Experience with the Ultrex and Ultrex Plus inflatable penile prosthesis: new implantation techniques and surgical outcome

The Ultrex and Ultrex Plus penile prosthesis incorporate sequential design modifications that afford important functional advantages that reduce the potential for mechanical failure. This retrospective study reviews our experience with these models emphasizing innovations in surgical technique and p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of impotence research 1998-09, Vol.10 (3), p.175-179
Hauptverfasser: Liberman, SN, Gomella, LG, Hirsch, IH
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 179
container_issue 3
container_start_page 175
container_title International journal of impotence research
container_volume 10
creator Liberman, SN
Gomella, LG
Hirsch, IH
description The Ultrex and Ultrex Plus penile prosthesis incorporate sequential design modifications that afford important functional advantages that reduce the potential for mechanical failure. This retrospective study reviews our experience with these models emphasizing innovations in surgical technique and postoperative results. Implantation of Ultrex (31%) and Ultrex Plus (69%) penile prosthesis was performed in 90 impotent men with organic erectile dysfunction following comprehensive multi-disciplinary evaluation. During a follow-up interval of 7–50 months, postoperative outcome was assessed. Of this group, 10% underwent simultaneous explant of another malfunctioning inflatable device or conversion from a semi-rigid prosthesis due to patient preference. Of the remainder, 20% selected implant surgery as their primary therapy while 73% were initially treated with various nonsurgical options prior to implantation. In all patients we employed a single peno-scrotal incision and applied the concept of controlled radial dilatation of all compartments. In our last 32 consecutive patients including eight with previous radical pelvic surgery, we utilized the preperitoneal distention balloon (PDB) facilitating safe and non-traumatic creation of the prevesical space for reservoir insertion. Post operative complications occurred in 8% of patients including pump infection and corporal deformity requiring reimplantation with AMS 700 CX cylinders, or self-contained unitarian prosthesis as a salvage procedure. Satisfactory, functional and anatomic outcome was reported in 95% of patients. Interim advances incorporated into the Ultrex and Ultrex Plus prosthesis have markedly reduced mechanical failure during our follow-up interval of up to 50 months. Importantly, controlled, non-traumatic radial dilatation of the prevesical space by the PDB may encourage broader use of the multicomponent inflatable models, particularly in a setting of pelvic fibrosis due to previous pelvic surgery or radiation.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900337
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69999339</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2645334900</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-dc64d0f3b94ca23ad2d769226944ee3fc20a0290cfd7c7dc16c87705e21078723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UcFq3DAQFaUh3W57zqkgKPTmzViSLau3EpI2EGgOzVlo5XFWxpa3kkySv6-c3bQQ6Fxm4L15eqNHyFkJmxJ4cx77jetd2HAFwLl8Q1alkHVRiUa9JStQVVUoxeEdeR9jDwAKyvqUnCrZNCXIFXm6fNxjcOgt0geXdjTtkN4NKeAjNb59GW-HOVLnu8Eksx2Q7tG7pYUp5oXo4lfq8YG6cT8Yn0xyk6cJ7c673zPGZ6U4h3tnzUCnOdlpxA_kpDNDxI_HviZ3V5e_Ln4UNz-_X198uymsYCIVra1FCx3fKmEN46ZlrawVY7USApF3loEBpsB2rbSytWVtGymhQpbvayTja_LloJvNLmaSHl20OGSjOM1R1yoX5yoTP78i9tMcfPamWS0qzsXyx2tyfmDZfHsM2Ol9cKMJT7oEvUSiY6-XSPQxkrzx6ag7b0ds__KPGWQcDnjMiL_H8O_d_0n-AfFImrc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2645334900</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experience with the Ultrex and Ultrex Plus inflatable penile prosthesis: new implantation techniques and surgical outcome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Liberman, SN ; Gomella, LG ; Hirsch, IH</creator><creatorcontrib>Liberman, SN ; Gomella, LG ; Hirsch, IH</creatorcontrib><description>The Ultrex and Ultrex Plus penile prosthesis incorporate sequential design modifications that afford important functional advantages that reduce the potential for mechanical failure. This retrospective study reviews our experience with these models emphasizing innovations in surgical technique and postoperative results. Implantation of Ultrex (31%) and Ultrex Plus (69%) penile prosthesis was performed in 90 impotent men with organic erectile dysfunction following comprehensive multi-disciplinary evaluation. During a follow-up interval of 7–50 months, postoperative outcome was assessed. Of this group, 10% underwent simultaneous explant of another malfunctioning inflatable device or conversion from a semi-rigid prosthesis due to patient preference. Of the remainder, 20% selected implant surgery as their primary therapy while 73% were initially treated with various nonsurgical options prior to implantation. In all patients we employed a single peno-scrotal incision and applied the concept of controlled radial dilatation of all compartments. In our last 32 consecutive patients including eight with previous radical pelvic surgery, we utilized the preperitoneal distention balloon (PDB) facilitating safe and non-traumatic creation of the prevesical space for reservoir insertion. Post operative complications occurred in 8% of patients including pump infection and corporal