The acceptance of low prestige
I employ a simulation model previously used to analyze the choice of top members in a hierarchy to examine the acceptance of low prestige in a group of possibly large size. Results show that acceptance of low rank is most likely when the collective benefit available is mostly nonrival and nonexcluda...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Politics and the life sciences 2007-09, Vol.26 (2), p.33-45 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 45 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 33 |
container_title | Politics and the life sciences |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Whitmeyer, Joseph M. |
description | I employ a simulation model previously used to analyze the choice of top members in a hierarchy to examine the acceptance of low prestige in a group of possibly large size. Results show that acceptance of low rank is most likely when the collective benefit available is mostly nonrival and nonexcludable and has low additivity (every contribution helps), and the ability of even low ability group members to contribute is high in absolute terms. I discuss possible mechanisms, through genetic or behavioral selection, by which the capacity to believe in one's own low rank may have developed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2990/26_2_33 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70150473</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_2990_26_2_33</cupid><jstor_id>40072935</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40072935</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b300t-669c852e09a15a9dff5c216e8a119f7dab29beab5a209afde501f043686ad9ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0MtKxDAUBuAgijOO4hMoRVBxUc29zVIGbzDgZlyHtD0dO0ybmrSIb2-kxQFFXGVxPs5_8iN0TPA1VQrfUKmpZmwHTQlPSCy4SHbRFCcMx4qlfIIOvF9jTCjhch9NSJqyRKR8ik6XrxCZPIe2M00OkS2jjX2PWge-q1ZwiPZKs_FwNL4z9HJ_t5w_xovnh6f57SLOGMZdLKXKU0EBK0OEUUVZipwSCakhRJVJYTKqMjCZMDSQsgCBSYk5k6k0hcqBzdDFsLd19q0P2bqufA6bjWnA9l4nmAjME_YvFKENRagM8OwHXNveNeETmjLOlZCEBnQ5oNxZ7x2UunVVbdyHJlh_FavHYoM8Hdf1WQ3F1o1NBnAygLXvrPuec4wTqpgI86sxytSZq4oVbA_6HXY-2KyytoE_j_oE1waTCg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234495612</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The acceptance of low prestige</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><creator>Whitmeyer, Joseph M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Whitmeyer, Joseph M.</creatorcontrib><description>I employ a simulation model previously used to analyze the choice of top members in a hierarchy to examine the acceptance of low prestige in a group of possibly large size. Results show that acceptance of low rank is most likely when the collective benefit available is mostly nonrival and nonexcludable and has low additivity (every contribution helps), and the ability of even low ability group members to contribute is high in absolute terms. I discuss possible mechanisms, through genetic or behavioral selection, by which the capacity to believe in one's own low rank may have developed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0730-9384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-5457</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2990/26_2_33</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18837584</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PLISE2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, US: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Altruism ; Bioethics ; Biological Evolution ; Biological sciences ; Evolution ; Evolutionary biology ; Genetic selection ; Genetics ; Group Processes ; Heredity ; Hierarchies ; Hierarchy ; Hierarchy, Social ; Humans ; Modeling ; Models, Theoretical ; Multilevel models ; Politics ; Prestige ; Public goods ; Reproductive success ; Simulation ; Simulations ; Social classes ; Social sciences</subject><ispartof>Politics and the life sciences, 2007-09, Vol.26 (2), p.33-45</ispartof><rights>Association for Politics and the Life Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright 2007 Association for Politics and the Life Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright Beech Tree Publishing Sep 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b300t-669c852e09a15a9dff5c216e8a119f7dab29beab5a209afde501f043686ad9ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.2990/26_2_33$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40072935$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,26955,27901,27902,52338,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18837584$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Whitmeyer, Joseph M.</creatorcontrib><title>The acceptance of low prestige</title><title>Politics and the life sciences</title><addtitle>Politics and the Life Sciences</addtitle><description>I employ a simulation model previously used to analyze the choice of top members in a hierarchy to examine the acceptance of low prestige in a group of possibly large size. Results show that acceptance of low rank is most likely when the collective benefit available is mostly nonrival and nonexcludable and has low additivity (every contribution helps), and the ability of even low ability group members to contribute is high in absolute terms. I discuss possible mechanisms, through genetic or behavioral selection, by which the capacity to believe in one's own low rank may have developed.