Experience with the Ultrex and Ultrex Plus inflatable penile prosthesis: new implantation techniques and surgical outcome
The Ultrex and Ultrex Plus penile prosthesis incorporate sequential design modifications that afford important functional advantages that reduce the potential for mechanical failure. This retrospective study reviews our experience with these models emphasizing innovations in surgical technique and p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of impotence research 1998-09, Vol.10 (3), p.175-179 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 179 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 175 |
container_title | International journal of impotence research |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Liberman, SN Gomella, LG Hirsch, IH |
description | The Ultrex and Ultrex Plus penile prosthesis incorporate sequential design modifications that afford important functional advantages that reduce the potential for mechanical failure. This retrospective study reviews our experience with these models emphasizing innovations in surgical technique and postoperative results.
Implantation of Ultrex (31%) and Ultrex Plus (69%) penile prosthesis was performed in 90 impotent men with organic erectile dysfunction following comprehensive multi-disciplinary evaluation. During a follow-up interval of 7–50 months, postoperative outcome was assessed. Of this group, 10% underwent simultaneous explant of another malfunctioning inflatable device or conversion from a semi-rigid prosthesis due to patient preference. Of the remainder, 20% selected implant surgery as their primary therapy while 73% were initially treated with various nonsurgical options prior to implantation. In all patients we employed a single peno-scrotal incision and applied the concept of controlled radial dilatation of all compartments. In our last 32 consecutive patients including eight with previous radical pelvic surgery, we utilized the preperitoneal distention balloon (PDB) facilitating safe and non-traumatic creation of the prevesical space for reservoir insertion.
Post operative complications occurred in 8% of patients including pump infection and corporal deformity requiring reimplantation with AMS 700 CX cylinders, or self-contained unitarian prosthesis as a salvage procedure. Satisfactory, functional and anatomic outcome was reported in 95% of patients.
Interim advances incorporated into the Ultrex and Ultrex Plus prosthesis have markedly reduced mechanical failure during our follow-up interval of up to 50 months. Importantly, controlled, non-traumatic radial dilatation of the prevesical space by the PDB may encourage broader use of the multicomponent inflatable models, particularly in a setting of pelvic fibrosis due to previous pelvic surgery or radiation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900337 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69999339</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2645334900</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-dc64d0f3b94ca23ad2d769226944ee3fc20a0290cfd7c7dc16c87705e21078723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UcFq3DAQFaUh3W57zqkgKPTmzViSLau3EpI2EGgOzVlo5XFWxpa3kkySv6-c3bQQ6Fxm4L15eqNHyFkJmxJ4cx77jetd2HAFwLl8Q1alkHVRiUa9JStQVVUoxeEdeR9jDwAKyvqUnCrZNCXIFXm6fNxjcOgt0geXdjTtkN4NKeAjNb59GW-HOVLnu8Eksx2Q7tG7pYUp5oXo4lfq8YG6cT8Yn0xyk6cJ7c673zPGZ6U4h3tnzUCnOdlpxA_kpDNDxI_HviZ3V5e_Ln4UNz-_X198uymsYCIVra1FCx3fKmEN46ZlrawVY7USApF3loEBpsB2rbSytWVtGymhQpbvayTja_LloJvNLmaSHl20OGSjOM1R1yoX5yoTP78i9tMcfPamWS0qzsXyx2tyfmDZfHsM2Ol9cKMJT7oEvUSiY6-XSPQxkrzx6ag7b0ds__KPGWQcDnjMiL_H8O_d_0n-AfFImrc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2645334900</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experience with the Ultrex and Ultrex Plus inflatable penile prosthesis: new implantation techniques and surgical outcome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Liberman, SN ; Gomella, LG ; Hirsch, IH</creator><creatorcontrib>Liberman, SN ; Gomella, LG ; Hirsch, IH</creatorcontrib><description>The Ultrex and Ultrex Plus penile prosthesis incorporate sequential design modifications that afford important functional advantages that reduce the potential for mechanical failure. This retrospective study reviews our experience with these models emphasizing innovations in surgical technique and postoperative results.
Implantation of Ultrex (31%) and Ultrex Plus (69%) penile prosthesis was performed in 90 impotent men with organic erectile dysfunction following comprehensive multi-disciplinary evaluation. During a follow-up interval of 7–50 months, postoperative outcome was assessed. Of this group, 10% underwent simultaneous explant of another malfunctioning inflatable device or conversion from a semi-rigid prosthesis due to patient preference. Of the remainder, 20% selected implant surgery as their primary therapy while 73% were initially treated with various nonsurgical options prior to implantation. In all patients we employed a single peno-scrotal incision and applied the concept of controlled radial dilatation of all compartments. In our last 32 consecutive patients including eight with previous radical pelvic surgery, we utilized the preperitoneal distention balloon (PDB) facilitating safe and non-traumatic creation of the prevesical space for reservoir insertion.
