Rapid and accurate assessment of glomerular filtration rate in patients with renal transplants using serum cystatin C

Background. Assessment of renal function in patients with renal transplants is of great importance. Various studies have reported cystatin C as an easily and rapidly assessable marker that can be used for accurate information on renal function impairment. To date, no study is available to define the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation dialysis, transplantation, 1999-08, Vol.14 (8), p.1991-1996
Hauptverfasser: Risch, Lorenz, Blumberg, Alfred, Huber, Andreas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1996
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1991
container_title Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation
container_volume 14
creator Risch, Lorenz
Blumberg, Alfred
Huber, Andreas
description Background. Assessment of renal function in patients with renal transplants is of great importance. Various studies have reported cystatin C as an easily and rapidly assessable marker that can be used for accurate information on renal function impairment. To date, no study is available to define the role of cystatin C in patients with renal transplants. Methods. Thirty steady-state patients (50% male/50% female) with status post-kidney transplantation were studied. To assess renal function, cystatin C, creatinine clearance, serum creatinine, β2-microglobulin (β2M), and [125I]iothalamate clearance were determined. Correlations and non-parametric ROC curves for accuracy, using a cut-off glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 60 ml/min, were obtained for the different markers allowing for calculations of positive predictive values (PPV), positive likelihood ratios (PLR), specificity and sensitivity, respectively. Further, to evaluate the usefulness of these markers for monitoring, intraindividual coefficients of variation (CVs) for cystatin C and creatinine measurements were compared in 85 renal transplant patients. Measurements consisted of at least six pairs of results, which were obtained at different time points during routine follow-up. Results. Cystatin C correlated best with GFR (r=0.83), whereas serum creatinine (r=0.67), creatinine clearance (r=0.57) and β2M (r=0.58) all had lower correlation coefficients. The diagnostic accuracy of cystatin C was significantly better than serum creatinine (P=0.025), but did not differ significantly from creatinine clearance (P=0.76) and β2M (P=0.43). At a cut-off of 1.64 mg/l, cystatin C has a PPV of 93%, PLR of 6.4, specificity 89% and sensitivity 70%, respectively. For β2M, PPV 83%, PLR 1.7, specificity 67% and sensitivity 75% was seen at a cut-off of 3.57 mg/l. Accordingly, at a cut-off of 125 μmol/l for serum creatinine, a PPV 76%, PLR 1.4, specificity 44% and sensitivity 80% was revealed. Finally, at a cut-off of 66 ml/min/1.73 m2 for creatinine clearance, the following characteristics were found: PPV 94%, PLR 7.7, specificity 89% and sensitivity 85%. The intraindividual variation of creatinine was significantly lower than that of cystatin C (P
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ndt/14.8.1991
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69984933</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69984933</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-59542a5be99f45de06805108c448c7ff4f49fa4e0edd98d763e9923c3d1414bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpN0EFPHCEYBmBianRrPXptODTeZoUBZuDYbKrbaGzSaNP0QlgGLDrDTPmYtP572e6m9kAIfE9eyIvQGSVLShS7iF2-oHwpl1QpeoAWlDekqpkUb9CizGlFBFHH6C3AIyFE1W17hI4p4U1dy3qB5q9mCh02sSxr52SywwbAAQwuZjx6_NCPg0tzbxL2oc9FhDHivzBEPJVjgYB_h_wTJxdNj4uJMPVmez1DiA8YSsCA7TPkwiNevUOH3vTgTvf7Cbq__HS3Wlc3X64-rz7eVJYpkSuhBK-N2DilPBedI40kghJpOZe29Z57rrzhjriuU7JrG1ZkzSzrKKd8s2En6HyXO6Xx1-wg6yGAdX35mxtn0I1SkivGCqx20KYRIDmvpxQGk541JXrbsy49a8q11Nuei3-_D543g-v-07tiC_iwBwas6X2pxAZ4dYrWkrev7wbI7s-_sUlPumlZK_T6-w99-01d3l2vr_WavQBlIpd_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69984933</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rapid and accurate assessment of glomerular filtration rate in patients with renal transplants using serum cystatin C</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Risch, Lorenz ; Blumberg, Alfred ; Huber, Andreas</creator><creatorcontrib>Risch, Lorenz ; Blumberg, Alfred ; Huber, Andreas</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Assessment of renal function in patients with renal transplants is of great importance. Various studies have reported cystatin C as an easily and rapidly assessable marker that can be used for accurate information on renal function impairment. To date, no study is available to define the role of cystatin C in patients with renal transplants. Methods. Thirty steady-state patients (50% male/50% female) with status post-kidney transplantation were studied. To assess renal function, cystatin C, creatinine clearance, serum creatinine, β2-microglobulin (β2M), and [125I]iothalamate