Kristine Bonnevie, Tine Tammes and Elisabeth Schiemann in Early Genetics: Emerging Chances for a University Career for Women
The beginning of the twentieth century saw the emergence of the discipline of genetics. It is striking how many female scientists were contributing to this new field at the time. At least three female pioneers succeeded in becoming professors: Kristine Bonnevie (Norway), Elisabeth Schiemann (Germany...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the history of biology 2007-09, Vol.40 (3), p.427-466 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 466 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 427 |
container_title | Journal of the history of biology |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Stamhuis, Ida H. Monsen, Arve |
description | The beginning of the twentieth century saw the emergence of the discipline of genetics. It is striking how many female scientists were contributing to this new field at the time. At least three female pioneers succeeded in becoming professors: Kristine Bonnevie (Norway), Elisabeth Schiemann (Germany) and the Tine Tammes (The Netherlands). The question is which factors contributed to the success of these women's careers? At the time women were gaining access to university education it had become quite the norm for universities to be sites for teaching and research. They were still expanding: new laboratories were being built and new disciplines were being established. All three women benefited from the fact that genetics was considered a new field promising in terms of its utility to society; in the case of Tammes and Schiemann in agriculture and in the case of Bonnevie in eugenics. On the other hand, the field of genetics also benefited from the fact that these first female researchers were eager for the chance to work in science and wanted to make active contributions. They all worked and studied in environments which, although different from one another, were positive towards them, at least at the start. Having a patron was generally a prerequisite. Tammes profited from her teacher's contacts and status. Bonnevie made herself indispensable through her success as a teacher and eventually made her position so strong that she was no longer dependent on a single patron. The case of Schiemann adds something new; it shows the vulnerability of such dependency. Initially, Schiemann's teacher had to rely on the first generation of university women simply because he was unable to attract ambitious young men to his institute. In those early, uncertain years of the new discipline, male scientists tended to choose other, better established, and more prestigious disciplines. However, when genetics itself had become an established field, it also became more attractive to men. Our case studies also demonstrate that a new field at first relatively open to women closes its doors to them once it becomes established. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10739-007-9132-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70140676</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>29737497</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>29737497</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-cd7bc5085c4c205635448c57c4cec65df63cec76ffc5a4c57a8fc5175e2a10673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFvEzEQhS1U1KalP4ADlYVUTmw7Xq_XNjeIQkGtxKGpOFqOM9s42vW29qZqJH48XhJRiQsX-43neyN5HiFvGVwwAHmZGEiuiywLzXhZPL8iEyYkL4AreUAmAGVZCGBwRI5TWgOAVlofkiOmuAIQ1YT8uo4-DT4g_dKHgE8eP9L5WM5t12GiNizprPXJLnBY0Vu38tjZEKgPdGZju6VXGHDwLn2isw7jvQ_3dLqywWVv00dq6V3wTxiTH7Z0aiNi_PP-s-8wvCGvG9smPN3fJ-Tu62w-_Vbc_Lj6Pv18U7hKlEPhlnLhBCjhKleCqLmoKuWEzCW6Wiybmmch66Zxwla5YVVWTAosLYNa8hPyYTf3IfaPG0yD6Xxy2LY2YL9JRgKrMlf_FyzHFXIxgu__Adf9Job8CaMUqyVIwTPEdpCLfUoRG_MQfWfj1jAwY4BmF6AZ5Rigec6es_3gzaLD5Ytjn1gGzveATc62Tcy79umF00zLWo_cux23TkMf__ZLLbms8vEbWG-syw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>881670753</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Kristine Bonnevie, Tine Tammes and Elisabeth Schiemann in Early Genetics: Emerging Chances for a University Career for Women</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Stamhuis, Ida H. ; Monsen, Arve</creator><creatorcontrib>Stamhuis, Ida H. ; Monsen, Arve</creatorcontrib><description>The beginning of the twentieth century saw the emergence of the discipline of genetics. It is striking how many female scientists were contributing to this new field at the time. At least three female pioneers succeeded in becoming professors: Kristine Bonnevie (Norway), Elisabeth Schiemann (Germany) and the Tine Tammes (The Netherlands). The question is which factors contributed to the success of these women's careers? At the time women were gaining access to university education it had become quite the norm for universities to be sites for teaching and research. They were still expanding: new laboratories were being built and new disciplines were being established. All three women benefited from the fact that genetics was considered a new field promising in terms of its utility to society; in the case of Tammes and Schiemann in agriculture and in the case of Bonnevie in eugenics. On the other hand, the field of genetics also benefited from the fact that these first female researchers were eager for the chance to work in science and wanted to make active contributions. They all worked and studied in environments which, although different from one another, were positive towards them, at least at the start. Having a patron was generally a prerequisite. Tammes profited from her teacher's contacts and status. Bonnevie made herself indispensable through her success as a teacher and eventually made her position so strong that she was no longer dependent on a single patron. The case of Schiemann adds something new; it shows the vulnerability of such dependency. Initially, Schiemann's teacher had to rely on the first generation of university women simply because he was unable to attract ambitious young men to his institute. In those early, uncertain years of the new discipline, male scientists tended to choose other, better established, and more prestigious disciplines. However, when genetics itself had become an established field, it also became more attractive to men. Our case studies also demonstrate that a new field at first relatively open to women closes its doors to them once it becomes established.