Interactions between electronic article surveillance systems and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

In patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). inappropriate shocks have been reported with exposure to electronic article surveillance systems. The risk to patients with ICDs of walking through or lingering near surveillance systems requires further investigation. We evaluated the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 1999-07, Vol.100 (4), p.387-392
Hauptverfasser: GROH, W. J, BOSCHEE, S. A, ENGELSTEIN, E. D, MILES, W. M, BURTON, M. E, FOSTER, P. R, CREVEY, B. J, ZIPES, D. P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 392
container_issue 4
container_start_page 387
container_title Circulation (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 100
creator GROH, W. J
BOSCHEE, S. A
ENGELSTEIN, E. D
MILES, W. M
BURTON, M. E
FOSTER, P. R
CREVEY, B. J
ZIPES, D. P
description In patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). inappropriate shocks have been reported with exposure to electronic article surveillance systems. The risk to patients with ICDs of walking through or lingering near surveillance systems requires further investigation. We evaluated the response in ICD function in 170 subjects during a 10- to 15-second midgate walk-through of and during extreme (2 minutes within 6 in of the gate) exposure to 3 common article surveillance systems. Complete testing was done in 169 subjects. During a 10- to 15-second (very slow) walk-through of the 3 surveillance systems, no interactions were observed that would negatively affect ICD function. During extreme exposure (169 subjects) and during extreme exposure and pacing via the ICD (126 subjects), interactions between the ICD and the article surveillance systems were observed in 19 subjects. In 7 subjects, this interaction was clinically relevant and would have likely (3 subjects) and possibly (4 subjects) resulted in ICD shocks. In 12 subjects, the interaction was minor. It is safe for a patient with an ICD to walk through electronic article surveillance systems. Lingering in a surveillance system may result in an inappropriate ICD shock.
doi_str_mv 10.1161/01.CIR.100.4.387
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69921833</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69921833</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-d8816b7a496d86d1d8a2ce2c241a4ab81558c1844ff1597cfa0bca72390a3dde3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc2LFDEQxYMo7uzq3ZM0InvrNpWku5OjDH4MLAii51CdVGOW_hiT9C7735thBhRP4YXfe1TVY-wN8Aaggw8cmv3hewOcN6qRun_GdtAKVatWmudsxzk3dS-FuGLXKd0X2cm-fcmugCsBrTE79uuwZIrocliXVA2UH4mWiiZyOa5LcBXGHNxEVdriA4VpwsUV8ZQyzanCxVdhPpbPjEOBHEYf1geKJbP2NIYhnix5jekVezHilOj15b1hPz9_-rH_Wt99-3LYf7yrnZIq115r6IYelem87jx4jcKRcEIBKhw0tK12oJUax7JA70bkg8NeSMNRek_yht2ec49x_b1RynYOydFpcFq3ZDtjBGgpC_juP_B-3eJSZrMCRK8kKFMgfoZcXFOKNNpjDDPGJwvcniqwHGypoEhulS0VFMvbS-42zOT_MZxvXoD3FwCTw2mM5aQh_eUMl6rr5B8WQZDL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212743149</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interactions between electronic article surveillance systems and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators</title><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>GROH, W. J ; BOSCHEE, S. A ; ENGELSTEIN, E. D ; MILES, W. M ; BURTON, M. E ; FOSTER, P. R ; CREVEY, B. J ; ZIPES, D. P</creator><creatorcontrib>GROH, W. J ; BOSCHEE, S. A ; ENGELSTEIN, E. D ; MILES, W. M ; BURTON, M. E ; FOSTER, P. R ; CREVEY, B. J ; ZIPES, D. P</creatorcontrib><description>In patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). inappropriate shocks have been reported with exposure to electronic article surveillance systems. The risk to patients with ICDs of walking through or lingering near surveillance systems requires further investigation. We evaluated the response in ICD function in 170 subjects during a 10- to 15-second midgate walk-through of and during extreme (2 minutes within 6 in of the gate) exposure to 3 common article surveillance systems. Complete testing was done in 169 subjects. During a 10- to 15-second (very slow) walk-through of the 3 surveillance systems, no interactions were observed that would negatively affect ICD function. During extreme exposure (169 subjects) and during extreme exposure and pacing via the ICD (126 subjects), interactions between the ICD and the article surveillance systems were observed in 19 subjects. In 7 subjects, this interaction was clinically relevant and would have likely (3 subjects) and possibly (4 subjects) resulted in ICD shocks. In 12 subjects, the interaction was minor. It is safe for a patient with an ICD to walk through electronic article surveillance systems. Lingering in a surveillance system may result in an inappropriate ICD shock.