Post operative complications occurred in 8% of patients including pump infection and corporal deformity requiring reimplantation with AMS 700 CX cylinders, or self-contained unitarian prosthesis as a salvage procedure. Satisfactory, functional and anatomic outcome was reported in 95% of patients.
Interim advances incorporated into the Ultrex and Ultrex Plus prosthesis have markedly reduced mechanical failure during our follow-up interval of up to 50 months. Importantly, controlled, non-traumatic radial dilatation of the prevesical space by the PDB may encourage broader use of the multicomponent inflatable models, particularly in a setting of pelvic fibrosis due to previous pelvic surgery or radiation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0955-9930</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5489</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900337</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9788107</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Erectile dysfunction ; Erectile Dysfunction - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Penile Implantation - adverse effects ; Penile Implantation - instrumentation ; Penile Implantation - methods ; Penile Prosthesis ; Penis ; Prostheses ; Reproductive Medicine ; Retrospective Studies ; rology ; Surgery ; Transplants & implants ; Urology</subject><ispartof>International journal of impotence research, 1998-09, Vol.10 (3), p.175-179</ispartof><rights>Macmillan Publishers Limited 1998</rights><rights>Macmillan Publishers Limited 1998.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-dc64d0f3b94ca23ad2d769226944ee3fc20a0290cfd7c7dc16c87705e21078723</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900337$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900337$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9788107$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liberman, SN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomella, LG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirsch, IH</creatorcontrib><title>Experience with the Ultrex and Ultrex Plus inflatable penile prosthesis: new implantation techniques and surgical outcome</title><title>International journal of impotence research</title><addtitle>Int J Impot Res</addtitle><addtitle>Int J Impot Res</addtitle><description>The Ultrex and Ultrex Plus penile prosthesis incorporate sequential design modifications that afford important functional advantages that reduce the potential for mechanical failure. This retrospective study reviews our experience with these models emphasizing innovations in surgical technique and postoperative results.
Implantation of Ultrex (31%) and Ultrex Plus (69%) penile prosthesis was performed in 90 impotent men with organic erectile dysfunction following comprehensive multi-disciplinary evaluation. During a follow-up interval of 7–50 months, postoperative outcome was assessed. Of this group, 10% underwent simultaneous explant of another malfunctioning inflatable device or conversion from a semi-rigid prosthesis due to patient preference. Of the remainder, 20% selected implant surgery as their primary therapy while 73% were initially treated with various nonsurgical options prior to implantation. In all patients we employed a single peno-scrotal incision and applied the concept of controlled radial dilatation of all compartments. In our last 32 consecutive patients including eight with previous radical pelvic surgery, we utilized the preperitoneal distention balloon (PDB) facilitating safe and non-traumatic creation of the prevesical space for reservoir insertion.
Post operative complications occurred in 8% of patients including pump infection and corporal deformity requiring reimplantation with AMS 700 CX cylinders, or self-contained unitarian prosthesis as a salvage procedure. Satisfactory, functional and anatomic outcome was reported in 95% of patients.
