Identification of Viable Myocardium in Patients with Chronic Coronary Artery Disease Using Rest-Redistribution Thallium-201 Tomography: Optimal Image Analysis

With the widely used 50% threshold, sensitivity is high, but specificity is low in detecting viable myocardium on 201Tl SPECT. In this study, we sought to identify the best threshold for semiquantitative 201Tl analysis. Rest-redistribution 201Tl SPECT was performed in 46 patients with chronic corona...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978) 1998-11, Vol.39 (11), p.1869-1874
Hauptverfasser: Pace, Leonardo, Perrone-Filardi, Pasquale, Mainenti, PierPaolo, Cuocolo, Alberto, Vezzuto, Pasquale, Prastaro, Mariella, Vairone, Andrea, De Luca, Giuseppe, Soricelli, Andrea, Betocchi, Sandro, Chiariello, Massimo, Salvatore, Marco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1874
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1869
container_title The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)
container_volume 39
creator Pace, Leonardo
Perrone-Filardi, Pasquale
Mainenti, PierPaolo
Cuocolo, Alberto
Vezzuto, Pasquale
Prastaro, Mariella
Vairone, Andrea
De Luca, Giuseppe
Soricelli, Andrea
Betocchi, Sandro
Chiariello, Massimo
Salvatore, Marco
description With the widely used 50% threshold, sensitivity is high, but specificity is low in detecting viable myocardium on 201Tl SPECT. In this study, we sought to identify the best threshold for semiquantitative 201Tl analysis. Rest-redistribution 201Tl SPECT was performed in 46 patients with chronic coronary artery disease before and after myocardial revascularization. Regional function was evaluated by two-dimensional echocardiography before and after myocardial revascularization using a 3-point scale (1 = normal, 2 = hypokinetic, 3 = a/dyskinetic). Myocardial segments with abnormal systolic function were defined as viable if the systolic function score decreased > or = 1 after myocardial revascularization. A second group of 12 patients with chronic coronary artery disease constituted the validation population. Sensitivity-specificity curves, as well as receiver operating characteristic curves, for rest and redistribution mages were generated by varying the 201Tl uptake threshold. A 65% threshold uptake using resting images was found to be the best for detecting a/dyskinetic segments that improve after myocardial revascularization from those that do not improve. Sensitivity was lower with a 65% threshold (75%) than with a 50% threshold (90%, p < 0.05), but specificity was higher (76% versus 26%, p < 0.05) resulting in better accuracy (76% versus 57%, p < 0.05) and positive predictive value (77% versus 55%), while the negative predictive value was not different (69% versus 75%, p not significant). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was significantly (p < 005) larger for rest (0.80 +/- 0.05) as opposed to redistribution (0.72 +/- 0.05) images. Similar results were obtained in a subgroup of patients with low ejection fraction. Significant correlations between the percentage of revascularized viable segments and both the change in ejection fraction and in postrevascularization ejection fraction were found. When these findings were applied in the validation group, a gain in specificity, accuracy and positive predictive value was obtained with the 65% threshold compared with the 50% threshold. This study demonstrated that analysis of resting images and use of the 65% 201Tl uptake threshold is preferable for separating viable from not viable dyssynergic myocardial segments in patients with chronic coronary artery disease.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70061063</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70061063</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h295t-29b7b987b95eaacab41d7134774f2864da284a172531e797dc2e928c0393fffb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMtq3DAUhk1pSSdJH6EgSinZGHSxLKm7YdLLQEpCmHRrjmV5rEGWppJN8Mv0WaM0QxdZHP7F__FxznlTrAhnvOR1Ld4WK0xqUnKO-fviPKUDxriWUp4VZ0pSxQVbFX-3nfGT7a2GyQaPQo9-W2idQb-WoCF2dh6R9egu1xlM6NFOA9oMMXir0SbkhLigdZxMjmubDCSDHpL1e3Rv0lTem86mKdp2_uffDeBcdpYUE7QLY9hHOA7LV3R7nOwIDm1H2Bu09uCWZNNl8a4Hl8yHU14UD9-_7TY_y5vbH9vN-qYc8h1TSVUrWiXzcAOgoa1IJwirhKh6KuuqAyorIIJyRoxQotPUKCo1Zor1fd-yi-LLi_cYw585792MNmnjHHgT5tSI_DmCa5bBT6_AQ5hj3jY1lCjCZSVFhj6eoLkdTdccYz4tLs3p67n_fOohaXB9BK9t-o8RrgjBz5qrF2yw--HRRtP4WTsD8dl58CNTDSENkbViT9Tum1M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219158487</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identification of Viable Myocardium in Patients with Chronic Coronary Artery Disease Using Rest-Redistribution Thallium-201 Tomography: Optimal Image Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Pace, Leonardo ; Perrone-Filardi, Pasquale ; Mainenti, PierPaolo ; Cuocolo, Alberto ; Vezzuto, Pasquale ; Prastaro, Mariella ; Vairone, Andrea ; De Luca, Giuseppe ; Soricelli, Andrea ; Betocchi, Sandro ; Chiariello, Massimo ; Salvatore, Marco</creator><creatorcontrib>Pace, Leonardo ; Perrone-Filardi, Pasquale ; Mainenti, PierPaolo ; Cuocolo, Alberto ; Vezzuto, Pasquale ; Prastaro, Mariella ; Vairone, Andrea ; De Luca, Giuseppe ; Soricelli, Andrea ; Betocchi, Sandro ; Chiariello, Massimo ; Salvatore, Marco</creatorcontrib><description>With the widely used 50% threshold, sensitivity is high, but specificity is low in detecting viable myocardium on 201Tl SPECT. In this study, we sought to identify the best threshold for semiquantitative 201Tl analysis. Rest-redistribution 201Tl SPECT was performed in 46 patients with chronic coronary artery disease before and after myocardial revascularization. Regional function was evaluated by two-dimensional echocardiography before and after myocardial revascularization using a 3-point scale (1 = normal, 2 = hypokinetic, 3 = a/dyskinetic). Myocardial segments with abnormal systolic function were defined as viable if the systolic function score decreased &gt; or = 1 after myocardial revascularization. A second group of 12 patients with chronic coronary artery disease constituted the validation population. Sensitivity-specificity curves, as well as receiver operating characteristic curves, for rest and redistribution mages were generated by varying the 201Tl uptake threshold. A 65% threshold uptake using resting images was found to be the best for detecting a/dyskinetic segments that improve after myocardial revascularization from those that do not improve. Sensitivity was lower with a 65% threshold (75%) than with a 50% threshold (90%, p &lt; 0.05), but specificity was higher (76% versus 26%, p &lt; 0.05) resulting in better accuracy (76% versus 57%, p &lt; 0.05) and positive predictive value (77% versus 55%), while the negative predictive value was not different (69% versus 75%, p not significant). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was significantly (p &lt; 005) larger for rest (0.80 +/- 0.05) as opposed to redistribution (0.72 +/- 0.05) images. Similar results were obtained in a subgroup of patients with low ejection fraction. Significant correlations between the percentage of revascularized viable segments and both the change in ejection fraction and in postrevascularization ejection fraction were found. When these findings were applied in the validation group, a gain in specificity, accuracy and positive predictive value was obtained with the 65% threshold compared with the 50% threshold. This study demonstrated that analysis of resting images and use of the 65% 201Tl uptake threshold is preferable for separating viable from not viable dyssynergic myocardial segments in patients with chronic coronary artery disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-5505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-5667</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9829573</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNMEAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: Soc Nuclear Med</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiovascular system ; Case-Control Studies ; Coronary Disease - diagnostic imaging ; Coronary Disease - epidemiology ; Coronary Disease - therapy ; Echocardiography ; Female ; Heart - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Myocardial Revascularization ; Radionuclide investigations ; ROC Curve ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Thallium Radioisotopes ; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods</subject><ispartof>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978), 1998-11, Vol.39 (11), p.1869-1874</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine Nov 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1591107$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9829573$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pace, Leonardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrone-Filardi, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mainenti, PierPaolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuocolo, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vezzuto, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prastaro, Mariella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vairone, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Luca, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soricelli, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Betocchi, Sandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiariello, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvatore, Marco</creatorcontrib><title>Identification of Viable Myocardium in Patients with Chronic Coronary Artery Disease Using Rest-Redistribution Thallium-201 Tomography: Optimal Image Analysis</title><title>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</title><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><description>With the widely used 50% threshold, sensitivity is high, but specificity is low in detecting viable myocardium on 201Tl SPECT. In this study, we sought to identify the best threshold for semiquantitative 201Tl analysis. Rest-redistribution 201Tl SPECT was performed in 46 patients with chronic coronary artery disease before and after myocardial revascularization. Regional function was evaluated by two-dimensional echocardiography before and after myocardial revascularization using a 3-point scale (1 = normal, 2 = hypokinetic, 3 = a/dyskinetic). Myocardial segments with abnormal systolic function were defined as viable