Validity and Usefulness of the Wisconsin Manual for Assessing Psychotic-like Experiences
The Wisconsin Manual for Assessing Psychotic-like Experiences is an interview-based assessment system for rating psychotic and psychotic-like symptoms on a continuum of deviancy from normal to grossly psychotic. The original manual contained six scales, assessing thought transmission, passivity expe...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Schizophrenia bulletin 1999-01, Vol.25 (2), p.363-375 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 375 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 363 |
| container_title | Schizophrenia bulletin |
| container_volume | 25 |
| creator | Kwapil, Thomas R. Chapman, Loren J. Chapman, Jean |
| description | The Wisconsin Manual for
Assessing Psychotic-like Experiences is an interview-based assessment system for rating
psychotic and psychotic-like symptoms on a continuum of deviancy from normal to grossly
psychotic. The original manual contained six scales, assessing thought transmission, passivity
experiences, thought withdrawal, auditory experiences, personally relevant aberrant beliefs,
and visual experiences. A seventh scale assessing deviant olfactory experiences was
subsequently added. The rating scales have good interrater reliability when used by trained
raters. Cross-sectional studies indicated that the frequency and deviancy of psychotic-like
experiences are elevated among college students who were identified, hypothetically, as
psychosis prone by other criteria. Psychotic-like experiences of moderate deviancy in college
students successfully predicted the development of psychotic illness and poorer overall
adjustment 10 years later. The manual is useful for identifying psychosis-prone individuals and
is recommended for use in linkage and treatment outcome studies. The present article provides
an interview schedule for collecting information required for rating psychotic-like
experiences. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033384 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69901116</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>42640190</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a466t-f18e77f726ec081900d7c07f2a0b69a25ecc2f3befa53b6d1dd089f36148e333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUuP1DAQhC0EYoeFv4AsJLigDH4kdnLgsFotD2kRHJbHzXKcNuPF42TdibTDr8eQQQIkTn35uqq7ipCnnG056-SL8daPebgel5xsxC26Xb_ErWVSyra-QzZc103FNeN3yYY1raq04vUJeYB4zRivOyXukxPOaq601Bvy5ZONYQjzgdo00I8IfokJEOno6bwD-jmgGxOGRN_ZtNhIizs9QyxISF_pBzy43TgHV8XwDejF7QQ5QHKAD8k9Xw6ER8d5Sq5eXVydv6ku379-e352WdlaqbnyvAWtvRYKHGt5x9igHdNeWNarzooGnBNe9uBtI3s18GFgbedleaqF8vMpebbKTnm8WQBnsy8XQ4w2wbigUV3HOOeqgE_-AX9naIpWzRr5S-2_kBCyaWrJRIFerpDLI2IGb6Yc9jYfDGfmZ0fm747M2pE5dlT2Hx9Nln4Pwx_baykFeL4CdrJmKgnbXBKOgG7JGdJs8HtvRGOEkUrKHwPipRE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614405333</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity and Usefulness of the Wisconsin Manual for Assessing Psychotic-like Experiences</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kwapil, Thomas R. ; Chapman, Loren J. ; Chapman, Jean</creator><creatorcontrib>Kwapil, Thomas R. ; Chapman, Loren J. ; Chapman, Jean</creatorcontrib><description>The Wisconsin Manual for
Assessing Psychotic-like Experiences is an interview-based assessment system for rating
psychotic and psychotic-like symptoms on a continuum of deviancy from normal to grossly
psychotic. The original manual contained six scales, assessing thought transmission, passivity
experiences, thought withdrawal, auditory experiences, personally relevant aberrant beliefs,
and visual experiences. A seventh scale assessing deviant olfactory experiences was
subsequently added. The rating scales have good interrater reliability when used by trained
raters. Cross-sectional studies indicated that the frequency and deviancy of psychotic-like
experiences are elevated among college students who were identified, hypothetically, as
psychosis prone by other criteria. Psychotic-like experiences of moderate deviancy in college
students successfully predicted the development of psychotic illness and poorer overall
adjustment 10 years later. The manual is useful for identifying psychosis-prone individuals and
is recommended for use in linkage and treatment outcome studies. The present article provides
an interview schedule for collecting information required for rating psychotic-like