clearance were determined. Correlations and non-parametric ROC curves for accuracy, using a cut-off glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 60 ml/min, were obtained for the different markers allowing for calculations of positive predictive values (PPV), positive likelihood ratios (PLR), specificity and sensitivity, respectively. Further, to evaluate the usefulness of these markers for monitoring, intraindividual coefficients of variation (CVs) for cystatin C and creatinine measurements were compared in 85 renal transplant patients. Measurements consisted of at least six pairs of results, which were obtained at different time points during routine follow-up. Results. Cystatin C correlated best with GFR (r=0.83), whereas serum creatinine (r=0.67), creatinine clearance (r=0.57) and β2M (r=0.58) all had lower correlation coefficients. The diagnostic accuracy of cystatin C was significantly better than serum creatinine (P=0.025), but did not differ significantly from creatinine clearance (P=0.76) and β2M (P=0.43). At a cut-off of 1.64 mg/l, cystatin C has a PPV of 93%, PLR of 6.4, specificity 89% and sensitivity 70%, respectively. For β2M, PPV 83%, PLR 1.7, specificity 67% and sensitivity 75% was seen at a cut-off of 3.57 mg/l. Accordingly, at a cut-off of 125 μmol/l for serum creatinine, a PPV 76%, PLR 1.4, specificity 44% and sensitivity 80% was revealed. Finally, at a cut-off of 66 ml/min/1.73 m2 for creatinine clearance, the following characteristics were found: PPV 94%, PLR 7.7, specificity 89% and sensitivity 85%. The intraindividual variation of creatinine was significantly lower than that of cystatin C (P&lt;0.001). With increasing concentrations, their ratios of CV tended towards a value of 1, demonstrating identical variability at low GFR. Conclusion. Together, our data show that in patients with renal transplants, cystatin C, in terms of PPV and PLR, has a similar diagnostic value as creatinine clearance. However, it is superior to serum determinations of creatinine and β2M. The intraindividual variation of cystatin C is greater than that of creatinine. This might be due to the better ability of cystatin C to reflect temporary changes especially in mildly impaired GFR, most critical for early detection of rejection and other function impairment. Thus, cystatin C allows for rapid and accurate assessment of renal function (GFR) in renal transplants and is clearly superior to the commonly used serum creatinine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0931-0509</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2385</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ndt/14.8.1991</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10462282</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NDTREA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Creatinine - pharmacokinetics ; Cystatin C ; Cystatins - blood ; Female ; Glomerular Filtration Rate ; Humans ; intraindividual variability ; Investigative techniques of renal and urinary tract function ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Iothalamic Acid - pharmacokinetics ; Kidney Transplantation ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Period ; renal function markers ; ROC Curve ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation, 1999-08, Vol.14 (8), p.1991-1996</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-59542a5be99f45de06805108c448c7ff4f49fa4e0edd98d763e9923c3d1414bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-59542a5be99f45de06805108c448c7ff4f49fa4e0edd98d763e9923c3d1414bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1912847$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10462282$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Risch, Lorenz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blumberg, Alfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huber, Andreas</creatorcontrib><title>Rapid and accurate assessment of glomerular filtration rate in patients with renal transplants using serum cystatin C</title><title>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation</title><addtitle>Nephrol. Dial. Transplant</addtitle><description>Background. Assessment of renal function in patients with renal transplants is of great importance. Various studies have reported cystatin C as an easily and rapidly assessable marker that can be used for accurate information on renal function impairment. To date, no study is available to define the role of cystatin C in patients with renal transplants. Methods. Thirty steady-state patients (50% male/50% female) with status post-kidney transplantation were studied. To assess renal function, cystatin C, creatinine clearance, serum creatinine, β2-microglobulin (β2M), and [125I]iothalamate clearance were determined. Correlations and non-parametric ROC curves for accuracy, using a cut-off glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 60 ml/min, were obtained for the different markers allowing for calculations of positive predictive