Ultrasonography and Limited Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis and Management of Appendicitis in Children
CONTEXT Limited computed tomography with rectal contrast (CTRC) has been shown to be 98% accurate in the diagnosis of appendicitis in the adult population, but data are lacking regarding the accuracy and effectiveness of this technique in diagnosing pediatric appendicitis. OBJECTIVE To determine the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 1999-09, Vol.282 (11), p.1041-1046 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | CONTEXT Limited computed tomography with rectal contrast (CTRC) has been shown
to be 98% accurate in the diagnosis of appendicitis in the adult population,
but data are lacking regarding the accuracy and effectiveness of this technique
in diagnosing pediatric appendicitis. OBJECTIVE To determine the diagnostic value of a protocol involving ultrasonography
and CTRC in the diagnosis and management of appendicitis in children and adolescents. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Prospective cohort study of 139 children and adolescents aged 3 to 21
years (2 patients were older than 18 years) who had equivocal clinical findings
for acute appendicitis and who presented to the emergency department of a
large, urban, pediatric teaching hospital between July and December 1998. INTERVENTIONS Children were first evaluated with pelvic ultrasonography. If the result
was definitive for appendicitis, laparotomy was performed; if ultrasonography
was negative or inconclusive, CTRC was obtained. Patients who did not undergo
laparotomy had telephone follow-up at 2 weeks and medical records of all patients
were reviewed 4 to 6 months after study completion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, negative predictive
value, and accuracy of tests based on final diagnoses; surgeons' estimated
likelihood of appendicitis on a scale of 1 to 10 for each case and their case
management plans before imaging, after ultrasonography, and after CTRC. RESULTS A total of 108 patients underwent both ultrasonography and CTRC examinations.
The protocol had a sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 94%, positive predictive
value of 90%, negative predictive value of 97%, and accuracy of 94%. A normal
appendix was identified by ultrasonography in 2 (2.4%) of 83 patients without
appendicitis and by CTRC in 62 (84%) of 74 patients. A negative ultrasonography
result did not change the surgeons' clinical confidence level in excluding
appendicitis (P=.06), while a negative CTRC result
did have a significant effect (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0098-7484 1538-3598 |
DOI: | 10.1001/jama.282.11.1041 |