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0387</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10739-007-9132-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18380054</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Archives ; Biology ; Bonnevie ; Career Choice ; Careers ; College instruction ; College students ; Elisabeth Schiemann ; Europe ; Evolutionary genetics ; Faculty - history ; Female ; Females ; Genetics ; Genetics - history ; Genetics - manpower ; History of medicine and histology ; History of science and technology ; History, 19th Century ; History, 20th Century ; Humans ; Kristine Bonnevie ; Life sciences ; Medical genetics ; Palaeontology; evolution ; genetics ; Research universities ; Schiemann ; Scientists ; Special Section on Women in Genetics ; Studies ; Tammes ; Tine Tammes ; Universities ; Universities - history ; Universities - manpower ; Women, Working - history ; Working women ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Journal of the history of biology, 2007-09, Vol.40 (3), p.427-466</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-cd7bc5085c4c205635448c57c4cec65df63cec76ffc5a4c57a8fc5175e2a10673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-cd7bc5085c4c205635448c57c4cec65df63cec76ffc5a4c57a8fc5175e2a10673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/29737497$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/29737497$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27922,27923,58015,58248</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19197694$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18380054$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stamhuis, Ida H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monsen, Arve</creatorcontrib><title>Kristine Bonnevie, Tine Tammes and Elisabeth Schiemann in Early Genetics: Emerging Chances for a University Career for Women</title><title>Journal of the history of biology</title><addtitle>J Hist Biol</addtitle><description>The beginning of the twentieth century saw the emergence of the discipline of genetics. It is striking how many female scientists were contributing to this new field at the time. At least three female pioneers succeeded in becoming professors: Kristine Bonnevie (Norway), Elisabeth Schiemann (Germany) and the Tine Tammes (The Netherlands). The question is which factors contributed to the success of these women's careers? At the time women were gaining access to university education it had become quite the norm for universities to be sites for teaching and research. They were still expanding: new laboratories were being built and new disciplines were being established. All three women benefited from the fact that genetics was considered a new field promising in terms of its utility to society; in the case of Tammes and Schiemann in agriculture and in the case of Bonnevie in eugenics. On the other hand, the field of genetics also benefited from the fact that these first female researchers were eager for the chance to work in science and wanted to make active contributions. They all worked and studied in environments which, although different from one another, were positive towards them, at least at the start. Having a patron was generally a prerequisite. Tammes profited from her teacher's contacts and status. Bonnevie made herself indispensable through her success as a teacher and eventually made her position so strong that she was no longer dependent on a single patron. The case of Schiemann adds something new; it shows the vulnerability of such dependency. Initially, Schiemann's teacher had to rely on the first generation of university women simply because he was unable to attract ambitious young men to his institute. In those early, uncertain years of the new discipline, male scientists tended to choose other, better established, and more prestigious disciplines. However, when genetics itself had become an established field, it also became more attractive to men. Our case studies also demonstrate that a new field at first relatively open to women closes its doors to them once it becomes established.</description><subject>Archives</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Bonnevie</subject><subject>Career Choice</subject><subject>Careers</subject><subject>College instruction</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Elisabeth Schiemann</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Evolutionary genetics</subject><subject>Faculty - history</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Genetics - history</subject><subject>Genetics - manpower</subject><subject>History of medicine and histology</subject><subject>History of science and technology</subject><subject>History, 19th Century</subject><subject>History, 20th Century</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kristine Bonnevie</subject><subject>Life sciences</subject><subject>Medical genetics</subject><subject>Palaeontology; evolution ; genetics</subject><subject>Research universities</subject><subject>Schiemann</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Special Section on Women in Genetics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tammes</subject><subject>Tine Tammes</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Universities - history</subject><subject>Universities - manpower</subject><subject>Women, Working - history</subject><subject>Working women</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0022-5010</issn><issn>1573-0387</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFvEzEQhS1U1KalP4ADlYVUTmw7Xq_XNjeIQkGtxKGpOFqOM9s42vW29qZqJH48XhJRiQsX-43neyN5HiFvGVwwAHmZGEiuiywLzXhZPL8iEyYkL4AreUAmAGVZCGBwRI5TWgOAVlofkiOmuAIQ1YT8uo4-DT4g_dKHgE8eP9L5WM5t12GiNizprPXJLnBY0Vu38tjZEKgPdGZju6VXGHDwLn2isw7jvQ_3dLqywWVv00dq6V3wTxiTH7Z0aiNi_PP-s-8wvCGvG9smPN3fJ-Tu62w-_Vbc_Lj6Pv18U7hKlEPhlnLhBCjhKleCqLmoKuWEzCW6Wiybmmch66Zxwla5YVVWTAosLYNa8hPyYTf3IfaPG0yD6Xxy2LY2YL9JRgKrMlf_FyzHFXIxgu__Adf9Job8CaMUqyVIwTPEdpCLfUoRG_MQfWfj1jAwY4BmF6AZ5Rigec6es_3gzaLD5Ytjn1gGzveATc62Tcy79umF00zLWo_cux23TkMf__ZLLbms8vEbWG-syw</recordid><startdate>20070901</startdate><enddate>20070901</enddate><creator>Stamhuis, Ida H.