvnMlpR9aKBR0xcuQzSR2yuzONJkR99-bYYcVvHCvQsiT94RzgtAbIEsgTH0khNKKCeBLw5ewBPkMLcAwUwED8RwtDucn6DTnR0IIF5S-RCegQZliFuj-x8MOX3X4dtO3jW8G7LY1vv49by6GoRnGOuBVyEPGV82vkH6GT3j1EPDXrg24i_jbkEY_jMm1-KYZXqEX0bU5vJ7XM_T95np1-aW6u_98e3lxVzmhyFDF2hOiQaxrFkOUa8GJYhScqrmUeh0DjZxFUWvFgTJPdQAjKWGBm2iiq9kZ-rDP7VP3NJbX2U2TfWhbtw3dmK0ioEuoPgolSGmAwlEoFKUKJD0KmdRSGEUKfPcPfOzGtC1tKVU5N5oT-T9EidHAtVQFwR751OWcQrR9ajYu7SwQO30FO43aTqO2hluwMAW_nYPH9SbUf2_Msy_gfAYue9fG5La-yQdXuq0FZZN7v3eud7bPO-_S0Pg2FJr7Q7k_GWXD4w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614498406</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why Do Implicit and Explicit Attitude Tests Diverge? The Role of Structural Fit</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Payne, B. Keith ; Burkley, Melissa A ; Stokes, Mark B</creator><creatorcontrib>Payne, B. Keith ; Burkley, Melissa A ; Stokes, Mark B</creatorcontrib><description>Implicit and explicit attitude tests are often weakly correlated, leading some theorists to conclude that implicit and explicit cognition are independent. Popular implicit and explicit tests, however, differ in many ways beyond implicit and explicit cognition. The authors examined in 4 studies whether correlations between implicit and explicit tests were influenced by the similarity in task demands (i.e., structural fit) and, hence, the processes engaged by each test. Using an affect misattribution procedure, they systematically varied the structural fit of implicit and explicit tests of racial attitudes. As test formats became more similar, the implicit-explicit correlation increased until it became higher than in most previous research. When tests differ in structure, they may underestimate the relationship between implicit and explicit cognition. The authors propose a solution that uses procedures to maximize structural fit.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.16</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18179315</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPSPB2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Alcohol Drinking ; Analysis of Variance ; Associative memory ; Attitude ; Attitude Measures ; Attitude tests ; Attitudes ; Behavior. Attitude ; Behavioral Research - methods ; Beliefs ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Cognition & reasoning ; Correlation analysis ; Emotions ; Explicit memory ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Implicit beliefs ; Male ; Measurement ; Prejudice ; Psychological Tests ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Questionnaires ; Racial and Ethnic Attitudes ; Racial attitudes ; Racial Relations ; Reproducibility of Results ; Role ; Social Cognition ; Social Conformity ; Social Perception ; Social psychology ; Truth Disclosure</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality and social psychology, 2008-01, Vol.94 (1), p.16-31</ispartof><rights>2008 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2008 APA, all rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jan 2008</rights><rights>2008, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a570t-fdc00815bd3fef6b5407321a7d4668bfe2f43f5d874123c28e196203e49f9fad3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4010,27904,27905,27906,30980,30981,33755,33756</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20385235$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18179315$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Payne, B. Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burkley, Melissa A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stokes, Mark B</creatorcontrib><title>Why Do Implicit and Explicit Attitude Tests Diverge? The Role of Structural Fit</title><title>Journal of personality and social psychology</title><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><description>Implicit and explicit attitude tests are often weakly correlated, leading some theorists to conclude that implicit and explicit cognition are independent. Popular implicit and explicit tests, however, differ in many ways beyond implicit and explicit cognition. The authors examined in 4 studies whether correlations between implicit and explicit tests were influenced by the similarity in task demands (i.e., structural fit) and, hence, the processes engaged by each test. Using an affect misattribution procedure, they systematically varied the structural fit of implicit and explicit tests of racial attitudes. As test formats became more similar, the implicit-explicit correlation increased until it became higher than in most previous research. When tests differ in structure, they may underestimate the relationship between implicit and explicit cognition. The authors propose a solution that uses procedures to maximize structural fit.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Alcohol Drinking</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Associative memory</subject><subject>Attitude</subject><subject>Attitude Measures</subject><subject>Attitude tests</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Behavior. Attitude</subject><subject>Behavioral Research - methods</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Explicit memory</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implicit beliefs</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Prejudice</subject><subject>Psychological Tests</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Racial and Ethnic Attitudes</subject><subject>Racial attitudes</subject><subject>Racial Relations</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Role</subject><subject>Social Cognition</subject><subject>Social Conformity</subject><subject>Social