</description><subject>Altruism</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Biological sciences</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolutionary biology</subject><subject>Genetic selection</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Group Processes</subject><subject>Heredity</subject><subject>Hierarchies</subject><subject>Hierarchy</subject><subject>Hierarchy, Social</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Multilevel models</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Prestige</subject><subject>Public goods</subject><subject>Reproductive success</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Simulations</subject><subject>Social classes</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><issn>0730-9384</issn><issn>1471-5457</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0MtKxDAUBuAgijOO4hMoRVBxUc29zVIGbzDgZlyHtD0dO0ybmrSIb2-kxQFFXGVxPs5_8iN0TPA1VQrfUKmpZmwHTQlPSCy4SHbRFCcMx4qlfIIOvF9jTCjhch9NSJqyRKR8ik6XrxCZPIe2M00OkS2jjX2PWge-q1ZwiPZKs_FwNL4z9HJ_t5w_xovnh6f57SLOGMZdLKXKU0EBK0OEUUVZipwSCakhRJVJYTKqMjCZMDSQsgCBSYk5k6k0hcqBzdDFsLd19q0P2bqufA6bjWnA9l4nmAjME_YvFKENRagM8OwHXNveNeETmjLOlZCEBnQ5oNxZ7x2UunVVbdyHJlh_FavHYoM8Hdf1WQ3F1o1NBnAygLXvrPuec4wTqpgI86sxytSZq4oVbA_6HXY-2KyytoE_j_oE1waTCg</recordid><startdate>200709</startdate><enddate>200709</enddate><creator>Whitmeyer, Joseph M.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Association for Politics and the Life Sciences</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200709</creationdate><title>The acceptance of low prestige</title><author>Whitmeyer, Joseph M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b300t-669c852e09a15a9dff5c216e8a119f7dab29beab5a209afde501f043686ad9ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Altruism</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Biological sciences</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolutionary biology</topic><topic>Genetic selection</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Group Processes</topic><topic>Heredity</topic><topic>Hierarchies</topic><topic>Hierarchy</topic><topic>Hierarchy, Social</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Multilevel models</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Prestige</topic><topic>Public goods</topic><topic>Reproductive success</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Simulations</topic><topic>Social classes</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Whitmeyer, Joseph M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Politics and the life sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Whitmeyer, Joseph M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The acceptance of low prestige</atitle><jtitle>Politics and the life sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Politics and the Life Sciences</addtitle><date>2007-09</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>33</spage><epage>45</epage><pages>33-45</pages><issn>0730-9384</issn><eissn>1471-5457</eissn><coden>PLISE2</coden><abstract>I employ a simulation model previously used to analyze the choice of top members in a hierarchy to examine the acceptance of low prestige in a group of possibly large size. Results show that acceptance of low rank is most likely when the collective benefit available is mostly nonrival and nonexcludable and has low additivity (every contribution helps), and the ability of even low ability group members to contribute is high in absolute terms. I discuss possible mechanisms, through genetic or behavioral selection, by which the capacity to believe in one's own low rank may have developed.</abstract><cop>New York, US</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>18837584</pmid><doi>10.2990/26_2_33</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0730-9384 |
ispartof | Politics and the life sciences, 2007-09, Vol.26 (2), p.33-45 |
issn | 0730-9384 1471-5457 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70150473 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Political Science Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; BioOne Complete |
subjects | Altruism Bioethics Biological Evolution Biological sciences Evolution Evolutionary biology Genetic selection Genetics Group Processes Heredity Hierarchies Hierarchy Hierarchy, Social Humans Modeling Models, Theoretical Multilevel models Politics Prestige Public goods Reproductive success Simulation Simulations Social classes Social sciences |
title | The acceptance of low prestige |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T14%3A21%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20acceptance%20of%20low%20prestige&rft.jtitle=Politics%20and%20the%20life%20sciences&rft.au=Whitmeyer,%20Joseph%20M.&rft.date=2007-09&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=45&rft.pages=33-45&rft.issn=0730-9384&rft.eissn=1471-5457&rft.coden=PLISE2&rft_id=info:doi/10.2990/26_2_33&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40072935%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234495612&rft_id=info:pmid/18837584&rft_cupid=10_2990_26_2_33&rft_jstor_id=40072935&rfr_iscdi=true |