Comparative studies on chemically and enzymatically coupled DNA–Sepharose columns for purification of a lac repressor chimeric fusion protein

The length of a DNA sequence attached to an affinity chromatography column affects column retention of transcription factors. Even when unrelated sequences such as a poly(A):poly(T) tail are included in a DNA sequence, transcription factors such as the lac repressor are bound more tightly by the col...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Chromatography A 1999-07, Vol.849 (2), p.403-412
Hauptverfasser: Robinson, F.Darlene, Gadgil, Himanshu, Jarrett, Harry W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 412
container_issue 2
container_start_page 403
container_title Journal of Chromatography A
container_volume 849
creator Robinson, F.Darlene
Gadgil, Himanshu
Jarrett, Harry W.
description The length of a DNA sequence attached to an affinity chromatography column affects column retention of transcription factors. Even when unrelated sequences such as a poly(A):poly(T) tail are included in a DNA sequence, transcription factors such as the lac repressor are bound more tightly by the column. The position of the additional sequences is also important. To compare coupling procedures, an identical DNA sequence was covalently attached to Sepharose by chemical coupling or produced enzymatically by template driven enzymatic primer extension. These two types of supports, containing the O 1 operator sequence bound by lac repressor, were packed into identical columns and compared by purification of a lac repressor–β-galactosidase fusion protein. We found that the purity and yield of proteins eluted from the two columns were similar. Overall, the results suggest that there is no significant advantage to either type of support for the purification of some proteins. The study revealed a potentially important effect of the length of DNA sequences on column selectivity.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0021-9673(99)00586-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69990269</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021967399005865</els_id><sourcerecordid>69990269</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-11739a5e60a06c2ee85fccac09496389ec9153795e8512436993acc7d27f13323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtu1DAUhr0AtaXwCCAvEKKLFF_GyXiFqoECUgWLwtoyJ8caoyQOPkmlYdU3YMEb8iR4mhF0x8rSf75z8cfYUynOpZD1q2shlKxs3eiX1p4JYdZ1ZR6wk7_xMXtE9E0I2YhGHbFjKVamWen1Cfu5Sf3os5_iDXKa5jYi8TRw2GIfwXfdjvuh5Tj82PUFWhJI89hhy998vPh9--sax63PibDk3dwPxEPKfJxzDIWfYpmWAve888AzjhmJSh22scccgYeZ9siY04RxeMweBt8RPjm8p-zL5dvPm_fV1ad3HzYXVxVoK6ZKykZbb7AWXtSgENcmAHgQdmVrvbYIVhrdWFMKUq10ba32AE2rmiC1VvqUvVjmlr3fZ6TJ9ZEAu84PmGZypcEKVdsCmgWE8kXKGNyYY-_zzknh9vbdnX231-ysdXf2nSl9zw4L5q89tve6FvUFeH4APBWtIfsBIv3jrNRKyYK9XjAsNm4iZkcQcQBsY0aYXJvify75AwHDprg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69990269</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative studies on chemically and enzymatically coupled DNA–Sepharose columns for purification of a lac repressor chimeric fusion protein</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Robinson, F.Darlene ; Gadgil, Himanshu ; Jarrett, Harry W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Robinson, F.Darlene ; Gadgil, Himanshu ; Jarrett, Harry W.</creatorcontrib><description>The length of a DNA sequence attached to an affinity chromatography column affects column retention of transcription factors. Even when unrelated sequences such as a poly(A):poly(T) tail are included in a DNA sequence, transcription factors such as the lac repressor are bound more tightly by the column. The position of the additional sequences is also important. To compare coupling procedures, an identical DNA sequence was covalently attached to Sepharose by chemical coupling or produced enzymatically by template driven enzymatic primer extension. These two types of supports, containing the O 1 operator sequence bound by lac repressor, were packed into identical columns and compared by purification of a lac repressor–β-galactosidase fusion protein. We found that the purity and yield of proteins eluted from the two columns were similar. Overall, the results suggest that there is no significant advantage to either type of support for the purification of some proteins. The study revealed a potentially important effect of the length of DNA sequences on column selectivity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9673</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9673(99)00586-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10457438</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOCRAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Bacterial Proteins - isolation &amp; purification ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chromatography, Affinity - methods ; Chromatography, Agarose - methods ; DNA - chemistry ; Escherichia coli Proteins ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Lac Repressors ; Molecular and cellular biology ; Molecular genetics ; Proteins ; Recombinant Fusion Proteins - isolation &amp; purification ; Repressor Proteins - isolation &amp; purification ; Transcription. Transcription factor. Splicing. Rna processing</subject><ispartof>Journal of Chromatography A, 1999-07, Vol.849 (2), p.403-412</ispartof><rights>1999 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-11739a5e60a06c2ee85fccac09496389ec9153795e8512436993acc7d27f13323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-11739a5e60a06c2ee85fccac09496389ec9153795e8512436993acc7d27f13323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021967399005865$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1913221$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10457438$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Robinson, F.Darlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gadgil, Himanshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarrett, Harry W.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative studies on chemically and enzymatically coupled DNA–Sepharose columns for purification of a lac repressor chimeric fusion protein</title><title>Journal of Chromatography A</title><addtitle>J Chromatogr A</addtitle><description>The length of a DNA sequence attached to an affinity chromatography column affects column retention of transcription factors. Even when unrelated sequences such as a poly(A):poly(T) tail are included in a DNA sequence, transcription factors such as the lac repressor are bound more tightly by the column. The position of the additional sequences is also important. To compare coupling procedures, an identical DNA sequence was covalently attached to Sepharose by chemical coupling or produced enzymatically by template driven enzymatic primer extension. These two types of supports, containing the O 1 operator sequence bound by lac repressor, were packed into identical columns and compared by purification of a lac repressor–β-galactosidase fusion protein. We found that the purity and yield of proteins eluted from the two columns were similar. Overall, the results suggest that there is no significant advantage to either type of support for the purification of some proteins. The study revealed a potentially important effect of the length of DNA sequences on column selectivity.