Effects of Common Laser Treatments on Hyaluronic Acid Fillers in a Porcine Model

Injectable hyaluronic acid fillers (HAFs) and laser/light procedures have become increasingly popular for noninvasive facial rejuvenation in many cosmetic practices. However, the effect of laser/light treatments on HAFs is unknown. Our objective was to examine the effect of laser/light treatments on...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aesthetic surgery journal 2008-09, Vol.28 (5), p.503-511
Hauptverfasser: Farkas, Jordan P., Richardson, James A., Brown, Spencer, Hoopman, John E., Kenkel, Jeffrey M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 511
container_issue 5
container_start_page 503
container_title Aesthetic surgery journal
container_volume 28
creator Farkas, Jordan P.
Richardson, James A.
Brown, Spencer
Hoopman, John E.
Kenkel, Jeffrey M.
description Injectable hyaluronic acid fillers (HAFs) and laser/light procedures have become increasingly popular for noninvasive facial rejuvenation in many cosmetic practices. However, the effect of laser/light treatments on HAFs is unknown. Our objective was to examine the effect of laser/light treatments on HAFs in a porcine model. The abdomens of 6 Yorkshire pigs were injected with 3 different HAFs: Restylane (Medicis, Scottsdale, AZ), Perlane (Medicis), and Juvéderm (Allergan, Santa Barbara, CA). Two weeks after injection, the injection sites were treated with 1 of 7 common laser/light ablative or nonablative devices. Following laser treatment, 8-mm punch biopsies were collected from the treated tissue and fixed for histopathologic evaluation. Sections were stained with hematoxylin–eosin and alcian blue stains for identification of the preinjected HAF. The filler was identified in different areas of the dermis in different sections. The Sciton intense pulsed 560 nm filter (Sciton, Palo Alto, CA), the Sciton Nd: YAG, Lux1540 (Palomar Medical Technologies, Burlington, MA), or ActiveFX (Lumenis, Yokneum, Israel) treatments showed no sign of interaction with superficial or deep dermal filler. No evidence of morphologic changes to the filler or the surrounding tissues was observed. Obvious interaction between the HAFs and the laser injury was demonstrated in sections treated with the deep ablative systems fractional erbium 2940 (Profractional; Sciton) and DeepFX CO 2, (Lumenis). However, no uncharacteristic tissue injury or morphologic change in the filler was appreciated in any of the preinjected specimens. Injected HAFs were unaffected by the nonablative laser/light and superficial ablative treatments. The more aggressive deeper laser treatments demonstrated laser/filler interaction and may have a clinical effect on the longevity of the filler and/or efficacy of laser treatments. Novel ablative fractional lasers have the capability of deep dermal penetration, and this should be taken into consideration when planning to use them in combination with soft tissue fillers for noninvasive facial rejuvenation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.asj.2008.07.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69890730</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1090820X08002331</els_id><sourcerecordid>69890730</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3090-5617fba4389c35278ae2b422d7eb51f121e72185649bd126ff2620ca9bffcccf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMotlY_gBfJyVvXSdL9h6dSWitU7KFCbyGbnUDK7qYmXaHf3pQWvHmagXnv8eZHyCODhAHLXnaJCruEAxQJ5AkwuCJDlvJ8LARsr-MOJYwLDtsBuQthBwClyCa3ZMBKKESaw5Cs58agPgTqDJ25tnUdXamAnm48qkOL3enU0eVRNb13ndV0qm1NF7Zp0AdqO6ro2nltO6QfrsbmntwY1QR8uMwR-VrMN7PlePX59j6brsZanFqlGctNpSaiKLWIlQuFvJpwXudYpcwwzjDnrEizSVnVjGfG8IyDVmVljNbaiBF5PufuvfvuMRxka4PGplEduj7IrCxKyAVEITsLtXcheDRy722r_FEykCeMcicjRnnCKCGXEWP0PF3C-6rF-s9x4RYFr2cBxhd_LHoZtMVOY219xClrZ_-J_wV2SIH8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69890730</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Common Laser Treatments on Hyaluronic Acid Fillers in a Porcine Model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Farkas, Jordan P. ; Richardson, James A. ; Brown, Spencer ; Hoopman, John E. ; Kenkel, Jeffrey M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Farkas, Jordan P. ; Richardson, James A. ; Brown, Spencer ; Hoopman, John E. ; Kenkel, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><description>Injectable hyaluronic acid fillers (HAFs) and laser/light procedures have become increasingly popular for noninvasive facial rejuvenation in many cosmetic practices. However, the effect of laser/light treatments on HAFs is unknown. Our objective was to examine the effect of laser/light treatments on HAFs in a porcine model. The abdomens of 6 Yorkshire pigs were injected with 3 different HAFs: Restylane (Medicis, Scottsdale, AZ), Perlane (Medicis), and Juvéderm (Allergan, Santa Barbara, CA). Two weeks after injection, the injection sites were treated with 1 of 7 common laser/light ablative or nonablative devices. Following laser treatment, 8-mm punch biopsies were collected from the treated tissue and fixed for histopathologic evaluation. Sections were stained with hematoxylin–eosin and alcian blue stains for identification of the preinjected HAF. The filler was identified in different areas of the dermis in different sections. The Sciton intense pulsed 560 nm filter (Sciton, Palo Alto, CA), the Sciton Nd: YAG, Lux1540 (Palomar Medical Technologies, Burlington, MA), or ActiveFX (Lumenis, Yokneum, Israel) treatments showed no sign of interaction with superficial or deep dermal filler. No evidence of morphologic changes to the filler or the surrounding tissues was observed. Obvious interaction between the HAFs and the laser injury was demonstrated in sections treated with the deep ablative systems fractional erbium 2940 (Profractional; Sciton) and DeepFX CO 2, (Lumenis). However, no uncharacteristic tissue injury or morphologic change in the filler was appreciated in any of the preinjected specimens. Injected HAFs were unaffected by the nonablative laser/light and superficial ablative treatments. The more aggressive deeper laser treatments demonstrated laser/filler interaction and may have a clinical effect on the longevity of the filler and/or efficacy of laser treatments. Novel ablative fractional lasers have the capability of deep dermal penetration, and this should be taken into consideration when planning to use them in combination with soft tissue fillers for noninvasive facial rejuvenation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-820X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-330X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.asj.2008.07.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19083570</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cosmetic Techniques ; Face ; Female ; Hyaluronic Acid - administration &amp; dosage ; Injections ; Laser Therapy ; Models, Animal ; Rejuvenation ; Skin Aging ; Swine</subject><ispartof>Aesthetic surgery journal, 2008-09, Vol.28 (5), p.503-511</ispartof><rights>2008 American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3090-5617fba4389c35278ae2b422d7eb51f121e72185649bd126ff2620ca9bffcccf3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19083570$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Farkas, Jordan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Spencer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoopman, John E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenkel, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Common Laser Treatments on Hyaluronic Acid Fillers in a Porcine Model</title><title>Aesthetic surgery journal</title><addtitle>Aesthet Surg J</addtitle><description>Injectable hyaluronic acid fillers (HAFs) and laser/light procedures have become increasingly popular for noninvasive facial rejuvenation in many cosmetic practices. However, the effect of laser/light treatments on HAFs is unknown. Our objective was to examine the effect of laser/light treatments on HAFs in a porcine model. The abdomens of 6 Yorkshire pigs were injected with 3 different HAFs: Restylane (Medicis, Scottsdale, AZ), Perlane (Medicis), and Juvéderm (Allergan, Santa Barbara, CA). Two weeks after injection, the injection sites were treated with 1 of 7 common laser/light ablative or nonablative devices. Following laser treatment, 8-mm punch biopsies were collected from the treated tissue and fixed for histopathologic evaluation. Sections were stained with hematoxylin–eosin and alcian blue stains for identification of the preinjected HAF. The filler was identified in different areas of the dermis in different sections. The Sciton intense pulsed 560 nm filter (Sciton, Palo Alto, CA), the Sciton Nd: YAG, Lux1540 (Palomar Medical Technologies, Burlington, MA), or ActiveFX (Lumenis, Yokneum, Israel) treatments showed no sign of interaction with superficial or deep dermal filler. No evidence of morphologic changes to the filler or the surrounding tissues was observed. Obvious interaction between the HAFs and the laser injury was demonstrated in sections treated with the deep ablative systems fractional erbium 2940 (Profractional; Sciton) and DeepFX CO 2, (Lumenis). However, no uncharacteristic tissue injury or morphologic change in the filler was appreciated in any of the preinjected specimens. Injected HAFs were unaffected by the nonablative laser/light and superficial ablative treatments. The more aggressive deeper laser treatments demonstrated laser/filler interaction and may have a clinical effect on the longevity of the filler and/or efficacy of laser treatments. Novel ablative fractional lasers have the capability of deep dermal penetration, and this should be taken into consideration when planning to use them in combination with soft tissue fillers for noninvasive facial rejuvenation.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cosmetic Techniques</subject><subject>Face</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hyaluronic Acid - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Injections</subject><subject>Laser Therapy</subject><subject>Models, Animal</subject><subject>Rejuvenation</subject><subject>Skin Aging</subject><subject>Swine</subject><issn>1090-820X</issn><issn>1527-330X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMotlY_gBfJyVvXSdL9h6dSWitU7KFCbyGbnUDK7qYmXaHf3pQWvHmagXnv8eZHyCODhAHLXnaJCruEAxQJ5AkwuCJDlvJ8LARsr-MOJYwLDtsBuQthBwClyCa3ZMBKKESaw5Cs58agPgTqDJ25tnUdXamAnm48qkOL3enU0eVRNb13ndV0qm1NF7Zp0AdqO6ro2nltO6QfrsbmntwY1QR8uMwR-VrMN7PlePX59j6brsZanFqlGctNpSaiKLWIlQuFvJpwXudYpcwwzjDnrEizSVnVjGfG8IyDVmVljNbaiBF5PufuvfvuMRxka4PGplEduj7IrCxKyAVEITsLtXcheDRy722r_FEykCeMcicjRnnCKCGXEWP0PF3C-6rF-s9x4RYFr2cBxhd_LHoZtMVOY219xClrZ_-J_wV2SIH8</recordid><startdate>200809</startdate><enddate>200809</enddate><creator>Farkas, Jordan P.