Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection
It has been nearly two decades since the first laparoscopic colectomy was reported. However, the wide application of the procedure in various colorectal diseases, particularly colorectal malignancy, has been slow. With the recent reports of oncological outcomes from randomised controlled trials, the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The surgeon (Edinburgh) 2008-12, Vol.6 (6), p.357-360 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 360 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 357 |
container_title | The surgeon (Edinburgh) |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Tong, D.K.H Fan, J.K.M Law, W.L |
description | It has been nearly two decades since the first laparoscopic colectomy was reported. However, the wide application of the procedure in various colorectal diseases, particularly colorectal malignancy, has been slow. With the recent reports of oncological outcomes from randomised controlled trials, the oncological safety of laparoscopic colectomy has been proven and the long-term outcome is at least not inferior to open resection. The application of laparoscopic resection should not be regarded as a contraindication against management of colon cancer, but instead it appears the preferred treatment when the short-term benefits are considered. Regarding rectal cancer, the CLASICC (Conventional versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery in Colorectal Cancer) trial showed equal oncological outcome in patients who underwent laparoscopic and open resection for rectal cancer in a randomised trial. The application of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer should be accepted, though cautions are still needed to scrutinise more data from high quality studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1479-666X(08)80008-X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69922786</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1479666X0880008X</els_id><sourcerecordid>69922786</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-c79adfe0ebd26437668356066ed9c6319c46444cd39bcafe68107b43e8c4cd33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gtKTKLg62c1msxdFil9Q6MEeegvp7Cykbjc16Qr99-62RcGLpwnDO89MHsbOOdxy4PLunYssj6SUsytQ1woAVDQ7YP1YQBqlSsAh6_9EeuwkhAVAnCaQHrMezzkHFYs-u5k0a3RLGrpyWJmV8S6gW1kcoqucJ1ybaugptA_r6lN2VJoq0Nm-Dtj0-Wk6eo3Gk5e30eM4QqHEOsIsN0VJQPMiliLJpFRJKkFKKnKUCc9RSCEEFkk-R1OSVByyuUhIYddMBuxyh11599lQWOulDUhVZWpyTdAyz-M4U7INprsgtmcHT6Veebs0fqM56M6S3lrSnQINSm8t6Vk7d7Ff0MyXVPxO7bW0gYddgNpfflnyOqClGqmwnRNdOPvvivs_BKxsbdFUH7ShsHCNr1uFmusQa9hBOgaoLWGWfAPUU4xy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69922786</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Tong, D.K.H ; Fan, J.K.M ; Law, W.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Tong, D.K.H ; Fan, J.K.M ; Law, W.L</creatorcontrib><description>It has been nearly two decades since the first laparoscopic colectomy was reported. However, the wide application of the procedure in various colorectal diseases, particularly colorectal malignancy, has been slow. With the recent reports of oncological outcomes from randomised controlled trials, the oncological safety of laparoscopic colectomy has been proven and the long-term outcome is at least not inferior to open resection. The application of laparoscopic resection should not be regarded as a contraindication against management of colon cancer, but instead it appears the preferred treatment when the short-term benefits are considered. Regarding rectal cancer, the CLASICC (Conventional versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery in Colorectal Cancer) trial showed equal oncological outcome in patients who underwent laparoscopic and open resection for rectal cancer in a randomised trial. The application of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer should be accepted, though cautions are still needed to scrutinise more data from high quality studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1479-666X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2405-5840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1479-666X(08)80008-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19110824</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Colectomy - methods ; Colonic Neoplasms - mortality ; Colonic Neoplasms - surgery ; Humans ; laparoscopic colorectal resection ; Laparoscopy ; outcome ; Rectal Neoplasms - mortality ; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Surgery ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The surgeon (Edinburgh), 2008-12, Vol.6 (6), p.357-360</ispartof><rights>Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland</rights><rights>2008 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-c79adfe0ebd26437668356066ed9c6319c46444cd39bcafe68107b43e8c4cd33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-c79adfe0ebd26437668356066ed9c6319c46444cd39bcafe68107b43e8c4cd33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1479-666X(08)80008-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,27931,27932,46002</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19110824$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tong, D.K.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, J.K.