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-7322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.100.4.387</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10421599</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CIRCAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial ; Defibrillators, Implantable ; Diseases of the cardiovascular system ; Electromagnetic Fields - adverse effects ; Equipment Failure - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Likelihood Functions ; Medical sciences ; Multivariate Analysis ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Theft - prevention &amp; control ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 1999-07, Vol.100 (4), p.387-392</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Heart Association, Inc. Jul 27, 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-d8816b7a496d86d1d8a2ce2c241a4ab81558c1844ff1597cfa0bca72390a3dde3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-d8816b7a496d86d1d8a2ce2c241a4ab81558c1844ff1597cfa0bca72390a3dde3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3674,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1903466$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10421599$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GROH, W. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOSCHEE, S. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ENGELSTEIN, E. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MILES, W. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BURTON, M. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FOSTER, P. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CREVEY, B. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZIPES, D. P</creatorcontrib><title>Interactions between electronic article surveillance systems and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators</title><title>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><description>In patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). inappropriate shocks have been reported with exposure to electronic article surveillance systems. The risk to patients with ICDs of walking through or lingering near surveillance systems requires further investigation. We evaluated the response in ICD function in 170 subjects during a 10- to 15-second midgate walk-through of and during extreme (2 minutes within 6 in of the gate) exposure to 3 common article surveillance systems. Complete testing was done in 169 subjects. During a 10- to 15-second (very slow) walk-through of the 3 surveillance systems, no interactions were observed that would negatively affect ICD function. During extreme exposure (169 subjects) and during extreme exposure and pacing via the ICD (126 subjects), interactions between the ICD and the article surveillance systems were observed in 19 subjects. In 7 subjects, this interaction was clinically relevant and would have likely (3 subjects) and possibly (4 subjects) resulted in ICD shocks. In 12 subjects, the interaction was minor. It is safe for a patient with an ICD to walk through electronic article surveillance systems. Lingering in a surveillance system may result in an inappropriate ICD shock.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial</subject><subject>Defibrillators, Implantable</subject><subject>Diseases of the cardiovascular system</subject><subject>Electromagnetic Fields - adverse effects</subject><subject>Equipment Failure - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Likelihood Functions</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Theft - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0009-7322</issn><issn>1524-4539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc2LFDEQxYMo7uzq3ZM0InvrNpWku5OjDH4MLAii51CdVGOW_hiT9C7735thBhRP4YXfe1TVY-wN8Aaggw8cmv3hewOcN6qRun_GdtAKVatWmudsxzk3dS-FuGLXKd0X2cm-fcmugCsBrTE79uuwZIrocliXVA2UH4mWiiZyOa5LcBXGHNxEVdriA4VpwsUV8ZQyzanCxVdhPpbPjEOBHEYf1geKJbP2NIYhnix5jekVezHilOj15b1hPz9_-rH_Wt99-3LYf7yrnZIq115r6IYelem87jx4jcKRcEIBKhw0tK12oJUax7JA70bkg8NeSMNRek_yht2ec49x_b1RynYOydFpcFq3ZDtjBGgpC_juP_B-3eJSZrMCRK8kKFMgfoZcXFOKNNpjDDPGJwvcniqwHGypoEhulS0VFMvbS-42zOT_MZxvXoD3FwCTw2mM5aQh_eUMl6rr5B8WQZDL</recordid><startdate>19990727</startdate><enddate>19990727</enddate><creator>GROH, W. J</creator><creator>BOSCHEE, S. A</creator><creator>ENGELSTEIN, E. D</creator><creator>MILES, W. M</creator><creator>BURTON, M. E</creator><creator>FOSTER, P. R</creator><creator>CREVEY, B. J</creator><creator>ZIPES, D. P</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><general>American Heart Association, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990727</creationdate><title>Interactions between