</creator><creator>Richardson, James A.</creator><creator>Brown, Spencer</creator><creator>Hoopman, John E.</creator><creator>Kenkel, Jeffrey M.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200809</creationdate><title>Effects of Common Laser Treatments on Hyaluronic Acid Fillers in a Porcine Model</title><author>Farkas, Jordan P. ; Richardson, James A. ; Brown, Spencer ; Hoopman, John E. ; Kenkel, Jeffrey M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3090-5617fba4389c35278ae2b422d7eb51f121e72185649bd126ff2620ca9bffcccf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cosmetic Techniques</topic><topic>Face</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hyaluronic Acid - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Injections</topic><topic>Laser Therapy</topic><topic>Models, Animal</topic><topic>Rejuvenation</topic><topic>Skin Aging</topic><topic>Swine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farkas, Jordan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Spencer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoopman, John E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenkel, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Aesthetic surgery journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farkas, Jordan P.</au><au>Richardson, James A.</au><au>Brown, Spencer</au><au>Hoopman, John E.</au><au>Kenkel, Jeffrey M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Common Laser Treatments on Hyaluronic Acid Fillers in a Porcine Model</atitle><jtitle>Aesthetic surgery journal</jtitle><addtitle>Aesthet Surg J</addtitle><date>2008-09</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>503</spage><epage>511</epage><pages>503-511</pages><issn>1090-820X</issn><eissn>1527-330X</eissn><abstract>Injectable hyaluronic acid fillers (HAFs) and laser/light procedures have become increasingly popular for noninvasive facial rejuvenation in many cosmetic practices. However, the effect of laser/light treatments on HAFs is unknown. Our objective was to examine the effect of laser/light treatments on HAFs in a porcine model. The abdomens of 6 Yorkshire pigs were injected with 3 different HAFs: Restylane (Medicis, Scottsdale, AZ), Perlane (Medicis), and Juvéderm (Allergan, Santa Barbara, CA). Two weeks after injection, the injection sites were treated with 1 of 7 common laser/light ablative or nonablative devices. Following laser treatment, 8-mm punch biopsies were collected from the treated tissue and fixed for histopathologic evaluation. Sections were stained with hematoxylin–eosin and alcian blue stains for identification of the preinjected HAF. The filler was identified in different areas of the dermis in different sections. The Sciton intense pulsed 560 nm filter (Sciton, Palo Alto, CA), the Sciton Nd: YAG, Lux1540 (Palomar Medical Technologies, Burlington, MA), or ActiveFX (Lumenis, Yokneum, Israel) treatments showed no sign of interaction with superficial or deep dermal filler. No evidence of morphologic changes to the filler or the surrounding tissues was observed. Obvious interaction between the HAFs and the laser injury was demonstrated in sections treated with the deep ablative systems fractional erbium 2940 (Profractional; Sciton) and DeepFX CO 2, (Lumenis). However, no uncharacteristic tissue injury or morphologic change in the filler was appreciated in any of the preinjected specimens. Injected HAFs were unaffected by the nonablative laser/light and superficial ablative treatments. The more aggressive deeper laser treatments demonstrated laser/filler interaction and may have a clinical effect on the longevity of the filler and/or efficacy of laser treatments. Novel ablative fractional lasers have the capability of deep dermal penetration, and this should be taken into consideration when planning to use them in combination with soft tissue fillers for noninvasive facial rejuvenation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>19083570</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.asj.2008.07.010</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1090-820X
ispartof Aesthetic surgery journal, 2008-09, Vol.28 (5), p.503-511
issn 1090-820X
1527-330X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69890730
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animals
Cosmetic Techniques
Face
Female
Hyaluronic Acid - administration & dosage
Injections
Laser Therapy
Models, Animal
Rejuvenation
Skin Aging
Swine
title Effects of Common Laser Treatments on Hyaluronic Acid Fillers in a Porcine Model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A36%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Common%20Laser%20Treatments%20on%20Hyaluronic%20Acid%20Fillers%20in%20a%20Porcine%20Model&rft.jtitle=Aesthetic%20surgery%20journal&rft.au=Farkas,%20Jordan%20P.&rft.date=2008-09&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=503&rft.epage=511&rft.pages=503-511&rft.issn=1090-820X&rft.eissn=1527-330X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.asj.2008.07.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69890730%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69890730&rft_id=info:pmid/19083570&rft_els_id=S1090820X08002331&rfr_iscdi=true