Developing a Self-Report Outcome Measure for Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Our objective was to develop a pilot measure of subjective outcomes of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Current options for assessing subjective outcomes in CAM are either too burdensome or fail to represent diverse outcomes. A single measure specifying common, patient-reported outcomes...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Explore (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2005-05, Vol.1 (3), p.177-185 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 185 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 177 |
container_title | Explore (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 1 |
creator | Eton, David T. Koffler, Karen Cella, David Eisenstein, Amy Astin, John A. Pelletier, Kenneth R. Riley, David |
description | Our objective was to develop a pilot measure of subjective outcomes of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Current options for assessing subjective outcomes in CAM are either too burdensome or fail to represent diverse outcomes. A single measure specifying common, patient-reported outcomes of CAM would be of value.
We conducted a three-phase instrument development study. In phase I, 30 CAM-receiving patients and 12 CAM practitioners completed a battery of standardized measures. Participants identified those standardized items relevant to CAM outcome and suggested additional outcome issues. In phase II, 20 CAM-receiving patients completed a Q-sort to determine which items from phase I were most relevant to CAM outcome. In phase III, five experts reviewed the items from phase II for content validity.
An integrative medicine clinic at a private, Midwest US hospital.
CAM patients, practitioners, and researchers and an outcomes measurement specialist.
In phase I, 30 standardized items were judged relevant to CAM outcome, and 8 additional items were suggested. In phase II, 29 of the 38 phase I items were deemed at least “moderately relevant” to CAM outcome. In phase III, experts added 15 items, dropped 9 items, and altered 3 items. The 35 resulting items were classified into content domains, forming a testable, pilot version of the instrument. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.explore.2005.02.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70167395</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1550830705001473</els_id><sourcerecordid>70167395</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-a12b5559c6751d403c129bf798844a105c041e096a659eccde52b11c8f7c5d0c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EolD4BFBW7BLGSWwnK1SVp1RUicLacp0JcpXEwU4q-HtctRJLVjOLc-dqDiFXFBIKlN9uEvzuG-swSQFYAmkCII7IGS1EEQuW0-OwMwZxkYGYkHPvNwAZZ5yfkgnloqAsFWdkdY9bbGxvus9IRSts6vgNe-uGaDkO2rYYvaLyo8Ooti6a27ZvsMVuUO4nUl0VzZoBXacGs92RldGmwwtyUqvG4-VhTsnH48P7_DleLJ9e5rNFrDOeDbGi6ZoxVmouGK1yyDRNy3UtyqLIc0WBacgpQskVZyVqXSFL15TqohaaVaCzKbnZ3-2d_RrRD7I1XmPTqA7t6KUInkRWsgCyPaid9d5hLXtn2vCCpCB3NuVGHmzKnU0JqQw2Q-76UDCuW6z-Ugd9AbjbAxje3Bp00muDnQ4iHOpBVtb8U_ELkG2I3w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70167395</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Developing a Self-Report Outcome Measure for Complementary and Alternative Medicine</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Eton, David T. ; Koffler, Karen ; Cella, David ; Eisenstein, Amy ; Astin, John A. ; Pelletier, Kenneth R. ; Riley, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Eton, David T. ; Koffler, Karen ; Cella, David ; Eisenstein, Amy ; Astin, John A. ; Pelletier, Kenneth R. ; Riley, David</creatorcontrib><description>Our objective was to develop a pilot measure of subjective outcomes of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Current options for assessing subjective outcomes in CAM are either too burdensome or fail to represent diverse outcomes. A single measure specifying common, patient-reported outcomes of CAM would be of value.
We conducted a three-phase instrument development study. In phase I, 30 CAM-receiving patients and 12 CAM practitioners completed a battery of standardized measures. Participants identified those standardized items relevant to CAM outcome and suggested additional outcome issues. In phase II, 20 CAM-receiving patients completed a Q-sort to determine which items from phase I were most relevant to CAM outcome. In phase III, five experts reviewed the items from phase II for content validity.
An integrative medicine clinic at a private, Midwest US hospital.
CAM patients, practitioners, and researchers and an outcomes measurement specialist.
In phase I, 30 standardized items were judged relevant to CAM outcome, and 8 additional items were suggested. In phase II, 29 of the 38 phase I items were deemed at least “moderately relevant” to CAM outcome. In phase III, experts added 15 items, dropped 9 items, and altered 3 items. The 35 resulting items were classified into content domains, forming a testable, pilot version of the instrument.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1550-8307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-7541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.explore.2005.02.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16781527</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; CAM ; Complementary Therapies ; Female ; Health Personnel ; Humans ; Male ; measurement ; Middle Aged ; outcome ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods ; Patients ; Pilot Projects ; quality of life ; Research Design ; Self Disclosure ; self-report</subject><ispartof>Explore (New York, N.Y.), 2005-05, Vol.1 (3), p.177-185</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-a12b5559c6751d403c129bf798844a105c041e096a659eccde52b11c8f7c5d0c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-a12b5559c6751d403c129bf798844a105c041e096a659eccde52b11c8f7c5d0c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550830705001473$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16781527$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eton, David T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koffler, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cella, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenstein, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Astin, John A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelletier, Kenneth R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riley, David</creatorcontrib><title>Developing a Self-Report Outcome Measure for Complementary and Alternative Medicine</title><title>Explore (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Explore (NY)</addtitle><description>Our objective was to develop a pilot measure of subjective outcomes of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Current options for assessing subjective outcomes in CAM are either too burdensome or fail to represent diverse outcomes. A single measure specifying common, patient-reported outcomes of CAM would be of value.
