Nematode control practices and anthelmintic resistance in dairy calves in the south west of England

A postal survey of worming practices on West Country dairy farms was undertaken and farmers were requested to send faecal samples for nematode egg counts. The majority of the farmers who responded had a nematode control policy which was based on a mixture of anthelmintics and pasture rotation. Sixty...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary record 1999-06, Vol.144 (24), p.659-661
Hauptverfasser: Stafford, K., Coles, G. C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 661
container_issue 24
container_start_page 659
container_title Veterinary record
container_volume 144
creator Stafford, K.
Coles, G. C.
description A postal survey of worming practices on West Country dairy farms was undertaken and farmers were requested to send faecal samples for nematode egg counts. The majority of the farmers who responded had a nematode control policy which was based on a mixture of anthelmintics and pasture rotation. Sixty-five per cent tumed out calves on to the same paddock each year and 57 per cent treated their stock with anthelmintics during the second year. Ninety farms submitted samples for analysis but only 16 samples contained sufficient eggs to justify repeat egg counts and only eight of these produced enough eggs for in vitro tests. The small number of positive samples, even into the latter part of the year suggests a heavy use of anthelmintics with relatively clean pasture. One Somerset farm had larvae which developed in high concentrations of ivermectin, and eggs were still being passed after two treatments with ivermectin at the manufacturer's recommended dose seven days apart. Of 100 male nematodes isolated from two of the calves, 88 were Cooperia species and 12 were Nematodirus species. A controlled trial with this isolate in eight Friesian male calves showed a 44 per cent reduction in egg counts at day 7 but no significant reduction in worm burden postmortem. This is the first reported case of ivermectin-resistant Cooperia species in cattle in the United Kingdom.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/vr.144.24.659
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69890457</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3976652041</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4212-7e77c99e66332676799e8d0693caec43cf198e956987f09b980f60d0df2848693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFPHCEUxomx0a322GslMWl62fXBMDAcq1nbJsYmrfZKWIZRNjPDFmbW7H_ftxkPjQc9EB7k97738UHIRwYLxgp5sU0LJsSCi4Us9QGZcRB8rqSCQzKDfS00wDF5n_MagOuy4EfkmIEAIaGYEXfrOzvE2lMX-yHFlm6SdUNwPlPb17iGR992occrmnwOebC98zT0tLYh7aiz7RZZPCNIcxyHR_rk80BjQ5f9Q4sip-RdY9vsPzzvJ-T-enl39X1-8_Pbj6uvN_OV4AxNe6Wc1l7KouASn4B1VYPUhbPeicI1TFdel1JXqgG90hU0EmqoG16JCrET8nnS3aT4d0QPpgvZ-RY9-Dhmg40aRKkQPH8BruOYevRmmFJMVUyWAqn5RLkUc06-MZsUOpt2hoHZZ2-2yWD2hguD2SP_6Vl1XHW-_o-ewkZATsBTaP3udTXzZ3n36_Kaa5AcG8-mxsZGYx9SyOb-NwdW7D-0ErCf_WUiVt36DZv_AJNopMM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1771781654</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nematode control practices and anthelmintic resistance in dairy calves in the south west of England</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Stafford, K. ; Coles, G. C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stafford, K. ; Coles, G. C.</creatorcontrib><description>A postal survey of worming practices on West Country dairy farms was undertaken and farmers were requested to send faecal samples for nematode egg counts. The majority of the farmers who responded had a nematode control policy which was based on a mixture of anthelmintics and pasture rotation. Sixty-five per cent tumed out calves on to the same paddock each year and 57 per cent treated their stock with anthelmintics during the second year. Ninety farms submitted samples for analysis but only 16 samples contained sufficient eggs to justify repeat egg counts and only eight of these produced enough eggs for in vitro tests. The small number of positive samples, even into the latter part of the year suggests a heavy use of anthelmintics with relatively clean pasture. One Somerset farm had larvae which developed in high concentrations of ivermectin, and eggs were still being passed after two treatments with ivermectin at the manufacturer's recommended dose seven days apart. Of 100 male nematodes isolated from two of the calves, 88 were Cooperia species and 12 were Nematodirus species. A controlled trial with this isolate in eight Friesian male calves showed a 44 per cent reduction in egg counts at day 7 but no significant reduction in worm burden postmortem. This is the first reported case of ivermectin-resistant Cooperia species in cattle in the United Kingdom.