Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection

It has been nearly two decades since the first laparoscopic colectomy was reported. However, the wide application of the procedure in various colorectal diseases, particularly colorectal malignancy, has been slow. With the recent reports of oncological outcomes from randomised controlled trials, the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The surgeon (Edinburgh) 2008-12, Vol.6 (6), p.357-360
Hauptverfasser: Tong, D.K.H, Fan, J.K.M, Law, W.L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 360
container_issue 6
container_start_page 357
container_title The surgeon (Edinburgh)
container_volume 6
creator Tong, D.K.H
Fan, J.K.M
Law, W.L
description It has been nearly two decades since the first laparoscopic colectomy was reported. However, the wide application of the procedure in various colorectal diseases, particularly colorectal malignancy, has been slow. With the recent reports of oncological outcomes from randomised controlled trials, the oncological safety of laparoscopic colectomy has been proven and the long-term outcome is at least not inferior to open resection. The application of laparoscopic resection should not be regarded as a contraindication against management of colon cancer, but instead it appears the preferred treatment when the short-term benefits are considered. Regarding rectal cancer, the CLASICC (Conventional versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery in Colorectal Cancer) trial showed equal oncological outcome in patients who underwent laparoscopic and open resection for rectal cancer in a randomised trial. The application of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer should be accepted, though cautions are still needed to scrutinise more data from high quality studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1479-666X(08)80008-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69922786</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1479666X0880008X</els_id><sourcerecordid>69922786</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-c79adfe0ebd26437668356066ed9c6319c46444cd39bcafe68107b43e8c4cd33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gtKTKLg62c1msxdFil9Q6MEeegvp7Cykbjc16Qr99-62RcGLpwnDO89MHsbOOdxy4PLunYssj6SUsytQ1woAVDQ7YP1YQBqlSsAh6_9EeuwkhAVAnCaQHrMezzkHFYs-u5k0a3RLGrpyWJmV8S6gW1kcoqucJ1ybaugptA_r6lN2VJoq0Nm-Dtj0-Wk6eo3Gk5e30eM4QqHEOsIsN0VJQPMiliLJpFRJKkFKKnKUCc9RSCEEFkk-R1OSVByyuUhIYddMBuxyh11599lQWOulDUhVZWpyTdAyz-M4U7INprsgtmcHT6Veebs0fqM56M6S3lrSnQINSm8t6Vk7d7Ff0MyXVPxO7bW0gYddgNpfflnyOqClGqmwnRNdOPvvivs_BKxsbdFUH7ShsHCNr1uFmusQa9hBOgaoLWGWfAPUU4xy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69922786</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Tong, D.K.H ; Fan, J.K.M ; Law, W.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Tong, D.K.H ; Fan, J.K.M ; Law, W.L</creatorcontrib><description>It has been nearly two decades since the first laparoscopic colectomy was reported. However, the wide application of the procedure in various colorectal diseases, particularly colorectal malignancy, has been slow. With the recent reports of oncological outcomes from randomised controlled trials, the oncological safety of laparoscopic colectomy has been proven and the long-term outcome is at least not inferior to open resection. The application of laparoscopic resection should not be regarded as a contraindication against management of colon cancer, but instead it appears the preferred treatment when the short-term benefits are considered. Regarding rectal cancer, the CLASICC (Conventional versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery in Colorectal Cancer) trial showed equal oncological outcome in patients who underwent laparoscopic and open resection for rectal cancer in a randomised trial. The application of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer should be accepted, though cautions are still needed to scrutinise more data from high quality studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1479-666X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2405-5840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1479-666X(08)80008-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19110824</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Colectomy - methods ; Colonic Neoplasms - mortality ; Colonic Neoplasms - surgery ; Humans ; laparoscopic colorectal resection ; Laparoscopy ; outcome ; Rectal Neoplasms - mortality ; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Surgery ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The surgeon (Edinburgh), 2008-12, Vol.6 (6), p.357-360</ispartof><rights>Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland</rights><rights>2008 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-c79adfe0ebd26437668356066ed9c6319c46444cd39bcafe68107b43e8c4cd33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-c79adfe0ebd26437668356066ed9c6319c46444cd39bcafe68107b43e8c4cd33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1479-666X(08)80008-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,27931,27932,46002</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19110824$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tong, D.K.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, J.K.