Should the replacement of acute blood loss with non-red blood cell solutions in the elderly be called resuscitation or embalming?

Should the replacement of acute blood loss with non-red blood cell solutions in the elderly be called resuscitation or embalming?

The use of non-RBC fluid (allowing cardiac output to increase and oxygen delivery to be maintained) rather than RBCs in the actively bleeding patient is tolerated in the healthy young patient, as they may endure an isovolaemic drop in haemoglobin by up to 70%. However, in the elderly patient (eg 65...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical care and resuscitation 2005-06, Vol.7 (2), p.133-135
1. Verfasser: Worthley, L I G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Cardiovascular system
Complications
Diseases
Erythrocytes
Transfusion
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 135
container_issue 2
container_start_page 133
container_title Critical care and resuscitation
container_volume 7
creator Worthley, L I G
description The use of non-RBC fluid (allowing cardiac output to increase and oxygen delivery to be maintained) rather than RBCs in the actively bleeding patient is tolerated in the healthy young patient, as they may endure an isovolaemic drop in haemoglobin by up to 70%. However, in the elderly patient (eg 65 years and older) with cardiovascular comorbid conditions, any acute drop in haemoglobin can be hazardous; deliberate isovolaemic resuscitation using non-RBC fluid rather than RBC in this group may reflect more a process of embalming rather than resuscitation. (non-author abstract)
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1441-2772(23)01647-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70147851</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/informit.518729954661185</informt_id><sourcerecordid>70147851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2282-7e1641452c22d12838a801d81041b9b36929fbeb3fafb347fc96a6f8607741c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEtv3SAQhVm0StLb_oRWrKp24ZaXAa-qKupLitRFEik7BHicS4TNLdiKsuw_L_a9SlfAmcOcmQ-ht5R8ooTKz9dUCNowpdgHxj9WRaiGvUAXz_I5elXKAyGsE1KdoXMqW6E10Rfo7_U-LbHH8x5whkO0HkaYZpwGbP0yA3YxpR7HVAp-DPMeT2lqMvQn3UOMuKS4zCFNBYdpawSxhxyfsAPsbYzVnaEsxYfZrj6cMobR2TiG6f7La_RysLHAm9O5Q7ffv91c_myufv_4dfn1qvGMadYoqGtR0bL67CnTXFtNaK8pEdR1jsuOdYMDxwc7OC7U4Dtp5aAlUUpQ3_Iden_se8jpzwJlNmMo6_x2grQUowgVSre0Gtuj0ee6dYbBHHIYbX4ylJiVt9l4mxWsYdxsvOtlh96dAhY3Qv__1wl2NdwdDXkMs_GpkvEbtwc7F1PAZr83YRrSVk_53vQpGOvKGsx5DX4utlQr1nWtkJJS3fJ_9_Od5Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70147851</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Should the replacement of acute blood loss with non-red blood cell solutions in the elderly be called resuscitation or embalming?</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Worthley, L I G</creator><creatorcontrib>Worthley, L I G</creatorcontrib><description>The use of non-RBC fluid (allowing cardiac output to increase and oxygen delivery to be maintained) rather than RBCs in the actively bleeding patient is tolerated in the healthy young patient, as they may endure an isovolaemic drop in haemoglobin by up to 70%. However, in the elderly patient (eg 65 years and older) with cardiovascular comorbid conditions, any acute drop in haemoglobin can be hazardous; deliberate isovolaemic resuscitation using non-RBC fluid rather than RBC in this group may reflect more a process of embalming rather than resuscitation. (non-author abstract)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1441-2772</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1441-2772(23)01647-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16548808</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia</publisher><subject>Cardiovascular system ; Complications ; Diseases ; Erythrocytes ; Transfusion</subject><ispartof>Critical care and resuscitation, 2005-06, Vol.7 (2), p.133-135</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2282-7e1641452c22d12838a801d81041b9b36929fbeb3fafb347fc96a6f8607741c53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16548808$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Worthley, L I G</creatorcontrib><title>Should the replacement of acute blood loss with non-red blood cell solutions in the elderly be called resuscitation or embalming?