</description><subject>Bacterial Proteins - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chromatography, Affinity - methods</subject><subject>Chromatography, Agarose - methods</subject><subject>DNA - chemistry</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Proteins</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Lac Repressors</subject><subject>Molecular and cellular biology</subject><subject>Molecular genetics</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Recombinant Fusion Proteins - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Repressor Proteins - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Transcription. Transcription factor. Splicing. Rna processing</subject><issn>0021-9673</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtu1DAUhr0AtaXwCCAvEKKLFF_GyXiFqoECUgWLwtoyJ8caoyQOPkmlYdU3YMEb8iR4mhF0x8rSf75z8cfYUynOpZD1q2shlKxs3eiX1p4JYdZ1ZR6wk7_xMXtE9E0I2YhGHbFjKVamWen1Cfu5Sf3os5_iDXKa5jYi8TRw2GIfwXfdjvuh5Tj82PUFWhJI89hhy998vPh9--sax63PibDk3dwPxEPKfJxzDIWfYpmWAve888AzjhmJSh22scccgYeZ9siY04RxeMweBt8RPjm8p-zL5dvPm_fV1ad3HzYXVxVoK6ZKykZbb7AWXtSgENcmAHgQdmVrvbYIVhrdWFMKUq10ba32AE2rmiC1VvqUvVjmlr3fZ6TJ9ZEAu84PmGZypcEKVdsCmgWE8kXKGNyYY-_zzknh9vbdnX231-ysdXf2nSl9zw4L5q89tve6FvUFeH4APBWtIfsBIv3jrNRKyYK9XjAsNm4iZkcQcQBsY0aYXJvify75AwHDprg</recordid><startdate>19990723</startdate><enddate>19990723</enddate><creator>Robinson, F.Darlene</creator><creator>Gadgil, Himanshu</creator><creator>Jarrett, Harry W.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990723</creationdate><title>Comparative studies on chemically and enzymatically coupled DNA–Sepharose columns for purification of a lac repressor chimeric fusion protein</title><author>Robinson, F.Darlene ; Gadgil, Himanshu ; Jarrett, Harry W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-11739a5e60a06c2ee85fccac09496389ec9153795e8512436993acc7d27f13323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Bacterial Proteins - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chromatography, Affinity - methods</topic><topic>Chromatography, Agarose - methods</topic><topic>DNA - chemistry</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Proteins</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Lac Repressors</topic><topic>Molecular and cellular biology</topic><topic>Molecular genetics</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Recombinant Fusion Proteins - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Repressor Proteins - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Transcription. Transcription factor. Splicing. Rna processing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Robinson, F.Darlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gadgil, Himanshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarrett, Harry W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Chromatography A</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Robinson, F.Darlene</au><au>Gadgil, Himanshu</au><au>Jarrett, Harry W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative studies on chemically and enzymatically coupled DNA–Sepharose columns for purification of a lac repressor chimeric fusion protein</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Chromatography A</jtitle><addtitle>J Chromatogr A</addtitle><date>1999-07-23</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>849</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>403</spage><epage>412</epage><pages>403-412</pages><issn>0021-9673</issn><coden>JOCRAM</coden><abstract>The length of a DNA sequence attached to an affinity chromatography column affects column retention of transcription factors. Even when unrelated sequences such as a poly(A):poly(T) tail are included in a DNA sequence, transcription factors such as the lac repressor are bound more tightly by the column. The position of the additional sequences is also important. To compare coupling procedures, an identical DNA sequence was covalently attached to Sepharose by chemical coupling or produced enzymatically by template driven enzymatic primer extension. These two types of supports, containing the O 1 operator sequence bound by lac repressor, were packed into identical columns and compared by purification of a lac repressor–β-galactosidase fusion protein. We found that the purity and yield of proteins eluted from the two columns were similar. Overall, the results suggest that there is no significant advantage to either type of support for the purification of some proteins. The study revealed a potentially important effect of the length of DNA sequences on column selectivity.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>10457438</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0021-9673(99)00586-5</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9673
ispartof Journal of Chromatography A, 1999-07, Vol.849 (2), p.403-412
issn 0021-9673
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69990269
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Bacterial Proteins - isolation & purification
Biological and medical sciences
Chromatography, Affinity - methods
Chromatography, Agarose - methods
DNA - chemistry
Escherichia coli Proteins
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Lac Repressors
Molecular and cellular biology
Molecular genetics
Proteins
Recombinant Fusion Proteins - isolation & purification
Repressor Proteins - isolation & purification
Transcription. Transcription factor. Splicing. Rna processing
title Comparative studies on chemically and enzymatically coupled DNA–Sepharose columns for purification of a lac repressor chimeric fusion protein
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T05%3A03%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20studies%20on%20chemically%20and%20enzymatically%20coupled%20DNA%E2%80%93Sepharose%20columns%20for%20purification%20of%20a%20lac%20repressor%20chimeric%20fusion%20protein&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Chromatography%20A&rft.au=Robinson,%20F.Darlene&rft.date=1999-07-23&rft.volume=849&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=403&rft.epage=412&rft.pages=403-412&rft.issn=0021-9673&rft.coden=JOCRAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0021-9673(99)00586-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69990269%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69990269&rft_id=info:pmid/10457438&rft_els_id=S0021967399005865&rfr_iscdi=true