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, W.L</creatorcontrib><title>Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection</title><title>The surgeon (Edinburgh)</title><addtitle>Surgeon</addtitle><description>It has been nearly two decades since the first laparoscopic colectomy was reported. However, the wide application of the procedure in various colorectal diseases, particularly colorectal malignancy, has been slow. With the recent reports of oncological outcomes from randomised controlled trials, the oncological safety of laparoscopic colectomy has been proven and the long-term outcome is at least not inferior to open resection. The application of laparoscopic resection should not be regarded as a contraindication against management of colon cancer, but instead it appears the preferred treatment when the short-term benefits are considered. Regarding rectal cancer, the CLASICC (Conventional versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery in Colorectal Cancer) trial showed equal oncological outcome in patients who underwent laparoscopic and open resection for rectal cancer in a randomised trial. The application of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer should be accepted, though cautions are still needed to scrutinise more data from high quality studies.</description><subject>Colectomy - methods</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>laparoscopic colorectal resection</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>outcome</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1479-666X</issn><issn>2405-5840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gtKTKLg62c1msxdFil9Q6MEeegvp7Cykbjc16Qr99-62RcGLpwnDO89MHsbOOdxy4PLunYssj6SUsytQ1woAVDQ7YP1YQBqlSsAh6_9EeuwkhAVAnCaQHrMezzkHFYs-u5k0a3RLGrpyWJmV8S6gW1kcoqucJ1ybaugptA_r6lN2VJoq0Nm-Dtj0-Wk6eo3Gk5e30eM4QqHEOsIsN0VJQPMiliLJpFRJKkFKKnKUCc9RSCEEFkk-R1OSVByyuUhIYddMBuxyh11599lQWOulDUhVZWpyTdAyz-M4U7INprsgtmcHT6Veebs0fqM56M6S3lrSnQINSm8t6Vk7d7Ff0MyXVPxO7bW0gYddgNpfflnyOqClGqmwnRNdOPvvivs_BKxsbdFUH7ShsHCNr1uFmusQa9hBOgaoLWGWfAPUU4xy</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>Tong, D.K.H</creator><creator>Fan, J.K.M</creator><creator>Law, W.L</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection</title><author>Tong, D.K.H ; Fan, J.K.M ; Law, W.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-c79adfe0ebd26437668356066ed9c6319c46444cd39bcafe68107b43e8c4cd33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Colectomy - methods</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>laparoscopic colorectal resection</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>outcome</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tong, D.K.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, J.K.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, W.L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The surgeon (Edinburgh)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tong, D.K.H</au><au>Fan, J.K.M</au><au>Law, W.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection</atitle><jtitle>The surgeon (Edinburgh)</jtitle><addtitle>Surgeon</addtitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>357</spage><epage>360</epage><pages>357-360</pages><issn>1479-666X</issn><eissn>2405-5840</eissn><abstract>It has been nearly two decades since the first laparoscopic colectomy was reported. However, the wide application of the procedure in various colorectal diseases, particularly colorectal malignancy, has been slow. With the recent reports of oncological outcomes from randomised controlled trials, the oncological safety of laparoscopic colectomy has been proven and the long-term outcome is at least not inferior to open resection. The application of laparoscopic resection should not be regarded as a contraindication against management of colon cancer, but instead it appears the preferred treatment when the short-term benefits are considered. Regarding rectal cancer, the CLASICC (Conventional versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery in Colorectal Cancer) trial showed equal oncological outcome in patients who underwent laparoscopic and open resection for rectal cancer in a randomised trial. The application of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer should be accepted, though cautions are still needed to scrutinise more data from high quality studies.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>19110824</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1479-666X(08)80008-X</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1479-666X |
ispartof | The surgeon (Edinburgh), 2008-12, Vol.6 (6), p.357-360 |
issn | 1479-666X 2405-5840 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69922786 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Colectomy - methods Colonic Neoplasms - mortality Colonic Neoplasms - surgery Humans laparoscopic colorectal resection Laparoscopy outcome Rectal Neoplasms - mortality Rectal Neoplasms - surgery Surgery Survival Analysis Treatment Outcome |
title | Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T04%3A00%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcome%20of%20laparoscopic%20colorectal%20resection&rft.jtitle=The%20surgeon%20(Edinburgh)&rft.au=Tong,%20D.K.H&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=357&rft.epage=360&rft.pages=357-360&rft.issn=1479-666X&rft.eissn=2405-5840&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1479-666X(08)80008-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69922786%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69922786&rft_id=info:pmid/19110824&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1479666X0880008X&rfr_iscdi=true |