Interim advances incorporated into the Ultrex and Ultrex Plus prosthesis have markedly reduced mechanical failure during our follow-up interval of up to 50 months. Importantly, controlled, non-traumatic radial dilatation of the prevesical space by the PDB may encourage broader use of the multicomponent inflatable models, particularly in a setting of pelvic fibrosis due to previous pelvic surgery or radiation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Erectile dysfunction</subject><subject>Erectile Dysfunction - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Penile Implantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Penile Implantation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Penile Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Penile Prosthesis</subject><subject>Penis</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Reproductive Medicine</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>rology</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>0955-9930</issn><issn>1476-5489</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UcFq3DAQFaUh3W57zqkgKPTmzViSLau3EpI2EGgOzVlo5XFWxpa3kkySv6-c3bQQ6Fxm4L15eqNHyFkJmxJ4cx77jetd2HAFwLl8Q1alkHVRiUa9JStQVVUoxeEdeR9jDwAKyvqUnCrZNCXIFXm6fNxjcOgt0geXdjTtkN4NKeAjNb59GW-HOVLnu8Eksx2Q7tG7pYUp5oXo4lfq8YG6cT8Yn0xyk6cJ7c673zPGZ6U4h3tnzUCnOdlpxA_kpDNDxI_HviZ3V5e_Ln4UNz-_X198uymsYCIVra1FCx3fKmEN46ZlrawVY7USApF3loEBpsB2rbSytWVtGymhQpbvayTja_LloJvNLmaSHl20OGSjOM1R1yoX5yoTP78i9tMcfPamWS0qzsXyx2tyfmDZfHsM2Ol9cKMJT7oEvUSiY6-XSPQxkrzx6ag7b0ds__KPGWQcDnjMiL_H8O_d_0n-AfFImrc</recordid><startdate>19980901</startdate><enddate>19980901</enddate><creator>Liberman, SN</creator><creator>Gomella, LG</creator><creator>Hirsch, IH</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980901</creationdate><title>Experience with the Ultrex and Ultrex Plus inflatable penile prosthesis: new implantation techniques and surgical outcome</title><author>Liberman, SN ; Gomella, LG ; Hirsch, IH</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-dc64d0f3b94ca23ad2d769226944ee3fc20a0290cfd7c7dc16c87705e21078723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Erectile dysfunction</topic><topic>Erectile Dysfunction - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Penile Implantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Penile Implantation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Penile Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Penile Prosthesis</topic><topic>Penis</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Reproductive Medicine</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>rology</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liberman, SN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomella, LG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirsch, IH</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of impotence research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liberman, SN</au><au>Gomella, LG</au><au>Hirsch, IH</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experience with the Ultrex and Ultrex Plus inflatable penile prosthesis: new implantation techniques and surgical outcome</atitle><jtitle>International journal of impotence research</jtitle><stitle>Int J Impot Res</stitle><addtitle>Int J Impot Res</addtitle><date>1998-09-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>175</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>175-179</pages><issn>0955-9930</issn><eissn>1476-5489</eissn><abstract>The Ultrex and Ultrex Plus penile prosthesis incorporate sequential design modifications that afford important functional advantages that reduce the potential for mechanical failure. This retrospective study reviews our experience with these models emphasizing innovations in surgical technique and postoperative results.
Implantation of Ultrex (31%) and Ultrex Plus (69%) penile prosthesis was performed in 90 impotent men with organic erectile dysfunction following comprehensive multi-disciplinary evaluation. During a follow-up interval of 7–50 months, postoperative outcome was assessed. Of this group, 10% underwent simultaneous explant of another malfunctioning inflatable device or conversion from a semi-rigid prosthesis due to patient preference. Of the remainder, 20% selected implant surgery as their primary therapy while 73% were initially treated with various nonsurgical options prior to implantation. In all patients we employed a single peno-scrotal incision and applied the concept of controlled radial dilatation of all compartments. In our last 32 consecutive patients including eight with previous radical pelvic surgery, we utilized the preperitoneal distention balloon (PDB) facilitating safe and non-traumatic creation of the prevesical space for reservoir insertion.
Post operative complications occurred in 8% of patients including pump infection and corporal deformity requiring reimplantation with AMS 700 CX cylinders, or self-contained unitarian prosthesis as a salvage procedure. Satisfactory, functional and anatomic outcome was reported in 95% of patients.
Interim advances incorporated into the Ultrex and Ultrex Plus prosthesis have markedly reduced mechanical failure during our follow-up interval of up to 50 months. Importantly, controlled, non-traumatic radial dilatation of the prevesical space by the PDB may encourage broader use of the multicomponent inflatable models, particularly in a setting of pelvic fibrosis due to previous pelvic surgery or radiation.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>9788107</pmid><doi>10.1038/sj.ijir.3900337</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0955-9930 |
ispartof | International journal of impotence research, 1998-09, Vol.10 (3), p.175-179 |
issn | 0955-9930 1476-5489 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69999339 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adult Aged Erectile dysfunction Erectile Dysfunction - surgery Humans Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Penile Implantation - adverse effects Penile Implantation - instrumentation Penile Implantation - methods Penile Prosthesis Penis Prostheses Reproductive Medicine Retrospective Studies rology Surgery Transplants & implants Urology |
title | Experience with the Ultrex and Ultrex Plus inflatable penile prosthesis: new implantation techniques and surgical outcome |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T08%3A41%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experience%20with%20the%20Ultrex%20and%20Ultrex%20Plus%20inflatable%20penile%20prosthesis:%20new%20implantation%20techniques%20and%20surgical%20outcome&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20impotence%20research&rft.au=Liberman,%20SN&rft.date=1998-09-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=175-179&rft.issn=0955-9930&rft.eissn=1476-5489&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900337&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2645334900%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2645334900&rft_id=info:pmid/9788107&rfr_iscdi=true |