ONE HUNDRED LIVER RESECTIONS INCLUDING COMPARISON TO NON-RESECTED LIVER-MOBILIZED PATIENTS

Background: Factors of liver resection associated with postoperative recovery and survival, the modalities that affect survival with resected colorectal carcinoma liver metastases, the comparison of liver function of liver‐resected to liver‐mobilized but not resected patients, and observation of ear...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery 1998-10, Vol.68 (10), p.716-721
Hauptverfasser: Hardy, Kenneth J., Fletcher, David R., Jones, Robert McL
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 721
container_issue 10
container_start_page 716
container_title Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery
container_volume 68
creator Hardy, Kenneth J.
Fletcher, David R.
Jones, Robert McL
description Background: Factors of liver resection associated with postoperative recovery and survival, the modalities that affect survival with resected colorectal carcinoma liver metastases, the comparison of liver function of liver‐resected to liver‐mobilized but not resected patients, and observation of early liver regeneration volume over time have not been studied prospectively. This study aimed to prospectively analyse these factors. Methods: Data were collected prospectively on 100 consecutive liver resections, and 10 liver‐mobilized but not resected patients by the Hepatobiliary Unit, University of Melbourne, Austin Campus. Follow‐up of patients was 100%. Results: The factors associated with blood loss were the type of liver resection (P= 0.0001), the length of the operation (P= 0.0001) and a central venous pressure greater than 5 cm of water (P= 0.0008). An inverse correlation existed between blood loss and long‐term survival (P= 0.003). The only predictor for a postoperative complication was the length of the operation (P= 0.03): a correlation of moderate significance existed between blood loss and a complication (P= 0.052; confidence interval 0.19–1.17). The 5‐year cumulative survival for hepatic resection for colorectal carcinoma Dukes A + B was 55%; there was a significantly better survival of Dukes A + B compared to Dukes C (P= 0.03) and also for those 50 years or older, but this did not depend on whether there were one or more lesions present. Resected patients had a significantly higher alanine transaminase (ALT), total bilirubin and international normalized ratio than non‐resected patients, but not albumin, total protein, alkaline phosphatase or aspartate aminotransferase. The serum albumin fall was similar in both groups, which indicated that loss of liver tissue was not the cause. The re‐resection rate was 8% without mortality and with low morbidity. Liver volume was restored by 64% (510± 170cc) by 7 days postoperatively. Conclusions: Major hepatic resection can be performed with low mortality, morbidity and short hospital stay, with a 5‐year survival for colorectal carcinoma better than 50%. Resection needs to be considered more frequently for curative management. Serum albumin fall is not caused by loss of liver tissue and blood loss can be controlled by central venous pressure manipulation and vascular isolation. Re‐resection is a safe and rewarding treatment and needs to be planned at the first resection.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1998.tb04658.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69959865</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69959865</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4076-ed5f24e2adaeb2868ecf920cf2bff4ad9b0718f5bdb294d015c20f3ada3e1ebd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkFtLwzAUx4Moc14-glB88K01Sds08UGYXZ3Bms61U_Al9JLA5ua02XB-e1s69-55ORz-l4QfAJcIOqiZ67mDPM-3MWKBgxijzrqAHvGpsz0A_b10CPoQQs-mhOJjcGLMvD0JpT3QYwGhBNI-eEtEZD1MxXASDa2Yv0QTaxKlUZjxRKQWF2E8HXIxssLkaTyY8DQRVpZYIhF2Z_tL2U_JHY_5W3OPBxmPRJaegSOdL4w63-1TML2PsvDBjpMRDwexXXowILaqfI09hfMqVwVuPqtKzTAsNS609vKKFTBAVPtFVWDmVRD5JYbabeyuQqqo3FNw1fV-1quvjTJruZyZUi0W-YdabYwkjPmMEr8x3nTGsl4ZUystP-vZMq9_JIKyBSvnsqUnW3qyBSt3YOW2CV_sXtkUS1XtozuSjX7b6d-zhfr5R7MciDRApCmwu4KZWavtviCv3yUJ3MCXr2Ikszgj4jF8lvfuLwU3kaw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69959865</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ONE HUNDRED LIVER RESECTIONS INCLUDING COMPARISON TO NON-RESECTED LIVER-MOBILIZED PATIENTS</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Hardy, Kenneth J. ; Fletcher, David R. ; Jones, Robert McL</creator><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Kenneth