Kristine Bonnevie, Tine Tammes and Elisabeth Schiemann in Early Genetics: Emerging Chances for a University Career for Women

The beginning of the twentieth century saw the emergence of the discipline of genetics. It is striking how many female scientists were contributing to this new field at the time. At least three female pioneers succeeded in becoming professors: Kristine Bonnevie (Norway), Elisabeth Schiemann (Germany...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the history of biology 2007-09, Vol.40 (3), p.427-466
Hauptverfasser: Stamhuis, Ida H., Monsen, Arve
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 466
container_issue 3
container_start_page 427
container_title Journal of the history of biology
container_volume 40
creator Stamhuis, Ida H.
Monsen, Arve
description The beginning of the twentieth century saw the emergence of the discipline of genetics. It is striking how many female scientists were contributing to this new field at the time. At least three female pioneers succeeded in becoming professors: Kristine Bonnevie (Norway), Elisabeth Schiemann (Germany) and the Tine Tammes (The Netherlands). The question is which factors contributed to the success of these women's careers? At the time women were gaining access to university education it had become quite the norm for universities to be sites for teaching and research. They were still expanding: new laboratories were being built and new disciplines were being established. All three women benefited from the fact that genetics was considered a new field promising in terms of its utility to society; in the case of Tammes and Schiemann in agriculture and in the case of Bonnevie in eugenics. On the other hand, the field of genetics also benefited from the fact that these first female researchers were eager for the chance to work in science and wanted to make active contributions. They all worked and studied in environments which, although different from one another, were positive towards them, at least at the start. Having a patron was generally a prerequisite. Tammes profited from her teacher's contacts and status. Bonnevie made herself indispensable through her success as a teacher and eventually made her position so strong that she was no longer dependent on a single patron. The case of Schiemann adds something new; it shows the vulnerability of such dependency. Initially, Schiemann's teacher had to rely on the first generation of university women simply because he was unable to attract ambitious young men to his institute. In those early, uncertain years of the new discipline, male scientists tended to choose other, better established, and more prestigious disciplines. However, when genetics itself had become an established field, it also became more attractive to men. Our case studies also demonstrate that a new field at first relatively open to women closes its doors to them once it becomes established.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10739-007-9132-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70140676</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>29737497</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>29737497</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-cd7bc5085c4c205635448c57c4cec65df63cec76ffc5a4c57a8fc5175e2a10673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFvEzEQhS1U1KalP4ADlYVUTmw7Xq_XNjeIQkGtxKGpOFqOM9s42vW29qZqJH48XhJRiQsX-43neyN5HiFvGVwwAHmZGEiuiywLzXhZPL8iEyYkL4AreUAmAGVZCGBwRI5TWgOAVlofkiOmuAIQ1YT8uo4-DT4g_dKHgE8eP9L5WM5t12GiNizprPXJLnBY0Vu38tjZEKgPdGZju6VXGHDwLn2isw7jvQ_3dLqywWVv00dq6V3wTxiTH7Z0aiNi_PP-s-8wvCGvG9smPN3fJ-Tu62w-_Vbc_Lj6Pv18U7hKlEPhlnLhBCjhKleCqLmoKuWEzCW6Wiybmmch66Zxwla5YVVWTAosLYNa8hPyYTf3IfaPG0yD6Xxy2LY2YL9JRgKrMlf_FyzHFXIxgu__Adf9Job8CaMUqyVIwTPEdpCLfUoRG_MQfWfj1jAwY4BmF6AZ5Rigec6es_3gzaLD5Ytjn1gGzveATc62Tcy79umF00zLWo_cux23TkMf__ZLLbms8vEbWG-syw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>881670753</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Kristine Bonnevie, Tine Tammes and Elisabeth Schiemann in Early Genetics: Emerging Chances for a University Career for Women</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Stamhuis, Ida H. ; Monsen, Arve</creator><creatorcontrib>Stamhuis, Ida H. ; Monsen, Arve</creatorcontrib><description>The beginning of the twentieth century saw the emergence of the discipline of genetics. It is striking how many female scientists were contributing to this new field at the time. At least three female pioneers succeeded in becoming professors: Kristine Bonnevie (Norway), Elisabeth Schiemann (Germany) and the Tine Tammes (The Netherlands). The question is which factors contributed to the success of these women's careers? At the time women were gaining access to university education it had become quite the norm for universities to be sites for teaching and research. They were still expanding: new laboratories were being built and new disciplines were being established. All three women benefited from the fact that genetics was considered a new field promising in terms of its utility to society; in the case of Tammes and Schiemann in agriculture and in the case of Bonnevie in eugenics. On the other hand, the field of genetics also benefited from the fact that these first female researchers were eager for the chance to work in science and wanted to make active contributions. They all worked and studied in environments which, although different from one another, were positive towards them, at least at the start. Having a patron was generally a prerequisite. Tammes profited from her teacher's contacts and status. Bonnevie made herself indispensable through her success as a teacher and eventually made her position so strong that she was no longer dependent on a single patron. The case of Schiemann adds something new; it shows the vulnerability of such dependency. Initially, Schiemann's teacher had to rely on the first generation of university women simply because he was unable to attract ambitious young men to his institute. In those early, uncertain years of the new discipline, male scientists tended to choose other, better established, and more prestigious disciplines. However, when genetics itself had become an established field, it also became more attractive to men. Our case studies also demonstrate that a new field at first relatively open to women closes its doors to them once it becomes established.