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, W.L</creatorcontrib><title>Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection</title><title>The surgeon (Edinburgh)</title><addtitle>Surgeon</addtitle><description>It has been nearly two decades since the first laparoscopic colectomy was reported. However, the wide application of the procedure in various colorectal diseases, particularly colorectal malignancy, has been slow. With the recent reports of oncological outcomes from randomised controlled trials, the oncological safety of laparoscopic colectomy has been proven and the long-term outcome is at least not inferior to open resection. The application of laparoscopic resection should not be regarded as a contraindication against management of colon cancer, but instead it appears the preferred treatment when the short-term benefits are considered. Regarding rectal cancer, the CLASICC (Conventional versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery in Colorectal Cancer) trial showed equal oncological outcome in patients who underwent laparoscopic and open resection for rectal cancer in a randomised trial. The application of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer should be accepted, though cautions are still needed to scrutinise more data from high quality studies.</description><subject>Colectomy - methods</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>laparoscopic colorectal resection</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>outcome</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1479-666X</issn><issn>2405-5840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gtKTKLg62c1msxdFil9Q6MEeegvp7Cykbjc16Qr99-62RcGLpwnDO89MHsbOOdxy4PLunYssj6SUsytQ1woAVDQ7YP1YQBqlSsAh6_9EeuwkhAVAnCaQHrMezzkHFYs-u5k0a3RLGrpyWJmV8S6gW1kcoqucJ1ybaugptA_r6lN2VJoq0Nm-Dtj0-Wk6eo3Gk5e30eM4QqHEOsIsN0VJQPMiliLJpFRJKkFKKnKUCc9RSCEEFkk-R1OSVByyuUhIYddMBuxyh11599lQWOulDUhVZWpyTdAyz-M4U7INprsgtmcHT6Veebs0fqM56M6S3lrSnQINSm8t6Vk7d7Ff0MyXVPxO7bW0gYddgNpfflnyOqClGqmwnRNdOPvvivs_BKxsbdFUH7ShsHCNr1uFmusQa9hBOgaoLWGWfAPUU4xy</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>Tong, D.K.H</creator><creator>Fan, J.K.M</creator><creator>Law, W.L</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection</title><author>Tong, D.K.H ; Fan, J.K.M ; Law, W.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-c79adfe0ebd26437668356066ed9c6319c46444cd39bcafe68107b43e8c4cd33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Colectomy - methods</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>laparoscopic colorectal resection</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>outcome</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tong, D.K.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, J.K.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, W.L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The surgeon (Edinburgh)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tong, D.K.H</au><au>Fan, J.K.M</au><au>Law, W.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection</atitle><jtitle>The surgeon (Edinburgh)</jtitle><addtitle>Surgeon</addtitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>357</spage><epage>360</epage><pages>357-360</pages><issn>1479-666X</issn><eissn>2405-5840</eissn><abstract>It has been nearly two decades since the first laparoscopic colectomy was reported. However, the wide application of the procedure in various colorectal diseases, particularly colorectal malignancy, has been slow. With the recent reports of oncological outcomes from randomised controlled trials, the oncological safety of laparoscopic colectomy has been proven and the long-term outcome is at least not inferior to open resection. The application of laparoscopic resection should not be regarded as a contraindication against management of colon cancer, but instead it appears the preferred treatment when the short-term benefits are considered. Regarding rectal cancer, the CLASICC (Conventional versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery in Colorectal Cancer) trial showed equal oncological outcome in patients who underwent laparoscopic and open resection for rectal cancer in a randomised trial. The application of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer should be accepted, though cautions are still needed to scrutinise more data from high quality studies.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>19110824</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1479-666X(08)80008-X</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1479-666X
ispartof The surgeon (Edinburgh), 2008-12, Vol.6 (6), p.357-360
issn 1479-666X
2405-5840
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69922786
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Colectomy - methods
Colonic Neoplasms - mortality
Colonic Neoplasms - surgery
Humans
laparoscopic colorectal resection
Laparoscopy
outcome
Rectal Neoplasms - mortality
Rectal Neoplasms - surgery
Surgery
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome
title Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T04%3A00%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcome%20of%20laparoscopic%20colorectal%20resection&rft.jtitle=The%20surgeon%20(Edinburgh)&rft.au=Tong,%20D.K.H&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=357&rft.epage=360&rft.pages=357-360&rft.issn=1479-666X&rft.eissn=2405-5840&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1479-666X(08)80008-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69922786%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69922786&rft_id=info:pmid/19110824&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1479666X0880008X&rfr_iscdi=true