The acceptance of low prestige

I employ a simulation model previously used to analyze the choice of top members in a hierarchy to examine the acceptance of low prestige in a group of possibly large size. Results show that acceptance of low rank is most likely when the collective benefit available is mostly nonrival and nonexcluda...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Politics and the life sciences 2007-09, Vol.26 (2), p.33-45
1. Verfasser: Whitmeyer, Joseph M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 45
container_issue 2
container_start_page 33
container_title Politics and the life sciences
container_volume 26
creator Whitmeyer, Joseph M.
description I employ a simulation model previously used to analyze the choice of top members in a hierarchy to examine the acceptance of low prestige in a group of possibly large size. Results show that acceptance of low rank is most likely when the collective benefit available is mostly nonrival and nonexcludable and has low additivity (every contribution helps), and the ability of even low ability group members to contribute is high in absolute terms. I discuss possible mechanisms, through genetic or behavioral selection, by which the capacity to believe in one's own low rank may have developed.
doi_str_mv 10.2990/26_2_33
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70150473</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_2990_26_2_33</cupid><jstor_id>40072935</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40072935</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b300t-669c852e09a15a9dff5c216e8a119f7dab29beab5a209afde501f043686ad9ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0MtKxDAUBuAgijOO4hMoRVBxUc29zVIGbzDgZlyHtD0dO0ybmrSIb2-kxQFFXGVxPs5_8iN0TPA1VQrfUKmpZmwHTQlPSCy4SHbRFCcMx4qlfIIOvF9jTCjhch9NSJqyRKR8ik6XrxCZPIe2M00OkS2jjX2PWge-q1ZwiPZKs_FwNL4z9HJ_t5w_xovnh6f57SLOGMZdLKXKU0EBK0OEUUVZipwSCakhRJVJYTKqMjCZMDSQsgCBSYk5k6k0hcqBzdDFsLd19q0P2bqufA6bjWnA9l4nmAjME_YvFKENRagM8OwHXNveNeETmjLOlZCEBnQ5oNxZ7x2UunVVbdyHJlh_FavHYoM8Hdf1WQ3F1o1NBnAygLXvrPuec4wTqpgI86sxytSZq4oVbA_6HXY-2KyytoE_j_oE1waTCg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234495612</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The acceptance of low prestige</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><creator>Whitmeyer, Joseph M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Whitmeyer, Joseph M.</creatorcontrib><description>I employ a simulation model previously used to analyze the choice of top members in a hierarchy to examine the acceptance of low prestige in a group of possibly large size. Results show that acceptance of low rank is most likely when the collective benefit available is mostly nonrival and nonexcludable and has low additivity (every contribution helps), and the ability of even low ability group members to contribute is high in absolute terms. I discuss possible mechanisms, through genetic or behavioral selection, by which the capacity to believe in one's own low rank may have developed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0730-9384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-5457</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2990/26_2_33</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18837584</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PLISE2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, US: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Altruism ; Bioethics ; Biological Evolution ; Biological sciences ; Evolution ; Evolutionary biology ; Genetic selection ; Genetics ; Group Processes ; Heredity ; Hierarchies ; Hierarchy ; Hierarchy, Social ; Humans ; Modeling ; Models, Theoretical ; Multilevel models ; Politics ; Prestige ; Public goods ; Reproductive success ; Simulation ; Simulations ; Social classes ; Social sciences</subject><ispartof>Politics and the life sciences, 2007-09, Vol.26 (2), p.33-45</ispartof><rights>Association for Politics and the Life Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright 2007 Association for Politics and the Life Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright Beech Tree Publishing Sep 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b300t-669c852e09a15a9dff5c216e8a119f7dab29beab5a209afde501f043686ad9ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.2990/26_2_33$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40072935$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,26955,27901,27902,52338,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18837584$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Whitmeyer, Joseph M.</creatorcontrib><title>The acceptance of low prestige</title><title>Politics and the life sciences</title><addtitle>Politics and the Life Sciences</addtitle><description>I employ a simulation model previously used to analyze the choice of top members in a hierarchy to examine the acceptance of low prestige in a group of possibly large size. Results show that acceptance of low rank is most likely when the collective benefit available is mostly nonrival and nonexcludable and has low additivity (every contribution helps), and the ability of even low ability group members to contribute is high in absolute terms. I discuss possible mechanisms, through genetic or behavioral selection, by which the capacity to believe in one's own low rank may have developed.