Routine preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is not necessary prior to sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer
Background: This prospective study was performed to ascertain the added benefit of lymphoscintigraphy to a standard method of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer. Methods: Patients with invasive breast cancer were injected with 99mTc sulfur colloid prior to se...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of surgery 1999-06, Vol.177 (6), p.445-449 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 449 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 445 |
container_title | The American journal of surgery |
container_volume | 177 |
creator | Burak, William E Walker, Michael J Yee, Lisa D Kim, Julian A Saha, Sanjoy Hinkle, George Olsen, John O Pozderac, Rodney Farrar, William B |
description | Background: This prospective study was performed to ascertain the added benefit of lymphoscintigraphy to a standard method of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer.
Methods: Patients with invasive breast cancer were injected with 99mTc sulfur colloid prior to sentinel node biopsy; preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was then performed in half of the patient population.
Results: Sentinel node identification was possible in 45 of 50 patients (90%). All 14 patients (31%) with axillary nodal metastases had at least one histologically positive sentinel node (0% false negative rate). Lymphoscintigraphy revealed sentinel nodes in 17 of the 24 patients (70.8%) imaged. All 17 of these patients had one or more axillary sentinel nodes identified using intraoperative lymphatic mapping. In addition, 5 of 7 patients with a negative preoperative lymphoscintogram had an axillary sentinel lymph node(s) identified intraoperatively. None of the tumors showed drainage to the internal mammary lymph node chain by lymphoscintigraphy despite the fact that there were 5 patients with inner quadrant tumors. There was no significant advantage with respect to sentinel lymph node localization (91.7% versus 88.5%, P = not significant) or false negative rate (0%, both groups, P = not significant) in the group undergoing preoperative lymphoscintigraphy when compared with the patients in whom lymphoscintigraphy was not performed.
Conclusions: Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy adds little additional information to intraoperative lymphatic mapping, and its routine use is not justified. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00088-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69902854</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002961099000884</els_id><sourcerecordid>2847439873</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-70133027e7277c7f3d7e2d32cb7c857c04bddd3ca827a989f64bc0b9dc8876c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVuLFDEQhYMo7uzqT1ACyqIPrUkn00meZFm8LCwIXp5DOql2svR02iS9MP9-a3YGFV_2qSjqq0PVOYS84OwdZ7x7_50x1jam4-yNMW-x0bqRj8iKa2UarrV4TFZ_kBNyWsoNtpxL8ZSccCa57Axbkc23tNQ4AZ0zpBmyq_EW6LjbzptUfJxq_JXdvNnRWOiUKp3AQyku73AhpkxrogWmvcKI8wC0j2kuOzrgrM_gSqXeTR7yM_JkcGOB58d6Rn5--vjj8ktz_fXz1eXFdeMl17VRjAvBWgWqVcqrQQQFbRCt75XXa-WZ7EMIwjvdKme0GTrZe9ab4LVWnWfijJwfdOecfi9Qqt3G4mEc3QRpKbYzhrV6LRF89R94k5Y84W221VJJYbQSSK0PlM-plAyDxb-3-L_lzO6DsPdB2L3L1hh7H4Tdq788qi_9FsI_WwfnEXh9BFzxbhwyuhTLX04bPHSN2IcDBujZbYRsMRVAQ0PM4KsNKT5wyR0rx6Xl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2847439873</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Routine preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is not necessary prior to sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Burak, William E ; Walker, Michael J ; Yee, Lisa D ; Kim, Julian A ; Saha, Sanjoy ; Hinkle, George ; Olsen, John O ; Pozderac, Rodney ; Farrar, William B</creator><creatorcontrib>Burak, William E ; Walker, Michael J ; Yee, Lisa D ; Kim, Julian A ; Saha, Sanjoy ; Hinkle, George ; Olsen, John O ; Pozderac, Rodney ; Farrar, William B</creatorcontrib><description>Background: This prospective study was performed to ascertain the added benefit of lymphoscintigraphy to a standard method of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer.
Methods: Patients with invasive breast cancer were injected with 99mTc sulfur colloid prior to sentinel node biopsy; preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was then performed in half of the patient population.