experiences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0586-7614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-1701</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033384</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10416737</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Institute of Mental Health</publisher><subject>Delusions - diagnosis ; Delusions - psychology ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hallucinations - diagnosis ; Hallucinations - psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics & numerical data ; Psychiatric Symptoms ; Psychodiagnosis ; Psychometrics ; Psychosis ; Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis ; Psychotic Disorders - psychology ; Rating Scales ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk Assessment ; Schizophrenia - diagnosis ; Schizophrenic Psychology ; Schizotypal Personality Disorder - diagnosis ; Schizotypal Personality Disorder - psychology ; Students - psychology ; Test Construction ; Test Validity</subject><ispartof>Schizophrenia bulletin, 1999-01, Vol.25 (2), p.363-375</ispartof><rights>Copyright Superintendent of Documents 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a466t-f18e77f726ec081900d7c07f2a0b69a25ecc2f3befa53b6d1dd089f36148e333</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10416737$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kwapil, Thomas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Loren J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Jean</creatorcontrib><title>Validity and Usefulness of the Wisconsin Manual for Assessing Psychotic-like Experiences</title><title>Schizophrenia bulletin</title><addtitle>Schizophr Bull</addtitle><description>The Wisconsin Manual for
Assessing Psychotic-like Experiences is an interview-based assessment system for rating
psychotic and psychotic-like symptoms on a continuum of deviancy from normal to grossly
psychotic. The original manual contained six scales, assessing thought transmission, passivity
experiences, thought withdrawal, auditory experiences, personally relevant aberrant beliefs,
and visual experiences. A seventh scale assessing deviant olfactory experiences was
subsequently added. The rating scales have good interrater reliability when used by trained
raters. Cross-sectional studies indicated that the frequency and deviancy of psychotic-like
experiences are elevated among college students who were identified, hypothetically, as
psychosis prone by other criteria. Psychotic-like experiences of moderate deviancy in college
students successfully predicted the development of psychotic illness and poorer overall
adjustment 10 years later. The manual is useful for identifying psychosis-prone individuals and
is recommended for use in linkage and treatment outcome studies. The present article provides
an interview schedule for collecting information required for rating psychotic-like
experiences.</description><subject>Delusions - diagnosis</subject><subject>Delusions - psychology</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hallucinations - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hallucinations - psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Psychiatric Symptoms</subject><subject>Psychodiagnosis</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychosis</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Rating Scales</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Schizophrenia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Schizophrenic Psychology</subject><subject>Schizotypal Personality Disorder - diagnosis</subject><subject>Schizotypal Personality Disorder - psychology</subject><subject>Students - psychology</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><issn>0586-7614</issn><issn>1745-1701</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUuP1DAQhC0EYoeFv4AsJLigDH4kdnLgsFotD2kRHJbHzXKcNuPF42TdibTDr8eQQQIkTn35uqq7ipCnnG056-SL8daPebgel5xsxC26Xb_ErWVSyra-QzZc103FNeN3yYY1raq04vUJeYB4zRivOyXukxPOaq601Bvy5ZONYQjzgdo00I8IfokJEOno6bwD-jmgGxOGRN_ZtNhIizs9QyxISF_pBzy43TgHV8XwDejF7QQ5QHKAD8k9Xw6ER8d5Sq5eXVydv6ku379-e352WdlaqbnyvAWtvRYKHGt5x9igHdNeWNarzooGnBNe9uBtI3s18GFgbedleaqF8vMpebbKTnm8WQBnsy8XQ4w2wbigUV3HOOeqgE_-AX9naIpWzRr5S-2_kBCyaWrJRIFerpDLI2IGb6Yc9jYfDGfmZ0fm747M2pE5dlT2Hx9Nln4Pwx_baykFeL4CdrJmKgnbXBKOgG7JGdJs8HtvRGOEkUrKHwPipRE</recordid><startdate>19990101</startdate><enddate>19990101</enddate><creator>Kwapil, Thomas R.</creator><creator>Chapman, Loren J.