Comparison of Methods of In Vitro Dry Matter Digestibility for Ten Feeds
The objectives were to determine if the in vitro dry matter (DM) digestibility was similar by using a traditional method compared to the new DAISYII system and to determine if in vitro DM digestibility was similar for sources of inoculum from two different donor cow diets, all forage or total mixed...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of dairy science 1999-08, Vol.82 (8), p.1791-1794 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1794 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 1791 |
| container_title | Journal of dairy science |
| container_volume | 82 |
| creator | Holden, L.A. |
| description | The objectives were to determine if the in vitro dry matter (DM) digestibility was similar by using a traditional method compared to the new DAISYII system and to determine if in vitro DM digestibility was similar for sources of inoculum from two different donor cow diets, all forage or total mixed ration. Ten feeds were digested by the traditional method, the DAISYII method with same feeds in a digestion vessel, and the DAISYII method with different feeds in a digestion vessel. The study used a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement of treatments with two sources of inoculum and three methods. The study was replicated. Source of inoculum affected in vitro DM digestibility; the grass hay donor cow diet resulted in lower digestibility values in six of the 10 feeds tested. Method did not significantly affect the digestibility values, and there were no significant source by method interactions. The DAISYII method can be used to increase labor efficiency in the in vitro DM digestibility analysis, and forages and grains can be analyzed together in a single digestion vessel. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75409-3 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70022261</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022030299754093</els_id><sourcerecordid>1877116685</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-3d080b532af5b4b0c86d93f9708fa640822c05ea74d1dc9a1ccdd6995d61d9213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFv1DAQhS0EotvCX4AgKgSHFI8dO_YRbSmt1IpDW66WYzu7XiXx1s6C9t_jNCuKOHHyWPpm5r03CL0DfEaBi88bm85uMSakxBSTj1J-qlmFZUmfoQUwwkoKUjxHiz_IETpOaZO_QDB7iY4AVwIDZgt0uQz9VkefwlCEtrhx4zrYNJVXQ_HDjzEU53Ff3OhxdLE49yuXRt_4zo_7og2xuHNDceGcTa_Qi1Z3yb0-vCfo_uLr3fKyvP7-7Wr55bo0jPKxpBYL3DBKdMuaqsFGcCtpK2ssWs0rLAgxmDldVxaskRqMsZZLySwHKwnQE_RhnruN4WGX1ajeJ-O6Tg8u7JKqJ9OET-D7f8BN2MUha1Mg6hqAc8EyJWfKxJBSdK3aRt_ruFeA1RS2ymGrx7DVlKSSUj2GrWjufXPYsGt6Z__qnNPNwOkB0Mnoro16MD49cSQfC-STpbVfrX_56FTqddflqTBtF0QJBbWcLL2dwVYHpVf5aur-lmDIuiSVDKpMLGfC5RP89C6qZLwbjLN5rBmVDf4_jP0GiYiyQg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877116685</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Methods of In Vitro Dry Matter Digestibility for Ten Feeds</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Holden, L.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Holden, L.A.</creatorcontrib><description>The objectives were to determine if the in vitro dry matter (DM) digestibility was similar by using a traditional method compared to the new DAISYII system and to determine if in vitro DM digestibility was similar for sources of inoculum from two different donor cow diets, all forage or total mixed ration. Ten feeds were digested by the traditional method, the DAISYII method with same feeds in a digestion vessel, and the DAISYII method with different feeds in a digestion vessel. The study used a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement of treatments with two sources of inoculum and three methods. The study was replicated. Source of inoculum affected in vitro DM digestibility; the grass hay donor cow diet resulted in lower digestibility values in six of the 10 feeds tested. Method did not significantly affect the digestibility values, and there were no significant source by method interactions. The DAISYII method can be used to increase labor efficiency in the in vitro DM digestibility analysis, and forages and grains can be analyzed together in a single digestion vessel.