values (PPV), positive likelihood ratios (PLR), specificity and sensitivity, respectively. Further, to evaluate the usefulness of these markers for monitoring, intraindividual coefficients of variation (CVs) for cystatin C and creatinine measurements were compared in 85 renal transplant patients. Measurements consisted of at least six pairs of results, which were obtained at different time points during routine follow-up. Results. Cystatin C correlated best with GFR (r=0.83), whereas serum creatinine (r=0.67), creatinine clearance (r=0.57) and β2M (r=0.58) all had lower correlation coefficients. The diagnostic accuracy of cystatin C was significantly better than serum creatinine (P=0.025), but did not differ significantly from creatinine clearance (P=0.76) and β2M (P=0.43). At a cut-off of 1.64 mg/l, cystatin C has a PPV of 93%, PLR of 6.4, specificity 89% and sensitivity 70%, respectively. For β2M, PPV 83%, PLR 1.7, specificity 67% and sensitivity 75% was seen at a cut-off of 3.57 mg/l. Accordingly, at a cut-off of 125 μmol/l for serum creatinine, a PPV 76%, PLR 1.4, specificity 44% and sensitivity 80% was revealed. Finally, at a cut-off of 66 ml/min/1.73 m2 for creatinine clearance, the following characteristics were found: PPV 94%, PLR 7.7, specificity 89% and sensitivity 85%. The intraindividual variation of creatinine was significantly lower than that of cystatin C (P&lt;0.001). With increasing concentrations, their ratios of CV tended towards a value of 1, demonstrating identical variability at low GFR. Conclusion. Together, our data show that in patients with renal transplants, cystatin C, in terms of PPV and PLR, has a similar diagnostic value as creatinine clearance. However, it is superior to serum determinations of creatinine and β2M. The intraindividual variation of cystatin C is greater than that of creatinine. This might be due to the better ability of cystatin C to reflect temporary changes especially in mildly impaired GFR, most critical for early detection of rejection and other function impairment. Thus, cystatin C allows for rapid and accurate assessment of renal function (GFR) in renal transplants and is clearly superior to the commonly used serum creatinine.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Creatinine - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Cystatin C</subject><subject>Cystatins - blood</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glomerular Filtration Rate</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intraindividual variability</subject><subject>Investigative techniques of renal and urinary tract function</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Iothalamic Acid - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>renal function markers</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0931-0509</issn><issn>1460-2385</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpN0EFPHCEYBmBianRrPXptODTeZoUBZuDYbKrbaGzSaNP0QlgGLDrDTPmYtP572e6m9kAIfE9eyIvQGSVLShS7iF2-oHwpl1QpeoAWlDekqpkUb9CizGlFBFHH6C3AIyFE1W17hI4p4U1dy3qB5q9mCh02sSxr52SywwbAAQwuZjx6_NCPg0tzbxL2oc9FhDHivzBEPJVjgYB_h_wTJxdNj4uJMPVmez1DiA8YSsCA7TPkwiNevUOH3vTgTvf7Cbq__HS3Wlc3X64-rz7eVJYpkSuhBK-N2DilPBedI40kghJpOZe29Z57rrzhjriuU7JrG1ZkzSzrKKd8s2En6HyXO6Xx1-wg6yGAdX35mxtn0I1SkivGCqx20KYRIDmvpxQGk541JXrbsy49a8q11Nuei3-_D543g-v-07tiC_iwBwas6X2pxAZ4dYrWkrev7wbI7s-_sUlPumlZK_T6-w99-01d3l2vr_WavQBlIpd_</recordid><startdate>19990801</startdate><enddate>19990801</enddate><creator>Risch, Lorenz</creator><creator>Blumberg, Alfred</creator><creator>Huber, Andreas</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990801</creationdate><title>Rapid and accurate assessment of glomerular filtration rate in patients with renal transplants using serum cystatin C</title><author>Risch, Lorenz ; Blumberg, Alfred ; Huber, Andreas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-59542a5be99f45de06805108c448c7ff4f49fa4e0edd98d763e9923c3d1414bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Creatinine - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Cystatin C</topic><topic>Cystatins - blood</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glomerular Filtration Rate</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intraindividual variability</topic><topic>Investigative techniques of renal and urinary tract function</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Iothalamic Acid - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>renal function markers</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Risch, Lorenz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blumberg, Alfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huber, Andreas</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Risch, Lorenz</au><au>Blumberg, Alfred</au><au>Huber, Andreas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rapid and accurate assessment of glomerular filtration rate in patients with renal transplants using serum cystatin