</creator><creator>Chapman, Jean</creator><general>National Institute of Mental Health</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990101</creationdate><title>Validity and Usefulness of the Wisconsin Manual for Assessing Psychotic-like Experiences</title><author>Kwapil, Thomas R. ; Chapman, Loren J. ; Chapman, Jean</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a466t-f18e77f726ec081900d7c07f2a0b69a25ecc2f3befa53b6d1dd089f36148e333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Delusions - diagnosis</topic><topic>Delusions - psychology</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hallucinations - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hallucinations - psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Psychiatric Symptoms</topic><topic>Psychodiagnosis</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychosis</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Rating Scales</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Schizophrenia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Schizophrenic Psychology</topic><topic>Schizotypal Personality Disorder - diagnosis</topic><topic>Schizotypal Personality Disorder - psychology</topic><topic>Students - psychology</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kwapil, Thomas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Loren J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Jean</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Schizophrenia bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kwapil, Thomas R.</au><au>Chapman, Loren J.</au><au>Chapman, Jean</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validity and Usefulness of the Wisconsin Manual for Assessing Psychotic-like Experiences</atitle><jtitle>Schizophrenia bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Schizophr Bull</addtitle><date>1999-01-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>363</spage><epage>375</epage><pages>363-375</pages><issn>0586-7614</issn><eissn>1745-1701</eissn><abstract>The Wisconsin Manual for
Assessing Psychotic-like Experiences is an interview-based assessment system for rating
psychotic and psychotic-like symptoms on a continuum of deviancy from normal to grossly
psychotic. The original manual contained six scales, assessing thought transmission, passivity
experiences, thought withdrawal, auditory experiences, personally relevant aberrant beliefs,
and visual experiences. A seventh scale assessing deviant olfactory experiences was
subsequently added. The rating scales have good interrater reliability when used by trained
raters. Cross-sectional studies indicated that the frequency and deviancy of psychotic-like
experiences are elevated among college students who were identified, hypothetically, as
psychosis prone by other criteria. Psychotic-like experiences of moderate deviancy in college
students successfully predicted the development of psychotic illness and poorer overall
adjustment 10 years later. The manual is useful for identifying psychosis-prone individuals and
is recommended for use in linkage and treatment outcome studies. The present article provides
an interview schedule for collecting information required for rating psychotic-like
experiences.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Institute of Mental Health</pub><pmid>10416737</pmid><doi>10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033384</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0586-7614 |
| ispartof | Schizophrenia bulletin, 1999-01, Vol.25 (2), p.363-375 |
| issn | 0586-7614 1745-1701 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69901116 |
| source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Delusions - diagnosis Delusions - psychology Follow-Up Studies Hallucinations - diagnosis Hallucinations - psychology Human Humans Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics & numerical data Psychiatric Symptoms Psychodiagnosis Psychometrics Psychosis Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis Psychotic Disorders - psychology Rating Scales Reproducibility of Results Risk Assessment Schizophrenia - diagnosis Schizophrenic Psychology Schizotypal Personality Disorder - diagnosis Schizotypal Personality Disorder - psychology Students - psychology Test Construction Test Validity |
| title | Validity and Usefulness of the Wisconsin Manual for Assessing Psychotic-like Experiences |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T01%3A54%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity%20and%20Usefulness%20of%20the%20Wisconsin%20Manual%20for%20Assessing%20Psychotic-like%20Experiences&rft.jtitle=Schizophrenia%20bulletin&rft.au=Kwapil,%20Thomas%20R.&rft.date=1999-01-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=363&rft.epage=375&rft.pages=363-375&rft.issn=0586-7614&rft.eissn=1745-1701&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033384&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E42640190%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614405333&rft_id=info:pmid/10416737&rfr_iscdi=true |