The value of sonography in early pregnancy for the detection of fetal abnormalities in an unselected population

Objective To determine the value of early pregnancy sonography in detecting fetal abnormalities in an unselected obstetric population. Design Prospective cross‐sectional study. All women initially underwent transabdominal sonography and when the anatomical survey was considered to be incomplete, tra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 1999-09, Vol.106 (9), p.929-936
Hauptverfasser: Whitlow, B. J., Chatzipapas, I. K., Lazanakis, M. L., Kadir, R. A., Economides, D. L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 936
container_issue 9
container_start_page 929
container_title BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
container_volume 106
creator Whitlow, B. J.
Chatzipapas, I. K.
Lazanakis, M. L.
Kadir, R. A.
Economides, D. L.
description Objective To determine the value of early pregnancy sonography in detecting fetal abnormalities in an unselected obstetric population. Design Prospective cross‐sectional study. All women initially underwent transabdominal sonography and when the anatomical survey was considered to be incomplete, transvaginal sonography was also performed (20.1 %). Nuchal translucency was measured and karyotyping was performed as appropriate. Setting University Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Participants 6634 sequential unselected women (mean maternal age 29–9 years, range 13–50; mean gestational age 12+4 weeks, range 11+0‐14+6), carrying 6443 live fetuses participated in this study. Main outcome measure Detection rate of fetal anomalies and the associated cost per case detected in early pregnancy. Results The incidence of anomalous fetuses was 1.4% (926443) including 43 chromosomal abnormalities. The detection rate for structural abnormalities was 59.0% (37/63, 95% CI 46.5–72.4) and the specificity was 99.9% in early pregnancy. When the first and second trimester scans were combined, the detection for structural abnormalities was 8 1.0% (5 1/63, 95% CI 67.7–89.2). Seventy‐eight percent (31/40) of chromosomal abnormalities (excluding three cases of XXY) were diagnosed at 11–14 weeks, either because of a nuchal translucency greater than or equal to the 99th centile for gestational age (43%; 17/40,95% CI 27‐4–60.4), or due to the presence of structural abnormalities (35%; 14/40, 95% CI 21.2–52.8). Sixty‐five percent (15/23) of cases of trisomy 21 were also diagnosed either because of having a nuchal translucency greater than or equal to the 99th centile (57.0%; 13/23) or due to the presence of a structural abnormality (9.0%; 2/23). Overall, the detection rate of structurally abnormal fetuses was 59% (37/63) in early pregnancy and 81% in combination with the second trimester scan. The cost per abnormality diagnosed in early pregnancy is estimated to be f6258 per structurally abnormal fetus, £7470 per chromosomal abnormality and f4453 per anomalous fetus. Conclusion The majority of fetal structural and chromosomal abnormalities can be detected by sonographic screening at 11–14 weeks, but the second trimester scan should not be abandoned.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08432.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70055982</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70055982</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3999-6f6969c324b469453aa1ad96a6ff714bdfeb00ddbcbdccd0352188e8dca297293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE1vFSEUhomxsbX1LxhijLsZgfkCFyba-NU06aZdkzNwaOeGO4wwo51_L-O9UbeygJPwvHDOQ8grzkqe19tdyeuOF6wRsuRKqXLumawrUT4-IWd_rp7-rlnBKiFPyfOUdozxVrDqGTnlrFYib2ck3D4g_QF-QRocTWEM9xGmh5UOI0WIfqVTxPsRRrNSFyKdM25xRjMPYdwiDmfwFPoxxD34YR4wbVkY6TIm9BlES6cwLR62yAU5ceATvjie5-Tu86fby6_F9c2Xb5cfrgtT5YmK1rWqVaYSdV-3qm4qAA5WtdA61_G6tw57xqztTW-NsaxqBJcSpTUgVCdUdU7eHN6dYvi-YJr1fkgGvYcRw5J0x1jTKCky-O4AmhhSiuj0FIc9xFVzpjfdeqc3p3pzqjfd-qhbP-bwy-MvS79H-0_04DcDr48AJAPexSxySH85xTspZMbeH7Cfg8f1PzrQH69uVB73F0cxnt0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70055982</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The value of sonography in early pregnancy for the detection of fetal abnormalities in an unselected population</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Whitlow, B. J. ; Chatzipapas, I. K. ; Lazanakis, M. L. ; Kadir, R. A. ; Economides, D. L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Whitlow, B. J. ; Chatzipapas, I. K. ; Lazanakis, M. L. ; Kadir, R. A. ; Economides, D. L.