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0387</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10739-007-9132-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18380054</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Archives ; Biology ; Bonnevie ; Career Choice ; Careers ; College instruction ; College students ; Elisabeth Schiemann ; Europe ; Evolutionary genetics ; Faculty - history ; Female ; Females ; Genetics ; Genetics - history ; Genetics - manpower ; History of medicine and histology ; History of science and technology ; History, 19th Century ; History, 20th Century ; Humans ; Kristine Bonnevie ; Life sciences ; Medical genetics ; Palaeontology; evolution ; genetics ; Research universities ; Schiemann ; Scientists ; Special Section on Women in Genetics ; Studies ; Tammes ; Tine Tammes ; Universities ; Universities - history ; Universities - manpower ; Women, Working - history ; Working women ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Journal of the history of biology, 2007-09, Vol.40 (3), p.427-466</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-cd7bc5085c4c205635448c57c4cec65df63cec76ffc5a4c57a8fc5175e2a10673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-cd7bc5085c4c205635448c57c4cec65df63cec76ffc5a4c57a8fc5175e2a10673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/29737497$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/29737497$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27922,27923,58015,58248</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19197694$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18380054$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stamhuis, Ida H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monsen, Arve</creatorcontrib><title>Kristine Bonnevie, Tine Tammes and Elisabeth Schiemann in Early Genetics: Emerging Chances for a University Career for Women</title><title>Journal of the history of biology</title><addtitle>J Hist Biol</addtitle><description>The beginning of the twentieth century saw the emergence of the discipline of genetics. It is striking how many female scientists were contributing to this new field at the time. At least three female pioneers succeeded in becoming professors: Kristine Bonnevie (Norway), Elisabeth Schiemann (Germany) and the Tine Tammes (The Netherlands). The question is which factors contributed to the success of these women's careers? At the time women were gaining access to university education it had become quite the norm for universities to be sites for teaching and research. They were still expanding: new laboratories were being built and new disciplines were being established. All three women benefited from the fact that genetics was considered a new field promising in terms of its utility to society; in the case of Tammes and Schiemann in agriculture and in the case of Bonnevie in eugenics. On the other hand, the field of genetics also benefited from the fact that these first female researchers were eager for the chance to work in science and wanted to make active contributions. They all worked and studied in environments which, although different from one another, were positive towards them, at least at the start. Having a patron was generally a prerequisite. Tammes profited from her teacher's contacts and status. Bonnevie made herself indispensable through her success as a teacher and eventually made her position so strong that she was no longer dependent on a single patron. The case of Schiemann adds something new; it shows the vulnerability of such dependency. Initially, Schiemann's teacher had to rely on the first generation of university women simply because he was unable to attract ambitious young men to his institute. In those early, uncertain years of the new discipline, male scientists tended to choose other, better established, and more prestigious disciplines. However, when genetics itself had become an established field, it also became more attractive to men. Our case studies also demonstrate that a new field at first relatively open to women closes its doors to them once it becomes established.</description><subject>Archives</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Bonnevie</subject><subject>Career Choice</subject><subject>Careers</subject><subject>College instruction</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Elisabeth Schiemann</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Evolutionary genetics</subject><subject>Faculty - history</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Genetics - history</subject><subject>Genetics - manpower</subject><subject>History of medicine and histology</subject><subject>History of science and technology</subject><subject>History, 19th Century</subject><subject>History, 20th Century</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kristine Bonnevie</subject><subject>Life sciences</subject><subject>Medical genetics</subject><subject>Palaeontology; evolution ; genetics</subject><subject>Research universities</subject><subject>Schiemann</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Special Section on Women in Genetics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tammes</subject><subject>Tine Tammes</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Universities - history</subject><subject>Universities - manpower</subject><subject>Women, Working - history</subject><subject>Working women</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0022-5010</issn><issn>1573-0387</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFvEzEQhS1U1KalP4ADlYVUTmw7Xq_XNjeIQkGtxKGpOFqOM9s42vW29qZqJH48XhJRiQsX-43neyN5HiFvGVwwAHmZGEiuiywLzXhZPL8iEyYkL4AreUAmAGVZCGBwRI5TWgOAVlofkiOmuAIQ1YT8uo4-DT4g_dKHgE8eP9L5WM5t12GiNizprPXJLnBY0Vu38tjZEKgPdGZju6VXGHDwLn2isw7jvQ_3dLqywWVv00dq6V3wTxiTH7Z0aiNi_PP-s-8wvCGvG9smPN3fJ-Tu62w-_Vbc_Lj6Pv18U7hKlEPhlnLhBCjhKleCqLmoKuWEzCW6Wiybmmch66Zxwla5YVVWTAosLYNa8hPyYTf3IfaPG0yD6Xxy2LY2YL9JRgKrMlf_FyzHFXIxgu__Adf9Job8CaMUqyVIwTPEdpCLfUoRG_MQfWfj1jAwY4BmF6AZ5Rigec6es_3gzaLD5Ytjn1gGzveATc62Tcy79umF00zLWo_cux23TkMf__ZLLbms8vEbWG-syw</recordid><startdate>20070901</startdate><enddate>20070901</enddate><creator>Stamhuis, Ida H.