Modulation of MAO Activity by Imidazoline and Guanidine Derivatives

I2‐binding sites (I2‐BS) are attributed to be a regulative site on monoamine oxidase (MAO). The in vivo and in vitro effects of various imidazoline and guanidine derivatives on MAO activity and on mitochondrial respiration were studied. Substances with high affinity for I2‐BS (antazoline, idazoxan,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1999-06, Vol.881 (1), p.313-331
Hauptverfasser: RAASCH, W., MUHLE, H., DOMINIAK, P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 331
container_issue 1
container_start_page 313
container_title Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
container_volume 881
creator RAASCH, W.
MUHLE, H.
DOMINIAK, P.
description I2‐binding sites (I2‐BS) are attributed to be a regulative site on monoamine oxidase (MAO). The in vivo and in vitro effects of various imidazoline and guanidine derivatives on MAO activity and on mitochondrial respiration were studied. Substances with high affinity for I2‐BS (antazoline, idazoxan, and cirazoline: IC50= 20.3, 33.8, and 43.4 μM) had a stronger inhibitory effect on MAO activity than did I1‐ligands (efaroxan, rilmenidine, clonidine, and moxonidine: IC50= 277, 801, 1,224, and >10,000 μM). Substances with the highest inhibitory effects were BDF8082 (IC50= 1.7 μM) and 2‐(2‐benzofuranyl)‐2‐imidazoline (BFI; IC50= 4.0 μM). The enzyme is inhibited noncompetitively and is reversible, because its activity is completely or partially restored after dialysis. Agmatine, the putative endogenous ligand for IBS, also decreased MAO activity (IC50= 168 μM), whereas its precursor, l‐arginine, and its metabolite, putrescine, had no effects. In vitro inhibition of MAO and mitochondrial respiration by the IBS‐ligands tested could not be correlated, suggesting no link between the function of the inner and outer mitochondrial membrane. MAO activity in vivo was significantly reduced only by pargyline (−95%), BDF8082 (−68%), BFI (−43%), and 1‐(m‐chlorophenyl)‐biguanide (−28%). Catecholamine content of livers obtained from animals treated with different IBS‐ligands was consequently increased. In conclusion, the strong inhibitory effects of I2 selective imidazoline ligands confirm the existence of I2‐BS as a regulatory site on MAO.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09376.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69906788</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69906788</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4423-f07a12d11cbb8d65529e26cb43420333969aa0efb23b9c1599a5fe24bf0f0d4c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkEFP2zAYhi00BKXwF6Zoh90SbH-OHe8ylQ4KUgFNAyF2sezEkdylSRcnpeHXkygV4oovn6zvfR9bD0LfCI5If85XERFMhpwDjYiUMmoMliB4tDtAk_fVFzTBWIgwkRSO0Yn3K4wJTZg4QscEMxJLoBM0v62yttCNq8qgyoPb2X0wSxu3dU0XmC64WbtMv1aFK22gyyxYtLp02XD7ZWu37Xtb60_RYa4Lb8_2c4oery4f5tfh8n5xM58tw5QxCmGOhSY0IyQ1Jsl4HFNpKU8NA0YxAEgutcY2NxSMTPv_SR3nljKT4xxnLIUp-j5yN3X1v7W-UWvnU1sUurRV6xWXEnORJH3wxxhM68r72uZqU7u1rjtFsBoUqpUaPKnBkxoUqr1CtevLX_evtGZtsw_V0Vkf-DkGXlxhu0-g1d3z7A8Q6AnhSHC-sbt3gq7_KS5AxOrpbqFg-fD3N16CuoA3gYaQMQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69906788</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modulation of MAO Activity by Imidazoline and Guanidine Derivatives</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>RAASCH, W. ; MUHLE, H. ; DOMINIAK, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>RAASCH, W. ; MUHLE, H. ; DOMINIAK, P.</creatorcontrib><description>I2‐binding sites (I2‐BS) are attributed to be a regulative site on monoamine oxidase (MAO). The in vivo and in vitro effects of various imidazoline and guanidine derivatives on MAO activity and on mitochondrial respiration were studied. Substances with high affinity for I2‐BS (antazoline, idazoxan, and cirazoline: IC50= 20.3, 33.8, and 43.4 μM) had a stronger inhibitory effect on MAO activity than did I1‐ligands (efaroxan, rilmenidine, clonidine, and moxonidine: IC50= 277, 801, 1,224, and &gt;10,000 μM). Substances with the highest inhibitory effects were BDF8082 (IC50= 1.7 μM) and 2‐(2‐benzofuranyl)‐2‐imidazoline (BFI; IC50= 4.0 μM). The enzyme is inhibited noncompetitively and is reversible, because its activity is completely or partially restored after dialysis. Agmatine, the putative endogenous ligand for IBS, also decreased MAO activity (IC50= 168 μM), whereas its precursor, l‐arginine, and its metabolite, putrescine, had no effects. In vitro inhibition of MAO and mitochondrial respiration by the IBS‐ligands tested could not be correlated, suggesting no link between the function of the inner and outer mitochondrial membrane. MAO activity in vivo was significantly reduced only by pargyline (−95%), BDF8082 (−68%), BFI (−43%), and 1‐(m‐chlorophenyl)‐biguanide (−28%). Catecholamine content of livers obtained from animals treated with different IBS‐ligands was consequently increased. In conclusion, the strong inhibitory effects of I2 selective imidazoline ligands confirm the existence of I2‐BS as a regulatory site on MAO.