A Latent Change Score Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial in Reasoning Training

The authors analyzed longitudinal data from a cognitive training experiment-Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly-using several alternative contemporary statistical models to test dynamic hypotheses based on latent change scores. The analyses focused on pretest and posttest d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychology and aging 2008-12, Vol.23 (4), p.702-719
Hauptverfasser: McArdle, John J, Prindle, John J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 719
container_issue 4
container_start_page 702
container_title Psychology and aging
container_volume 23
creator McArdle, John J
Prindle, John J
description The authors analyzed longitudinal data from a cognitive training experiment-Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly-using several alternative contemporary statistical models to test dynamic hypotheses based on latent change scores. The analyses focused on pretest and posttest data for only the group who received Reasoning training compared with the No-Contact (control) group. The initial structural equation modeling (SEM) path model isolated several training effects and an important source of transfer of training, Near → Far , but this transfer was not increased due to training. The subsequent models, which accounted for pretest differences and latent changes, implied that only the Near measurements were influenced by training, and the change transfer was small. Introduction of common factors for both Near and Far measurements showed the factor patterns were unaffected by training or time and suggested training was a broader effect than in any single variable. The bivariate analysis of common factors did not appear to alter the previous results. Addition of demographic covariates and latent mixture analysis of the trained group led to further results. The uses of contemporary SEMs with experimental data are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/a0014349
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69952870</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1649142041</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a461t-dfdb5548643d08f304a8e0473e3d6a95bac793578d347b35f2ca6217afd1c11c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c9rFDEUB_AgFrutgn-BBBHxMpqXH5PkuCxaCwuFtp7D2ySzpsxmxmT2sP3rO2VXBA96yQuPD9_D-xLyFthnYEJ_QcZACmlfkAVYYRuQ1rwkC2YMb7TV8pxc1PrAGNNg9StyDhYkayVfkLslXeMU80RXPzFvI73zQ4l0mbE_1FTp0FGkt5jDsEuPMdBVn3Ly2NP7kuY3ZXobsQ455e28wvT8eU3OOuxrfHOal-THt6_3q-_N-ubqerVcNyhbmJrQhY1S0rRSBGY6wSSayKQWUYQWrdqg11YobYKQeiNUxz22HDR2ATyAF5fk4zF3LMOvfayT26XqY99jjsO-utZaxY1m_4VKcyOEgRm-_ws-DPsy32IOAyktl8D_hTgoI5UWckafjsiXodYSOzeWtMNycMDcc2fud2czfXfK2292MfyBp5Jm8OEIcEQ31oPHMiXfx-pG3DounHSacfEE3XKaOw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614492412</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Latent Change Score Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial in Reasoning Training</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>McArdle, John J ; Prindle, John J</creator><creatorcontrib>McArdle, John J ; Prindle, John J</creatorcontrib><description>The authors analyzed longitudinal data from a cognitive training experiment-Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly-using several alternative contemporary statistical models to test dynamic hypotheses based on latent change scores. The analyses focused on pretest and posttest data for only the group who received Reasoning training compared with the No-Contact (control) group. The initial structural equation modeling (SEM) path model isolated several training effects and an important source of transfer of training, Near → Far , but this transfer was not increased due to training. The subsequent models, which accounted for pretest differences and latent changes, implied that only the Near measurements were influenced by training, and the change transfer was small. Introduction of common factors for both Near and Far measurements showed the factor patterns were unaffected by training or time and suggested training was a broader effect than in any single variable. The bivariate analysis of common factors did not appear to alter the previous results. Addition of demographic covariates and latent mixture analysis of the trained group led to further results. The uses of contemporary SEMs with experimental data are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0882-7974</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1498</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0014349</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19140642</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PAGIEL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging ; Clinical randomized controlled trials ; Cognition ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognition Disorders - psychology ; Cognition Disorders - rehabilitation ; Female ; Human ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Models, Statistical ; Multicenter Studies as Topic ; Neuropsychological Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Older people ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Practice (Psychology) ; Problem Solving ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Reasoning ; Structural Equation Modeling ; Structural equation models ; Training ; Transfer (Learning) ; Transfer (Psychology)</subject><ispartof>Psychology and aging, 2008-12, Vol.23 (4), p.702-719</ispartof><rights>2008 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Dec 2008</rights><rights>2008, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a461t-dfdb5548643d08f304a8e0473e3d6a95bac793578d347b35f2ca6217afd1c11c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,30978,30979</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19140642$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McArdle, John J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prindle, John J</creatorcontrib><title>A Latent Change Score Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial in Reasoning Training</title><title>Psychology and aging</title><addtitle>Psychol Aging</addtitle><description>The authors analyzed longitudinal data from a cognitive training experiment-Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly-using several alternative contemporary statistical models to test dynamic hypotheses based on latent change scores. The analyses focused on pretest and posttest data for only the group who received Reasoning training compared with the No-Contact (control) group. The initial structural equation modeling (SEM) path model isolated several training effects and an important source of transfer of training, Near → Far , but this transfer was not increased due to training. The subsequent models, which accounted for pretest differences and latent changes, implied that only the Near measurements were influenced by training, and the change transfer was small. Introduction of common factors for both Near and Far measurements showed the factor patterns were unaffected by training or time and suggested training was a broader effect than in any single variable. The bivariate analysis of common factors did not appear to alter the previous results. Addition of demographic covariates and latent mixture analysis of the trained group led to further results. The uses of contemporary SEMs with experimental data are discussed.