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To determine the value of early pregnancy sonography in detecting fetal abnormalities in an unselected obstetric population. Design Prospective cross‐sectional study. All women initially underwent transabdominal sonography and when the anatomical survey was considered to be incomplete, transvaginal sonography was also performed (20.1 %). Nuchal translucency was measured and karyotyping was performed as appropriate. Setting University Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Participants 6634 sequential unselected women (mean maternal age 29–9 years, range 13–50; mean gestational age 12+4 weeks, range 11+0‐14+6), carrying 6443 live fetuses participated in this study. Main outcome measure Detection rate of fetal anomalies and the associated cost per case detected in early pregnancy. Results The incidence of anomalous fetuses was 1.4% (926443) including 43 chromosomal abnormalities. The detection rate for structural abnormalities was 59.0% (37/63, 95% CI 46.5–72.4) and the specificity was 99.9% in early pregnancy. When the first and second trimester scans were combined, the detection for structural abnormalities was 8 1.0% (5 1/63, 95% CI 67.7–89.2). Seventy‐eight percent (31/40) of chromosomal abnormalities (excluding three cases of XXY) were diagnosed at 11–14 weeks, either because of a nuchal translucency greater than or equal to the 99th centile for gestational age (43%; 17/40,95% CI 27‐4–60.4), or due to the presence of structural abnormalities (35%; 14/40, 95% CI 21.2–52.8). Sixty‐five percent (15/23) of cases of trisomy 21 were also diagnosed either because of having a nuchal translucency greater than or equal to the 99th centile (57.0%; 13/23) or due to the presence of a structural abnormality (9.0%; 2/23). Overall, the detection rate of structurally abnormal fetuses was 59% (37/63) in early pregnancy and 81% in combination with the second trimester scan. The cost per abnormality diagnosed in early pregnancy is estimated to be f6258 per structurally abnormal fetus, £7470 per chromosomal abnormality and f4453 per anomalous fetus. Conclusion The majority of fetal structural and chromosomal abnormalities can be detected by sonographic screening at 11–14 weeks, but the second trimester scan should not be abandoned.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-0328</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0306-5456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-0528</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-215X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08432.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10492104</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJOGAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Chromosome Aberrations ; Costs and Cost Analysis ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Fetus - abnormalities ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Management. Prenatal diagnosis ; Medical sciences ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Trimester, First ; Pregnancy Trimester, Second ; Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta ; Prospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal - economics ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods</subject><ispartof>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 1999-09, Vol.106 (9), p.929-936</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3999-6f6969c324b469453aa1ad96a6ff714bdfeb00ddbcbdccd0352188e8dca297293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3999-6f6969c324b469453aa1ad96a6ff714bdfeb00ddbcbdccd0352188e8dca297293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1471-0528.1999.tb08432.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1471-0528.1999.tb08432.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,1411,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1917828$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10492104$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Whitlow, B. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatzipapas, I. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lazanakis, M. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadir, R. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Economides, D. L.