We conducted a three-phase instrument development study. In phase I, 30 CAM-receiving patients and 12 CAM practitioners completed a battery of standardized measures. Participants identified those standardized items relevant to CAM outcome and suggested additional outcome issues. In phase II, 20 CAM-receiving patients completed a Q-sort to determine which items from phase I were most relevant to CAM outcome. In phase III, five experts reviewed the items from phase II for content validity.
An integrative medicine clinic at a private, Midwest US hospital.
CAM patients, practitioners, and researchers and an outcomes measurement specialist.
In phase I, 30 standardized items were judged relevant to CAM outcome, and 8 additional items were suggested. In phase II, 29 of the 38 phase I items were deemed at least “moderately relevant” to CAM outcome. In phase III, experts added 15 items, dropped 9 items, and altered 3 items. The 35 resulting items were classified into content domains, forming a testable, pilot version of the instrument.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>CAM</subject><subject>Complementary Therapies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>measurement</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>outcome</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>quality of life</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Self Disclosure</subject><subject>self-report</subject><issn>1550-8307</issn><issn>1878-7541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EolD4BFBW7BLGSWwnK1SVp1RUicLacp0JcpXEwU4q-HtctRJLVjOLc-dqDiFXFBIKlN9uEvzuG-swSQFYAmkCII7IGS1EEQuW0-OwMwZxkYGYkHPvNwAZZ5yfkgnloqAsFWdkdY9bbGxvus9IRSts6vgNe-uGaDkO2rYYvaLyo8Ooti6a27ZvsMVuUO4nUl0VzZoBXacGs92RldGmwwtyUqvG4-VhTsnH48P7_DleLJ9e5rNFrDOeDbGi6ZoxVmouGK1yyDRNy3UtyqLIc0WBacgpQskVZyVqXSFL15TqohaaVaCzKbnZ3-2d_RrRD7I1XmPTqA7t6KUInkRWsgCyPaid9d5hLXtn2vCCpCB3NuVGHmzKnU0JqQw2Q-76UDCuW6z-Ugd9AbjbAxje3Bp00muDnQ4iHOpBVtb8U_ELkG2I3w</recordid><startdate>20050501</startdate><enddate>20050501</enddate><creator>Eton, David T.</creator><creator>Koffler, Karen</creator><creator>Cella, David</creator><creator>Eisenstein, Amy</creator><creator>Astin, John A.</creator><creator>Pelletier, Kenneth R.</creator><creator>Riley, David</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050501</creationdate><title>Developing a Self-Report Outcome Measure for Complementary and Alternative Medicine</title><author>Eton, David T. ; Koffler, Karen ; Cella, David ; Eisenstein, Amy ; Astin, John A. ; Pelletier, Kenneth R. ; Riley, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-a12b5559c6751d403c129bf798844a105c041e096a659eccde52b11c8f7c5d0c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>CAM</topic><topic>Complementary Therapies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>measurement</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>outcome</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>quality of life</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Self Disclosure</topic><topic>self-report</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eton, David T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koffler, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cella, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenstein, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Astin, John A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelletier, Kenneth R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riley, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Explore (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eton, David T.</au><au>Koffler, Karen</au><au>Cella, David</au><au>Eisenstein, Amy</au><au>Astin, John A.</au><au>Pelletier, Kenneth R.</au><au>Riley, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Developing a Self-Report Outcome Measure for Complementary and Alternative Medicine</atitle><jtitle>Explore (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Explore (NY)</addtitle><date>2005-05-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>177</spage><epage>185</epage><pages>177-185</pages><issn>1550-8307</issn><eissn>1878-7541</eissn><abstract>Our objective was to develop a pilot measure of subjective outcomes of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Current options for assessing subjective outcomes in CAM are either too burdensome or fail to represent diverse outcomes. A single measure specifying common, patient-reported outcomes of CAM would be of value.
We conducted a three-phase instrument development study. In phase I, 30 CAM-receiving patients and 12 CAM practitioners completed a battery of standardized measures. Participants identified those standardized items relevant to CAM outcome and suggested additional outcome issues. In phase II, 20 CAM-receiving patients completed a Q-sort to determine which items from phase I were most relevant to CAM outcome. In phase III, five experts reviewed the items from phase II for content validity.
An integrative medicine clinic at a private, Midwest US hospital.
CAM patients, practitioners, and researchers and an outcomes measurement specialist.
In phase I, 30 standardized items were judged relevant to CAM outcome, and 8 additional items were suggested. In phase II, 29 of the 38 phase I items were deemed at least “moderately relevant” to CAM outcome. In phase III, experts added 15 items, dropped 9 items, and altered 3 items. The 35 resulting items were classified into content domains, forming a testable, pilot version of the instrument.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16781527</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.explore.2005.02.007</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1550-8307 |
ispartof | Explore (New York, N.Y.), 2005-05, Vol.1 (3), p.177-185 |
issn | 1550-8307 1878-7541 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70167395 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged CAM Complementary Therapies Female Health Personnel Humans Male measurement Middle Aged outcome Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods Patients Pilot Projects quality of life Research Design Self Disclosure self-report |
title | Developing a Self-Report Outcome Measure for Complementary and Alternative Medicine |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T07%3A16%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Developing%20a%20Self-Report%20Outcome%20Measure%20for%20Complementary%20and%20Alternative%20Medicine&rft.jtitle=Explore%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Eton,%20David%20T.&rft.date=2005-05-01&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=177&rft.epage=185&rft.pages=177-185&rft.issn=1550-8307&rft.eissn=1878-7541&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.explore.2005.02.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70167395%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70167395&rft_id=info:pmid/16781527&rft_els_id=S1550830705001473&rfr_iscdi=true |