J. ; Fletcher, David R. ; Jones, Robert McL</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Factors of liver resection associated with postoperative recovery and survival, the modalities that affect survival with resected colorectal carcinoma liver metastases, the comparison of liver function of liver‐resected to liver‐mobilized but not resected patients, and observation of early liver regeneration volume over time have not been studied prospectively. This study aimed to prospectively analyse these factors. Methods: Data were collected prospectively on 100 consecutive liver resections, and 10 liver‐mobilized but not resected patients by the Hepatobiliary Unit, University of Melbourne, Austin Campus. Follow‐up of patients was 100%. Results: The factors associated with blood loss were the type of liver resection (P= 0.0001), the length of the operation (P= 0.0001) and a central venous pressure greater than 5 cm of water (P= 0.0008). An inverse correlation existed between blood loss and long‐term survival (P= 0.003). The only predictor for a postoperative complication was the length of the operation (P= 0.03): a correlation of moderate significance existed between blood loss and a complication (P= 0.052; confidence interval 0.19–1.17). The 5‐year cumulative survival for hepatic resection for colorectal carcinoma Dukes A + B was 55%; there was a significantly better survival of Dukes A + B compared to Dukes C (P= 0.03) and also for those 50 years or older, but this did not depend on whether there were one or more lesions present. Resected patients had a significantly higher alanine transaminase (ALT), total bilirubin and international normalized ratio than non‐resected patients, but not albumin, total protein, alkaline phosphatase or aspartate aminotransferase. The serum albumin fall was similar in both groups, which indicated that loss of liver tissue was not the cause. The re‐resection rate was 8% without mortality and with low morbidity. Liver volume was restored by 64% (510± 170cc) by 7 days postoperatively. Conclusions: Major hepatic resection can be performed with low mortality, morbidity and short hospital stay, with a 5‐year survival for colorectal carcinoma better than 50%. Resection needs to be considered more frequently for curative management. Serum albumin fall is not caused by loss of liver tissue and blood loss can be controlled by central venous pressure manipulation and vascular isolation. Re‐resection is a safe and rewarding treatment and needs to be planned at the first resection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-8682</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1445-2197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1998.tb04658.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9768608</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Blood Loss, Surgical - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology ; complications ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hepatectomy - methods ; Hepatectomy - mortality ; Hepatectomy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; liver ; Liver - physiopathology ; liver function tests ; Liver Neoplasms - secondary ; Liver Neoplasms - surgery ; Middle Aged ; Morbidity ; Prospective Studies ; resection ; survival ; Survival Analysis</subject><ispartof>Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery, 1998-10, Vol.68 (10), p.716-721</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4076-ed5f24e2adaeb2868ecf920cf2bff4ad9b0718f5bdb294d015c20f3ada3e1ebd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4076-ed5f24e2adaeb2868ecf920cf2bff4ad9b0718f5bdb294d015c20f3ada3e1ebd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1445-2197.1998.tb04658.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1445-2197.1998.tb04658.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9768608$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Kenneth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fletcher, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Robert McL</creatorcontrib><title>ONE HUNDRED LIVER RESECTIONS INCLUDING COMPARISON TO NON-RESECTED LIVER-MOBILIZED PATIENTS</title><title>Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery</title><addtitle>Aust N Z J Surg</addtitle><description>Background: Factors of liver resection associated with postoperative recovery and survival, the modalities that affect survival with resected colorectal carcinoma liver metastases, the comparison of liver function of liver‐resected to