</creatorcontrib><title>The value of sonography in early pregnancy for the detection of fetal abnormalities in an unselected population</title><title>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</title><addtitle>Br J Obstet Gynaecol</addtitle><description>Objective To determine the value of early pregnancy sonography in detecting fetal abnormalities in an unselected obstetric population. Design Prospective cross‐sectional study. All women initially underwent transabdominal sonography and when the anatomical survey was considered to be incomplete, transvaginal sonography was also performed (20.1 %). Nuchal translucency was measured and karyotyping was performed as appropriate. Setting University Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Participants 6634 sequential unselected women (mean maternal age 29–9 years, range 13–50; mean gestational age 12+4 weeks, range 11+0‐14+6), carrying 6443 live fetuses participated in this study. Main outcome measure Detection rate of fetal anomalies and the associated cost per case detected in early pregnancy. Results The incidence of anomalous fetuses was 1.4% (926443) including 43 chromosomal abnormalities. The detection rate for structural abnormalities was 59.0% (37/63, 95% CI 46.5–72.4) and the specificity was 99.9% in early pregnancy. When the first and second trimester scans were combined, the detection for structural abnormalities was 8 1.0% (5 1/63, 95% CI 67.7–89.2). Seventy‐eight percent (31/40) of chromosomal abnormalities (excluding three cases of XXY) were diagnosed at 11–14 weeks, either because of a nuchal translucency greater than or equal to the 99th centile for gestational age (43%; 17/40,95% CI 27‐4–60.4), or due to the presence of structural abnormalities (35%; 14/40, 95% CI 21.2–52.8). Sixty‐five percent (15/23) of cases of trisomy 21 were also diagnosed either because of having a nuchal translucency greater than or equal to the 99th centile (57.0%; 13/23) or due to the presence of a structural abnormality (9.0%; 2/23). Overall, the detection rate of structurally abnormal fetuses was 59% (37/63) in early pregnancy and 81% in combination with the second trimester scan. The cost per abnormality diagnosed in early pregnancy is estimated to be f6258 per structurally abnormal fetus, £7470 per chromosomal abnormality and f4453 per anomalous fetus. Conclusion The majority of fetal structural and chromosomal abnormalities can be detected by sonographic screening at 11–14 weeks, but the second trimester scan should not be abandoned.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chromosome Aberrations</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetus - abnormalities</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Trimester, First</subject><subject>Pregnancy Trimester, Second</subject><subject>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Prenatal - economics</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods</subject><issn>1470-0328</issn><issn>0306-5456</issn><issn>1471-0528</issn><issn>1365-215X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkE1vFSEUhomxsbX1LxhijLsZgfkCFyba-NU06aZdkzNwaOeGO4wwo51_L-O9UbeygJPwvHDOQ8grzkqe19tdyeuOF6wRsuRKqXLumawrUT4-IWd_rp7-rlnBKiFPyfOUdozxVrDqGTnlrFYib2ck3D4g_QF-QRocTWEM9xGmh5UOI0WIfqVTxPsRRrNSFyKdM25xRjMPYdwiDmfwFPoxxD34YR4wbVkY6TIm9BlES6cwLR62yAU5ceATvjie5-Tu86fby6_F9c2Xb5cfrgtT5YmK1rWqVaYSdV-3qm4qAA5WtdA61_G6tw57xqztTW-NsaxqBJcSpTUgVCdUdU7eHN6dYvi-YJr1fkgGvYcRw5J0x1jTKCky-O4AmhhSiuj0FIc9xFVzpjfdeqc3p3pzqjfd-qhbP-bwy-MvS79H-0_04DcDr48AJAPexSxySH85xTspZMbeH7Cfg8f1PzrQH69uVB73F0cxnt0</recordid><startdate>199909</startdate><enddate>199909</enddate><creator>Whitlow, B. J.</creator><creator>Chatzipapas, I. K.</creator><creator>Lazanakis, M. L.</creator><creator>Kadir, R. A.</creator><creator>Economides, D. L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199909</creationdate><title>The value of sonography in early pregnancy for the detection of fetal abnormalities in an unselected population</title><author>Whitlow, B. J. ; Chatzipapas, I. K. ; Lazanakis, M. L. ; Kadir, R. A. ; Economides, D. L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3999-6f6969c324b469453aa1ad96a6ff714bdfeb00ddbcbdccd0352188e8dca297293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chromosome Aberrations</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetus - abnormalities</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Trimester, First</topic><topic>Pregnancy Trimester, Second</topic><topic>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Prenatal - economics</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Whitlow, B. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatzipapas, I. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lazanakis, M. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadir, R. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Economides, D. L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Whitlow, B. J.</au><au>Chatzipapas, I. K.</au><au>Lazanakis, M. L.</au><au>Kadir, R. A.