The Mayo Clinic-Canadian cooperative trial of sulfasalazine in active multiple sclerosis

To determine whether sulfasalazine is better than placebo in slowing disability progression in MS. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial, 199 patients with active relapsing-remitting (n = 151) or progressive (n = 48) MS were evaluated at 3-month intervals for a minimum...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurology 1998-11, Vol.51 (5), p.1342-1352
Hauptverfasser: NOSEWORTHY, J. H, OBRIEN, P, DUQUETTE, P, CARTER, J, FRANCIS, G, METZ, L, SHUSTER, E, ERICKSON, B. J, LEE, D, SNEVE, D, EBERS, G. C, RICE, G. P. A, AUTY, A, HADER, W. J, KIRK, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1352
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1342
container_title Neurology
container_volume 51
creator NOSEWORTHY, J. H
OBRIEN, P
DUQUETTE, P
CARTER, J
FRANCIS, G
METZ, L
SHUSTER, E
ERICKSON, B. J
LEE, D
SNEVE, D
EBERS, G. C
RICE, G. P. A
AUTY, A
HADER, W. J
KIRK, A
description To determine whether sulfasalazine is better than placebo in slowing disability progression in MS. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial, 199 patients with active relapsing-remitting (n = 151) or progressive (n = 48) MS were evaluated at 3-month intervals for a minimum of 3 years (94% completed 3 years of follow-up; mean follow-up, 3.7 years). MRI studies were performed at 6-month intervals on a subset of 89 patients. Sulfasalazine failed to slow or prevent disability progression as measured by the primary outcome (confirmed worsening of the Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score by at least 1.0 point on two consecutive 3-month visits). Sulfasalazine influenced favorably a number of secondary outcomes during the first 18 months of the trial (e.g., annualized relapse rate, proportion of relapse-free patients; progressive subgroup only: rate of EDSS progression at 1 and 2 years, median time to EDSS progression) but these positive findings were not sustained into the second half of the trial. Sulfasalazine does not prevent EDSS score progression in the subset of MS patients studied by this protocol. Treatments may improve relapse-related outcomes in MS, at least temporarily, without providing sustained slowing of EDSS progression. Phase III MS trials should be of sufficient length to determine a meaningful impact on disease course.
doi_str_mv 10.1212/WNL.51.5.1342
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70053172</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70053172</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-7a7f9c2875fca120f8b2e5ece940f8e35d74e82caa9ea4b241e03388703f17063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEtLAzEUhYMotVaXLoUsxN3UPCaTzFKKL6i6qdhduE1vMJLO1MmMUH-9U1t0dQ-cj8PlI-ScszEXXFy_PU_Hio_VmMtcHJAhV6LICinmh2TImDCZNNock5OUPhjrS10OyKA03BhlhmQ-e0f6BJuaTmKogssmUMEyQEVdXa-xgTZ8IW2bAJHWnqYuekgQ4TtUSENFwf0Cqy62YR2RJhexqVNIp-TIQ0x4tr8j8np3O5s8ZNOX-8fJzTRzsuBtpkH70gmjlXfABfNmIVChwzLvM0q11Dka4QBKhHwhco5MSmM0k55rVsgRudrtrpv6s8PU2lVIDmOECusuWc2YklyLHsx2oOv_Sw16u27CCpqN5cxuTdrepFXcKrs12fMX--FuscLlH71X1_eX-x6Sg-gbqFxI_6OqpwomfwBT-Hvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70053172</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Mayo Clinic-Canadian cooperative trial of sulfasalazine in active multiple sclerosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>NOSEWORTHY, J. H ; OBRIEN, P ; DUQUETTE, P ; CARTER, J ; FRANCIS, G ; METZ, L ; SHUSTER, E ; ERICKSON, B. J ; LEE, D ; SNEVE, D ; EBERS, G. C ; RICE, G. P. A ; AUTY, A ; HADER, W. J ; KIRK, A</creator><creatorcontrib>NOSEWORTHY, J. H ; OBRIEN, P ; DUQUETTE, P ; CARTER, J ; FRANCIS, G ; METZ, L ; SHUSTER, E ; ERICKSON, B. J ; LEE, D ; SNEVE, D ; EBERS, G. C ; RICE, G. P. A ; AUTY, A ; HADER, W. J ; KIRK, A ; The Mayo Clinic-Canadian Cooperative MS Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>To determine whether sulfasalazine is better than placebo in slowing disability progression in MS. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial, 199 patients with active relapsing-remitting (n = 151) or progressive (n = 48) MS were evaluated at 3-month intervals for a minimum of 3 years (94% completed 3 years of follow-up; mean follow-up, 3.7 years). MRI studies were performed at 6-month intervals on a subset of 89 patients. Sulfasalazine failed to slow or prevent disability progression as measured by the primary outcome (confirmed worsening of the Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score by at least 1.0 point on two consecutive 3-month visits). Sulfasalazine influenced favorably a number of secondary outcomes during the first 18 months of the trial (e.g., annualized relapse rate, proportion of relapse-free patients; progressive subgroup only: rate of EDSS progression at 1 and 2 years, median time to EDSS progression) but these positive findings were not sustained into the second half of the trial. Sulfasalazine does not prevent EDSS score progression in the subset of MS patients studied by this protocol. Treatments may improve relapse-related outcomes in MS, at least temporarily, without providing sustained slowing of EDSS progression. Phase III MS trials should be of sufficient length to determine a meaningful impact on disease course.