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Clinical randomized controlled trials</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Multicenter Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Practice (Psychology)</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Reasoning</subject><subject>Structural Equation Modeling</subject><subject>Structural equation models</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Transfer (Learning)</subject><subject>Transfer (Psychology)</subject><issn>0882-7974</issn><issn>1939-1498</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c9rFDEUB_AgFrutgn-BBBHxMpqXH5PkuCxaCwuFtp7D2ySzpsxmxmT2sP3rO2VXBA96yQuPD9_D-xLyFthnYEJ_QcZACmlfkAVYYRuQ1rwkC2YMb7TV8pxc1PrAGNNg9StyDhYkayVfkLslXeMU80RXPzFvI73zQ4l0mbE_1FTp0FGkt5jDsEuPMdBVn3Ly2NP7kuY3ZXobsQ455e28wvT8eU3OOuxrfHOal-THt6_3q-_N-ubqerVcNyhbmJrQhY1S0rRSBGY6wSSayKQWUYQWrdqg11YobYKQeiNUxz22HDR2ATyAF5fk4zF3LMOvfayT26XqY99jjsO-utZaxY1m_4VKcyOEgRm-_ws-DPsy32IOAyktl8D_hTgoI5UWckafjsiXodYSOzeWtMNycMDcc2fud2czfXfK2292MfyBp5Jm8OEIcEQ31oPHMiXfx-pG3DounHSacfEE3XKaOw</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>McArdle, John J</creator><creator>Prindle, John J</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>A Latent Change Score Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial in Reasoning Training</title><author>McArdle, John J ; Prindle, John J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a461t-dfdb5548643d08f304a8e0473e3d6a95bac793578d347b35f2ca6217afd1c11c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Clinical randomized controlled trials</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Multicenter Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Practice (Psychology)</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Reasoning</topic><topic>Structural Equation Modeling</topic><topic>Structural equation models</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Transfer (Learning)</topic><topic>Transfer (Psychology)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McArdle, John J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prindle, John J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychology and aging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McArdle, John J</au><au>Prindle, John J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Latent Change Score Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial in Reasoning Training</atitle><jtitle>Psychology and aging</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Aging</addtitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>702</spage><epage>719</epage><pages>702-719</pages><issn>0882-7974</issn><eissn>1939-1498</eissn><coden>PAGIEL</coden><abstract>The authors analyzed longitudinal data from a cognitive training experiment-Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly-using several alternative contemporary statistical models to test dynamic hypotheses based on latent change scores. The analyses focused on pretest and posttest data for only the group who received Reasoning training compared with the No-Contact (control) group. The initial structural equation modeling (SEM) path model isolated several training effects and an important source of transfer of training, Near → Far , but this transfer was not increased due to training. The subsequent models, which accounted for pretest differences and latent changes, implied that only the Near measurements were influenced by training, and the change transfer was small. Introduction of common factors for both Near and Far measurements showed the factor patterns were unaffected by training or time and suggested training was a broader effect than in any single variable. The bivariate analysis of common factors did not appear to alter the previous results. Addition of demographic covariates and latent mixture analysis of the trained group led to further results. The uses of contemporary SEMs with experimental data are discussed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>19140642</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0014349</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0882-7974
ispartof Psychology and aging, 2008-12, Vol.23 (4), p.702-719
issn 0882-7974
1939-1498
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69952870
source MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aging
Clinical randomized controlled trials
Cognition
Cognition & reasoning
Cognition Disorders - psychology
Cognition Disorders - rehabilitation
Female
Human
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Models, Statistical
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Neuropsychological Tests - statistics & numerical data
Older people
Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data
Practice (Psychology)
Problem Solving
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Reasoning
Structural Equation Modeling
Structural equation models
Training
Transfer (Learning)
Transfer (Psychology)
title A Latent Change Score Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial in Reasoning Training
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T19%3A57%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Latent%20Change%20Score%20Analysis%20of%20a%20Randomized%20Clinical%20Trial%20in%20Reasoning%20Training&rft.jtitle=Psychology%20and%20aging&rft.au=McArdle,%20John%20J&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=702&rft.epage=719&rft.pages=702-719&rft.issn=0882-7974&rft.eissn=1939-1498&rft.coden=PAGIEL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0014349&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1649142041%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614492412&rft_id=info:pmid/19140642&rfr_iscdi=true