</creator><creator>Monsen, Arve</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070901</creationdate><title>Kristine Bonnevie, Tine Tammes and Elisabeth Schiemann in Early Genetics: Emerging Chances for a University Career for Women</title><author>Stamhuis, Ida H. ; Monsen, Arve</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-cd7bc5085c4c205635448c57c4cec65df63cec76ffc5a4c57a8fc5175e2a10673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Archives</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Bonnevie</topic><topic>Career Choice</topic><topic>Careers</topic><topic>College instruction</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Elisabeth Schiemann</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Evolutionary genetics</topic><topic>Faculty - history</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Genetics - history</topic><topic>Genetics - manpower</topic><topic>History of medicine and histology</topic><topic>History of science and technology</topic><topic>History, 19th Century</topic><topic>History, 20th Century</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kristine Bonnevie</topic><topic>Life sciences</topic><topic>Medical genetics</topic><topic>Palaeontology; evolution ; genetics</topic><topic>Research universities</topic><topic>Schiemann</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Special Section on Women in Genetics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tammes</topic><topic>Tine Tammes</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Universities - history</topic><topic>Universities - manpower</topic><topic>Women, Working - history</topic><topic>Working women</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stamhuis, Ida H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monsen, Arve</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the history of biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stamhuis, Ida H.</au><au>Monsen, Arve</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Kristine Bonnevie, Tine Tammes and Elisabeth Schiemann in Early Genetics: Emerging Chances for a University Career for Women</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the history of biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Hist Biol</addtitle><date>2007-09-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>427</spage><epage>466</epage><pages>427-466</pages><issn>0022-5010</issn><eissn>1573-0387</eissn><abstract>The beginning of the twentieth century saw the emergence of the discipline of genetics. It is striking how many female scientists were contributing to this new field at the time. At least three female pioneers succeeded in becoming professors: Kristine Bonnevie (Norway), Elisabeth Schiemann (Germany) and the Tine Tammes (The Netherlands). The question is which factors contributed to the success of these women's careers? At the time women were gaining access to university education it had become quite the norm for universities to be sites for teaching and research. They were still expanding: new laboratories were being built and new disciplines were being established. All three women benefited from the fact that genetics was considered a new field promising in terms of its utility to society; in the case of Tammes and Schiemann in agriculture and in the case of Bonnevie in eugenics. On the other hand, the field of genetics also benefited from the fact that these first female researchers were eager for the chance to work in science and wanted to make active contributions. They all worked and studied in environments which, although different from one another, were positive towards them, at least at the start. Having a patron was generally a prerequisite. Tammes profited from her teacher's contacts and status. Bonnevie made herself indispensable through her success as a teacher and eventually made her position so strong that she was no longer dependent on a single patron. The case of Schiemann adds something new; it shows the vulnerability of such dependency. Initially, Schiemann's teacher had to rely on the first generation of university women simply because he was unable to attract ambitious young men to his institute. In those early, uncertain years of the new discipline, male scientists tended to choose other, better established, and more prestigious disciplines. However, when genetics itself had become an established field, it also became more attractive to men. Our case studies also demonstrate that a new field at first relatively open to women closes its doors to them once it becomes established.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>18380054</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10739-007-9132-x</doi><tpages>40</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-5010 |
ispartof | Journal of the history of biology, 2007-09, Vol.40 (3), p.427-466 |
issn | 0022-5010 1573-0387 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70140676 |
source | MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Archives Biology Bonnevie Career Choice Careers College instruction College students Elisabeth Schiemann Europe Evolutionary genetics Faculty - history Female Females Genetics Genetics - history Genetics - manpower History of medicine and histology History of science and technology History, 19th Century History, 20th Century Humans Kristine Bonnevie Life sciences Medical genetics Palaeontology evolution genetics Research universities Schiemann Scientists Special Section on Women in Genetics Studies Tammes Tine Tammes Universities Universities - history Universities - manpower Women, Working - history Working women Zoology |
title | Kristine Bonnevie, Tine Tammes and Elisabeth Schiemann in Early Genetics: Emerging Chances for a University Career for Women |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T07%3A07%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Kristine%20Bonnevie,%20Tine%20Tammes%20and%20Elisabeth%20Schiemann%20in%20Early%20Genetics:%20Emerging%20Chances%20for%20a%20University%20Career%20for%20Women&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20history%20of%20biology&rft.au=Stamhuis,%20Ida%20H.&rft.date=2007-09-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=427&rft.epage=466&rft.pages=427-466&rft.issn=0022-5010&rft.eissn=1573-0387&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10739-007-9132-x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E29737497%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=881670753&rft_id=info:pmid/18380054&rft_jstor_id=29737497&rfr_iscdi=true |