Peak power and pulmonary oxygen uptake during knee extension exercise : comparisons among different incremental protocols

Four incremental protocols of knee extension exercise of different stage durations were compared to study the effect of the protocol upon power output at the last stage (Ppeak). Previous studies of knee extension have found very different power outputs with similar ergometers and these large differe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of applied physiology 1998-10, Vol.78 (5), p.441-447
Hauptverfasser: LE CHEVALIER, J. M, VANDEWALLE, H, VALLIER, J. M, WOLFF, M, STEIN, J. F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 447
container_issue 5
container_start_page 441
container_title European journal of applied physiology
container_volume 78
creator LE CHEVALIER, J. M
VANDEWALLE, H
VALLIER, J. M
WOLFF, M
STEIN, J. F
description Four incremental protocols of knee extension exercise of different stage durations were compared to study the effect of the protocol upon power output at the last stage (Ppeak). Previous studies of knee extension have found very different power outputs with similar ergometers and these large differences have been interpreted as being the result of the fatigue due to the durations of the protocols. The knee extension device used in previous studies was modified to avoid the action of the knee and hip flexors: the subjects pushing on a lever instead of pulling a rod. In the present study five subjects performed four incremental knee extension exercises which differed with regard to stage duration (60, 90, 180 or 360 s) on this ergometer. The Ppeak, peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) and peak heart rate (HRpeak) were measured at the end of each of these four incremental protocols. In eight subjects, the reliability of the protocols with the two shortest increments (60 and 90-s stages) was verified by measuring Ppeak at 60 s and 90 s (Ppeak60, Ppeak90) twice. The knee ergometer proposed in the present paper was easy to use without any special training and should improve the measurement of Ppeak. The Ppeak60 [49.4 (SD 5.6) W] was higher than at 180 s [Ppeak180), 43.6 (SD 5.8) W, P < 0.05] and at 360 s [Ppeak360, 43.4 (SD 5.3) W, P < 0.05]. All the other differences in Ppeak, VO2 peak and HRpeak were not significant. All correlations between Ppeak60, Ppeak90, Ppeak180 and Ppeak360 were significant, except those between Ppeak360 and Ppeak90 or Ppeak180. The effect of the stage duration on power output and oxygen uptake at the end of the knee extension exercises was not great. Consequently, the large differences in power output and oxygen uptake observed in previous studies cannot be explained by the protocol only. The significant difference between Ppeak 60 and Ppeak90 was of the order of 10% in agreement with findings in the literature using cycle ergometry. The reliability of Ppeak60 and Ppeak90 was high and the use of these protocols can be recommended if further studies show that the measurement of Ppeak, is useful in the evaluation of local endurance.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s004210050443
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70035083</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18857089</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-e195f8b8835bf8abe0b454c6f0a5d83d3dd96a0747a1555d146a7d91a3f9245e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUGLFDEQhYMo6-zq0aOQg3hrrXSS6cSbLOoKC3rQc1OdVIZ2upM26WZ3_r2RHRRPnurB-3gF7zH2QsAbAdC9LQCqrUqDUvIR2wkl20ZAqx-zHUgQjdbKPGWXpfwAaMHK7oJdWAPWKL1jp6-ER76kO8oco-fLNs0pYj7xdH86UOTbsuKRuN_yGA_8GIk43a8Uy5hiVZTdWIi_4y7NC-axpFg41ogD92MIlCmufIwu01wVTnzJaU0uTeUZexJwKvT8fK_Y948fvl3fNLdfPn2-fn_bOKnM2pCwOpjBGKmHYHAgGJRWbh8AtTfSS-_tHqFTHQqttRdqj523AmWwrdIkr9jrh9z6-edGZe3nsTiaJoyUttJ3AFKDkf8FhTG6A2Mr2DyALqdSMoV-yeNcO-sF9L836f_ZpPIvz8HbMJP_Q59HqP6rs4_F4RQyxlrq31BtW9EK-Qu6m5WU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18857089</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Peak power and pulmonary oxygen uptake during knee extension exercise : comparisons among different incremental protocols</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Online Journals Complete</source><creator>LE CHEVALIER, J. M ; VANDEWALLE, H ; VALLIER, J. M ; WOLFF, M ; STEIN, J. F</creator><creatorcontrib>LE CHEVALIER, J. M ; VANDEWALLE, H ; VALLIER, J. M ; WOLFF, M ; STEIN, J. F</creatorcontrib><description>Four incremental protocols of knee extension exercise of different stage durations were compared to study the effect of the protocol upon power output at the last stage (Ppeak). Previous studies of knee extension have found very different power outputs with similar ergometers and these large differences have been interpreted as being the result of the fatigue due to the durations of the protocols. The knee extension device used in previous studies was modified to avoid the action of the knee and hip flexors: the subjects pushing on a lever instead of pulling a rod. In the present study five subjects performed four incremental knee extension exercises which differed with regard to stage duration (60, 90, 180 or 360 s) on this ergometer. The Ppeak, peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) and peak heart rate (HRpeak) were measured at the end of each of these four incremental protocols. In eight subjects, the reliability of the protocols with the two shortest increments (60 and 90-s stages) was verified by measuring Ppeak at 60 s and 90 s (Ppeak60, Ppeak90) twice. The knee ergometer proposed in the present paper was easy to use without any special training and should improve the measurement of Ppeak. The Ppeak60 [49.4 (SD 5.6) W] was higher than at 180 s [Ppeak180), 43.6 (SD 5.8) W, P &lt; 0.05] and at 360 s [Ppeak360, 43.4 (SD 5.3) W, P &lt; 