Effects of growth type on carcass traits of pasture- or feedlot-developed steers
Carcasses of 342 steers of known genetic backgrounds from four fundamentally different growth types were developed either on pasture or feedlot regimens to study differences in carcass traits. Growth types were large framed-late maturing (LL), intermediate framed-intermediate maturing (II), intermed...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 1999-09, Vol.77 (9), p.2437-2443 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2443 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 2437 |
| container_title | Journal of animal science |
| container_volume | 77 |
| creator | Camfield, P.K Brown, A.H. Jr Johnson, Z.B Brown, C.J Lewis, P.K Rakes, L.Y |
| description | Carcasses of 342 steers of known genetic backgrounds from four fundamentally different growth types were developed either on pasture or feedlot regimens to study differences in carcass traits. Growth types were large framed-late maturing (LL), intermediate framed-intermediate maturing (II), intermediate framed-early maturing (IE), and small framed-early maturing (SE). Five calves from each growth type were assigned to each regimen in each year of a 9-yr study. Eighteen steers were removed from the study because of accident or illness. Data collected were preslaughter shrunk BW (SBW); hot carcass weight (HCW); chilled carcass weight (CCW); dressing percentage (DRESS); fat thickness at the 12th and 13th-rib interface (FAT); percentage kidney, pelvic, and heart fat (KPH); longissimus muscle area (LMA); marbling score (MARB); quality grade (QG); and yield grade (YG). Differences in carcass traits reflected genetic differences among growth types. The LL steers had heavier BW, HCW, and CCW and larger LMA (P < .05) than steers of other growth types, regardless of development regimen. Among pasture-developed steer carcasses, IE and SE steers had higher (P < .05) MARB and QG than either LL or II steers. Carcasses of large framed-late maturing steers had the lowest (P < .05) MARB and QG of the growth types. Carcasses of the II, IE, and SE steers had a higher (P < .05) numerical value for YG than carcasses of the LL steers. Among the carcasses of the feedlot-developed steers, IE and SE steers had the highest (P < .05) MARB and QG. Carcasses from the IE and SE steers were fatter (P < .05) than those from LL or II steers. Carcasses of the LL steers had the lowest percentage of KPH of growth types developed in the feedlot. No difference was observed in KPH for carcasses of II, IE, and SE steers. The LL steer carcasses had the lowest numerical value for YG of all growth types. These data indicate that variation existed among carcass traits for the four growth types and that carcass traits influenced by fatness were greater and more attainable in the feedlot-developed steers using current methods of evaluation. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2527/1999.7792437x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70047279</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70047279</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f85cc8a723d962b64687f8625c2d644541c28a23d8211c63cf2edf97159e2ee63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0Etv1DAUBWALUdGhsGQLVoXYpdg3fsRLVJWHVKlI0LXlOtczGWXGwXZo--_xKIOKWHnh7x77HkLecHYBEvRHboy50NqAaPXDM7LiEmTTctU-JyvGgDddx-GUvMx5yxgHaeQLcsqZqAOSrcj3qxDQl0xjoOsU78uGlscJadxT75J3OdOS3LCAyeUyJ2xoTDQg9mMsTY-_cYwT9jQXxJRfkZPgxoyvj-cZuf189fPya3N98-Xb5afrxgvGShM66X3nNLS9UXCnhOp06BRID70SQgruoXP1tgPOvWp9AOyD0VwaBETVnpEPS-6U4q8Zc7G7IXscR7fHOGerGRMatKnw_D-4jXPa179Z4LUbYwSrqFmQTzHnhMFOadi59Gg5s4ee7aFn-7fn6t8eQ-e7Hfb_6KXYCt4fgcvejSG5vR_yk6ubKMOettgM6839kNDmnRvHmsrt1mWtrbGHFyt8t8DgonXrVLNufwDjLQMjeKt1-wfaG5mp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218129940</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of growth type on carcass traits of pasture- or feedlot-developed steers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Camfield, P.K ; Brown, A.H. Jr ; Johnson, Z.B ; Brown, C.J ; Lewis, P.K ; Rakes, L.Y</creator><creatorcontrib>Camfield, P.K ; Brown, A.H. Jr ; Johnson, Z.B ; Brown, C.J ; Lewis, P.K ; Rakes, L.Y</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Carcasses of 342 steers of known genetic backgrounds from four fundamentally different growth types were developed either on pasture or feedlot regimens to study differences in carcass traits. Growth types were large framed-late maturing (LL), intermediate framed-intermediate maturing (II), intermediate framed-early