if the systolic function score decreased &gt; or = 1 after myocardial revascularization. A second group of 12 patients with chronic coronary artery disease constituted the validation population. Sensitivity-specificity curves, as well as receiver operating characteristic curves, for rest and redistribution mages were generated by varying the 201Tl uptake threshold. A 65% threshold uptake using resting images was found to be the best for detecting a/dyskinetic segments that improve after myocardial revascularization from those that do not improve. Sensitivity was lower with a 65% threshold (75%) than with a 50% threshold (90%, p &lt; 0.05), but specificity was higher (76% versus 26%, p &lt; 0.05) resulting in better accuracy (76% versus 57%, p &lt; 0.05) and positive predictive value (77% versus 55%), while the negative predictive value was not different (69% versus 75%, p not significant). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was significantly (p &lt; 005) larger for rest (0.80 +/- 0.05) as opposed to redistribution (0.72 +/- 0.05) images. Similar results were obtained in a subgroup of patients with low ejection fraction. Significant correlations between the percentage of revascularized viable segments and both the change in ejection fraction and in postrevascularization ejection fraction were found. When these findings were applied in the validation group, a gain in specificity, accuracy and positive predictive value was obtained with the 65% threshold compared with the 50% threshold. This study demonstrated that analysis of resting images and use of the 65% 201Tl uptake threshold is preferable for separating viable from not viable dyssynergic myocardial segments in patients with chronic coronary artery disease.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiovascular system</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Coronary Disease - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Coronary Disease - epidemiology</subject><subject>Coronary Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Echocardiography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myocardial Revascularization</subject><subject>Radionuclide investigations</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Thallium Radioisotopes</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods</subject><issn>0161-5505</issn><issn>1535-5667</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkMtq3DAUhk1pSSdJH6EgSinZGHSxLKm7YdLLQEpCmHRrjmV5rEGWppJN8Mv0WaM0QxdZHP7F__FxznlTrAhnvOR1Ld4WK0xqUnKO-fviPKUDxriWUp4VZ0pSxQVbFX-3nfGT7a2GyQaPQo9-W2idQb-WoCF2dh6R9egu1xlM6NFOA9oMMXir0SbkhLigdZxMjmubDCSDHpL1e3Rv0lTem86mKdp2_uffDeBcdpYUE7QLY9hHOA7LV3R7nOwIDm1H2Bu09uCWZNNl8a4Hl8yHU14UD9-_7TY_y5vbH9vN-qYc8h1TSVUrWiXzcAOgoa1IJwirhKh6KuuqAyorIIJyRoxQotPUKCo1Zor1fd-yi-LLi_cYw585792MNmnjHHgT5tSI_DmCa5bBT6_AQ5hj3jY1lCjCZSVFhj6eoLkdTdccYz4tLs3p67n_fOohaXB9BK9t-o8RrgjBz5qrF2yw--HRRtP4WTsD8dl58CNTDSENkbViT9Tum1M</recordid><startdate>19981101</startdate><enddate>19981101</enddate><creator>Pace, Leonardo</creator><creator>Perrone-Filardi, Pasquale</creator><creator>Mainenti, PierPaolo</creator><creator>Cuocolo, Alberto</creator><creator>Vezzuto, Pasquale</creator><creator>Prastaro, Mariella</creator><creator>Vairone, Andrea</creator><creator>De Luca, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Soricelli, Andrea</creator><creator>Betocchi, Sandro</creator><creator>Chiariello, Massimo</creator><creator>Salvatore, Marco</creator><general>Soc Nuclear Med</general><general>Society of Nuclear Medicine</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19981101</creationdate><title>Identification of Viable Myocardium in Patients with Chronic Coronary Artery Disease Using Rest-Redistribution Thallium-201 Tomography: Optimal Image Analysis</title><author>Pace, Leonardo ; Perrone-Filardi, Pasquale ; Mainenti, PierPaolo ; Cuocolo, Alberto ; Vezzuto, Pasquale ; Prastaro, Mariella ; Vairone, Andrea ; De Luca, Giuseppe ; Soricelli, Andrea ; Betocchi, Sandro ; Chiariello, Massimo ; Salvatore, Marco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h295t-29b7b987b95eaacab41d7134774f2864da284a172531e797dc2e928c0393fffb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiovascular system</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Coronary Disease - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Coronary Disease - epidemiology</topic><topic>Coronary Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Echocardiography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myocardial Revascularization</topic><topic>Radionuclide investigations</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Thallium Radioisotopes</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pace, Leonardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrone-Filardi, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mainenti, PierPaolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuocolo, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vezzuto, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prastaro, Mariella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vairone, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Luca, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soricelli, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Betocchi, Sandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiariello, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvatore, Marco</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pace, Leonardo</au><au>Perrone-Filardi, Pasquale</au><au>Mainenti, PierPaolo</au><au>Cuocolo, Alberto</au><au>Vezzuto, Pasquale</au><au>Prastaro, Mariella</au><au>Vairone, Andrea</au><au>De