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75409-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10480105</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JDSCAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Savoy, IL: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>alfalfa ; alfalfa hay ; Animal Feed ; Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; Animal productions ; Animals ; artificial rumen ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cattle ; complete feeds ; corn ; corn silage ; dairy cows ; Digestion ; Edible Grain ; Fabaceae ; Feeding. Feeding behavior ; flaking ; Food Handling ; forages ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; grains ; grasses ; green fodders ; hay ; haylage ; in vitro ; in vitro digestibility ; In Vitro Techniques ; laboratory equipment ; Medicago sativa ; milling ; Plants, Medicinal ; Poaceae ; rapid methods ; rumen fluids ; Silage ; steaming ; Terrestrial animal productions ; Vertebrates ; Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Journal of dairy science, 1999-08, Vol.82 (8), p.1791-1794</ispartof><rights>1999 American Dairy Science Association</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-3d080b532af5b4b0c86d93f9708fa640822c05ea74d1dc9a1ccdd6995d61d9213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-3d080b532af5b4b0c86d93f9708fa640822c05ea74d1dc9a1ccdd6995d61d9213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030299754093$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27848,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1215219$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10480105$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holden, L.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Methods of In Vitro Dry Matter Digestibility for Ten Feeds</title><title>Journal of dairy science</title><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><description>The objectives were to determine if the in vitro dry matter (DM) digestibility was similar by using a traditional method compared to the new DAISYII system and to determine if in vitro DM digestibility was similar for sources of inoculum from two different donor cow diets, all forage or total mixed ration. Ten feeds were digested by the traditional method, the DAISYII method with same feeds in a digestion vessel, and the DAISYII method with different feeds in a digestion vessel. The study used a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement of treatments with two sources of inoculum and three methods. The study was replicated. Source of inoculum affected in vitro DM digestibility; the grass hay donor cow diet resulted in lower digestibility values in six of the 10 feeds tested. Method did not significantly affect the digestibility values, and there were no significant source by method interactions. The DAISYII method can be used to increase labor efficiency in the in vitro DM digestibility analysis, and forages and grains can be analyzed together in a single digestion vessel.</description><subject>alfalfa</subject><subject>alfalfa hay</subject><subject>Animal Feed</subject><subject>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>artificial rumen</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>complete feeds</subject><subject>corn</subject><subject>corn silage</subject><subject>dairy cows</subject><subject>Digestion</subject><subject>Edible Grain</subject><subject>Fabaceae</subject><subject>Feeding. Feeding behavior</subject><subject>flaking</subject><subject>Food Handling</subject><subject>forages</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>grains</subject><subject>grasses</subject><subject>green fodders</subject><subject>hay</subject><subject>haylage</subject><subject>in vitro</subject><subject>in vitro digestibility</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>laboratory equipment</subject><subject>Medicago sativa</subject><subject>milling</subject><subject>Plants, Medicinal</subject><subject>Poaceae</subject><subject>rapid methods</subject><subject>rumen fluids</subject><subject>Silage</subject><subject>steaming</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>0022-0302</issn><issn>1525-3198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFv1DAQhS0EotvCX4AgKgSHFI8dO_YRbSmt1IpDW66WYzu7XiXx1s6C9t_jNCuKOHHyWPpm5r03CL0DfEaBi88bm85uMSakxBSTj1J-qlmFZUmfoQUwwkoKUjxHiz_IETpOaZO_QDB7iY4AVwIDZgt0uQz9VkefwlCEtrhx4zrYNJVXQ_HDjzEU53Ff3OhxdLE49yuXRt_4zo_7og2xuHNDceGcTa_Qi1Z3yb0-vCfo_uLr3fKyvP7-7Wr55bo0jPKxpBYL3DBKdMuaqsFGcCtpK2ssWs0rLAgxmDldVxaskRqMsZZLySwHKwnQE_RhnruN4WGX1ajeJ-O6Tg8u7JKqJ9OET-D7f8BN2MUha1Mg6hqAc8EyJWfKxJBSdK3aRt_ruFeA1RS2ymGrx7DVlKSSUj2GrWjufXPYsGt6Z__qnNPNwOkB0Mnoro16MD49cSQfC-STpbVfrX_56FTqddflqTBtF0QJBbWcLL2dwVYHpVf5aur-lmDIuiSVDKpMLGfC5RP89C6qZLwbjLN5rBmVDf4_jP0GiYiyQg</recordid><startdate>19990801</startdate><enddate>19990801</enddate><creator>Holden, L.A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Am Dairy Sci Assoc</general><general>American Dairy Science Association</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7WH</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990801</creationdate><title>Comparison of Methods of In Vitro Dry Matter Digestibility for Ten Feeds</title><author>Holden, L.