liver‐mobilized but not resected patients, and observation of early liver regeneration volume over time have not been studied prospectively. This study aimed to prospectively analyse these factors. Methods: Data were collected prospectively on 100 consecutive liver resections, and 10 liver‐mobilized but not resected patients by the Hepatobiliary Unit, University of Melbourne, Austin Campus. Follow‐up of patients was 100%. Results: The factors associated with blood loss were the type of liver resection (P= 0.0001), the length of the operation (P= 0.0001) and a central venous pressure greater than 5 cm of water (P= 0.0008). An inverse correlation existed between blood loss and long‐term survival (P= 0.003). The only predictor for a postoperative complication was the length of the operation (P= 0.03): a correlation of moderate significance existed between blood loss and a complication (P= 0.052; confidence interval 0.19–1.17). The 5‐year cumulative survival for hepatic resection for colorectal carcinoma Dukes A + B was 55%; there was a significantly better survival of Dukes A + B compared to Dukes C (P= 0.03) and also for those 50 years or older, but this did not depend on whether there were one or more lesions present. Resected patients had a significantly higher alanine transaminase (ALT), total bilirubin and international normalized ratio than non‐resected patients, but not albumin, total protein, alkaline phosphatase or aspartate aminotransferase. The serum albumin fall was similar in both groups, which indicated that loss of liver tissue was not the cause. The re‐resection rate was 8% without mortality and with low morbidity. Liver volume was restored by 64% (510± 170cc) by 7 days postoperatively. Conclusions: Major hepatic resection can be performed with low mortality, morbidity and short hospital stay, with a 5‐year survival for colorectal carcinoma better than 50%. Resection needs to be considered more frequently for curative management. Serum albumin fall is not caused by loss of liver tissue and blood loss can be controlled by central venous pressure manipulation and vascular isolation. Re‐resection is a safe and rewarding treatment and needs to be planned at the first resection.</description><subject>Blood Loss, Surgical - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>complications</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - mortality</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>liver</subject><subject>Liver - physiopathology</subject><subject>liver function tests</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>resection</subject><subject>survival</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><issn>0004-8682</issn><issn>1445-2197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkFtLwzAUx4Moc14-glB88K01Sds08UGYXZ3Bms61U_Al9JLA5ua02XB-e1s69-55ORz-l4QfAJcIOqiZ67mDPM-3MWKBgxijzrqAHvGpsz0A_b10CPoQQs-mhOJjcGLMvD0JpT3QYwGhBNI-eEtEZD1MxXASDa2Yv0QTaxKlUZjxRKQWF2E8HXIxssLkaTyY8DQRVpZYIhF2Z_tL2U_JHY_5W3OPBxmPRJaegSOdL4w63-1TML2PsvDBjpMRDwexXXowILaqfI09hfMqVwVuPqtKzTAsNS609vKKFTBAVPtFVWDmVRD5JYbabeyuQqqo3FNw1fV-1quvjTJruZyZUi0W-YdabYwkjPmMEr8x3nTGsl4ZUystP-vZMq9_JIKyBSvnsqUnW3qyBSt3YOW2CV_sXtkUS1XtozuSjX7b6d-zhfr5R7MciDRApCmwu4KZWavtviCv3yUJ3MCXr2Ikszgj4jF8lvfuLwU3kaw</recordid><startdate>199810</startdate><enddate>199810</enddate><creator>Hardy, Kenneth J.</creator><creator>Fletcher, David R.</creator><creator>Jones, Robert McL</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199810</creationdate><title>ONE HUNDRED LIVER RESECTIONS INCLUDING COMPARISON TO NON-RESECTED LIVER-MOBILIZED PATIENTS</title><author>Hardy, Kenneth J. ; Fletcher, David R. ; Jones, Robert McL</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4076-ed5f24e2adaeb2868ecf920cf2bff4ad9b0718f5bdb294d015c20f3ada3e1ebd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Blood Loss, Surgical - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>complications</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - mortality</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>liver</topic><topic>Liver - physiopathology</topic><topic>liver function tests</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>resection</topic><topic>survival</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Kenneth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fletcher, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Robert McL</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hardy, Kenneth J.</au><au>Fletcher, David R.