deformity requiring reimplantation with AMS 700 CX cylinders, or self-contained unitarian prosthesis as a salvage procedure. Satisfactory, functional and anatomic outcome was reported in 95% of patients. Interim advances incorporated into the Ultrex and Ultrex Plus prosthesis have markedly reduced mechanical failure during our follow-up interval of up to 50 months. Importantly, controlled, non-traumatic radial dilatation of the prevesical space by the PDB may encourage broader use of the multicomponent inflatable models, particularly in a setting of pelvic fibrosis due to previous pelvic surgery or radiation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0955-9930</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5489</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900337</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9788107</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Erectile dysfunction ; Erectile Dysfunction - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Penile Implantation - adverse effects ; Penile Implantation - instrumentation ; Penile Implantation - methods ; Penile Prosthesis ; Penis ; Prostheses ; Reproductive Medicine ; Retrospective Studies ; rology ; Surgery ; Transplants &amp; implants ; Urology</subject><ispartof>International journal of impotence research, 1998-09, Vol.10 (3), p.175-179</ispartof><rights>Macmillan Publishers Limited 1998</rights><rights>Macmillan Publishers Limited 1998.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-dc64d0f3b94ca23ad2d769226944ee3fc20a0290cfd7c7dc16c87705e21078723</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900337$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900337$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9788107$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liberman, SN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomella, LG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirsch, IH</creatorcontrib><title>Experience with the Ultrex and Ultrex Plus inflatable penile prosthesis: new implantation techniques and surgical outcome</title><title>International journal of impotence research</title><addtitle>Int J Impot Res</addtitle><addtitle>Int J Impot Res</addtitle><description>The Ultrex and Ultrex Plus penile prosthesis incorporate sequential design modifications that afford important functional advantages that reduce the potential for mechanical failure. This retrospective study reviews our experience with these models emphasizing innovations in surgical technique and postoperative results. Implantation of Ultrex (31%) and Ultrex Plus (69%) penile prosthesis was performed in 90 impotent men with organic erectile dysfunction following comprehensive multi-disciplinary evaluation. During a follow-up interval of 7–50 months, postoperative outcome was assessed. Of this group, 10% underwent simultaneous explant of another malfunctioning inflatable device or conversion from a semi-rigid prosthesis due to patient preference. Of the remainder, 20% selected implant surgery as their primary therapy while 73% were initially treated with various nonsurgical options prior to implantation. In all patients we employed a single peno-scrotal incision and applied the concept of controlled radial dilatation of all compartments. In our last 32 consecutive patients including eight with previous radical pelvic surgery, we utilized the preperitoneal distention balloon (PDB) facilitating safe and non-traumatic creation of the prevesical space for reservoir insertion. Post operative complications occurred in 8% of patients including pump infection and corporal deformity requiring reimplantation with AMS 700 CX cylinders, or self-contained unitarian prosthesis as a salvage procedure. Satisfactory, functional and anatomic outcome was reported in 95% of patients. Interim advances incorporated into the Ultrex and Ultrex Plus prosthesis have markedly reduced mechanical failure during our follow-up interval of up to 50 months. Importantly, controlled, non-traumatic radial dilatation of the prevesical space by the PDB may encourage broader use of the multicomponent inflatable models, particularly in a setting of pelvic fibrosis due to previous pelvic surgery or radiation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Erectile dysfunction</subject><subject>Erectile Dysfunction - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Penile Implantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Penile Implantation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Penile Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Penile Prosthesis</subject><subject>Penis</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Reproductive Medicine</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>rology</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>0955-9930</issn><issn>1476-5489</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UcFq3DAQFaUh3W57zqkgKPTmzViSLau3EpI2EGgOzVlo5XFWxpa3kkySv6-c3bQQ6Fxm4L15eqNHyFkJmxJ4cx77jetd2HAFwLl8Q1alkHVRiUa9JStQVVUoxeEdeR9jDwAKyvqUnCrZNCXIFXm6fNxjcOgt0geXdjTtkN4NKeAjNb59GW-HOVLnu8Eksx2Q7tG7pYUp5oXo4lfq8YG6cT8Yn0xyk6cJ7c673zPGZ6U4h3tnzUCnOdlpxA_kpDNDxI_HviZ3V5e_Ln4UNz-_X198uymsYCIVra1FCx3fKmEN46ZlrawVY7USApF3loEBpsB2rbSytWVtGymhQpbvayTja_LloJvNLmaSHl20OGSjOM1R1yoX5yoTP78i9tMcfPamWS0qzsXyx2tyfmDZfHsM2Ol9cKMJT7oEvUSiY6-XSPQxkrzx6ag7b0ds__KPGWQcDnjMiL_H8O_d_0n-AfFImrc</recordid><startdate>19980901</startdate><enddate>19980901</enddate><creator>Liberman, SN</creator><creator>Gomella, LG</creator><creator>Hirsch, IH</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980901</creationdate><title>Experience