Confusion in Revascularization: Are Women Different and Why?

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in women in most developed countries of the world. Even though cardiovascular deaths of men in the United States have been declining, until recently the number of cardiovascular deaths in US women was on the rise, with 1 in 3 women dying from hear...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cardiology in review 2008-01, Vol.16 (1), p.30-35
Hauptverfasser: Dullum, Mercedes K. C, Dullum, Mercedes K. D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 35
container_issue 1
container_start_page 30
container_title Cardiology in review
container_volume 16
creator Dullum, Mercedes K. C
Dullum, Mercedes K. D
description Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in women in most developed countries of the world. Even though cardiovascular deaths of men in the United States have been declining, until recently the number of cardiovascular deaths in US women was on the rise, with 1 in 3 women dying from heart disease. Over the last 30 years numerous studies have reported sex differences in the epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, and clinical manifestations of coronary artery disease. A higher morbidity and mortality were also noted in women versus men undergoing revascularization during this early period. This has mainly been attributed to the fact that women have more comorbid conditions by the time that they are referred for revascularization. These conditions include increased age, hypertension, diabetes (metabolic syndrome), heart failure, renal disease, peripheral vascular disease, and worse lipid profile. With improvements of both surgical techniques and percutaneous coronary intervention, morbidity and mortality rates have decreased in women undergoing revascularization. However, there are now questions surrounding percutaneous coronary intervention strategies, particularly with drug eluting stents. More recent advances in coronary bypass graft surgery techniques, both off- and on-pump, and analysis of prospective and retrospective data have shown a clearly improved survival rate in patients undergoing coronary bypass graft surgery and the persistence of a durable result.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/CRD.0b013e31815cb185
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70151573</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70151573</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2995-c4efabdc6cbb960a3de1e7836da9f9775569e320d44837ecc7a366bb9f992a433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkFtLxDAQhYMo3v-BSJ986zrTJE0jgixdb7AgiOJjSNMpW-22mrQu66-34oLgwzBzhnPOw8fYCcIEQavz_HE2gQKQE8cMpSswk1tsHyXPYpFmfHu8IcVYcqX22EEIrwAJYiJ32R5moFEA7LPLvGurIdRdG9Vt9EifNrihsb7-sv34vIimnqKXbkltNKurijy1fWTbMnpZrK-O2E5lm0DHm33Inm-un_K7eP5we59P57FLtJaxE1TZonSpKwqdguUlIamMp6XVlVZKylQTT6AUIuOKnFOWp-norbROrOD8kJ399r777mOg0JtlHRw1jW2pG4JRgBKl-jGKX6PzXQieKvPu66X1a4NgfqiZkZr5T22MnW76h2JJ5V9og-mvd9U1Pfnw1gwr8mZBtukXBgCEFCjjBCADHGU8Dkj-Df7seCM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70151573</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Confusion in Revascularization: Are Women Different and Why?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Dullum, Mercedes K. C ; Dullum, Mercedes K. D</creator><creatorcontrib>Dullum, Mercedes K. C ; Dullum, Mercedes K. D</creatorcontrib><description>Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in women in most developed countries of the world. Even though cardiovascular deaths of men in the United States have been declining, until recently the number of cardiovascular deaths in US women was on the rise, with 1 in 3 women dying from heart disease. Over the last 30 years numerous studies have reported sex differences in the epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, and clinical manifestations of coronary artery disease. A higher morbidity and mortality were also noted in women versus men undergoing revascularization during this early period. This has mainly been attributed to the fact that women have more comorbid conditions by the time that they are referred for revascularization. These conditions include increased age, hypertension, diabetes (metabolic syndrome), heart failure, renal disease, peripheral vascular disease, and worse lipid profile. With improvements of both surgical techniques and percutaneous coronary intervention, morbidity and mortality rates have decreased in women undergoing revascularization. However, there are now questions surrounding percutaneous coronary intervention strategies, particularly with drug eluting stents. More recent advances in coronary bypass graft surgery techniques, both off- and on-pump, and analysis of prospective and retrospective data have shown a clearly improved survival rate in patients undergoing coronary bypass graft surgery and the persistence of a durable result.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1061-5377</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4683</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/CRD.0b013e31815cb185</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18091400</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - epidemiology ; Cardiovascular Diseases - surgery ; Coronary Artery Bypass - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Myocardial Revascularization - methods ; Sex Factors ; Survival Rate ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Cardiology in review, 2008-01, Vol.16 (1), p.30-35</ispartof><rights>2008 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2995-c4efabdc6cbb960a3de1e7836da9f9775569e320d44837ecc7a366bb9f992a433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18091400$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dullum, Mercedes K. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dullum, Mercedes K. D</creatorcontrib><title>Confusion in Revascularization: Are Women Different and Why?