</title><title>Critical care and resuscitation</title><addtitle>Crit Care Resusc</addtitle><description>The use of non-RBC fluid (allowing cardiac output to increase and oxygen delivery to be maintained) rather than RBCs in the actively bleeding patient is tolerated in the healthy young patient, as they may endure an isovolaemic drop in haemoglobin by up to 70%. However, in the elderly patient (eg 65 years and older) with cardiovascular comorbid conditions, any acute drop in haemoglobin can be hazardous; deliberate isovolaemic resuscitation using non-RBC fluid rather than RBC in this group may reflect more a process of embalming rather than resuscitation. (non-author abstract)</description><subject>Cardiovascular system</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Diseases</subject><subject>Erythrocytes</subject><subject>Transfusion</subject><issn>1441-2772</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkEtv3SAQhVm0StLb_oRWrKp24ZaXAa-qKupLitRFEik7BHicS4TNLdiKsuw_L_a9SlfAmcOcmQ-ht5R8ooTKz9dUCNowpdgHxj9WRaiGvUAXz_I5elXKAyGsE1KdoXMqW6E10Rfo7_U-LbHH8x5whkO0HkaYZpwGbP0yA3YxpR7HVAp-DPMeT2lqMvQn3UOMuKS4zCFNBYdpawSxhxyfsAPsbYzVnaEsxYfZrj6cMobR2TiG6f7La_RysLHAm9O5Q7ffv91c_myufv_4dfn1qvGMadYoqGtR0bL67CnTXFtNaK8pEdR1jsuOdYMDxwc7OC7U4Dtp5aAlUUpQ3_Iden_se8jpzwJlNmMo6_x2grQUowgVSre0Gtuj0ee6dYbBHHIYbX4ylJiVt9l4mxWsYdxsvOtlh96dAhY3Qv__1wl2NdwdDXkMs_GpkvEbtwc7F1PAZr83YRrSVk_53vQpGOvKGsx5DX4utlQr1nWtkJJS3fJ_9_Od5Q</recordid><startdate>20050601</startdate><enddate>20050601</enddate><creator>Worthley, L I G</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050601</creationdate><title>Should the replacement of acute blood loss with non-red blood cell solutions in the elderly be called resuscitation or embalming?</title><author>Worthley, L I G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2282-7e1641452c22d12838a801d81041b9b36929fbeb3fafb347fc96a6f8607741c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Cardiovascular system</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Diseases</topic><topic>Erythrocytes</topic><topic>Transfusion</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Worthley, L I G</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Critical care and resuscitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Worthley, L I G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Should the replacement of acute blood loss with non-red blood cell solutions in the elderly be called resuscitation or embalming?</atitle><jtitle>Critical care and resuscitation</jtitle><addtitle>Crit Care Resusc</addtitle><date>2005-06-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>133</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>133-135</pages><issn>1441-2772</issn><abstract>The use of non-RBC fluid (allowing cardiac output to increase and oxygen delivery to be maintained) rather than RBCs in the actively bleeding patient is tolerated in the healthy young patient, as they may endure an isovolaemic drop in haemoglobin by up to 70%. However, in the elderly patient (eg 65 years and older) with cardiovascular comorbid conditions, any acute drop in haemoglobin can be hazardous; deliberate isovolaemic resuscitation using non-RBC fluid rather than RBC in this group may reflect more a process of embalming rather than resuscitation. (non-author abstract)</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pmid>16548808</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1441-2772(23)01647-2</doi><tpages>133-5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1441-2772
ispartof Critical care and resuscitation, 2005-06, Vol.7 (2), p.133-135
issn 1441-2772
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70147851
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Cardiovascular system
Complications
Diseases
Erythrocytes
Transfusion
title Should the replacement of acute blood loss with non-red blood cell solutions in the elderly be called resuscitation or embalming?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T16%3A35%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Should%20the%20replacement%20of%20acute%20blood%20loss%20with%20non-red%20blood%20cell%20solutions%20in%20the%20elderly%20be%20called%20resuscitation%20or%20embalming?&rft.jtitle=Critical%20care%20and%20resuscitation&rft.au=Worthley,%20L%20I%20G&rft.date=2005-06-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=133-135&rft.issn=1441-2772&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1441-2772(23)01647-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70147851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70147851&rft_id=info:pmid/16548808&rft_informt_id=10.3316/informit.518729954661185&rfr_iscdi=true