Attentional modulation of short- and long-lead-interval modification of the acoustic startle eyeblink response: comparing auditory and visual prestimuli
Studies in our laboratory have shown that modification of startle by lead stimuli with short- and long-lead-intervals is modulated by stimulus significance. The significant stimulus in a tone duration judgement task generates enhanced short-lead-interval startle inhibition as well as pronounced long...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of psychophysiology 1999-06, Vol.32 (3), p.239-250 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 250 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 239 |
| container_title | International journal of psychophysiology |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Böhmelt, Andreas H Schell, Anne M Dawson, Michael E |
| description | Studies in our laboratory have shown that modification of startle by lead stimuli with short- and long-lead-intervals is modulated by stimulus significance. The significant stimulus in a tone duration judgement task generates enhanced short-lead-interval startle inhibition as well as pronounced long-lead-interval startle facilitation. The present study was designed to compare tones with simple visual stimuli as lead stimuli in a counterbalanced within-subjects design (Experiment I) or between-subjects design (Experiment II). The results show that auditory compared to visual lead stimuli generate more short-lead-interval inhibition but comparable amounts of long-lead-interval startle facilitation, which was significantly enhanced on to-be-attended trials independent of sensory modality. The attentional manipulation did not yield short-lead-interval effects in Experiment I, but previously reported attention effects were replicated in Experiment II. The results suggest early modality effects on startle modification, reflected by the differing levels of inhibition. Late effects of both modality and attention, however, seem to reflect a sensory modality independent process in startle modification. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0167-8760(99)00019-7 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69943929</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167876099000197</els_id><sourcerecordid>69943929</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-542b5e12bfc5b7019fb3b8d1be87ab15c476501b27f1e1bd6bcec7cd4f0b2e6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0cuOFCEUBmBiNE47-ggaFsboohTqRuHGTCYzajKJC3VNuBxmUApaoDrpN_Fxpbs6ozs3EJLvcOD8CD2n5C0ldHz3tS6smdhIXnP-hhBCecMeoA2dWNuwkbOHaHNPztCTnH9UxCjnj9EZJX3Hxm7YoN8XpUAoLgbp8RzN4uXhgKPF-S6m0mAZDPYx3DYepGlcKJB2q3XW6Xtd7gBLHZdcnMa5yFQ8YNiD8i78xAnyNoYM77GO81YmF26xXIwrMe2PHXYuL_XWbYXFzYt3T9EjK32GZ6f9HH2_vvp2-am5-fLx8-XFTaM7Tkoz9K0agLbK6kGxOgSrOjUZqmBiUtFB92wcCFUtsxSoMqPSoJk2vSWqhdF25-jVeu82xV9L7S5mlzV4LwPU34iR877jLa9wWKFOMecEVmyTm2XaC0rEIRJxjEQc5i04F8dIBKt1L04NFjWD-adqzaCClycgs5beJhm0y3_dNLKOTpV9WBnUaewcJJG1g6DBuAS6CBPdf17yByfSrXQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69943929</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attentional modulation of short- and long-lead-interval modification of the acoustic startle eyeblink response: comparing auditory and visual prestimuli</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Böhmelt, Andreas H ; Schell, Anne M ; Dawson, Michael E</creator><creatorcontrib>Böhmelt, Andreas H ; Schell, Anne M ; Dawson, Michael E</creatorcontrib><description>Studies in our laboratory have shown that modification of startle by lead stimuli with short- and long-lead-intervals is modulated by stimulus significance. The significant stimulus in a tone duration judgement task generates enhanced short-lead-interval startle inhibition as well as pronounced long-lead-interval startle facilitation. The present study was designed to compare tones with simple visual stimuli as lead stimuli in a counterbalanced within-subjects design (Experiment I) or between-subjects design (Experiment II). The results show that auditory compared to visual lead stimuli generate more short-lead-interval inhibition but comparable amounts of long-lead-interval startle facilitation, which was significantly enhanced on to-be-attended trials independent of sensory modality. The attentional manipulation did not yield short-lead-interval effects in Experiment I, but previously reported attention effects were replicated in Experiment II. The results suggest early modality effects on startle modification, reflected by the differing levels of inhibition. Late effects of both modality and attention, however, seem to reflect a sensory modality independent process in startle