Debating disability
This paper responds to the reviews by Edwards, Holm, Koch, Thomas and Vehmas of Disability Rights and Wrongs (2006). After summarising the recent history of disability studies as a discipline, it explores: the political nature of disability research, questions of ontology and definition, and the use...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of medical ethics 2008-01, Vol.34 (1), p.11-14 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 14 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 11 |
| container_title | Journal of medical ethics |
| container_volume | 34 |
| creator | Shakespeare, T |
| description | This paper responds to the reviews by Edwards, Holm, Koch, Thomas and Vehmas of Disability Rights and Wrongs (2006). After summarising the recent history of disability studies as a discipline, it explores: the political nature of disability research, questions of ontology and definition, and the uses and abuses of the expressivist argument. Disability is an emerging field of enquiry and constructive debate is to be welcomed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1136/jme.2006.019992 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70169147</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A173421609</galeid><jstor_id>27720008</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A173421609</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b456t-59242ad74242d78c66438a4e78c4c4d2f1d2be53ec306b2a289fbba17ceededa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotlZPHjwpguBB2Dbf2T22VatQLIh68BKS3WnZdT_qZgv235uypQUv5jKBeTLz5EXoguA-IUwOsgL6FGPZxySKInqAuoQrFnAq1CHqYoZlIEOMO-jEuQz7Q8PoGHVISIQUhHbR-T1Y06Tl4jpJnbFpnjbrU3Q0N7mDs23toffHh7fxUzCdTZ7Hw2lguZBNICLKqUkU9yVRYSwlZ6Hh4K885gmdk4RaEAxir2Gp8avn1hqiYoAEEsN66Ladu6yr7xW4RhepiyHPTQnVymmFiYw2_-mhmz9gVq3q0rtpokKCFWV4QwUttTA56LSMq7KBnyau8hwWoL36eKaHRDFOicSR5wctH9eVczXM9bJOC1OvNcF6k6726epNurpN17-42nqsbAHJnt_G6YHLFshcU9W7PlXKj8HhXjF1Xm3XN_WXloopoV8-xnoiwqkYfb7qkefvWt4W2b92vxbjl38</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781072307</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Debating disability</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Shakespeare, T</creator><creatorcontrib>Shakespeare, T</creatorcontrib><description>This paper responds to the reviews by Edwards, Holm, Koch, Thomas and Vehmas of Disability Rights and Wrongs (2006). After summarising the recent history of disability studies as a discipline, it explores: the political nature of disability research, questions of ontology and definition, and the uses and abuses of the expressivist argument. Disability is an emerging field of enquiry and constructive debate is to be welcomed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-6800</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-4257</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/jme.2006.019992</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18156512</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMETDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics</publisher><subject>Ableism ; Bioethics ; Disabilities ; Disability ; Disability Evaluation ; Disability rights ; Disability studies ; Disabled Persons ; Down syndrome ; Ethics ; Expressivism ; Humans ; Medical ethics ; Medical research ; Medical sociology ; Medicine, Experimental ; Modeling ; Oppression ; People with disabilities ; Philosophers ; Political activism ; Political aspects ; Political debate ; Politics ; Public Policy ; Quality of life ; Researchers ; Sociology ; Value of Life</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical ethics, 2008-01, Vol.34 (1), p.11-14</ispartof><rights>2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics</rights><rights>Copyright 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics</rights><rights>Copyright: 2008 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b456t-59242ad74242d78c66438a4e78c4c4d2f1d2be53ec306b2a289fbba17ceededa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b456t-59242ad74242d78c66438a4e78c4c4d2f1d2be53ec306b2a289fbba17ceededa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jme.bmj.com/content/34/1/11.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jme.bmj.com/content/34/1/11.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,799,3183,23550,27901,27902,57992,58225,77343,77374</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18156512$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shakespeare, T</creatorcontrib><title>Debating disability</title><title>Journal of medical ethics</title><addtitle>J Med Ethics</addtitle><description>This paper responds to the reviews by Edwards, Holm, Koch, Thomas and Vehmas of Disability Rights and Wrongs (2006). After summarising the recent history of disability studies as a discipline, it explores: the political nature of disability research, questions of ontology and definition, and the uses and abuses of the expressivist argument. Disability is an emerging field of enquiry and constructive debate is to be welcomed.