maturing (IE), and small framed-early maturing (SE). Five calves from each growth type were assigned to each regimen in each year of a 9-yr study. Eighteen steers were removed from the study because of accident or illness. Data collected were preslaughter shrunk BW (SBW); hot carcass weight (HCW); chilled carcass weight (CCW); dressing percentage (DRESS); fat thickness at the 12th and 13th-rib interface (FAT); percentage kidney, pelvic, and heart fat (KPH); longissimus muscle area (LMA); marbling score (MARB); quality grade (QG); and yield grade (YG). Differences in carcass traits reflected genetic differences among growth types. The LL steers had heavier BW, HCW, and CCW and larger LMA (P < .05) than steers of other growth types, regardless of development regimen. Among pasture-developed steer carcasses, IE and SE steers had higher (P < .05) MARB and QG than either LL or II steers. Carcasses of large framed-late maturing steers had the lowest (P < .05) MARB and QG of the growth types. Carcasses of the II, IE, and SE steers had a higher (P < .05) numerical value for YG than carcasses of the LL steers. Among the carcasses of the feedlot-developed steers, IE and SE steers had the highest (P < .05) MARB and QG. Carcasses from the IE and SE steers were fatter (P < .05) than those from LL or II steers. Carcasses of the LL steers had the lowest percentage of KPH of growth types developed in the feedlot. No difference was observed in KPH for carcasses of II, IE, and SE steers. The LL steer carcasses had the lowest numerical value for YG of all growth types. These data indicate that variation existed among carcass traits for the four growth types and that carcass traits influenced by fatness were greater and more attainable in the feedlot-developed steers using current methods of evaluation.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/1999.7792437x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10492450</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Savoy, IL: Am Soc Animal Sci</publisher><subject>Angus ; Animal Feed ; Animal Husbandry - methods ; Animal productions ; Animals ; area ; backfat ; Beef ; beef cattle ; beef quality ; Biological and medical sciences ; body fat ; body weight ; carcass weight ; carcass yield ; Cattle - growth & development ; Charolais ; Chianina ; dressing percentage ; fat thickness ; feedlots ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; grazing ; growth curve ; Hereford ; line differences ; marbling ; Meat - standards ; muscles ; Nutrition ; Red Poll ; slaughter weight ; steers ; Terrestrial animal productions ; Vertebrates</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 1999-09, Vol.77 (9), p.2437-2443</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Sep 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f85cc8a723d962b64687f8625c2d644541c28a23d8211c63cf2edf97159e2ee63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1971690$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10492450$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Camfield, P.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, A.H. Jr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Z.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, C.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, P.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rakes, L.Y</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of growth type on carcass traits of pasture- or feedlot-developed steers</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Carcasses of 342 steers of known genetic backgrounds from four fundamentally different growth types were developed either on pasture or feedlot regimens to study differences in carcass traits. Growth types were large framed-late maturing (LL), intermediate framed-intermediate maturing (II), intermediate framed-early maturing (IE), and small framed-early maturing (SE). Five calves from each growth type were assigned to each regimen in each year of a 9-yr study. Eighteen steers were removed from the study because of accident or illness. Data collected were preslaughter shrunk BW (SBW); hot carcass weight (HCW); chilled carcass weight (CCW); dressing percentage (DRESS); fat thickness at the 12th and 13th-rib interface (FAT); percentage kidney, pelvic, and heart fat (KPH); longissimus muscle area (LMA); marbling score (MARB); quality grade (QG); and yield grade (YG). Differences in carcass traits reflected genetic differences among growth types. The LL steers had heavier BW, HCW, and CCW and larger LMA (P < .05) than