modification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-8760</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8760(99)00019-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10437635</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJPSEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Attention ; Attention - physiology ; Auditory ; Auditory Perception - physiology ; Behavioral psychophysiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blinking - physiology ; Cues ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Inhibition (Psychology) ; Male ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychophysics ; Reflex, Startle - physiology ; Reflexes ; Sensory modality ; Startle eyeblink reflex ; Time Factors ; Time Perception - physiology ; Visual ; Volition - physiology</subject><ispartof>International journal of psychophysiology, 1999-06, Vol.32 (3), p.239-250</ispartof><rights>1999 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-542b5e12bfc5b7019fb3b8d1be87ab15c476501b27f1e1bd6bcec7cd4f0b2e6f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-542b5e12bfc5b7019fb3b8d1be87ab15c476501b27f1e1bd6bcec7cd4f0b2e6f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(99)00019-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1867318$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10437635$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Böhmelt, Andreas H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schell, Anne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Michael E</creatorcontrib><title>Attentional modulation of short- and long-lead-interval modification of the acoustic startle eyeblink response: comparing auditory and visual prestimuli</title><title>International journal of psychophysiology</title><addtitle>Int J Psychophysiol</addtitle><description>Studies in our laboratory have shown that modification of startle by lead stimuli with short- and long-lead-intervals is modulated by stimulus significance. The significant stimulus in a tone duration judgement task generates enhanced short-lead-interval startle inhibition as well as pronounced long-lead-interval startle facilitation. The present study was designed to compare tones with simple visual stimuli as lead stimuli in a counterbalanced within-subjects design (Experiment I) or between-subjects design (Experiment II). The results show that auditory compared to visual lead stimuli generate more short-lead-interval inhibition but comparable amounts of long-lead-interval startle facilitation, which was significantly enhanced on to-be-attended trials independent of sensory modality. The attentional manipulation did not yield short-lead-interval effects in Experiment I, but previously reported attention effects were replicated in Experiment II. The results suggest early modality effects on startle modification, reflected by the differing levels of inhibition. Late effects of both modality and attention, however, seem to reflect a sensory modality independent process in startle modification.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Auditory</subject><subject>Auditory Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blinking - physiology</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inhibition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychophysics</subject><subject>Reflex, Startle - physiology</subject><subject>Reflexes</subject><subject>Sensory modality</subject><subject>Startle eyeblink reflex</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Time Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Visual</subject><subject>Volition - physiology</subject><issn>0167-8760</issn><issn>1872-7697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0cuOFCEUBmBiNE47-ggaFsboohTqRuHGTCYzajKJC3VNuBxmUApaoDrpN_Fxpbs6ozs3EJLvcOD8CD2n5C0ldHz3tS6smdhIXnP-hhBCecMeoA2dWNuwkbOHaHNPztCTnH9UxCjnj9EZJX3Hxm7YoN8XpUAoLgbp8RzN4uXhgKPF-S6m0mAZDPYx3DYepGlcKJB2q3XW6Xtd7gBLHZdcnMa5yFQ8YNiD8i78xAnyNoYM77GO81YmF26xXIwrMe2PHXYuL_XWbYXFzYt3T9EjK32GZ6f9HH2_vvp2-am5-fLx8-XFTaM7Tkoz9K0agLbK6kGxOgSrOjUZqmBiUtFB92wcCFUtsxSoMqPSoJk2vSWqhdF25-jVeu82xV9L7S5mlzV4LwPU34iR877jLa9wWKFOMecEVmyTm2XaC0rEIRJxjEQc5i04F8dIBKt1L04NFjWD-adqzaCClycgs5beJhm0y3_dNLKOTpV9WBnUaewcJJG1g6DBuAS6CBPdf17yByfSrXQ</recordid><startdate>19990601</startdate><enddate>19990601</enddate><creator>Böhmelt, Andreas H</creator><creator>Schell, Anne M</creator><creator>Dawson, Michael E</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990601</creationdate><title>Attentional modulation of short- and long-lead-interval modification of the acoustic startle eyeblink response: comparing auditory and visual prestimuli</title><author>Böhmelt, Andreas H ; Schell, Anne M ; Dawson, Michael