Family and Staff Responses to a Scripted Introduction to Tissue Donation for Hospice Inpatients on Admission

Purpose To implement and evaluate a change in practice regarding the timing of introducing donation for inpatient hospice staff and families whereby scripted information about tissue/organ donation was given by the nurse upon admission as part of the normal admission process and then repeated at the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.) Calif.), 2007-12, Vol.17 (4), p.289-294
Hauptverfasser: Niday, Patricia, Painter, Caitlyn, Peak, Joyce, Bennett, Eileen, Wiley, Mandy, McCartt, Lee, Teixeira, Otto H. P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 294
container_issue 4
container_start_page 289
container_title Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.)
container_volume 17
creator Niday, Patricia
Painter, Caitlyn
Peak, Joyce
Bennett, Eileen
Wiley, Mandy
McCartt, Lee
Teixeira, Otto H. P.
description Purpose To implement and evaluate a change in practice regarding the timing of introducing donation for inpatient hospice staff and families whereby scripted information about tissue/organ donation was given by the nurse upon admission as part of the normal admission process and then repeated at the time of death per usual protocol. Methods Data were collected from staff for 6 months (January to June 2006). The hospice staff agreed to complete a donor services comment log at the admission and at the death of each patient to relay any concerns with the change in practice rather than just writing down complaints as was the previous practice. Data were supplemented with staff input during regular meetings. Donation rates were compiled as usual for 6 months and compared with the preceding 6 months. Results Data were analyzed from the written interactions. Trends identified were limited by the small sample size. The results confirmed that both nursing staff and potential donor families supported the change in practice. No families or staff called the organ procurement organization with complaints during the 6-month period. Corneal donations increased from 2 to 7, a 250% increment for the 6-month period. Conclusion The assumption that discussing donation when hospice patients are admitted will lead to a decrease in donation is not supported by the results of this study. The findings suggest the need for a methodologically rigorous, theoretically driven examination of hospice donor families' reactions to the introduction of donation at admission and the subsequent decrease in stress and increase in donation rates.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/152692480701700406
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70078934</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_152692480701700406</sage_id><sourcerecordid>70078934</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2136-518b40d31eaa58b263a5e4d07cf2410c770a280981b6063686196239feaae8b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90VFLwzAQAOAgipvTP-CDBB98q7ukaZI-jumcMBDcfC5pm0pHl9Skfdi_N3WDgYJPgbvvLscdQrcEHgkRYkoSylPKJAggAoABP0NjSjiLuAB5jsYDiAYxQlfebwGoCPoSjYikQadsjJqF2tXNHitT4nWnqgq_a99a47XHncUKrwtXt50u8avpnC37oqutGVKb2vte4ydr1E-osg4vrW_rQgfbhqA2ncchMyt3wQZzjS4q1Xh9c3wn6GPxvJkvo9Xby-t8tooKSmIeJUTmDMqYaKUSmVMeq0SzEkRRUUagEAIUlZBKknPgMZecpJzGaRW8ljmJJ-jh0Ld19qvXvsvCAIVuGmW07X0WliVkGrMA73_Bre2dCbNllIqUg0ggIHpAhbPeO11lrat3yu0zAtlwiOzvIULR3bFzn-90eSo5bj6A6QF49alP3_7T8hueCI9J</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>227960750</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Family and Staff Responses to a Scripted Introduction to Tissue Donation for Hospice Inpatients on Admission</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Niday, Patricia ; Painter, Caitlyn ; Peak, Joyce ; Bennett, Eileen ; Wiley, Mandy ; McCartt, Lee ; Teixeira, Otto H. P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Niday, Patricia ; Painter, Caitlyn ; Peak, Joyce ; Bennett, Eileen ; Wiley, Mandy ; McCartt, Lee ; Teixeira, Otto H. P.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To implement and evaluate a change in practice regarding the timing of introducing donation for inpatient hospice staff and families whereby scripted information about tissue/organ donation was given by the nurse upon admission as part of the normal admission process and then repeated at the time of death per usual protocol. Methods Data were collected from staff for 6 months (January to June 2006). The hospice staff agreed to complete a donor services comment log at the admission and at the death of each patient to relay any concerns with the change in practice rather than just writing down complaints as was the previous practice. Data were supplemented with staff input during regular meetings. Donation rates were compiled as usual for 6 months and compared with the preceding 6 months. Results Data were analyzed from the written interactions. Trends identified were limited by the small sample size. The results confirmed that both nursing staff and potential donor families supported the change in practice. No families or staff called the organ procurement organization with