Placement Shift, Sibling Relationship Quality, and Child Outcomes in Foster Care: A Controlled Study
Sibling unity during family transitions is considered a protective factor for child behavior problems, but there is little empirical support for the widespread child protection policy of placing siblings together in foster care. In a prospective study of 156 maltreated children, siblings were classi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of family psychology 2007-12, Vol.21 (4), p.736-743 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 743 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 736 |
| container_title | Journal of family psychology |
| container_volume | 21 |
| creator | Linares, L. Oriana Li, MiMin Shrout, Patrick E Brody, Gene H Pettit, Gregory S |
| description | Sibling unity during family transitions is considered a protective factor for child behavior problems, but there is little empirical support for the widespread child protection policy of placing siblings together in foster care. In a prospective study of 156 maltreated children, siblings were classified in 1 of 3 placement groups: continuously together (
n
= 110), continuously apart (
n
= 22), and
disrupted placement
(siblings placed together were separated;
n
= 24). Changes in child adjustment as a function of sibling relationship and placement group were examined. Sibling positivity predicted lower child problems at follow-up (about 14 months later), while sibling negativity predicted higher child problems. Placement group did not affect child behavior problems at follow-up; however, compared to siblings in continuous placement (either together or apart), siblings in disrupted placement with high initial behavior problems were rated as having fewer problems at follow-up, while siblings in disrupted placement with low initial behavior problems were rated as having more problems at follow-up. These findings highlight the importance of considering relationships between siblings and the risk that one poses to another before early placement decisions are made. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.736 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70054481</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1423317111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a512t-de46146ceef877e248f61909df972478c546b79b55bf96ff3baa576f6ba996e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ktrVDEYBuAgih2rf8CFBFE39oy5X5YyWBUKrVbXIScncVJyLk3OWcy_N8MMVkXsKpvn_ULyfgA8x2iNEZXvkNK0oQShNcFrtpZUPAArrKluMNH0IVj9AifgSSk3CGFGlXoMTrDCUlPGV-DqKlnnez_M8Hobw3wGr2Ob4vADfvXJznEcyjZO8MtiU5x3Z9AOHdxsY-rg5TK7sfcFxgGej2X2GW5s9k_Bo2BT8c-O5yn4fv7h2-ZTc3H58fPm_UVjOSZz03kmMBPO-6Ck9ISpILBGugtaEiaV40y0Urect0GLEGhrLZciiNZqLTyhp-DNYe6Ux9vFl9n0sTifkh38uBQjEeKMKXwvFFgopSW_F3JJKNUCVfjyL3gzLnmor63DGJMcEfI_RDDXSHEhKyIH5PJYSvbBTDn2Nu8MRmbfsdlXaPYV1pRhpnZcQy-Ok5e2991d5FhqBa-PwBZnU8h2cLHcOa3r32NV3duDs5M1U9k5m-foki9uybluhAm2__3aV__Wf7KfntjHog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614475022</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Placement Shift, Sibling Relationship Quality, and Child Outcomes in Foster Care: A Controlled Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Linares, L. Oriana ; Li, MiMin ; Shrout, Patrick E ; Brody, Gene H ; Pettit, Gregory S</creator><contributor>Kazak, Anne E</contributor><creatorcontrib>Linares, L. Oriana ; Li, MiMin ; Shrout, Patrick E ; Brody, Gene H ; Pettit, Gregory S ; Kazak, Anne E</creatorcontrib><description>Sibling unity during family transitions is considered a protective factor for child behavior problems, but there is little empirical support for the widespread child protection policy of placing siblings together in foster care. In a prospective study of 156 maltreated children, siblings were classified in 1 of 3 placement groups: continuously together (
n
= 110), continuously apart (
n
= 22), and
disrupted placement
(siblings placed together were separated;
n
= 24). Changes in child adjustment as a function of sibling relationship and placement group were examined. Sibling positivity predicted lower child problems at follow-up (about 14 months later), while sibling negativity predicted higher child problems. Placement group did not affect child behavior problems at follow-up; however, compared to siblings in continuous placement (either together or apart), siblings in disrupted placement with high initial behavior problems were rated as having fewer problems at follow-up, while siblings in disrupted placement with low initial behavior problems were rated as having more problems at follow-up. These findings highlight the importance of considering relationships between siblings and the risk that one poses to another before early placement decisions are made.