E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-542b5e12bfc5b7019fb3b8d1be87ab15c476501b27f1e1bd6bcec7cd4f0b2e6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Auditory</topic><topic>Auditory Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blinking - physiology</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inhibition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychophysics</topic><topic>Reflex, Startle - physiology</topic><topic>Reflexes</topic><topic>Sensory modality</topic><topic>Startle eyeblink reflex</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Time Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Visual</topic><topic>Volition - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Böhmelt, Andreas H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schell, Anne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Michael E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of psychophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Böhmelt, Andreas H</au><au>Schell, Anne M</au><au>Dawson, Michael E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attentional modulation of short- and long-lead-interval modification of the acoustic startle eyeblink response: comparing auditory and visual prestimuli</atitle><jtitle>International journal of psychophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Psychophysiol</addtitle><date>1999-06-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>239</spage><epage>250</epage><pages>239-250</pages><issn>0167-8760</issn><eissn>1872-7697</eissn><coden>IJPSEE</coden><abstract>Studies in our laboratory have shown that modification of startle by lead stimuli with short- and long-lead-intervals is modulated by stimulus significance. The significant stimulus in a tone duration judgement task generates enhanced short-lead-interval startle inhibition as well as pronounced long-lead-interval startle facilitation. The present study was designed to compare tones with simple visual stimuli as lead stimuli in a counterbalanced within-subjects design (Experiment I) or between-subjects design (Experiment II). The results show that auditory compared to visual lead stimuli generate more short-lead-interval inhibition but comparable amounts of long-lead-interval startle facilitation, which was significantly enhanced on to-be-attended trials independent of sensory modality. The attentional manipulation did not yield short-lead-interval effects in Experiment I, but previously reported attention effects were replicated in Experiment II. The results suggest early modality effects on startle modification, reflected by the differing levels of inhibition. Late effects of both modality and attention, however, seem to reflect a sensory modality independent process in startle modification.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>10437635</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0167-8760(99)00019-7</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0167-8760 |
| ispartof | International journal of psychophysiology, 1999-06, Vol.32 (3), p.239-250 |
| issn | 0167-8760 1872-7697 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69943929 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
| subjects | Acoustic Stimulation Adult Analysis of Variance Attention Attention - physiology Auditory Auditory Perception - physiology Behavioral psychophysiology Biological and medical sciences Blinking - physiology Cues Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Inhibition (Psychology) Male Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychophysics Reflex, Startle - physiology Reflexes Sensory modality Startle eyeblink reflex Time Factors Time Perception - physiology Visual Volition - physiology |
| title | Attentional modulation of short- and long-lead-interval modification of the acoustic startle eyeblink response: comparing auditory and visual prestimuli |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T08%3A11%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attentional%20modulation%20of%20short-%20and%20long-lead-interval%20modification%20of%20the%20acoustic%20startle%20eyeblink%20response:%20comparing%20auditory%20and%20visual%20prestimuli&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20psychophysiology&rft.au=B%C3%B6hmelt,%20Andreas%20H&rft.date=1999-06-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=239&rft.epage=250&rft.pages=239-250&rft.issn=0167-8760&rft.eissn=1872-7697&rft.coden=IJPSEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0167-8760(99)00019-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69943929%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69943929&rft_id=info:pmid/10437635&rft_els_id=S0167876099000197&rfr_iscdi=true |