Processing Bias for Terror-Related Stimuli and September 11Th-Related Distress in College Students
The psychological sequelae of the September 11th terrorist attacks were examined in 249 college students at three sites in the USA and one site in the UK in the year following the attacks. Participants completed questionnaires tapping 9/11-related exposure and distress, and completed a modified Stro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological reports 2007-12, Vol.101 (3), p.787-795 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 795 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 787 |
container_title | Psychological reports |
container_volume | 101 |
creator | Waters, Andrew J. Parrott, W. Gerrod Mogg, Karin Bradley, Brendan P. Fuller, Mary C. Wertz, Joan M. |
description | The psychological sequelae of the September 11th terrorist attacks were examined in 249 college students at three sites in the USA and one site in the UK in the year following the attacks. Participants completed questionnaires tapping 9/11-related exposure and distress, and completed a modified Stroop task assessing time to color-name cards containing terror-related and neutral words. Geographical location and amount of exposure to the attacks were significant predictors of self-reported 9/11-related distress, but were not associated with processing bias for terror-related stimuli. Self-reported 9/11-related distress was significantly associated with processing bias, but only in the group (n = 124) which performed the neutral card first. Processing biases for terror-related stimuli are dependent on method of assessment and appear to be more closely tied to self-reported distress than to amount of objective exposure to the attacks. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2466/pr0.101.3.787-795 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70077845</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.2466_pr0.101.3.787-795</sage_id><sourcerecordid>70077845</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-4308ffa8cce74967ebd6339739988a89a96ffdce9fa8020f9024e004375bc0533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAUxIMo7rr6AbxIT95aX5q0SY66_oUFRVfwFtL2da20TU3ag9_eyC568_Rm4DcDbwg5pZCkPM8vBgcJBZqwREgRC5XtkTnNMhnnir7tkzkAY3GqOJ2RI-8_gqXAxCGZUZmylLNsToonZ0v0vuk30VVjfFRbF63ROeviZ2zNiFX0Mjbd1DaR6YPGYcSuQBdRun7_Ra4bP7pQEzV9tLRtixsMsanCfvTH5KA2rceT3V2Q19ub9fI-Xj3ePSwvV3GZKhhjzkDWtZFliYKrXGBR5YwpwZSS0khlVF7XVYkqMJBCrSDlCMCZyIoSMsYW5HzbOzj7OaEfddf4EtvW9GgnrwWAEJJnAaRbsHTWe4e1HlzTGfelKeifYYOHoKlmOgyrw7Ahc7Yrn4oOq7_EbskAJFvAmw3qDzu5Pjz7T-M3D7OCmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70077845</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Processing Bias for Terror-Related Stimuli and September 11Th-Related Distress in College Students</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Waters, Andrew J. ; Parrott, W. Gerrod ; Mogg, Karin ; Bradley, Brendan P. ; Fuller, Mary C. ; Wertz, Joan M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Waters, Andrew J. ; Parrott, W. Gerrod ; Mogg, Karin ; Bradley, Brendan P. ; Fuller, Mary C. ; Wertz, Joan M.</creatorcontrib><description>The psychological sequelae of the September 11th terrorist attacks were examined in 249 college students at three sites in the USA and one site in the UK in the year following the attacks. Participants completed questionnaires tapping 9/11-related exposure and distress, and completed a modified Stroop task assessing time to color-name cards containing terror-related and neutral words. Geographical location and amount of exposure to the attacks were significant predictors of self-reported 9/11-related distress, but were not associated with processing bias for terror-related stimuli. Self-reported 9/11-related distress was significantly associated with processing bias, but only in the group (n = 124) which performed the neutral card first. Processing biases for terror-related stimuli are dependent on method of assessment and appear to be more closely tied to self-reported distress than to amount of objective exposure to the attacks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2941</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-691X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2466/pr0.101.3.787-795</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18232435</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Bias ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Prevalence ; September 11 Terrorist Attacks - psychology ; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis ; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - epidemiology ; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - etiology ; Students - psychology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Universities</subject><ispartof>Psychological reports, 2007-12, Vol.101 (3), p.787-795</ispartof><rights>2007 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-4308ffa8cce74967ebd6339739988a89a96ffdce9fa8020f9024e004375bc0533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2466/pr0.101.3.787-795$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.2466/pr0.101.3.787-795$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18232435$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Waters, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrott, W. Gerrod</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mogg, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Brendan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Mary C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wertz, Joan M.