</au><au>Economides, D. L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The value of sonography in early pregnancy for the detection of fetal abnormalities in an unselected population</atitle><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Obstet Gynaecol</addtitle><date>1999-09</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>929</spage><epage>936</epage><pages>929-936</pages><issn>1470-0328</issn><issn>0306-5456</issn><eissn>1471-0528</eissn><eissn>1365-215X</eissn><coden>BJOGAS</coden><abstract>Objective To determine the value of early pregnancy sonography in detecting fetal abnormalities in an unselected obstetric population. Design Prospective cross‐sectional study. All women initially underwent transabdominal sonography and when the anatomical survey was considered to be incomplete, transvaginal sonography was also performed (20.1 %). Nuchal translucency was measured and karyotyping was performed as appropriate. Setting University Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Participants 6634 sequential unselected women (mean maternal age 29–9 years, range 13–50; mean gestational age 12+4 weeks, range 11+0‐14+6), carrying 6443 live fetuses participated in this study. Main outcome measure Detection rate of fetal anomalies and the associated cost per case detected in early pregnancy. Results The incidence of anomalous fetuses was 1.4% (926443) including 43 chromosomal abnormalities. The detection rate for structural abnormalities was 59.0% (37/63, 95% CI 46.5–72.4) and the specificity was 99.9% in early pregnancy. When the first and second trimester scans were combined, the detection for structural abnormalities was 8 1.0% (5 1/63, 95% CI 67.7–89.2). Seventy‐eight percent (31/40) of chromosomal abnormalities (excluding three cases of XXY) were diagnosed at 11–14 weeks, either because of a nuchal translucency greater than or equal to the 99th centile for gestational age (43%; 17/40,95% CI 27‐4–60.4), or due to the presence of structural abnormalities (35%; 14/40, 95% CI 21.2–52.8). Sixty‐five percent (15/23) of cases of trisomy 21 were also diagnosed either because of having a nuchal translucency greater than or equal to the 99th centile (57.0%; 13/23) or due to the presence of a structural abnormality (9.0%; 2/23). Overall, the detection rate of structurally abnormal fetuses was 59% (37/63) in early pregnancy and 81% in combination with the second trimester scan. The cost per abnormality diagnosed in early pregnancy is estimated to be f6258 per structurally abnormal fetus, £7470 per chromosomal abnormality and f4453 per anomalous fetus. Conclusion The majority of fetal structural and chromosomal abnormalities can be detected by sonographic screening at 11–14 weeks, but the second trimester scan should not be abandoned.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>10492104</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08432.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1470-0328
ispartof BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 1999-09, Vol.106 (9), p.929-936
issn 1470-0328
0306-5456
1471-0528
1365-215X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70055982
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Chromosome Aberrations
Costs and Cost Analysis
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Fetus - abnormalities
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Management. Prenatal diagnosis
Medical sciences
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Trimester, First
Pregnancy Trimester, Second
Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta
Prospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Ultrasonography, Prenatal - economics
Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods
title The value of sonography in early pregnancy for the detection of fetal abnormalities in an unselected population
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T21%3A51%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20value%20of%20sonography%20in%20early%20pregnancy%20for%20the%20detection%20of%20fetal%20abnormalities%20in%20an%20unselected%20population&rft.jtitle=BJOG%20:%20an%20international%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology&rft.au=Whitlow,%20B.%20J.&rft.date=1999-09&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=929&rft.epage=936&rft.pages=929-936&rft.issn=1470-0328&rft.eissn=1471-0528&rft.coden=BJOGAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08432.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70055982%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70055982&rft_id=info:pmid/10492104&rfr_iscdi=true