</description><subject>Ableism</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Disabilities</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Disability rights</subject><subject>Disability studies</subject><subject>Disabled Persons</subject><subject>Down syndrome</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Expressivism</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical ethics</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical sociology</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Oppression</subject><subject>People with disabilities</subject><subject>Philosophers</subject><subject>Political activism</subject><subject>Political aspects</subject><subject>Political debate</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Public Policy</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Value of Life</subject><issn>0306-6800</issn><issn>1473-4257</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotlZPHjwpguBB2Dbf2T22VatQLIh68BKS3WnZdT_qZgv235uypQUv5jKBeTLz5EXoguA-IUwOsgL6FGPZxySKInqAuoQrFnAq1CHqYoZlIEOMO-jEuQz7Q8PoGHVISIQUhHbR-T1Y06Tl4jpJnbFpnjbrU3Q0N7mDs23toffHh7fxUzCdTZ7Hw2lguZBNICLKqUkU9yVRYSwlZ6Hh4K885gmdk4RaEAxir2Gp8avn1hqiYoAEEsN66Ladu6yr7xW4RhepiyHPTQnVymmFiYw2_-mhmz9gVq3q0rtpokKCFWV4QwUttTA56LSMq7KBnyau8hwWoL36eKaHRDFOicSR5wctH9eVczXM9bJOC1OvNcF6k6726epNurpN17-42nqsbAHJnt_G6YHLFshcU9W7PlXKj8HhXjF1Xm3XN_WXloopoV8-xnoiwqkYfb7qkefvWt4W2b92vxbjl38</recordid><startdate>200801</startdate><enddate>200801</enddate><creator>Shakespeare, T</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics</general><general>Institute of Medical Ethics and BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200801</creationdate><title>Debating disability</title><author>Shakespeare, T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b456t-59242ad74242d78c66438a4e78c4c4d2f1d2be53ec306b2a289fbba17ceededa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Ableism</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Disabilities</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Disability rights</topic><topic>Disability studies</topic><topic>Disabled Persons</topic><topic>Down syndrome</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Expressivism</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical ethics</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical sociology</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Oppression</topic><topic>People with disabilities</topic><topic>Philosophers</topic><topic>Political activism</topic><topic>Political aspects</topic><topic>Political debate</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Public Policy</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Value of Life</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shakespeare, T</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shakespeare, T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Debating disability</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical ethics</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Ethics</addtitle><date>2008-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>11</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>11-14</pages><issn>0306-6800</issn><eissn>1473-4257</eissn><coden>JMETDR</coden><abstract>This paper responds to the reviews by Edwards, Holm, Koch, Thomas and Vehmas of Disability Rights and Wrongs (2006). After summarising the recent history of disability studies as a discipline, it explores: the political nature of disability research, questions of ontology and definition, and the uses and abuses of the expressivist argument. Disability is an emerging field of enquiry and constructive debate is to be welcomed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics</pub><pmid>18156512</pmid><doi>10.1136/jme.2006.019992</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0306-6800 |
| ispartof | Journal of medical ethics, 2008-01, Vol.34 (1), p.11-14 |
| issn | 0306-6800 1473-4257 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70169147 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2 |
| subjects | Ableism Bioethics Disabilities Disability Disability Evaluation Disability rights Disability studies Disabled Persons Down syndrome Ethics Expressivism Humans Medical ethics Medical research Medical sociology Medicine, Experimental Modeling Oppression People with disabilities Philosophers Political activism Political aspects Political debate Politics Public Policy Quality of life Researchers Sociology Value of Life |
| title | Debating disability |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T04%3A19%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Debating%20disability&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20ethics&rft.au=Shakespeare,%20T&rft.date=2008-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=11-14&rft.issn=0306-6800&rft.eissn=1473-4257&rft.coden=JMETDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/jme.2006.019992&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA173421609%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781072307&rft_id=info:pmid/18156512&rft_galeid=A173421609&rft_jstor_id=27720008&rfr_iscdi=true |