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0077-8923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1749-6632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09376.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10415932</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Binding Sites ; Brain - enzymology ; Catecholamines - metabolism ; Guanidines - pharmacology ; Imidazoles - pharmacology ; Imidazoline Receptors ; Kinetics ; Ligands ; Male ; Mitochondria, Liver - drug effects ; Mitochondria, Liver - metabolism ; Monoamine Oxidase - metabolism ; Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors - pharmacology ; Myocardium - enzymology ; Oxygen Consumption - drug effects ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Receptors, Drug - agonists ; Receptors, Drug - physiology ; Structure-Activity Relationship</subject><ispartof>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1999-06, Vol.881 (1), p.313-331</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4423-f07a12d11cbb8d65529e26cb43420333969aa0efb23b9c1599a5fe24bf0f0d4c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4423-f07a12d11cbb8d65529e26cb43420333969aa0efb23b9c1599a5fe24bf0f0d4c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1749-6632.1999.tb09376.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1749-6632.1999.tb09376.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10415932$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>RAASCH, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MUHLE, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOMINIAK, P.</creatorcontrib><title>Modulation of MAO Activity by Imidazoline and Guanidine Derivatives</title><title>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</title><addtitle>Ann N Y Acad Sci</addtitle><description>I2‐binding sites (I2‐BS) are attributed to be a regulative site on monoamine oxidase (MAO). The in vivo and in vitro effects of various imidazoline and guanidine derivatives on MAO activity and on mitochondrial respiration were studied. Substances with high affinity for I2‐BS (antazoline, idazoxan, and cirazoline: IC50= 20.3, 33.8, and 43.4 μM) had a stronger inhibitory effect on MAO activity than did I1‐ligands (efaroxan, rilmenidine, clonidine, and moxonidine: IC50= 277, 801, 1,224, and &gt;10,000 μM). Substances with the highest inhibitory effects were BDF8082 (IC50= 1.7 μM) and 2‐(2‐benzofuranyl)‐2‐imidazoline (BFI; IC50= 4.0 μM). The enzyme is inhibited noncompetitively and is reversible, because its activity is completely or partially restored after dialysis. Agmatine, the putative endogenous ligand for IBS, also decreased MAO activity (IC50= 168 μM), whereas its precursor, l‐arginine, and its metabolite, putrescine, had no effects. In vitro inhibition of MAO and mitochondrial respiration by the IBS‐ligands tested could not be correlated, suggesting no link between the function of the inner and outer mitochondrial membrane. MAO activity in vivo was significantly reduced only by pargyline (−95%), BDF8082 (−68%), BFI (−43%), and 1‐(m‐chlorophenyl)‐biguanide (−28%). Catecholamine content of livers obtained from animals treated with different IBS‐ligands was consequently increased. In conclusion, the strong inhibitory effects of I2 selective imidazoline ligands confirm the existence of I2‐BS as a regulatory site on MAO.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Binding Sites</subject><subject>Brain - enzymology</subject><subject>Catecholamines - metabolism</subject><subject>Guanidines - pharmacology</subject><subject>Imidazoles - pharmacology</subject><subject>Imidazoline Receptors</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Ligands</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mitochondria, Liver - drug effects</subject><subject>Mitochondria, Liver - metabolism</subject><subject>Monoamine Oxidase - metabolism</subject><subject>Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors - pharmacology</subject><subject>Myocardium - enzymology</subject><subject>Oxygen Consumption - drug effects</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</subject><subject>Receptors, Drug - agonists</subject><subject>Receptors, Drug - physiology</subject><subject>Structure-Activity Relationship</subject><issn>0077-8923</issn><issn>1749-6632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkEFP2zAYhi00BKXwF6Zoh90SbH-OHe8ylQ4KUgFNAyF2sezEkdylSRcnpeHXkygV4oovn6zvfR9bD0LfCI5If85XERFMhpwDjYiUMmoMliB4tDtAk_fVFzTBWIgwkRSO0Yn3K4wJTZg4QscEMxJLoBM0v62yttCNq8qgyoPb2X0wSxu3dU0XmC64WbtMv1aFK22gyyxYtLp02XD7ZWu37Xtb60_RYa4Lb8_2c4oery4f5tfh8n5xM58tw5QxCmGOhSY0IyQ1Jsl4HFNpKU8NA0YxAEgutcY2NxSMTPv_SR3nljKT4xxnLIUp-j5yN3X1v7W-UWvnU1sUurRV6xWXEnORJH3wxxhM68r72uZqU7u1rjtFsBoUqpUaPKnBkxoUqr1CtevLX_evtGZtsw_V0Vkf-DkGXlxhu0-g1d3z7A8Q6AnhSHC-sbt3gq7_KS5AxOrpbqFg-fD3N16CuoA3gYaQMQ</recordid><startdate>199906</startdate><enddate>199906</enddate><creator>RAASCH, W.</creator><creator>MUHLE, H.</creator><creator>DOMINIAK, P.