</title><title>Cardiology in review</title><addtitle>Cardiol Rev</addtitle><description>Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in women in most developed countries of the world. Even though cardiovascular deaths of men in the United States have been declining, until recently the number of cardiovascular deaths in US women was on the rise, with 1 in 3 women dying from heart disease. Over the last 30 years numerous studies have reported sex differences in the epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, and clinical manifestations of coronary artery disease. A higher morbidity and mortality were also noted in women versus men undergoing revascularization during this early period. This has mainly been attributed to the fact that women have more comorbid conditions by the time that they are referred for revascularization. These conditions include increased age, hypertension, diabetes (metabolic syndrome), heart failure, renal disease, peripheral vascular disease, and worse lipid profile. With improvements of both surgical techniques and percutaneous coronary intervention, morbidity and mortality rates have decreased in women undergoing revascularization. However, there are now questions surrounding percutaneous coronary intervention strategies, particularly with drug eluting stents. More recent advances in coronary bypass graft surgery techniques, both off- and on-pump, and analysis of prospective and retrospective data have shown a clearly improved survival rate in patients undergoing coronary bypass graft surgery and the persistence of a durable result.</description><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Bypass - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Myocardial Revascularization - methods</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>1061-5377</issn><issn>1538-4683</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkFtLxDAQhYMo3v-BSJ986zrTJE0jgixdb7AgiOJjSNMpW-22mrQu66-34oLgwzBzhnPOw8fYCcIEQavz_HE2gQKQE8cMpSswk1tsHyXPYpFmfHu8IcVYcqX22EEIrwAJYiJ32R5moFEA7LPLvGurIdRdG9Vt9EifNrihsb7-sv34vIimnqKXbkltNKurijy1fWTbMnpZrK-O2E5lm0DHm33Inm-un_K7eP5we59P57FLtJaxE1TZonSpKwqdguUlIamMp6XVlVZKylQTT6AUIuOKnFOWp-norbROrOD8kJ399r777mOg0JtlHRw1jW2pG4JRgBKl-jGKX6PzXQieKvPu66X1a4NgfqiZkZr5T22MnW76h2JJ5V9og-mvd9U1Pfnw1gwr8mZBtukXBgCEFCjjBCADHGU8Dkj-Df7seCM</recordid><startdate>200801</startdate><enddate>200801</enddate><creator>Dullum, Mercedes K. C</creator><creator>Dullum, Mercedes K. D</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200801</creationdate><title>Confusion in Revascularization: Are Women Different and Why?</title><author>Dullum, Mercedes K. C ; Dullum, Mercedes K. D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2995-c4efabdc6cbb960a3de1e7836da9f9775569e320d44837ecc7a366bb9f992a433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Bypass - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Myocardial Revascularization - methods</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dullum, Mercedes K. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dullum, Mercedes K. D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cardiology in review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dullum, Mercedes K. C</au><au>Dullum, Mercedes K. D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Confusion in Revascularization: Are Women Different and Why?</atitle><jtitle>Cardiology in review</jtitle><addtitle>Cardiol Rev</addtitle><date>2008-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>30</spage><epage>35</epage><pages>30-35</pages><issn>1061-5377</issn><eissn>1538-4683</eissn><abstract>Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in women in most developed countries of the world. Even though cardiovascular deaths of men in the United States have been declining, until recently the number of cardiovascular deaths in US women was on the rise, with 1 in 3 women dying from heart disease. Over the last 30 years numerous studies have reported sex differences in the epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, and clinical manifestations of coronary artery disease. A higher morbidity and mortality were also noted in women versus men undergoing revascularization during this early period. This has mainly been attributed to the fact that women have more comorbid conditions by the time that they are referred for revascularization. These conditions include increased age, hypertension, diabetes (metabolic syndrome), heart failure, renal disease, peripheral vascular disease, and worse lipid profile. With improvements of both surgical techniques and percutaneous coronary intervention, morbidity and mortality rates have decreased in women undergoing revascularization. However, there are now questions surrounding percutaneous coronary intervention strategies, particularly with drug eluting stents. More recent advances in coronary bypass graft surgery techniques, both off- and on-pump, and analysis of prospective and retrospective data have shown a clearly improved survival rate in patients undergoing coronary bypass graft surgery and the persistence of a durable result.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>18091400</pmid><doi>10.1097/CRD.0b013e31815cb185</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1061-5377
ispartof Cardiology in review, 2008-01, Vol.16 (1), p.30-35
issn 1061-5377
1538-4683
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70151573
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Cardiovascular Diseases - epidemiology
Cardiovascular Diseases - surgery
Coronary Artery Bypass - methods
Female
Humans
Myocardial Revascularization - methods
Sex Factors
Survival Rate
United States - epidemiology
title Confusion in Revascularization: Are Women Different and Why?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T06%3A21%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Confusion%20in%20Revascularization:%20Are%20Women%20Different%20and%20Why?&rft.jtitle=Cardiology%20in%20review&rft.au=Dullum,%20Mercedes%20K.%20C&rft.date=2008-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=35&rft.pages=30-35&rft.issn=1061-5377&rft.eissn=1538-4683&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/CRD.0b013e31815cb185&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70151573%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70151573&rft_id=info:pmid/18091400&rfr_iscdi=true