Results: Sentinel node identification was possible in 45 of 50 patients (90%). All 14 patients (31%) with axillary nodal metastases had at least one histologically positive sentinel node (0% false negative rate). Lymphoscintigraphy revealed sentinel nodes in 17 of the 24 patients (70.8%) imaged. All 17 of these patients had one or more axillary sentinel nodes identified using intraoperative lymphatic mapping. In addition, 5 of 7 patients with a negative preoperative lymphoscintogram had an axillary sentinel lymph node(s) identified intraoperatively. None of the tumors showed drainage to the internal mammary lymph node chain by lymphoscintigraphy despite the fact that there were 5 patients with inner quadrant tumors. There was no significant advantage with respect to sentinel lymph node localization (91.7% versus 88.5%, P = not significant) or false negative rate (0%, both groups, P = not significant) in the group undergoing preoperative lymphoscintigraphy when compared with the patients in whom lymphoscintigraphy was not performed.
Conclusions: Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy adds little additional information to intraoperative lymphatic mapping, and its routine use is not justified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00088-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10414690</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJSUAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Axilla ; Basins ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Dissection ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Intraoperative Care ; Localization ; Lymph nodes ; Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnostic imaging ; Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology ; Lymphatic system ; Mammary gland diseases ; Mapping ; Medical sciences ; Melanoma ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Patients ; Preoperative Care ; Prospective Studies ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Radiopharmaceuticals ; Sensors ; Sulfur ; Surgery ; Technetium Tc 99m Sulfur Colloid ; Tumors ; Ultrasonic imaging</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 1999-06, Vol.177 (6), p.445-449</ispartof><rights>1999 Excerpta Medica Inc.</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>1999. Excerpta Medica Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-70133027e7277c7f3d7e2d32cb7c857c04bddd3ca827a989f64bc0b9dc8876c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-70133027e7277c7f3d7e2d32cb7c857c04bddd3ca827a989f64bc0b9dc8876c03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2847439873?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3554,27933,27934,46004,64394,64396,64398,72478</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1899905$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10414690$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burak, William E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yee, Lisa D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Julian A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saha, Sanjoy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinkle, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsen, John O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pozderac, Rodney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrar, William B</creatorcontrib><title>Routine preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is not necessary prior to sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>Background: This prospective study was performed to ascertain the added benefit of lymphoscintigraphy to a standard method of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer.
Methods: Patients with invasive breast cancer were injected with 99mTc sulfur colloid prior to sentinel node biopsy; preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was then performed in half of the patient population.
Results: Sentinel node identification was possible in 45 of 50 patients (90%). All 14 patients (31%) with axillary nodal metastases had at least one histologically positive sentinel node (0% false negative rate). Lymphoscintigraphy revealed sentinel nodes in 17 of the 24 patients (70.8%) imaged. All 17 of these patients had one or more axillary sentinel nodes identified using intraoperative lymphatic mapping. In addition, 5 of 7 patients with a negative preoperative lymphoscintogram had an axillary sentinel lymph node(s) identified intraoperatively. None of the tumors showed drainage to the internal mammary lymph node chain by lymphoscintigraphy despite the fact that there were 5 patients with inner quadrant tumors. There was no significant advantage with respect to sentinel lymph node localization (91.7% versus 88.5%, P = not significant) or false negative rate (0%, both groups, P = not significant) in the group undergoing preoperative lymphoscintigraphy when compared with the patients in whom lymphoscintigraphy was not performed.