</creatorcontrib><title>Processing Bias for Terror-Related Stimuli and September 11Th-Related Distress in College Students</title><title>Psychological reports</title><addtitle>Psychol Rep</addtitle><description>The psychological sequelae of the September 11th terrorist attacks were examined in 249 college students at three sites in the USA and one site in the UK in the year following the attacks. Participants completed questionnaires tapping 9/11-related exposure and distress, and completed a modified Stroop task assessing time to color-name cards containing terror-related and neutral words. Geographical location and amount of exposure to the attacks were significant predictors of self-reported 9/11-related distress, but were not associated with processing bias for terror-related stimuli. Self-reported 9/11-related distress was significantly associated with processing bias, but only in the group (n = 124) which performed the neutral card first. Processing biases for terror-related stimuli are dependent on method of assessment and appear to be more closely tied to self-reported distress than to amount of objective exposure to the attacks.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>September 11 Terrorist Attacks - psychology</subject><subject>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - epidemiology</subject><subject>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - etiology</subject><subject>Students - psychology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Universities</subject><issn>0033-2941</issn><issn>1558-691X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAUxIMo7rr6AbxIT95aX5q0SY66_oUFRVfwFtL2da20TU3ag9_eyC568_Rm4DcDbwg5pZCkPM8vBgcJBZqwREgRC5XtkTnNMhnnir7tkzkAY3GqOJ2RI-8_gqXAxCGZUZmylLNsToonZ0v0vuk30VVjfFRbF63ROeviZ2zNiFX0Mjbd1DaR6YPGYcSuQBdRun7_Ra4bP7pQEzV9tLRtixsMsanCfvTH5KA2rceT3V2Q19ub9fI-Xj3ePSwvV3GZKhhjzkDWtZFliYKrXGBR5YwpwZSS0khlVF7XVYkqMJBCrSDlCMCZyIoSMsYW5HzbOzj7OaEfddf4EtvW9GgnrwWAEJJnAaRbsHTWe4e1HlzTGfelKeifYYOHoKlmOgyrw7Ahc7Yrn4oOq7_EbskAJFvAmw3qDzu5Pjz7T-M3D7OCmQ</recordid><startdate>200712</startdate><enddate>200712</enddate><creator>Waters, Andrew J.</creator><creator>Parrott, W. Gerrod</creator><creator>Mogg, Karin</creator><creator>Bradley, Brendan P.</creator><creator>Fuller, Mary C.</creator><creator>Wertz, Joan M.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200712</creationdate><title>Processing Bias for Terror-Related Stimuli and September 11Th-Related Distress in College Students</title><author>Waters, Andrew J. ; Parrott, W. Gerrod ; Mogg, Karin ; Bradley, Brendan P. ; Fuller, Mary C. ; Wertz, Joan M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-4308ffa8cce74967ebd6339739988a89a96ffdce9fa8020f9024e004375bc0533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>September 11 Terrorist Attacks - psychology</topic><topic>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - epidemiology</topic><topic>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - etiology</topic><topic>Students - psychology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Universities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Waters, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrott, W. Gerrod</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mogg, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Brendan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Mary C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wertz, Joan M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Waters, Andrew J.</au><au>Parrott, W. Gerrod</au><au>Mogg, Karin</au><au>Bradley, Brendan P.</au><au>Fuller, Mary C.</au><au>Wertz, Joan M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Processing Bias for Terror-Related Stimuli and September 11Th-Related Distress in College Students</atitle><jtitle>Psychological reports</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Rep</addtitle><date>2007-12</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>787</spage><epage>795</epage><pages>787-795</pages><issn>0033-2941</issn><eissn>1558-691X</eissn><abstract>The psychological sequelae of the September 11th terrorist attacks were examined in 249 college students at three sites in the USA and one site in the UK in the year following the attacks. Participants completed questionnaires tapping 9/11-related exposure and distress, and completed a modified Stroop task assessing time to color-name cards containing terror-related and neutral words. Geographical location and amount of exposure to the attacks were significant predictors of self-reported 9/11-related distress, but were not associated with processing bias for terror-related stimuli. Self-reported 9/11-related distress was significantly associated with processing bias, but only in the group (n = 124) which performed the neutral card first. Processing biases for terror-related stimuli are dependent on method of assessment and appear to be more closely tied to self-reported distress than to amount of objective exposure to the attacks.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>18232435</pmid><doi>10.2466/pr0.101.3.787-795</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-2941 |
ispartof | Psychological reports, 2007-12, Vol.101 (3), p.787-795 |
issn | 0033-2941 1558-691X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70077845 |
source | Access via SAGE; MEDLINE |
subjects | Bias Female Humans Male Prevalence September 11 Terrorist Attacks - psychology Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - epidemiology Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - etiology Students - psychology Surveys and Questionnaires Universities |
title | Processing Bias for Terror-Related Stimuli and September 11Th-Related Distress in College Students |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T15%3A38%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Processing%20Bias%20for%20Terror-Related%20Stimuli%20and%20September%2011Th-Related%20Distress%20in%20College%20Students&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20reports&rft.au=Waters,%20Andrew%20J.&rft.date=2007-12&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=787&rft.epage=795&rft.pages=787-795&rft.issn=0033-2941&rft.eissn=1558-691X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2466/pr0.101.3.787-795&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70077845%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70077845&rft_id=info:pmid/18232435&rft_sage_id=10.2466_pr0.101.3.787-795&rfr_iscdi=true |