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199906</creationdate><title>Modulation of MAO Activity by Imidazoline and Guanidine Derivatives</title><author>RAASCH, W. ; MUHLE, H. ; DOMINIAK, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4423-f07a12d11cbb8d65529e26cb43420333969aa0efb23b9c1599a5fe24bf0f0d4c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Binding Sites</topic><topic>Brain - enzymology</topic><topic>Catecholamines - metabolism</topic><topic>Guanidines - pharmacology</topic><topic>Imidazoles - pharmacology</topic><topic>Imidazoline Receptors</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Ligands</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mitochondria, Liver - drug effects</topic><topic>Mitochondria, Liver - metabolism</topic><topic>Monoamine Oxidase - metabolism</topic><topic>Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors - pharmacology</topic><topic>Myocardium - enzymology</topic><topic>Oxygen Consumption - drug effects</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</topic><topic>Receptors, Drug - agonists</topic><topic>Receptors, Drug - physiology</topic><topic>Structure-Activity Relationship</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>RAASCH, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MUHLE, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOMINIAK, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>RAASCH, W.</au><au>MUHLE, H.</au><au>DOMINIAK, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modulation of MAO Activity by Imidazoline and Guanidine Derivatives</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Ann N Y Acad Sci</addtitle><date>1999-06</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>881</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>313</spage><epage>331</epage><pages>313-331</pages><issn>0077-8923</issn><eissn>1749-6632</eissn><abstract>I2‐binding sites (I2‐BS) are attributed to be a regulative site on monoamine oxidase (MAO). The in vivo and in vitro effects of various imidazoline and guanidine derivatives on MAO activity and on mitochondrial respiration were studied. Substances with high affinity for I2‐BS (antazoline, idazoxan, and cirazoline: IC50= 20.3, 33.8, and 43.4 μM) had a stronger inhibitory effect on MAO activity than did I1‐ligands (efaroxan, rilmenidine, clonidine, and moxonidine: IC50= 277, 801, 1,224, and &gt;10,000 μM). Substances with the highest inhibitory effects were BDF8082 (IC50= 1.7 μM) and 2‐(2‐benzofuranyl)‐2‐imidazoline (BFI; IC50= 4.0 μM). The enzyme is inhibited noncompetitively and is reversible, because its activity is completely or partially restored after dialysis. Agmatine, the putative endogenous ligand for IBS, also decreased MAO activity (IC50= 168 μM), whereas its precursor, l‐arginine, and its metabolite, putrescine, had no effects. In vitro inhibition of MAO and mitochondrial respiration by the IBS‐ligands tested could not be correlated, suggesting no link between the function of the inner and outer mitochondrial membrane. MAO activity in vivo was significantly reduced only by pargyline (−95%), BDF8082 (−68%), BFI (−43%), and 1‐(m‐chlorophenyl)‐biguanide (−28%). Catecholamine content of livers obtained from animals treated with different IBS‐ligands was consequently increased. In conclusion, the strong inhibitory effects of I2 selective imidazoline ligands confirm the existence of I2‐BS as a regulatory site on MAO.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>10415932</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09376.x</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0077-8923
ispartof Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1999-06, Vol.881 (1), p.313-331
issn 0077-8923
1749-6632
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69906788
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals
subjects Animals
Binding Sites
Brain - enzymology
Catecholamines - metabolism
Guanidines - pharmacology
Imidazoles - pharmacology
Imidazoline Receptors
Kinetics
Ligands
Male
Mitochondria, Liver - drug effects
Mitochondria, Liver - metabolism
Monoamine Oxidase - metabolism
Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors - pharmacology
Myocardium - enzymology
Oxygen Consumption - drug effects
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Receptors, Drug - agonists
Receptors, Drug - physiology
Structure-Activity Relationship
title Modulation of MAO Activity by Imidazoline and Guanidine Derivatives
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T15%3A03%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modulation%20of%20MAO%20Activity%20by%20Imidazoline%20and%20Guanidine%20Derivatives&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20New%20York%20Academy%20of%20Sciences&rft.au=RAASCH,%20W.&rft.date=1999-06&rft.volume=881&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=313&rft.epage=331&rft.pages=313-331&rft.issn=0077-8923&rft.eissn=1749-6632&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09376.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69906788%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69906788&rft_id=info:pmid/10415932&rfr_iscdi=true