0.05]. All the other differences in Ppeak, VO2 peak and HRpeak were not significant. All correlations between Ppeak60, Ppeak90, Ppeak180 and Ppeak360 were significant, except those between Ppeak360 and Ppeak90 or Ppeak180. The effect of the stage duration on power output and oxygen uptake at the end of the knee extension exercises was not great. Consequently, the large differences in power output and oxygen uptake observed in previous studies cannot be explained by the protocol only. The significant difference between Ppeak 60 and Ppeak90 was of the order of 10% in agreement with findings in the literature using cycle ergometry. The reliability of Ppeak60 and Ppeak90 was high and the use of these protocols can be recommended if further studies show that the measurement of Ppeak, is useful in the evaluation of local endurance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-5548</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1439-6319</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1025</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-6327</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s004210050443</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9809845</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJAPCK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Energy Metabolism - physiology ; Ergometry ; Exercise - physiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Heart Rate - physiology ; Humans ; Knee Joint - physiology ; Oxygen Consumption - physiology ; Physical Exertion - physiology ; Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</subject><ispartof>European journal of applied physiology, 1998-10, Vol.78 (5), p.441-447</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-e195f8b8835bf8abe0b454c6f0a5d83d3dd96a0747a1555d146a7d91a3f9245e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1592121$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9809845$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>LE CHEVALIER, J. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VANDEWALLE, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VALLIER, J. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WOLFF, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STEIN, J. F</creatorcontrib><title>Peak power and pulmonary oxygen uptake during knee extension exercise : comparisons among different incremental protocols</title><title>European journal of applied physiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol</addtitle><description>Four incremental protocols of knee extension exercise of different stage durations were compared to study the effect of the protocol upon power output at the last stage (Ppeak). Previous studies of knee extension have found very different power outputs with similar ergometers and these large differences have been interpreted as being the result of the fatigue due to the durations of the protocols. The knee extension device used in previous studies was modified to avoid the action of the knee and hip flexors: the subjects pushing on a lever instead of pulling a rod. In the present study five subjects performed four incremental knee extension exercises which differed with regard to stage duration (60, 90, 180 or 360 s) on this ergometer. The Ppeak, peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) and peak heart rate (HRpeak) were measured at the end of each of these four incremental protocols. In eight subjects, the reliability of the protocols with the two shortest increments (60 and 90-s stages) was verified by measuring Ppeak at 60 s and 90 s (Ppeak60, Ppeak90) twice. The knee ergometer proposed in the present paper was easy to use without any special training and should improve the measurement of Ppeak. The Ppeak60 [49.4 (SD 5.6) W] was higher than at 180 s [Ppeak180), 43.6 (SD 5.8) W, P &lt; 0.05] and at 360 s [Ppeak360, 43.4 (SD 5.3) W, P &lt; 0.05]. All the other differences in Ppeak, VO2 peak and HRpeak were not significant. All correlations between Ppeak60, Ppeak90, Ppeak180 and Ppeak360 were significant, except those between Ppeak360 and Ppeak90 or Ppeak180. The effect of the stage duration on power output and oxygen uptake at the end of the knee extension exercises was not great. Consequently, the large differences in power output and oxygen uptake observed in previous studies cannot be explained by the protocol only. The significant difference between Ppeak 60 and Ppeak90 was of the order of 10% in agreement with findings in the literature using cycle ergometry. The reliability of Ppeak60 and Ppeak90 was high and the use of these protocols can be recommended if further studies show that the measurement of Ppeak, is useful in the evaluation of local endurance.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Energy Metabolism - physiology</subject><subject>Ergometry</subject><subject>Exercise - physiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Heart Rate - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Oxygen Consumption - physiology</subject><subject>Physical Exertion - physiology</subject><subject>Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</subject><issn>0301-5548</issn><issn>1439-6319</issn><issn>1432-1025</issn><issn>1439-6327</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUGLFDEQhYMo6-zq0aOQg3hrrXSS6cSbLOoKC3rQc1OdVIZ2upM26WZ3_r2RHRRPnurB-3gF7zH2QsAbAdC9LQCqrUqDUvIR2wkl20ZAqx-zHUgQjdbKPGWXpfwAaMHK7oJdWAPWKL1jp6-ER76kO8oco-fLNs0pYj7xdH86UOTbsuKRuN_yGA_8GIk43a8Uy5hiVZTdWIi_4y7NC-axpFg41ogD92MIlCmufIwu01wVTnzJaU0uTeUZexJwKvT8fK_Y948fvl3fNLdfPn2-fn_bOKnM2pCwOpjBGKmHYHAgGJRWbh8AtTfSS-_tHqFTHQqttRdqj523AmWwrdIkr9jrh9z6-edGZe3nsTiaJoyUttJ3AFKDkf8FhTG6A2Mr2DyALqdSMoV-yeNcO-sF9L836f_ZpPIvz8HbMJP_Q59HqP6rs4_F4RQyxlrq31BtW9EK-Qu6m5WU</recordid><startdate>19981001</startdate><enddate>19981001</enddate><creator>LE