electronic article surveillance systems and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators</title><author>GROH, W. J ; BOSCHEE, S. A ; ENGELSTEIN, E. D ; MILES, W. M ; BURTON, M. E ; FOSTER, P. R ; CREVEY, B. J ; ZIPES, D. P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-d8816b7a496d86d1d8a2ce2c241a4ab81558c1844ff1597cfa0bca72390a3dde3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial</topic><topic>Defibrillators, Implantable</topic><topic>Diseases of the cardiovascular system</topic><topic>Electromagnetic Fields - adverse effects</topic><topic>Equipment Failure - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Likelihood Functions</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Theft - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GROH, W. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOSCHEE, S. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ENGELSTEIN, E. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MILES, W. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BURTON, M. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FOSTER, P. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CREVEY, B. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZIPES, D. P</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GROH, W. J</au><au>BOSCHEE, S. A</au><au>ENGELSTEIN, E. D</au><au>MILES, W. M</au><au>BURTON, M. E</au><au>FOSTER, P. R</au><au>CREVEY, B. J</au><au>ZIPES, D. P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interactions between electronic article surveillance systems and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators</atitle><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><date>1999-07-27</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>387</spage><epage>392</epage><pages>387-392</pages><issn>0009-7322</issn><eissn>1524-4539</eissn><coden>CIRCAZ</coden><abstract>In patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). inappropriate shocks have been reported with exposure to electronic article surveillance systems. The risk to patients with ICDs of walking through or lingering near surveillance systems requires further investigation. We evaluated the response in ICD function in 170 subjects during a 10- to 15-second midgate walk-through of and during extreme (2 minutes within 6 in of the gate) exposure to 3 common article surveillance systems. Complete testing was done in 169 subjects. During a 10- to 15-second (very slow) walk-through of the 3 surveillance systems, no interactions were observed that would negatively affect ICD function. During extreme exposure (169 subjects) and during extreme exposure and pacing via the ICD (126 subjects), interactions between the ICD and the article surveillance systems were observed in 19 subjects. In 7 subjects, this interaction was clinically relevant and would have likely (3 subjects) and possibly (4 subjects) resulted in ICD shocks. In 12 subjects, the interaction was minor. It is safe for a patient with an ICD to walk through electronic article surveillance systems. Lingering in a surveillance system may result in an inappropriate ICD shock.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>10421599</pmid><doi>10.1161/01.CIR.100.4.387</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-7322
ispartof Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 1999-07, Vol.100 (4), p.387-392
issn 0009-7322
1524-4539
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69921833
source Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload; MEDLINE; American Heart Association Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial
Defibrillators, Implantable
Diseases of the cardiovascular system
Electromagnetic Fields - adverse effects
Equipment Failure - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Likelihood Functions
Medical sciences
Multivariate Analysis
Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)
Theft - prevention & control
Time Factors
title Interactions between electronic article surveillance systems and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T12%3A27%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interactions%20between%20electronic%20article%20surveillance%20systems%20and%20implantable%20cardioverter-defibrillators&rft.jtitle=Circulation%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=GROH,%20W.%20J&rft.date=1999-07-27&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=387&rft.epage=392&rft.pages=387-392&rft.issn=0009-7322&rft.eissn=1524-4539&rft.coden=CIRCAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/01.CIR.100.4.387&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69921833%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212743149&rft_id=info:pmid/10421599&rfr_iscdi=true