C</atitle><jtitle>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Nephrol. Dial. Transplant</addtitle><date>1999-08-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1991</spage><epage>1996</epage><pages>1991-1996</pages><issn>0931-0509</issn><eissn>1460-2385</eissn><coden>NDTREA</coden><abstract>Background. Assessment of renal function in patients with renal transplants is of great importance. Various studies have reported cystatin C as an easily and rapidly assessable marker that can be used for accurate information on renal function impairment. To date, no study is available to define the role of cystatin C in patients with renal transplants. Methods. Thirty steady-state patients (50% male/50% female) with status post-kidney transplantation were studied. To assess renal function, cystatin C, creatinine clearance, serum creatinine, β2-microglobulin (β2M), and [125I]iothalamate clearance were determined. Correlations and non-parametric ROC curves for accuracy, using a cut-off glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 60 ml/min, were obtained for the different markers allowing for calculations of positive predictive values (PPV), positive likelihood ratios (PLR), specificity and sensitivity, respectively. Further, to evaluate the usefulness of these markers for monitoring, intraindividual coefficients of variation (CVs) for cystatin C and creatinine measurements were compared in 85 renal transplant patients. Measurements consisted of at least six pairs of results, which were obtained at different time points during routine follow-up. Results. Cystatin C correlated best with GFR (r=0.83), whereas serum creatinine (r=0.67), creatinine clearance (r=0.57) and β2M (r=0.58) all had lower correlation coefficients. The diagnostic accuracy of cystatin C was significantly better than serum creatinine (P=0.025), but did not differ significantly from creatinine clearance (P=0.76) and β2M (P=0.43). At a cut-off of 1.64 mg/l, cystatin C has a PPV of 93%, PLR of 6.4, specificity 89% and sensitivity 70%, respectively. For β2M, PPV 83%, PLR 1.7, specificity 67% and sensitivity 75% was seen at a cut-off of 3.57 mg/l. Accordingly, at a cut-off of 125 μmol/l for serum creatinine, a PPV 76%, PLR 1.4, specificity 44% and sensitivity 80% was revealed. Finally, at a cut-off of 66 ml/min/1.73 m2 for creatinine clearance, the following characteristics were found: PPV 94%, PLR 7.7, specificity 89% and sensitivity 85%. The intraindividual variation of creatinine was significantly lower than that of cystatin C (P&lt;0.001). With increasing concentrations, their ratios of CV tended towards a value of 1, demonstrating identical variability at low GFR. Conclusion. Together, our data show that in patients with renal transplants, cystatin C, in terms of PPV and PLR, has a similar diagnostic value as creatinine clearance. However, it is superior to serum determinations of creatinine and β2M. The intraindividual variation of cystatin C is greater than that of creatinine. This might be due to the better ability of cystatin C to reflect temporary changes especially in mildly impaired GFR, most critical for early detection of rejection and other function impairment. Thus, cystatin C allows for rapid and accurate assessment of renal function (GFR) in renal transplants and is clearly superior to the commonly used serum creatinine.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>10462282</pmid><doi>10.1093/ndt/14.8.1991</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0931-0509
ispartof Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation, 1999-08, Vol.14 (8), p.1991-1996
issn 0931-0509
1460-2385
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69984933
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Creatinine - pharmacokinetics
Cystatin C
Cystatins - blood
Female
Glomerular Filtration Rate
Humans
intraindividual variability
Investigative techniques of renal and urinary tract function
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Iothalamic Acid - pharmacokinetics
Kidney Transplantation
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Postoperative Period
renal function markers
ROC Curve
Sensitivity and Specificity
Time Factors
title Rapid and accurate assessment of glomerular filtration rate in patients with renal transplants using serum cystatin C
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T08%3A35%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rapid%20and%20accurate%20assessment%20of%20glomerular%20filtration%20rate%20in%20patients%20with%20renal%20transplants%20using%20serum%20cystatin%20C&rft.jtitle=Nephrology,%20dialysis,%20transplantation&rft.au=Risch,%20Lorenz&rft.date=1999-08-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1991&rft.epage=1996&rft.pages=1991-1996&rft.issn=0931-0509&rft.eissn=1460-2385&rft.coden=NDTREA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ndt/14.8.1991&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69984933%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69984933&rft_id=info:pmid/10462282&rfr_iscdi=true