with the Ultrex and Ultrex Plus inflatable penile prosthesis: new implantation techniques and surgical outcome</title><author>Liberman, SN ; Gomella, LG ; Hirsch, IH</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-dc64d0f3b94ca23ad2d769226944ee3fc20a0290cfd7c7dc16c87705e21078723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Erectile dysfunction</topic><topic>Erectile Dysfunction - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Penile Implantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Penile Implantation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Penile Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Penile Prosthesis</topic><topic>Penis</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Reproductive Medicine</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>rology</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liberman, SN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomella, LG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirsch, IH</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of impotence research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liberman, SN</au><au>Gomella, LG</au><au>Hirsch, IH</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experience with the Ultrex and Ultrex Plus inflatable penile prosthesis: new implantation techniques and surgical outcome</atitle><jtitle>International journal of impotence research</jtitle><stitle>Int J Impot Res</stitle><addtitle>Int J Impot Res</addtitle><date>1998-09-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>175</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>175-179</pages><issn>0955-9930</issn><eissn>1476-5489</eissn><abstract>The Ultrex and Ultrex Plus penile prosthesis incorporate sequential design modifications that afford important functional advantages that reduce the potential for mechanical failure. This retrospective study reviews our experience with these models emphasizing innovations in surgical technique and postoperative results. Implantation of Ultrex (31%) and Ultrex Plus (69%) penile prosthesis was performed in 90 impotent men with organic erectile dysfunction following comprehensive multi-disciplinary evaluation. During a follow-up interval of 7–50 months, postoperative outcome was assessed. Of this group, 10% underwent simultaneous explant of another malfunctioning inflatable device or conversion from a semi-rigid prosthesis due to patient preference. Of the remainder, 20% selected implant surgery as their primary therapy while 73% were initially treated with various nonsurgical options prior to implantation. In all patients we employed a single peno-scrotal incision and applied the concept of controlled radial dilatation of all compartments. In our last 32 consecutive patients including eight with previous radical pelvic surgery, we utilized the preperitoneal distention balloon (PDB) facilitating safe and non-traumatic creation of the prevesical space for reservoir insertion. Post operative complications occurred in 8% of patients including pump infection and corporal deformity requiring reimplantation with AMS 700 CX cylinders, or self-contained unitarian prosthesis as a salvage procedure. Satisfactory, functional and anatomic outcome was reported in 95% of patients. Interim advances incorporated into the Ultrex and Ultrex Plus prosthesis have markedly reduced mechanical failure during our follow-up interval of up to 50 months. Importantly, controlled, non-traumatic radial dilatation of the prevesical space by the PDB may encourage broader use of the multicomponent inflatable models, particularly in a setting of pelvic fibrosis due to previous pelvic surgery or radiation.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>9788107</pmid><doi>10.1038/sj.ijir.3900337</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0955-9930
ispartof International journal of impotence research, 1998-09, Vol.10 (3), p.175-179
issn 0955-9930
1476-5489
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69999339
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adult
Aged
Erectile dysfunction
Erectile Dysfunction - surgery
Humans
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Penile Implantation - adverse effects
Penile Implantation - instrumentation
Penile Implantation - methods
Penile Prosthesis
Penis
Prostheses
Reproductive Medicine
Retrospective Studies
rology
Surgery
Transplants & implants
Urology
title Experience with the Ultrex and Ultrex Plus inflatable penile prosthesis: new implantation techniques and surgical outcome
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T08%3A41%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experience%20with%20the%20Ultrex%20and%20Ultrex%20Plus%20inflatable%20penile%20prosthesis:%20new%20implantation%20techniques%20and%20surgical%20outcome&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20impotence%20research&rft.au=Liberman,%20SN&rft.date=1998-09-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=175-179&rft.issn=0955-9930&rft.eissn=1476-5489&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900337&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2645334900%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2645334900&rft_id=info:pmid/9788107&rfr_iscdi=true