steers of other growth types, regardless of development regimen. Among pasture-developed steer carcasses, IE and SE steers had higher (P < .05) MARB and QG than either LL or II steers. Carcasses of large framed-late maturing steers had the lowest (P < .05) MARB and QG of the growth types. Carcasses of the II, IE, and SE steers had a higher (P < .05) numerical value for YG than carcasses of the LL steers. Among the carcasses of the feedlot-developed steers, IE and SE steers had the highest (P < .05) MARB and QG. Carcasses from the IE and SE steers were fatter (P < .05) than those from LL or II steers. Carcasses of the LL steers had the lowest percentage of KPH of growth types developed in the feedlot. No difference was observed in KPH for carcasses of II, IE, and SE steers. The LL steer carcasses had the lowest numerical value for YG of all growth types. These data indicate that variation existed among carcass traits for the four growth types and that carcass traits influenced by fatness were greater and more attainable in the feedlot-developed steers using current methods of evaluation.]]></description><subject>Angus</subject><subject>Animal Feed</subject><subject>Animal Husbandry - methods</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>area</subject><subject>backfat</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>beef cattle</subject><subject>beef quality</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>body fat</subject><subject>body weight</subject><subject>carcass weight</subject><subject>carcass yield</subject><subject>Cattle - growth & development</subject><subject>Charolais</subject><subject>Chianina</subject><subject>dressing percentage</subject><subject>fat thickness</subject><subject>feedlots</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>grazing</subject><subject>growth curve</subject><subject>Hereford</subject><subject>line differences</subject><subject>marbling</subject><subject>Meat - standards</subject><subject>muscles</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Red Poll</subject><subject>slaughter weight</subject><subject>steers</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><issn>0021-8812</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0Etv1DAUBWALUdGhsGQLVoXYpdg3fsRLVJWHVKlI0LXlOtczGWXGwXZo--_xKIOKWHnh7x77HkLecHYBEvRHboy50NqAaPXDM7LiEmTTctU-JyvGgDddx-GUvMx5yxgHaeQLcsqZqAOSrcj3qxDQl0xjoOsU78uGlscJadxT75J3OdOS3LCAyeUyJ2xoTDQg9mMsTY-_cYwT9jQXxJRfkZPgxoyvj-cZuf189fPya3N98-Xb5afrxgvGShM66X3nNLS9UXCnhOp06BRID70SQgruoXP1tgPOvWp9AOyD0VwaBETVnpEPS-6U4q8Zc7G7IXscR7fHOGerGRMatKnw_D-4jXPa179Z4LUbYwSrqFmQTzHnhMFOadi59Gg5s4ee7aFn-7fn6t8eQ-e7Hfb_6KXYCt4fgcvejSG5vR_yk6ubKMOettgM6839kNDmnRvHmsrt1mWtrbGHFyt8t8DgonXrVLNufwDjLQMjeKt1-wfaG5mp</recordid><startdate>19990901</startdate><enddate>19990901</enddate><creator>Camfield, P.K</creator><creator>Brown, A.H. Jr</creator><creator>Johnson, Z.B</creator><creator>Brown, C.J</creator><creator>Lewis, P.K</creator><creator>Rakes, L.Y</creator><general>Am Soc Animal Sci</general><general>American Society of Animal Science</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990901</creationdate><title>Effects of growth type on carcass traits of pasture- or feedlot-developed steers</title><author>Camfield, P.K ; Brown, A.H. Jr ; Johnson, Z.B ; Brown, C.J ; Lewis, P.K ; Rakes, L.Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f85cc8a723d962b64687f8625c2d644541c28a23d8211c63cf2edf97159e2ee63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Angus</topic><topic>Animal Feed</topic><topic>Animal Husbandry - methods</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>area</topic><topic>backfat</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>beef cattle</topic><topic>beef quality</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>body fat</topic><topic>body weight</topic><topic>carcass weight</topic><topic>carcass yield</topic><topic>Cattle - growth & development</topic><topic>Charolais</topic><topic>Chianina</topic><topic>dressing percentage</topic><topic>fat thickness</topic><topic>feedlots</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>grazing</topic><topic>growth curve</topic><topic>Hereford</topic><topic>line differences</topic><topic>marbling</topic><topic>Meat - standards</topic><topic>muscles</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Red Poll</topic><topic>slaughter weight</topic><topic>steers</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Camfield, P.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, A.H. Jr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Z.