Perception</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Truth Disclosure</subject><issn>0022-3514</issn><issn>1939-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0l1rFDEUBuAgit1Wf4A3EpR6N2tOvnMlpR9aKBR0xcuQzSR2yuzONJkR99-bYYcVvHCvQsiT94RzgtAbIEsgTH0khNKKCeBLw5ewBPkMLcAwUwED8RwtDucn6DTnR0IIF5S-RCegQZliFuj-x8MOX3X4dtO3jW8G7LY1vv49by6GoRnGOuBVyEPGV82vkH6GT3j1EPDXrg24i_jbkEY_jMm1-KYZXqEX0bU5vJ7XM_T95np1-aW6u_98e3lxVzmhyFDF2hOiQaxrFkOUa8GJYhScqrmUeh0DjZxFUWvFgTJPdQAjKWGBm2iiq9kZ-rDP7VP3NJbX2U2TfWhbtw3dmK0ioEuoPgolSGmAwlEoFKUKJD0KmdRSGEUKfPcPfOzGtC1tKVU5N5oT-T9EidHAtVQFwR751OWcQrR9ajYu7SwQO30FO43aTqO2hluwMAW_nYPH9SbUf2_Msy_gfAYue9fG5La-yQdXuq0FZZN7v3eud7bPO-_S0Pg2FJr7Q7k_GWXD4w</recordid><startdate>200801</startdate><enddate>200801</enddate><creator>Payne, B. Keith</creator><creator>Burkley, Melissa A</creator><creator>Stokes, Mark B</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200801</creationdate><title>Why Do Implicit and Explicit Attitude Tests Diverge? The Role of Structural Fit</title><author>Payne, B. Keith ; Burkley, Melissa A ; Stokes, Mark B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a570t-fdc00815bd3fef6b5407321a7d4668bfe2f43f5d874123c28e196203e49f9fad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Alcohol Drinking</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Associative memory</topic><topic>Attitude</topic><topic>Attitude Measures</topic><topic>Attitude tests</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Behavior. Attitude</topic><topic>Behavioral Research - methods</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Explicit memory</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implicit beliefs</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Prejudice</topic><topic>Psychological Tests</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Racial and Ethnic Attitudes</topic><topic>Racial attitudes</topic><topic>Racial Relations</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Role</topic><topic>Social Cognition</topic><topic>Social Conformity</topic><topic>Social Perception</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Truth Disclosure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Payne, B. Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burkley, Melissa A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stokes, Mark B</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Payne, B. Keith</au><au>Burkley, Melissa A</au><au>Stokes, Mark B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why Do Implicit and Explicit Attitude Tests Diverge? The Role of Structural Fit</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><date>2008-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>16</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>16-31</pages><issn>0022-3514</issn><eissn>1939-1315</eissn><coden>JPSPB2</coden><abstract>Implicit and explicit attitude tests are often weakly correlated, leading some theorists to conclude that implicit and explicit cognition are independent. Popular implicit and explicit tests, however, differ in many ways beyond implicit and explicit cognition. The authors examined in 4 studies whether correlations between implicit and explicit tests were influenced by the similarity in task demands (i.e., structural fit) and, hence, the processes engaged by each test. Using an affect misattribution procedure, they systematically varied the structural fit of implicit and explicit tests of racial attitudes. As test formats became more similar, the implicit-explicit correlation increased until it became higher than in most previous research. When tests differ in structure, they may underestimate the relationship between implicit and explicit cognition. The authors propose a solution that uses procedures to maximize structural fit.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>18179315</pmid><doi>10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.16</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3514 |
ispartof | Journal of personality and social psychology, 2008-01, Vol.94 (1), p.16-31 |
issn | 0022-3514 1939-1315 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70185408 |
source | MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Alcohol Drinking Analysis of Variance Associative memory Attitude Attitude Measures Attitude tests Attitudes Behavior. Attitude Behavioral Research - methods Beliefs Biological and medical sciences Cognition Cognition & reasoning Correlation analysis Emotions Explicit memory Factor Analysis, Statistical Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Implicit beliefs Male Measurement Prejudice Psychological Tests Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Questionnaires Racial and Ethnic Attitudes Racial attitudes Racial Relations Reproducibility of Results Role Social Cognition Social Conformity Social Perception Social psychology Truth Disclosure |
title | Why Do Implicit and Explicit Attitude Tests Diverge? The Role of Structural Fit |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T07%3A58%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20Do%20Implicit%20and%20Explicit%20Attitude%20Tests%20Diverge?%20The%20Role%20of%20Structural%20Fit&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20and%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Payne,%20B.%20Keith&rft.date=2008-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=16-31&rft.issn=0022-3514&rft.eissn=1939-1315&rft.coden=JPSPB2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.16&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1425865141%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614498406&rft_id=info:pmid/18179315&rfr_iscdi=true |