</description><subject>Altruism</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Biological sciences</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolutionary biology</subject><subject>Genetic selection</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Group Processes</subject><subject>Heredity</subject><subject>Hierarchies</subject><subject>Hierarchy</subject><subject>Hierarchy, Social</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Multilevel models</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Prestige</subject><subject>Public goods</subject><subject>Reproductive success</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Simulations</subject><subject>Social classes</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><issn>0730-9384</issn><issn>1471-5457</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0MtKxDAUBuAgijOO4hMoRVBxUc29zVIGbzDgZlyHtD0dO0ybmrSIb2-kxQFFXGVxPs5_8iN0TPA1VQrfUKmpZmwHTQlPSCy4SHbRFCcMx4qlfIIOvF9jTCjhch9NSJqyRKR8ik6XrxCZPIe2M00OkS2jjX2PWge-q1ZwiPZKs_FwNL4z9HJ_t5w_xovnh6f57SLOGMZdLKXKU0EBK0OEUUVZipwSCakhRJVJYTKqMjCZMDSQsgCBSYk5k6k0hcqBzdDFsLd19q0P2bqufA6bjWnA9l4nmAjME_YvFKENRagM8OwHXNveNeETmjLOlZCEBnQ5oNxZ7x2UunVVbdyHJlh_FavHYoM8Hdf1WQ3F1o1NBnAygLXvrPuec4wTqpgI86sxytSZq4oVbA_6HXY-2KyytoE_j_oE1waTCg</recordid><startdate>200709</startdate><enddate>200709</enddate><creator>Whitmeyer, Joseph M.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Association for Politics and the Life Sciences</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200709</creationdate><title>The acceptance of low prestige</title><author>Whitmeyer, Joseph M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b300t-669c852e09a15a9dff5c216e8a119f7dab29beab5a209afde501f043686ad9ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Altruism</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Biological sciences</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolutionary biology</topic><topic>Genetic selection</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Group Processes</topic><topic>Heredity</topic><topic>Hierarchies</topic><topic>Hierarchy</topic><topic>Hierarchy, Social</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Multilevel models</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Prestige</topic><topic>Public goods</topic><topic>Reproductive success</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Simulations</topic><topic>Social classes</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Whitmeyer, Joseph M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Politics and the life sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Whitmeyer, Joseph M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The acceptance of low prestige</atitle><jtitle>Politics and the life sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Politics and the Life Sciences</addtitle><date>2007-09</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>33</spage><epage>45</epage><pages>33-45</pages><issn>0730-9384</issn><eissn>1471-5457</eissn><coden>PLISE2</coden><abstract>I employ a simulation model previously used to analyze the choice of top members in a hierarchy to examine the acceptance of low prestige in a group of possibly large size. Results show that acceptance of low rank is most likely when the collective benefit available is mostly nonrival and nonexcludable and has low additivity (every contribution helps), and the ability of even low ability group members to contribute is high in absolute terms. I discuss possible mechanisms, through genetic or behavioral selection, by which the capacity to believe in one's own low rank may have developed.</abstract><cop>New York, US</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>18837584</pmid><doi>10.2990/26_2_33</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0730-9384
ispartof Politics and the life sciences, 2007-09, Vol.26 (2), p.33-45
issn 0730-9384
1471-5457
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70150473
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Political Science Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; BioOne Complete
subjects Altruism
Bioethics
Biological Evolution
Biological sciences
Evolution
Evolutionary biology
Genetic selection
Genetics
Group Processes
Heredity
Hierarchies
Hierarchy
Hierarchy, Social
Humans
Modeling
Models, Theoretical
Multilevel models
Politics
Prestige
Public goods
Reproductive success
Simulation
Simulations
Social classes
Social sciences
title The acceptance of low prestige
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T14%3A21%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20acceptance%20of%20low%20prestige&rft.jtitle=Politics%20and%20the%20life%20sciences&rft.au=Whitmeyer,%20Joseph%20M.&rft.date=2007-09&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=45&rft.pages=33-45&rft.issn=0730-9384&rft.eissn=1471-5457&rft.coden=PLISE2&rft_id=info:doi/10.2990/26_2_33&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40072935%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234495612&rft_id=info:pmid/18837584&rft_cupid=10_2990_26_2_33&rft_jstor_id=40072935&rfr_iscdi=true