MAGE-A and NY-ESO-1 expression in cervical cancer: Prognostic factors and effects of chemotherapy

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of cancer testis tumor-associated antigens MAGE-A and NY-ESO-1 in cervical cancer and correlate expression patterns with clinicopathologic parameters and prognosis. Study Design One hundred sixty-two cervical cancer samples from 109 pati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2008, Vol.198 (1), p.99.e1-99.e7
Hauptverfasser: Napoletano, Chiara, PhD, Bellati, Filippo, MD, Tarquini, Elisabetta, MD, Tomao, Federica, MD, Taurino, Federica, PhD, Spagnoli, Giulio, MD, Rughetti, Aurelia, PhD, Muzii, Ludovico, MD, Nuti, Marianna, PhD, Benedetti Panici, Pierluigi, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of cancer testis tumor-associated antigens MAGE-A and NY-ESO-1 in cervical cancer and correlate expression patterns with clinicopathologic parameters and prognosis. Study Design One hundred sixty-two cervical cancer samples from 109 patients who were treated with radical hysterectomy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or pelvic disease recurrence were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Results MAGE-A was expressed by 32/94 (34%) and 7/15 (47%) previously untreated and recurrent tumors, respectively. NY-ESO-1 was expressed by 46/94 (49%) and 6/15 (40%) previously untreated and recurrent tumors, respectively. MAGE-A in early stage tumors was correlated to tumor size and lymph node metastases ( P = .024 and P = .046, respectively) whereas NY-ESO-1 to tumor grading ( P = .039). Conclusion Cervical cancer frequently expresses cancer testis tumor-associated antigens. MAGE-A and NY-ESO-1 expression rates are not influenced by systemic therapies. Cancer testis tumor-associated antigens are correlated to common prognostic factors.
ISSN:0002-9378
1097-6868
DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.05.019