Luca, Giuseppe</au><au>Soricelli, Andrea</au><au>Betocchi, Sandro</au><au>Chiariello, Massimo</au><au>Salvatore, Marco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identification of Viable Myocardium in Patients with Chronic Coronary Artery Disease Using Rest-Redistribution Thallium-201 Tomography: Optimal Image Analysis</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</jtitle><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><date>1998-11-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1869</spage><epage>1874</epage><pages>1869-1874</pages><issn>0161-5505</issn><eissn>1535-5667</eissn><coden>JNMEAQ</coden><abstract>With the widely used 50% threshold, sensitivity is high, but specificity is low in detecting viable myocardium on 201Tl SPECT. In this study, we sought to identify the best threshold for semiquantitative 201Tl analysis. Rest-redistribution 201Tl SPECT was performed in 46 patients with chronic coronary artery disease before and after myocardial revascularization. Regional function was evaluated by two-dimensional echocardiography before and after myocardial revascularization using a 3-point scale (1 = normal, 2 = hypokinetic, 3 = a/dyskinetic). Myocardial segments with abnormal systolic function were defined as viable if the systolic function score decreased &gt; or = 1 after myocardial revascularization. A second group of 12 patients with chronic coronary artery disease constituted the validation population. Sensitivity-specificity curves, as well as receiver operating characteristic curves, for rest and redistribution mages were generated by varying the 201Tl uptake threshold. A 65% threshold uptake using resting images was found to be the best for detecting a/dyskinetic segments that improve after myocardial revascularization from those that do not improve. Sensitivity was lower with a 65% threshold (75%) than with a 50% threshold (90%, p &lt; 0.05), but specificity was higher (76% versus 26%, p &lt; 0.05) resulting in better accuracy (76% versus 57%, p &lt; 0.05) and positive predictive value (77% versus 55%), while the negative predictive value was not different (69% versus 75%, p not significant). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was significantly (p &lt; 005) larger for rest (0.80 +/- 0.05) as opposed to redistribution (0.72 +/- 0.05) images. Similar results were obtained in a subgroup of patients with low ejection fraction. Significant correlations between the percentage of revascularized viable segments and both the change in ejection fraction and in postrevascularization ejection fraction were found. When these findings were applied in the validation group, a gain in specificity, accuracy and positive predictive value was obtained with the 65% threshold compared with the 50% threshold. This study demonstrated that analysis of resting images and use of the 65% 201Tl uptake threshold is preferable for separating viable from not viable dyssynergic myocardial segments in patients with chronic coronary artery disease.</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>Soc Nuclear Med</pub><pmid>9829573</pmid><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-5505
ispartof The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978), 1998-11, Vol.39 (11), p.1869-1874
issn 0161-5505
1535-5667
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70061063
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Cardiovascular system
Case-Control Studies
Coronary Disease - diagnostic imaging
Coronary Disease - epidemiology
Coronary Disease - therapy
Echocardiography
Female
Heart - diagnostic imaging
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Myocardial Revascularization
Radionuclide investigations
ROC Curve
Sensitivity and Specificity
Thallium Radioisotopes
Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods
title Identification of Viable Myocardium in Patients with Chronic Coronary Artery Disease Using Rest-Redistribution Thallium-201 Tomography: Optimal Image Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T15%3A07%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identification%20of%20Viable%20Myocardium%20in%20Patients%20with%20Chronic%20Coronary%20Artery%20Disease%20Using%20Rest-Redistribution%20Thallium-201%20Tomography:%20Optimal%20Image%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20nuclear%20medicine%20(1978)&rft.au=Pace,%20Leonardo&rft.date=1998-11-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1869&rft.epage=1874&rft.pages=1869-1874&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.eissn=1535-5667&rft.coden=JNMEAQ&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70061063%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219158487&rft_id=info:pmid/9829573&rfr_iscdi=true