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-4900</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2042-7670</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/vr.144.24.659</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10404603</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Limited</publisher><subject>Animals ; anthelmintics ; Anthelmintics - pharmacology ; calves ; Cattle ; Cattle Diseases - prevention &amp; control ; control programs ; Cooperia ; dairy cattle ; Dairying - methods ; Data Collection ; drug resistance ; Drug Resistance - physiology ; England ; farm surveys ; feces ; Feces - parasitology ; helminth ova ; Infection Control ; Ivermectin - pharmacology ; Male ; Nematoda - isolation &amp; purification ; nematode control ; Nematode Infections - prevention &amp; control ; Nematodirus ; Parasite Egg Count ; south west england</subject><ispartof>Veterinary record, 1999-06, Vol.144 (24), p.659-661</ispartof><rights>British Veterinary Association. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>1999 British Veterinary Association</rights><rights>Copyright: 1999 British Veterinary Association. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4212-7e77c99e66332676799e8d0693caec43cf198e956987f09b980f60d0df2848693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4212-7e77c99e66332676799e8d0693caec43cf198e956987f09b980f60d0df2848693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1136%2Fvr.144.24.659$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1136%2Fvr.144.24.659$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10404603$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stafford, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coles, G. C.</creatorcontrib><title>Nematode control practices and anthelmintic resistance in dairy calves in the south west of England</title><title>Veterinary record</title><addtitle>Vet Rec</addtitle><description>A postal survey of worming practices on West Country dairy farms was undertaken and farmers were requested to send faecal samples for nematode egg counts. The majority of the farmers who responded had a nematode control policy which was based on a mixture of anthelmintics and pasture rotation. Sixty-five per cent tumed out calves on to the same paddock each year and 57 per cent treated their stock with anthelmintics during the second year. Ninety farms submitted samples for analysis but only 16 samples contained sufficient eggs to justify repeat egg counts and only eight of these produced enough eggs for in vitro tests. The small number of positive samples, even into the latter part of the year suggests a heavy use of anthelmintics with relatively clean pasture. One Somerset farm had larvae which developed in high concentrations of ivermectin, and eggs were still being passed after two treatments with ivermectin at the manufacturer's recommended dose seven days apart. Of 100 male nematodes isolated from two of the calves, 88 were Cooperia species and 12 were Nematodirus species. A controlled trial with this isolate in eight Friesian male calves showed a 44 per cent reduction in egg counts at day 7 but no significant reduction in worm burden postmortem. This is the first reported case of ivermectin-resistant Cooperia species in cattle in the United Kingdom.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>anthelmintics</subject><subject>Anthelmintics - pharmacology</subject><subject>calves</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle Diseases - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>control programs</subject><subject>Cooperia</subject><subject>dairy cattle</subject><subject>Dairying - methods</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>drug resistance</subject><subject>Drug Resistance - physiology</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>farm surveys</subject><subject>feces</subject><subject>Feces - parasitology</subject><subject>helminth ova</subject><subject>Infection Control</subject><subject>Ivermectin - pharmacology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nematoda - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>nematode control</subject><subject>Nematode Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Nematodirus</subject><subject>Parasite Egg Count</subject><subject>south west england</subject><issn>0042-4900</issn><issn>2042-7670</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFPHCEUxomx0a322GslMWl62fXBMDAcq1nbJsYmrfZKWIZRNjPDFmbW7H_ftxkPjQc9EB7k97738UHIRwYLxgp5sU0LJsSCi4Us9QGZcRB8rqSCQzKDfS00wDF5n_MagOuy4EfkmIEAIaGYEXfrOzvE2lMX-yHFlm6SdUNwPlPb17iGR992occrmnwOebC98zT0tLYh7aiz7RZZPCNIcxyHR_rk80BjQ5f9Q4sip-RdY9vsPzzvJ-T-enl39X1-8_Pbj6uvN_OV4AxNe6Wc1l7KouASn4B1VYPUhbPeicI1TFdel1JXqgG90hU0EmqoG16JCrET8nnS3aT4d0QPpgvZ-RY9-Dhmg40aRKkQPH8BruOYevRmmFJMVUyWAqn5RLkUc06-MZsUOpt2hoHZZ2-2yWD2hguD2SP_6Vl1XHW-_o-ewkZATsBTaP3udTXzZ3n36_Kaa5AcG8-mxsZGYx9SyOb-NwdW7D-0ErCf_WUiVt36DZv_AJNopMM</recordid><startdate>19990612</startdate><enddate>19990612</enddate><creator>Stafford, K.</creator><creator>Coles, G. C.