Conclusions: Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy adds little additional information to intraoperative lymphatic mapping, and its routine use is not justified.</description><subject>Axilla</subject><subject>Basins</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraoperative Care</subject><subject>Localization</subject><subject>Lymph nodes</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Melanoma</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Preoperative Care</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Technetium Tc 99m Sulfur Colloid</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVuLFDEQhYMo7uzqT1ACyqIPrUkn00meZFm8LCwIXp5DOql2svR02iS9MP9-a3YGFV_2qSjqq0PVOYS84OwdZ7x7_50x1jam4-yNMW-x0bqRj8iKa2UarrV4TFZ_kBNyWsoNtpxL8ZSccCa57Axbkc23tNQ4AZ0zpBmyq_EW6LjbzptUfJxq_JXdvNnRWOiUKp3AQyku73AhpkxrogWmvcKI8wC0j2kuOzrgrM_gSqXeTR7yM_JkcGOB58d6Rn5--vjj8ktz_fXz1eXFdeMl17VRjAvBWgWqVcqrQQQFbRCt75XXa-WZ7EMIwjvdKme0GTrZe9ab4LVWnWfijJwfdOecfi9Qqt3G4mEc3QRpKbYzhrV6LRF89R94k5Y84W221VJJYbQSSK0PlM-plAyDxb-3-L_lzO6DsPdB2L3L1hh7H4Tdq788qi_9FsI_WwfnEXh9BFzxbhwyuhTLX04bPHSN2IcDBujZbYRsMRVAQ0PM4KsNKT5wyR0rx6Xl</recordid><startdate>19990601</startdate><enddate>19990601</enddate><creator>Burak, William E</creator><creator>Walker, Michael J</creator><creator>Yee, Lisa D</creator><creator>Kim, Julian A</creator><creator>Saha, Sanjoy</creator><creator>Hinkle, George</creator><creator>Olsen, John O</creator><creator>Pozderac, Rodney</creator><creator>Farrar, William B</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990601</creationdate><title>Routine preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is not necessary prior to sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer</title><author>Burak, William E ; Walker, Michael J ; Yee, Lisa D ; Kim, Julian A ; Saha, Sanjoy ; Hinkle, George ; Olsen, John O ; Pozderac, Rodney ; Farrar, William B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-70133027e7277c7f3d7e2d32cb7c857c04bddd3ca827a989f64bc0b9dc8876c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Axilla</topic><topic>Basins</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraoperative Care</topic><topic>Localization</topic><topic>Lymph nodes</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Melanoma</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Preoperative Care</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Technetium Tc 99m Sulfur Colloid</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burak, William E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yee, Lisa D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Julian A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saha, Sanjoy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinkle, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsen, John O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pozderac, Rodney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrar, William B</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burak, William E</au><au>Walker, Michael J</au><au>Yee, Lisa D</au><au>Kim, Julian A</au><au>Saha, Sanjoy</au><au>Hinkle, George</au><au>Olsen, John O</au><au>Pozderac, Rodney</au><au>Farrar, William B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Routine preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is not necessary prior to sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>1999-06-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>177</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>445</spage><epage>449</epage><pages>445-449</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><coden>AJSUAB</coden><abstract>Background: This prospective study was performed to ascertain the added benefit of lymphoscintigraphy to a standard method of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer.
Methods: Patients with invasive breast cancer were injected with 99mTc sulfur colloid prior to sentinel node biopsy; preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was then performed in half of the patient population.
Results: Sentinel node identification was possible in 45 of 50 patients (90%). All 14 patients (31%) with axillary nodal metastases had at least one histologically positive sentinel node (0% false negative rate). Lymphoscintigraphy revealed sentinel nodes in 17 of the 24 patients (70.8%) imaged. All 17 of these patients had one or more axillary sentinel nodes identified using intraoperative lymphatic mapping. In addition, 5 of 7 patients with a negative preoperative lymphoscintogram had an axillary sentinel lymph node(s) identified intraoperatively. None of the tumors showed drainage to the internal mammary lymph node chain by lymphoscintigraphy despite the fact that there were 5 patients with inner quadrant tumors. There was no significant advantage with respect to sentinel lymph node localization (91.7% versus 88.5%, P = not significant) or false negative rate (0%, both groups, P = not significant) in the group undergoing preoperative lymphoscintigraphy when compared with the patients in whom lymphoscintigraphy was not performed.
Conclusions: Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy adds little additional information to intraoperative lymphatic mapping, and its routine use is not justified.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10414690</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00088-4</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9610 |
ispartof | The American journal of surgery, 1999-06, Vol.177 (6), p.445-449 |
issn | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69902854 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Axilla Basins Biological and medical sciences Biopsy Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Breast Neoplasms - pathology Breast Neoplasms - surgery Dissection Female Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Intraoperative Care Localization Lymph nodes Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging Lymph Nodes - pathology Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnostic imaging Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology Lymphatic system Mammary gland diseases Mapping Medical sciences Melanoma Metastases Metastasis Patients Preoperative Care Prospective Studies Radionuclide Imaging Radiopharmaceuticals Sensors Sulfur Surgery Technetium Tc 99m Sulfur Colloid Tumors Ultrasonic imaging |
title | Routine preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is not necessary prior to sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T12%3A42%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Routine%20preoperative%20lymphoscintigraphy%20is%20not%20necessary%20prior%20to%20sentinel%20node%20biopsy%20for%20breast%20cancer&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Burak,%20William%20E&rft.date=1999-06-01&rft.volume=177&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=445&rft.epage=449&rft.pages=445-449&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft.coden=AJSUAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00088-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2847439873%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2847439873&rft_id=info:pmid/10414690&rft_els_id=S0002961099000884&rfr_iscdi=true |