CHEVALIER, J. M</creator><creator>VANDEWALLE, H</creator><creator>VALLIER, J. M</creator><creator>WOLFF, M</creator><creator>STEIN, J. F</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19981001</creationdate><title>Peak power and pulmonary oxygen uptake during knee extension exercise : comparisons among different incremental protocols</title><author>LE CHEVALIER, J. M ; VANDEWALLE, H ; VALLIER, J. M ; WOLFF, M ; STEIN, J. F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-e195f8b8835bf8abe0b454c6f0a5d83d3dd96a0747a1555d146a7d91a3f9245e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Energy Metabolism - physiology</topic><topic>Ergometry</topic><topic>Exercise - physiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Heart Rate - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Oxygen Consumption - physiology</topic><topic>Physical Exertion - physiology</topic><topic>Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LE CHEVALIER, J. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VANDEWALLE, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VALLIER, J. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WOLFF, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STEIN, J. F</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of applied physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LE CHEVALIER, J. M</au><au>VANDEWALLE, H</au><au>VALLIER, J. M</au><au>WOLFF, M</au><au>STEIN, J. F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Peak power and pulmonary oxygen uptake during knee extension exercise : comparisons among different incremental protocols</atitle><jtitle>European journal of applied physiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol</addtitle><date>1998-10-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>441</spage><epage>447</epage><pages>441-447</pages><issn>0301-5548</issn><issn>1439-6319</issn><eissn>1432-1025</eissn><eissn>1439-6327</eissn><coden>EJAPCK</coden><abstract>Four incremental protocols of knee extension exercise of different stage durations were compared to study the effect of the protocol upon power output at the last stage (Ppeak). Previous studies of knee extension have found very different power outputs with similar ergometers and these large differences have been interpreted as being the result of the fatigue due to the durations of the protocols. The knee extension device used in previous studies was modified to avoid the action of the knee and hip flexors: the subjects pushing on a lever instead of pulling a rod. In the present study five subjects performed four incremental knee extension exercises which differed with regard to stage duration (60, 90, 180 or 360 s) on this ergometer. The Ppeak, peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) and peak heart rate (HRpeak) were measured at the end of each of these four incremental protocols. In eight subjects, the reliability of the protocols with the two shortest increments (60 and 90-s stages) was verified by measuring Ppeak at 60 s and 90 s (Ppeak60, Ppeak90) twice. The knee ergometer proposed in the present paper was easy to use without any special training and should improve the measurement of Ppeak. The Ppeak60 [49.4 (SD 5.6) W] was higher than at 180 s [Ppeak180), 43.6 (SD 5.8) W, P &lt; 0.05] and at 360 s [Ppeak360, 43.4 (SD 5.3) W, P &lt; 0.05]. All the other differences in Ppeak, VO2 peak and HRpeak were not significant. All correlations between Ppeak60, Ppeak90, Ppeak180 and Ppeak360 were significant, except those between Ppeak360 and Ppeak90 or Ppeak180. The effect of the stage duration on power output and oxygen uptake at the end of the knee extension exercises was not great. Consequently, the large differences in power output and oxygen uptake observed in previous studies cannot be explained by the protocol only. The significant difference between Ppeak 60 and Ppeak90 was of the order of 10% in agreement with findings in the literature using cycle ergometry. The reliability of Ppeak60 and Ppeak90 was high and the use of these protocols can be recommended if further studies show that the measurement of Ppeak, is useful in the evaluation of local endurance.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>9809845</pmid><doi>10.1007/s004210050443</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-5548
ispartof European journal of applied physiology, 1998-10, Vol.78 (5), p.441-447
issn 0301-5548
1439-6319
1432-1025
1439-6327
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70035083
source MEDLINE; Springer Online Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Energy Metabolism - physiology
Ergometry
Exercise - physiology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Heart Rate - physiology
Humans
Knee Joint - physiology
Oxygen Consumption - physiology
Physical Exertion - physiology
Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports
title Peak power and pulmonary oxygen uptake during knee extension exercise : comparisons among different incremental protocols
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T01%3A15%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Peak%20power%20and%20pulmonary%20oxygen%20uptake%20during%20knee%20extension%20exercise%20:%20comparisons%20among%20different%20incremental%20protocols&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20applied%20physiology&rft.au=LE%20CHEVALIER,%20J.%20M&rft.date=1998-10-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=441&rft.epage=447&rft.pages=441-447&rft.issn=0301-5548&rft.eissn=1432-1025&rft.coden=EJAPCK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s004210050443&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18857089%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18857089&rft_id=info:pmid/9809845&rfr_iscdi=true