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-3878</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-632X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1212/WNL.51.5.1342</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9818858</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NEURAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain - pathology ; Canada ; Disabled Persons ; Disease Progression ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Minnesota ; Miscellaneous ; Multiple Sclerosis - drug therapy ; Multiple Sclerosis - physiopathology ; Neuropharmacology ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Placebos ; Recurrence ; Sulfasalazine - therapeutic use ; Survival Analysis ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Neurology, 1998-11, Vol.51 (5), p.1342-1352</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-7a7f9c2875fca120f8b2e5ece940f8e35d74e82caa9ea4b241e03388703f17063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-7a7f9c2875fca120f8b2e5ece940f8e35d74e82caa9ea4b241e03388703f17063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23910,23911,25119,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1588560$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9818858$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>NOSEWORTHY, J. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OBRIEN, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUQUETTE, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CARTER, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRANCIS, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>METZ, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHUSTER, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ERICKSON, B. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEE, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SNEVE, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EBERS, G. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RICE, G. P. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AUTY, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HADER, W. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIRK, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The Mayo Clinic-Canadian Cooperative MS Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>The Mayo Clinic-Canadian cooperative trial of sulfasalazine in active multiple sclerosis</title><title>Neurology</title><addtitle>Neurology</addtitle><description>To determine whether sulfasalazine is better than placebo in slowing disability progression in MS. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial, 199 patients with active relapsing-remitting (n = 151) or progressive (n = 48) MS were evaluated at 3-month intervals for a minimum of 3 years (94% completed 3 years of follow-up; mean follow-up, 3.7 years). MRI studies were performed at 6-month intervals on a subset of 89 patients. Sulfasalazine failed to slow or prevent disability progression as measured by the primary outcome (confirmed worsening of the Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score by at least 1.0 point on two consecutive 3-month visits). Sulfasalazine influenced favorably a number of secondary outcomes during the first 18 months of the trial (e.g., annualized relapse rate, proportion of relapse-free patients; progressive subgroup only: rate of EDSS progression at 1 and 2 years, median time to EDSS progression) but these positive findings were not sustained into the second half of the trial. Sulfasalazine does not prevent EDSS score progression in the subset of MS patients studied by this protocol. Treatments may improve relapse-related outcomes in MS, at least temporarily, without providing sustained slowing of EDSS progression. Phase III MS trials should be of sufficient length to determine a meaningful impact on disease course.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain - pathology</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Disabled Persons</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Minnesota</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Neuropharmacology</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Placebos</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Sulfasalazine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0028-3878</issn><issn>1526-632X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEtLAzEUhYMotVaXLoUsxN3UPCaTzFKKL6i6qdhduE1vMJLO1MmMUH-9U1t0dQ-cj8PlI-ScszEXXFy_PU_Hio_VmMtcHJAhV6LICinmh2TImDCZNNock5OUPhjrS10OyKA03BhlhmQ-e0f6BJuaTmKogssmUMEyQEVdXa-xgTZ8IW2bAJHWnqYuekgQ4TtUSENFwf0Cqy62YR2RJhexqVNIp-TIQ0x4tr8j8np3O5s8ZNOX-8fJzTRzsuBtpkH70gmjlXfABfNmIVChwzLvM0q11Dka4QBKhHwhco5MSmM0k55rVsgRudrtrpv6s8PU2lVIDmOECusuWc2YklyLHsx2oOv_Sw16u27CCpqN5cxuTdrepFXcKrs12fMX--FuscLlH71X1_eX-x6Sg-gbqFxI_6OqpwomfwBT-Hvg</recordid><startdate>19981101</startdate><enddate>19981101</enddate><creator>NOSEWORTHY, J. H</creator><creator>OBRIEN, P</creator><creator>DUQUETTE, P</creator><creator>CARTER, J</creator><creator>FRANCIS, G</creator><creator>METZ, L</creator><creator>SHUSTER, E</creator><creator>ERICKSON, B. J</creator><creator>LEE, D</creator><creator>SNEVE, D</creator><creator>EBERS, G. C</creator><creator>RICE, G. P. A</creator><creator>AUTY, A</creator><creator>HADER, W. J</creator><creator>KIRK, A</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19981101</creationdate><title>The Mayo Clinic-Canadian cooperative trial of sulfasalazine in active multiple sclerosis</title><author>NOSEWORTHY, J. H ; OBRIEN, P ; DUQUETTE, P ; CARTER, J ; FRANCIS, G ; METZ, L ; SHUSTER, E ; ERICKSON, B. J ; LEE, D ; SNEVE, D ; EBERS, G. C ; RICE, G. P. A ; AUTY, A ; HADER, W. J ; KIRK, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-7a7f9c2875fca120f8b2e5ece940f8e35d74e82caa9ea4b241e03388703f17063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain - pathology</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Disabled Persons</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Minnesota</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Neuropharmacology</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Placebos</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Sulfasalazine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>NOSEWORTHY, J. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OBRIEN, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUQUETTE, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CARTER, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRANCIS, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>METZ, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHUSTER, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ERICKSON, B. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEE, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SNEVE, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EBERS, G. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RICE, G. P. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AUTY, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HADER, W. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIRK, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The Mayo Clinic-Canadian Cooperative MS Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>NOSEWORTHY, J. H</au><au>OBRIEN, P</au><au>DUQUETTE, P</au><au>CARTER, J</au><au>FRANCIS, G</au><au>METZ, L</au><au>SHUSTER, E</au><au>ERICKSON, B. J</au><au>LEE, D</au><au>SNEVE, D</au><au>EBERS, G. C</au><au>RICE, G. P. A</au><au>AUTY, A</au><au>HADER, W. J</au><au>KIRK, A</au><aucorp>The Mayo Clinic-Canadian Cooperative MS Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Mayo Clinic-Canadian cooperative trial of sulfasalazine in active multiple sclerosis</atitle><jtitle>Neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Neurology</addtitle><date>1998-11-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1342</spage><epage>1352</epage><pages>1342-1352</pages><issn>0028-3878</issn><eissn>1526-632X</eissn><coden>NEURAI</coden><abstract>To determine whether sulfasalazine is better than placebo in slowing disability progression in MS. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial, 199 patients with active relapsing-remitting (n = 151) or progressive (n = 48) MS were evaluated at 3-month intervals for a minimum of 3 years (94% completed 3 years of follow-up; mean follow-up, 3.7 years). MRI studies were performed at 6-month intervals on a subset of 89 patients. Sulfasalazine failed to slow or prevent disability progression as measured by the primary outcome (confirmed worsening of the Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score by at least 1.0 point on two consecutive 3-month visits). Sulfasalazine influenced favorably a number of secondary outcomes during the first 18 months of the trial (e.g., annualized relapse rate, proportion of relapse-free patients; progressive subgroup only: rate of EDSS progression at 1 and 2 years, median time to EDSS progression) but these positive findings were not sustained into the second half of the trial. Sulfasalazine does not prevent EDSS score progression in the subset of MS patients studied by this protocol. Treatments may improve relapse-related outcomes in MS, at least temporarily, without providing sustained slowing of EDSS progression. Phase III MS trials should be of sufficient length to determine a meaningful impact on disease course.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>9818858</pmid><doi>10.1212/WNL.51.5.1342</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-3878
ispartof Neurology, 1998-11, Vol.51 (5), p.1342-1352
issn 0028-3878
1526-632X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70053172
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
Brain - pathology
Canada
Disabled Persons
Disease Progression
Double-Blind Method
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Medical sciences
Minnesota
Miscellaneous
Multiple Sclerosis - drug therapy
Multiple Sclerosis - physiopathology
Neuropharmacology
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Placebos
Recurrence
Sulfasalazine - therapeutic use
Survival Analysis
Time Factors
title The Mayo Clinic-Canadian cooperative trial of sulfasalazine in active multiple sclerosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T11%3A27%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Mayo%20Clinic-Canadian%20cooperative%20trial%20of%20sulfasalazine%20in%20active%20multiple%20sclerosis&rft.jtitle=Neurology&rft.au=NOSEWORTHY,%20J.%20H&rft.aucorp=The%20Mayo%20Clinic-Canadian%20Cooperative%20MS%20Study%20Group&rft.date=1998-11-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1342&rft.epage=1352&rft.pages=1342-1352&rft.issn=0028-3878&rft.eissn=1526-632X&rft.coden=NEURAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1212/WNL.51.5.1342&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70053172%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70053172&rft_id=info:pmid/9818858&rfr_iscdi=true