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0893-3200</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1293</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.736</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18179345</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JFPSEV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Behavior ; Behavior Problems ; Behaviour disordered children ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child Abuse - psychology ; Child Behavior Disorders - etiology ; Child Behavior Disorders - psychology ; Child psychology ; Child Welfare Services ; Child, Preschool ; Emotional disorders ; Emotions ; Family environment. Family history ; Family Policy ; Female ; Foster Care ; Foster Children ; Foster Home Care - psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Male ; Maltreated children ; Medical sciences ; New York City ; Placement ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Regression Analysis ; Risk Factors ; Sibling Relations ; Sibling Relations - ethnology ; Sibling relationships ; Siblings ; Siblings - ethnology ; Siblings - psychology ; Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry ; Studies ; Unity</subject><ispartof>Journal of family psychology, 2007-12, Vol.21 (4), p.736-743</ispartof><rights>2007 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Dec 2007</rights><rights>2007, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a512t-de46146ceef877e248f61909df972478c546b79b55bf96ff3baa576f6ba996e23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,30998,30999,33774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19946118$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18179345$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Kazak, Anne E</contributor><creatorcontrib>Linares, L. Oriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, MiMin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shrout, Patrick E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brody, Gene H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettit, Gregory S</creatorcontrib><title>Placement Shift, Sibling Relationship Quality, and Child Outcomes in Foster Care: A Controlled Study</title><title>Journal of family psychology</title><addtitle>J Fam Psychol</addtitle><description>Sibling unity during family transitions is considered a protective factor for child behavior problems, but there is little empirical support for the widespread child protection policy of placing siblings together in foster care. In a prospective study of 156 maltreated children, siblings were classified in 1 of 3 placement groups: continuously together (
n
= 110), continuously apart (
n
= 22), and
disrupted placement
(siblings placed together were separated;
n
= 24). Changes in child adjustment as a function of sibling relationship and placement group were examined. Sibling positivity predicted lower child problems at follow-up (about 14 months later), while sibling negativity predicted higher child problems. Placement group did not affect child behavior problems at follow-up; however, compared to siblings in continuous placement (either together or apart), siblings in disrupted placement with high initial behavior problems were rated as having fewer problems at follow-up, while siblings in disrupted placement with low initial behavior problems were rated as having more problems at follow-up. These findings highlight the importance of considering relationships between siblings and the risk that one poses to another before early placement decisions are made.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavior Problems</subject><subject>Behaviour disordered children</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Abuse - psychology</subject><subject>Child Behavior Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Child Behavior Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Child psychology</subject><subject>Child Welfare Services</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Emotional disorders</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Family environment. Family history</subject><subject>Family Policy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foster Care</subject><subject>Foster Children</subject><subject>Foster Home Care - psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maltreated children</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>New York City</subject><subject>Placement</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sibling Relations</subject><subject>Sibling Relations - ethnology</subject><subject>Sibling relationships</subject><subject>Siblings</subject><subject>Siblings - ethnology</subject><subject>Siblings - psychology</subject><subject>Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Unity</subject><issn>0893-3200</issn><issn>1939-1293</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0ktrVDEYBuAgih2rf8CFBFE39oy5X5YyWBUKrVbXIScncVJyLk3OWcy_N8MMVkXsKpvn_ULyfgA8x2iNEZXvkNK0oQShNcFrtpZUPAArrKluMNH0IVj9AifgSSk3CGFGlXoMTrDCUlPGV-DqKlnnez_M8Hobw3wGr2Ob4vADfvXJznEcyjZO8MtiU5x3Z9AOHdxsY-rg5TK7sfcFxgGej2X2GW5s9k_Bo2BT8c-O5yn4fv7h2-ZTc3H58fPm_UVjOSZz03kmMBPO-6Ck9ISpILBGugtaEiaV40y0Urect0GLEGhrLZciiNZqLTyhp-DNYe6Ux9vFl9n0sTifkh38uBQjEeKMKXwvFFgopSW_F3JJKNUCVfjyL3gzLnmor63DGJMcEfI_RDDXSHEhKyIH5PJYSvbBTDn2Nu8MRmbfsdlXaPYV1pRhpnZcQy-Ok5e2991d5FhqBa-PwBZnU8h2cLHcOa3r32NV3duDs5M1U9k5m-foki9uybluhAm2__3aV__Wf7KfntjHog</recordid><startdate>20071201</startdate><enddate>20071201</enddate><creator>Linares, L. Oriana</creator><creator>Li, MiMin</creator><creator>Shrout, Patrick E</creator><creator>Brody, Gene H</creator><creator>Pettit, Gregory S</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071201</creationdate><title>Placement Shift, Sibling Relationship Quality, and Child Outcomes in Foster Care</title><author>Linares, L. Oriana ; Li, MiMin ; Shrout, Patrick E ; Brody, Gene H ; Pettit, Gregory S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a512t-de46146ceef877e248f61909df972478c546b79b55bf96ff3baa576f6ba996e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavior Problems</topic><topic>Behaviour