complaints during the 6-month period. Corneal donations increased from 2 to 7, a 250% increment for the 6-month period. Conclusion The assumption that discussing donation when hospice patients are admitted will lead to a decrease in donation is not supported by the results of this study. The findings suggest the need for a methodologically rigorous, theoretically driven examination of hospice donor families' reactions to the introduction of donation at admission and the subsequent decrease in stress and increase in donation rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-9248</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2164-6708</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/152692480701700406</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18240694</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PTRRBT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Attitude to Health ; Family ; Hospices ; Humans ; Patient Admission ; Tennessee ; Tissue and Organ Procurement - methods ; Tissue and Organ Procurement - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><ispartof>Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.), 2007-12, Vol.17 (4), p.289-294</ispartof><rights>2007 NATCO: The Organization for Transplant Professionals</rights><rights>Copyright North American Transplant Coordinators Organization Dec 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2136-518b40d31eaa58b263a5e4d07cf2410c770a280981b6063686196239feaae8b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2136-518b40d31eaa58b263a5e4d07cf2410c770a280981b6063686196239feaae8b13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/152692480701700406$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/152692480701700406$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27905,27906,43602,43603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18240694$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Niday, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Painter, Caitlyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peak, Joyce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Eileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiley, Mandy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCartt, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, Otto H. P.</creatorcontrib><title>Family and Staff Responses to a Scripted Introduction to Tissue Donation for Hospice Inpatients on Admission</title><title>Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.)</title><addtitle>Prog Transplant</addtitle><description>Purpose To implement and evaluate a change in practice regarding the timing of introducing donation for inpatient hospice staff and families whereby scripted information about tissue/organ donation was given by the nurse upon admission as part of the normal admission process and then repeated at the time of death per usual protocol. Methods Data were collected from staff for 6 months (January to June 2006). The hospice staff agreed to complete a donor services comment log at the admission and at the death of each patient to relay any concerns with the change in practice rather than just writing down complaints as was the previous practice. Data were supplemented with staff input during regular meetings. Donation rates were compiled as usual for 6 months and compared with the preceding 6 months. Results Data were analyzed from the written interactions. Trends identified were limited by the small sample size. The results confirmed that both nursing staff and potential donor families supported the change in practice. No families or staff called the organ procurement organization with complaints during the 6-month period. Corneal donations increased from 2 to 7, a 250% increment for the 6-month period. Conclusion The assumption that discussing donation when hospice patients are admitted will lead to a decrease in donation is not supported by the results of this study. The findings suggest the need for a methodologically rigorous, theoretically driven examination of hospice donor families' reactions to the introduction of donation at admission and the subsequent decrease in stress and increase in donation rates.</description><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Hospices</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Patient Admission</subject><subject>Tennessee</subject><subject>Tissue and Organ Procurement - methods</subject><subject>Tissue and Organ Procurement - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><issn>1526-9248</issn><issn>2164-6708</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp90VFLwzAQAOAgipvTP-CDBB98q7ukaZI-jumcMBDcfC5pm0pHl9Skfdi_N3WDgYJPgbvvLscdQrcEHgkRYkoSylPKJAggAoABP0NjSjiLuAB5jsYDiAYxQlfebwGoCPoSjYikQadsjJqF2tXNHitT4nWnqgq_a99a47XHncUKrwtXt50u8avpnC37oqutGVKb2vte4ydr1E-osg4vrW_rQgfbhqA2ncchMyt3wQZzjS4q1Xh9c3wn6GPxvJkvo9Xby-t8tooKSmIeJUTmDMqYaKUSmVMeq0SzEkRRUUagEAIUlZBKknPgMZecpJzGaRW8ljmJJ-jh0Ld19qvXvsvCAIVuGmW07X0WliVkGrMA73_Bre2dCbNllIqUg0ggIHpAhbPeO11lrat3yu0zAtlwiOzvIULR3bFzn-90eSo5bj6A6QF49alP3_7T8hueCI9J</recordid><startdate>200712</startdate><enddate>200712</enddate><creator>Niday, Patricia</creator><creator>Painter, Caitlyn</creator><creator>Peak, Joyce</creator><creator>Bennett, Eileen</creator><creator>Wiley, Mandy</creator><creator>McCartt, Lee</creator><creator>Teixeira, Otto H. P.