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-3d080b532af5b4b0c86d93f9708fa640822c05ea74d1dc9a1ccdd6995d61d9213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>alfalfa</topic><topic>alfalfa hay</topic><topic>Animal Feed</topic><topic>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>artificial rumen</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>complete feeds</topic><topic>corn</topic><topic>corn silage</topic><topic>dairy cows</topic><topic>Digestion</topic><topic>Edible Grain</topic><topic>Fabaceae</topic><topic>Feeding. Feeding behavior</topic><topic>flaking</topic><topic>Food Handling</topic><topic>forages</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>grains</topic><topic>grasses</topic><topic>green fodders</topic><topic>hay</topic><topic>haylage</topic><topic>in vitro</topic><topic>in vitro digestibility</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>laboratory equipment</topic><topic>Medicago sativa</topic><topic>milling</topic><topic>Plants, Medicinal</topic><topic>Poaceae</topic><topic>rapid methods</topic><topic>rumen fluids</topic><topic>Silage</topic><topic>steaming</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holden, L.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 50</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holden, L.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Methods of In Vitro Dry Matter Digestibility for Ten Feeds</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><date>1999-08-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1791</spage><epage>1794</epage><pages>1791-1794</pages><issn>0022-0302</issn><eissn>1525-3198</eissn><coden>JDSCAE</coden><abstract>The objectives were to determine if the in vitro dry matter (DM) digestibility was similar by using a traditional method compared to the new DAISYII system and to determine if in vitro DM digestibility was similar for sources of inoculum from two different donor cow diets, all forage or total mixed ration. Ten feeds were digested by the traditional method, the DAISYII method with same feeds in a digestion vessel, and the DAISYII method with different feeds in a digestion vessel. The study used a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement of treatments with two sources of inoculum and three methods. The study was replicated. Source of inoculum affected in vitro DM digestibility; the grass hay donor cow diet resulted in lower digestibility values in six of the 10 feeds tested. Method did not significantly affect the digestibility values, and there were no significant source by method interactions. The DAISYII method can be used to increase labor efficiency in the in vitro DM digestibility analysis, and forages and grains can be analyzed together in a single digestion vessel.</abstract><cop>Savoy, IL</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10480105</pmid><doi>10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75409-3</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-0302 |
| ispartof | Journal of dairy science, 1999-08, Vol.82 (8), p.1791-1794 |
| issn | 0022-0302 1525-3198 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70022261 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | alfalfa alfalfa hay Animal Feed Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena Animal productions Animals artificial rumen Biological and medical sciences Cattle complete feeds corn corn silage dairy cows Digestion Edible Grain Fabaceae Feeding. Feeding behavior flaking Food Handling forages Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology grains grasses green fodders hay haylage in vitro in vitro digestibility In Vitro Techniques laboratory equipment Medicago sativa milling Plants, Medicinal Poaceae rapid methods rumen fluids Silage steaming Terrestrial animal productions Vertebrates Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems Zea mays |
| title | Comparison of Methods of In Vitro Dry Matter Digestibility for Ten Feeds |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T16%3A36%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Methods%20of%20In%20Vitro%20Dry%20Matter%20Digestibility%20for%20Ten%20Feeds&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dairy%20science&rft.au=Holden,%20L.A.&rft.date=1999-08-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1791&rft.epage=1794&rft.pages=1791-1794&rft.issn=0022-0302&rft.eissn=1525-3198&rft.coden=JDSCAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75409-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1877116685%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877116685&rft_id=info:pmid/10480105&rft_els_id=S0022030299754093&rfr_iscdi=true |