</au><au>Jones, Robert McL</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ONE HUNDRED LIVER RESECTIONS INCLUDING COMPARISON TO NON-RESECTED LIVER-MOBILIZED PATIENTS</atitle><jtitle>Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Aust N Z J Surg</addtitle><date>1998-10</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>716</spage><epage>721</epage><pages>716-721</pages><issn>0004-8682</issn><eissn>1445-2197</eissn><abstract>Background: Factors of liver resection associated with postoperative recovery and survival, the modalities that affect survival with resected colorectal carcinoma liver metastases, the comparison of liver function of liver‐resected to liver‐mobilized but not resected patients, and observation of early liver regeneration volume over time have not been studied prospectively. This study aimed to prospectively analyse these factors. Methods: Data were collected prospectively on 100 consecutive liver resections, and 10 liver‐mobilized but not resected patients by the Hepatobiliary Unit, University of Melbourne, Austin Campus. Follow‐up of patients was 100%. Results: The factors associated with blood loss were the type of liver resection (P= 0.0001), the length of the operation (P= 0.0001) and a central venous pressure greater than 5 cm of water (P= 0.0008). An inverse correlation existed between blood loss and long‐term survival (P= 0.003). The only predictor for a postoperative complication was the length of the operation (P= 0.03): a correlation of moderate significance existed between blood loss and a complication (P= 0.052; confidence interval 0.19–1.17). The 5‐year cumulative survival for hepatic resection for colorectal carcinoma Dukes A + B was 55%; there was a significantly better survival of Dukes A + B compared to Dukes C (P= 0.03) and also for those 50 years or older, but this did not depend on whether there were one or more lesions present. Resected patients had a significantly higher alanine transaminase (ALT), total bilirubin and international normalized ratio than non‐resected patients, but not albumin, total protein, alkaline phosphatase or aspartate aminotransferase. The serum albumin fall was similar in both groups, which indicated that loss of liver tissue was not the cause. The re‐resection rate was 8% without mortality and with low morbidity. Liver volume was restored by 64% (510± 170cc) by 7 days postoperatively. Conclusions: Major hepatic resection can be performed with low mortality, morbidity and short hospital stay, with a 5‐year survival for colorectal carcinoma better than 50%. Resection needs to be considered more frequently for curative management. Serum albumin fall is not caused by loss of liver tissue and blood loss can be controlled by central venous pressure manipulation and vascular isolation. Re‐resection is a safe and rewarding treatment and needs to be planned at the first resection.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>9768608</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1445-2197.1998.tb04658.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-8682
ispartof Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery, 1998-10, Vol.68 (10), p.716-721
issn 0004-8682
1445-2197
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69959865
source Access via Wiley Online Library; MEDLINE
subjects Blood Loss, Surgical - statistics & numerical data
Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology
complications
Follow-Up Studies
Hepatectomy - methods
Hepatectomy - mortality
Hepatectomy - statistics & numerical data
Humans
liver
Liver - physiopathology
liver function tests
Liver Neoplasms - secondary
Liver Neoplasms - surgery
Middle Aged
Morbidity
Prospective Studies
resection
survival
Survival Analysis
title ONE HUNDRED LIVER RESECTIONS INCLUDING COMPARISON TO NON-RESECTED LIVER-MOBILIZED PATIENTS
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T02%3A39%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ONE%20HUNDRED%20LIVER%20RESECTIONS%20INCLUDING%20COMPARISON%20TO%20NON-RESECTED%20LIVER-MOBILIZED%20PATIENTS&rft.jtitle=Australian%20and%20New%20Zealand%20Journal%20of%20Surgery&rft.au=Hardy,%20Kenneth%20J.&rft.date=1998-10&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=716&rft.epage=721&rft.pages=716-721&rft.issn=0004-8682&rft.eissn=1445-2197&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1998.tb04658.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69959865%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69959865&rft_id=info:pmid/9768608&rfr_iscdi=true