disordered children</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Abuse - psychology</topic><topic>Child Behavior Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Child Behavior Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Child psychology</topic><topic>Child Welfare Services</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Emotional disorders</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Family environment. Family history</topic><topic>Family Policy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foster Care</topic><topic>Foster Children</topic><topic>Foster Home Care - psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maltreated children</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>New York City</topic><topic>Placement</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sibling Relations</topic><topic>Sibling Relations - ethnology</topic><topic>Sibling relationships</topic><topic>Siblings</topic><topic>Siblings - ethnology</topic><topic>Siblings - psychology</topic><topic>Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Unity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Linares, L. Oriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, MiMin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shrout, Patrick E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brody, Gene H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettit, Gregory S</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of family psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Linares, L. Oriana</au><au>Li, MiMin</au><au>Shrout, Patrick E</au><au>Brody, Gene H</au><au>Pettit, Gregory S</au><au>Kazak, Anne E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Placement Shift, Sibling Relationship Quality, and Child Outcomes in Foster Care: A Controlled Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of family psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Fam Psychol</addtitle><date>2007-12-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>736</spage><epage>743</epage><pages>736-743</pages><issn>0893-3200</issn><eissn>1939-1293</eissn><coden>JFPSEV</coden><abstract>Sibling unity during family transitions is considered a protective factor for child behavior problems, but there is little empirical support for the widespread child protection policy of placing siblings together in foster care. In a prospective study of 156 maltreated children, siblings were classified in 1 of 3 placement groups: continuously together (
n
= 110), continuously apart (
n
= 22), and
disrupted placement
(siblings placed together were separated;
n
= 24). Changes in child adjustment as a function of sibling relationship and placement group were examined. Sibling positivity predicted lower child problems at follow-up (about 14 months later), while sibling negativity predicted higher child problems. Placement group did not affect child behavior problems at follow-up; however, compared to siblings in continuous placement (either together or apart), siblings in disrupted placement with high initial behavior problems were rated as having fewer problems at follow-up, while siblings in disrupted placement with low initial behavior problems were rated as having more problems at follow-up. These findings highlight the importance of considering relationships between siblings and the risk that one poses to another before early placement decisions are made.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>18179345</pmid><doi>10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.736</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0893-3200 |
| ispartof | Journal of family psychology, 2007-12, Vol.21 (4), p.736-743 |
| issn | 0893-3200 1939-1293 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70054481 |
| source | MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Adolescent Behavior Behavior Problems Behaviour disordered children Biological and medical sciences Child Child Abuse - psychology Child Behavior Disorders - etiology Child Behavior Disorders - psychology Child psychology Child Welfare Services Child, Preschool Emotional disorders Emotions Family environment. Family history Family Policy Female Foster Care Foster Children Foster Home Care - psychology Human Humans Male Maltreated children Medical sciences New York City Placement Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Regression Analysis Risk Factors Sibling Relations Sibling Relations - ethnology Sibling relationships Siblings Siblings - ethnology Siblings - psychology Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry Studies Unity |
| title | Placement Shift, Sibling Relationship Quality, and Child Outcomes in Foster Care: A Controlled Study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T09%3A41%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Placement%20Shift,%20Sibling%20Relationship%20Quality,%20and%20Child%20Outcomes%20in%20Foster%20Care:%20A%20Controlled%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20family%20psychology&rft.au=Linares,%20L.%20Oriana&rft.date=2007-12-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=736&rft.epage=743&rft.pages=736-743&rft.issn=0893-3200&rft.eissn=1939-1293&rft.coden=JFPSEV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.736&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1423317111%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614475022&rft_id=info:pmid/18179345&rfr_iscdi=true |