</creator><creator>Monsen, Arve</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070901</creationdate><title>Kristine Bonnevie, Tine Tammes and Elisabeth Schiemann in Early Genetics: Emerging Chances for a University Career for Women</title><author>Stamhuis, Ida H. ; Monsen, Arve</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-cd7bc5085c4c205635448c57c4cec65df63cec76ffc5a4c57a8fc5175e2a10673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Archives</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Bonnevie</topic><topic>Career Choice</topic><topic>Careers</topic><topic>College instruction</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Elisabeth Schiemann</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Evolutionary genetics</topic><topic>Faculty - history</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Genetics - history</topic><topic>Genetics - manpower</topic><topic>History of medicine and histology</topic><topic>History of science and technology</topic><topic>History, 19th Century</topic><topic>History, 20th Century</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kristine Bonnevie</topic><topic>Life sciences</topic><topic>Medical genetics</topic><topic>Palaeontology; evolution ; genetics</topic><topic>Research universities</topic><topic>Schiemann</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Special Section on Women in Genetics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tammes</topic><topic>Tine Tammes</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Universities - history</topic><topic>Universities - manpower</topic><topic>Women, Working - history</topic><topic>Working women</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stamhuis, Ida H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monsen, Arve</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the history of biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stamhuis, Ida H.</au><au>Monsen, Arve</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Kristine Bonnevie, Tine Tammes and Elisabeth Schiemann in Early Genetics: Emerging Chances for a University Career for Women</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the history of biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Hist Biol</addtitle><date>2007-09-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>427</spage><epage>466</epage><pages>427-466</pages><issn>0022-5010</issn><eissn>1573-0387</eissn><abstract>The beginning of the twentieth century saw the emergence of the discipline of genetics. It is striking how many female scientists were contributing to this new field at the time. At least three female pioneers succeeded in becoming professors: Kristine Bonnevie (Norway), Elisabeth Schiemann (Germany) and the Tine Tammes (The Netherlands). The question is which factors contributed to the success of these women's careers? At the time women were gaining access to university education it had become quite the norm for universities to be sites for teaching and research. They were still expanding: new laboratories were being built and new disciplines were being established. All three women benefited from the fact that genetics was considered a new field promising in terms of its utility to society; in the case of Tammes and Schiemann in agriculture and in the case of Bonnevie in eugenics. On the other hand, the field of genetics also benefited from the fact that these first female researchers were eager for the chance to work in science and wanted to make active contributions. They all worked and studied in environments which, although different from one another, were positive towards them, at least at the start. Having a patron was generally a prerequisite. Tammes profited from her teacher's contacts and status. Bonnevie made herself indispensable through her success as a teacher and eventually made her position so strong that she was no longer dependent on a single patron. The case of Schiemann adds something new; it shows the vulnerability of such dependency. Initially, Schiemann's teacher had to rely on the first generation of university women simply because he was unable to attract ambitious young men to his institute. In those early, uncertain years of the new discipline, male scientists tended to choose other, better established, and more prestigious disciplines. However, when genetics itself had become an established field, it also became more attractive to men. Our case studies also demonstrate that a new field at first relatively open to women closes its doors to them once it becomes established.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>18380054</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10739-007-9132-x</doi><tpages>40</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-5010
ispartof Journal of the history of biology, 2007-09, Vol.40 (3), p.427-466
issn 0022-5010
1573-0387
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70140676
source MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Archives
Biology
Bonnevie
Career Choice
Careers
College instruction
College students
Elisabeth Schiemann
Europe
Evolutionary genetics
Faculty - history
Female
Females
Genetics
Genetics - history
Genetics - manpower
History of medicine and histology
History of science and technology
History, 19th Century
History, 20th Century
Humans
Kristine Bonnevie
Life sciences
Medical genetics
Palaeontology
evolution
genetics
Research universities
Schiemann
Scientists
Special Section on Women in Genetics
Studies
Tammes
Tine Tammes
Universities
Universities - history
Universities - manpower
Women, Working - history
Working women
Zoology
title Kristine Bonnevie, Tine Tammes and Elisabeth Schiemann in Early Genetics: Emerging Chances for a University Career for Women
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T07%3A07%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Kristine%20Bonnevie,%20Tine%20Tammes%20and%20Elisabeth%20Schiemann%20in%20Early%20Genetics:%20Emerging%20Chances%20for%20a%20University%20Career%20for%20Women&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20history%20of%20biology&rft.au=Stamhuis,%20Ida%20H.&rft.date=2007-09-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=427&rft.epage=466&rft.pages=427-466&rft.issn=0022-5010&rft.eissn=1573-0387&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10739-007-9132-x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E29737497%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=881670753&rft_id=info:pmid/18380054&rft_jstor_id=29737497&rfr_iscdi=true