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, C.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, P.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rakes, L.Y</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Camfield, P.K</au><au>Brown, A.H. Jr</au><au>Johnson, Z.B</au><au>Brown, C.J</au><au>Lewis, P.K</au><au>Rakes, L.Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of growth type on carcass traits of pasture- or feedlot-developed steers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>1999-09-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2437</spage><epage>2443</epage><pages>2437-2443</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><eissn>0021-8812</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Carcasses of 342 steers of known genetic backgrounds from four fundamentally different growth types were developed either on pasture or feedlot regimens to study differences in carcass traits. Growth types were large framed-late maturing (LL), intermediate framed-intermediate maturing (II), intermediate framed-early maturing (IE), and small framed-early maturing (SE). Five calves from each growth type were assigned to each regimen in each year of a 9-yr study. Eighteen steers were removed from the study because of accident or illness. Data collected were preslaughter shrunk BW (SBW); hot carcass weight (HCW); chilled carcass weight (CCW); dressing percentage (DRESS); fat thickness at the 12th and 13th-rib interface (FAT); percentage kidney, pelvic, and heart fat (KPH); longissimus muscle area (LMA); marbling score (MARB); quality grade (QG); and yield grade (YG). Differences in carcass traits reflected genetic differences among growth types. The LL steers had heavier BW, HCW, and CCW and larger LMA (P < .05) than steers of other growth types, regardless of development regimen. Among pasture-developed steer carcasses, IE and SE steers had higher (P < .05) MARB and QG than either LL or II steers. Carcasses of large framed-late maturing steers had the lowest (P < .05) MARB and QG of the growth types. Carcasses of the II, IE, and SE steers had a higher (P < .05) numerical value for YG than carcasses of the LL steers. Among the carcasses of the feedlot-developed steers, IE and SE steers had the highest (P < .05) MARB and QG. Carcasses from the IE and SE steers were fatter (P < .05) than those from LL or II steers. Carcasses of the LL steers had the lowest percentage of KPH of growth types developed in the feedlot. No difference was observed in KPH for carcasses of II, IE, and SE steers. The LL steer carcasses had the lowest numerical value for YG of all growth types. These data indicate that variation existed among carcass traits for the four growth types and that carcass traits influenced by fatness were greater and more attainable in the feedlot-developed steers using current methods of evaluation.]]></abstract><cop>Savoy, IL</cop><pub>Am Soc Animal Sci</pub><pmid>10492450</pmid><doi>10.2527/1999.7792437x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
| ispartof | Journal of animal science, 1999-09, Vol.77 (9), p.2437-2443 |
| issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 0021-8812 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70047279 |
| source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
| subjects | Angus Animal Feed Animal Husbandry - methods Animal productions Animals area backfat Beef beef cattle beef quality Biological and medical sciences body fat body weight carcass weight carcass yield Cattle - growth & development Charolais Chianina dressing percentage fat thickness feedlots Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology grazing growth curve Hereford line differences marbling Meat - standards muscles Nutrition Red Poll slaughter weight steers Terrestrial animal productions Vertebrates |
| title | Effects of growth type on carcass traits of pasture- or feedlot-developed steers |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T09%3A46%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20growth%20type%20on%20carcass%20traits%20of%20pasture-%20or%20feedlot-developed%20steers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Camfield,%20P.K&rft.date=1999-09-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2437&rft.epage=2443&rft.pages=2437-2443&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/1999.7792437x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70047279%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218129940&rft_id=info:pmid/10492450&rfr_iscdi=true |