</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Limited</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990612</creationdate><title>Nematode control practices and anthelmintic resistance in dairy calves in the south west of England</title><author>Stafford, K. ; Coles, G. C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b4212-7e77c99e66332676799e8d0693caec43cf198e956987f09b980f60d0df2848693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>anthelmintics</topic><topic>Anthelmintics - pharmacology</topic><topic>calves</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle Diseases - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>control programs</topic><topic>Cooperia</topic><topic>dairy cattle</topic><topic>Dairying - methods</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>drug resistance</topic><topic>Drug Resistance - physiology</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>farm surveys</topic><topic>feces</topic><topic>Feces - parasitology</topic><topic>helminth ova</topic><topic>Infection Control</topic><topic>Ivermectin - pharmacology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nematoda - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>nematode control</topic><topic>Nematode Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Nematodirus</topic><topic>Parasite Egg Count</topic><topic>south west england</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stafford, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coles, G. C.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary record</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stafford, K.</au><au>Coles, G. C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nematode control practices and anthelmintic resistance in dairy calves in the south west of England</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary record</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Rec</addtitle><date>1999-06-12</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>144</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>659</spage><epage>661</epage><pages>659-661</pages><issn>0042-4900</issn><eissn>2042-7670</eissn><abstract>A postal survey of worming practices on West Country dairy farms was undertaken and farmers were requested to send faecal samples for nematode egg counts. The majority of the farmers who responded had a nematode control policy which was based on a mixture of anthelmintics and pasture rotation. Sixty-five per cent tumed out calves on to the same paddock each year and 57 per cent treated their stock with anthelmintics during the second year. Ninety farms submitted samples for analysis but only 16 samples contained sufficient eggs to justify repeat egg counts and only eight of these produced enough eggs for in vitro tests. The small number of positive samples, even into the latter part of the year suggests a heavy use of anthelmintics with relatively clean pasture. One Somerset farm had larvae which developed in high concentrations of ivermectin, and eggs were still being passed after two treatments with ivermectin at the manufacturer's recommended dose seven days apart. Of 100 male nematodes isolated from two of the calves, 88 were Cooperia species and 12 were Nematodirus species. A controlled trial with this isolate in eight Friesian male calves showed a 44 per cent reduction in egg counts at day 7 but no significant reduction in worm burden postmortem. This is the first reported case of ivermectin-resistant Cooperia species in cattle in the United Kingdom.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Limited</pub><pmid>10404603</pmid><doi>10.1136/vr.144.24.659</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0042-4900
ispartof Veterinary record, 1999-06, Vol.144 (24), p.659-661
issn 0042-4900
2042-7670
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69890457
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Animals
anthelmintics
Anthelmintics - pharmacology
calves
Cattle
Cattle Diseases - prevention & control
control programs
Cooperia
dairy cattle
Dairying - methods
Data Collection
drug resistance
Drug Resistance - physiology
England
farm surveys
feces
Feces - parasitology
helminth ova
Infection Control
Ivermectin - pharmacology
Male
Nematoda - isolation & purification
nematode control
Nematode Infections - prevention & control
Nematodirus
Parasite Egg Count
south west england
title Nematode control practices and anthelmintic resistance in dairy calves in the south west of England
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T18%3A31%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nematode%20control%20practices%20and%20anthelmintic%20resistance%20in%20dairy%20calves%20in%20the%20south%20west%20of%20England&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20record&rft.au=Stafford,%20K.&rft.date=1999-06-12&rft.volume=144&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=659&rft.epage=661&rft.pages=659-661&rft.issn=0042-4900&rft.eissn=2042-7670&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/vr.144.24.659&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3976652041%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1771781654&rft_id=info:pmid/10404603&rfr_iscdi=true