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200712</creationdate><title>Family and Staff Responses to a Scripted Introduction to Tissue Donation for Hospice Inpatients on Admission</title><author>Niday, Patricia ; Painter, Caitlyn ; Peak, Joyce ; Bennett, Eileen ; Wiley, Mandy ; McCartt, Lee ; Teixeira, Otto H. P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2136-518b40d31eaa58b263a5e4d07cf2410c770a280981b6063686196239feaae8b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Hospices</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Patient Admission</topic><topic>Tennessee</topic><topic>Tissue and Organ Procurement - methods</topic><topic>Tissue and Organ Procurement - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Niday, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Painter, Caitlyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peak, Joyce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Eileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiley, Mandy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCartt, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, Otto H. P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Niday, Patricia</au><au>Painter, Caitlyn</au><au>Peak, Joyce</au><au>Bennett, Eileen</au><au>Wiley, Mandy</au><au>McCartt, Lee</au><au>Teixeira, Otto H. P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Family and Staff Responses to a Scripted Introduction to Tissue Donation for Hospice Inpatients on Admission</atitle><jtitle>Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.)</jtitle><addtitle>Prog Transplant</addtitle><date>2007-12</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>289</spage><epage>294</epage><pages>289-294</pages><issn>1526-9248</issn><eissn>2164-6708</eissn><coden>PTRRBT</coden><abstract>Purpose To implement and evaluate a change in practice regarding the timing of introducing donation for inpatient hospice staff and families whereby scripted information about tissue/organ donation was given by the nurse upon admission as part of the normal admission process and then repeated at the time of death per usual protocol. Methods Data were collected from staff for 6 months (January to June 2006). The hospice staff agreed to complete a donor services comment log at the admission and at the death of each patient to relay any concerns with the change in practice rather than just writing down complaints as was the previous practice. Data were supplemented with staff input during regular meetings. Donation rates were compiled as usual for 6 months and compared with the preceding 6 months. Results Data were analyzed from the written interactions. Trends identified were limited by the small sample size. The results confirmed that both nursing staff and potential donor families supported the change in practice. No families or staff called the organ procurement organization with complaints during the 6-month period. Corneal donations increased from 2 to 7, a 250% increment for the 6-month period. Conclusion The assumption that discussing donation when hospice patients are admitted will lead to a decrease in donation is not supported by the results of this study. The findings suggest the need for a methodologically rigorous, theoretically driven examination of hospice donor families' reactions to the introduction of donation at admission and the subsequent decrease in stress and increase in donation rates.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>18240694</pmid><doi>10.1177/152692480701700406</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-9248
ispartof Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.), 2007-12, Vol.17 (4), p.289-294
issn 1526-9248
2164-6708
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70078934
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Attitude to Health
Family
Hospices
Humans
Patient Admission
Tennessee
Tissue and Organ Procurement - methods
Tissue and Organ Procurement - statistics & numerical data
title Family and Staff Responses to a Scripted Introduction to Tissue Donation for Hospice Inpatients on Admission
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T03%3A37%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Family%20and%20Staff%20Responses%20to%20a%20Scripted%20Introduction%20to%20Tissue%20Donation%20for%20Hospice%20Inpatients%20on%20Admission&rft.jtitle=Progress%20in%20transplantation%20(Aliso%20Viejo,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Niday,%20Patricia&rft.date=2007-12&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=289&rft.epage=294&rft.pages=289-294&rft.issn=1526-9248&rft.eissn=2164-6708&rft.coden=PTRRBT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/152692480701700406&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70078934%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=227960750&rft_id=info:pmid/18240694&rft_sage_id=10.1177_152692480701700406&rfr_iscdi=true