MRI appearances of the axilla in treated breast cancer
Differentiation between recurrent axillary disease and changes due to radiotherapy or surgery has major implications for management in patients following breast cancer treatment, but clinical examination of the axilla may be difficult. This study was undertaken to correlate the MRI appearances of th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of radiology 1999-03, Vol.72 (855), p.250-257 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 257 |
---|---|
container_issue | 855 |
container_start_page | 250 |
container_title | British journal of radiology |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Potterton, A J Yuille, F Tinkler, S Chippindale, A J Wilsdon, J B Lucraft, H H Dawes, P J Coulthard, A |
description | Differentiation between recurrent axillary disease and changes due to radiotherapy or surgery has major implications for management in patients following breast cancer treatment, but clinical examination of the axilla may be difficult. This study was undertaken to correlate the MRI appearances of the axilla following breast cancer treatment with clinical outcome. 74 women with treated breast cancer were evaluated by MRI (0.5 T) and the appearances defined by consensus. Outcome was assessed by long-term clinical follow-up. 62 women had symptoms related to the axilla while 12 were scanned to stage the axilla. None of the axillary staging group had abnormal MRI appearances and none of these subsequently developed recurrence. The 62 symptomatic women were subdivided according to MRI appearances. 22 had normal axillary appearances, 18 had an axillary mass and 22 women had abnormal axillary appearances (rated mild, moderate and severe) in the absence of a mass. Normal axillary appearances on MRI excluded recurrent disease as the cause of symptoms with a specificity of 94.7% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 95.5%. The presence of an axillary mass was commonly but not exclusively due to recurrent disease (sensitivity 68.4%, specificity 88.4%, PPV 72.2%). Sensitivity for diagnosis of axillary recurrence was increased to 89.5% with a specificity of 76.7% if the criteria for recurrent disease were taken as either the presence of an axillary mass or severe axillary changes in the absence of a mass lesion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1259/bjr.72.855.10396214 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69874243</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69874243</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c251t-2fa6838a7008ebca48efc4cf5972d231dae94e2a6d9e3887750b093b386c8e3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-AkFm5S5xnpk7Syk-ChVBFNwNk8kNprRNnElB_70JbcHV4cB3DvceQq45y7nQ9q5cxdyIHLTOOZO2EFydkCk3CjIA9nlKpowxk3EBekIuUlqNVlt2TiZHfkqKl7cF9V2HPvptwETbmvZfSP1Ps1572mxpH9H3WNFy0NTTMGLxkpzVfp3w6qAz8vH48D5_zpavT4v5_TILQvM-E7UvQII3jAGWwSvAOqhQa2tEJSSvPFqFwheVRQlgjGYls7KUUATAQWfkdt_bxfZ7h6l3myYFHE7bYrtLrrBglFByAOUeDLFNKWLtuthsfPx1nLlxLjfM5Yxww1zu-P6QujnU78oNVv8yB-APZdFlfA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69874243</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MRI appearances of the axilla in treated breast cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Potterton, A J ; Yuille, F ; Tinkler, S ; Chippindale, A J ; Wilsdon, J B ; Lucraft, H H ; Dawes, P J ; Coulthard, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Potterton, A J ; Yuille, F ; Tinkler, S ; Chippindale, A J ; Wilsdon, J B ; Lucraft, H H ; Dawes, P J ; Coulthard, A</creatorcontrib><description>Differentiation between recurrent axillary disease and changes due to radiotherapy or surgery has major implications for management in patients following breast cancer treatment, but clinical examination of the axilla may be difficult. This study was undertaken to correlate the MRI appearances of the axilla following breast cancer treatment with clinical outcome. 74 women with treated breast cancer were evaluated by MRI (0.5 T) and the appearances defined by consensus. Outcome was assessed by long-term clinical follow-up. 62 women had symptoms related to the axilla while 12 were scanned to stage the axilla. None of the axillary staging group had abnormal MRI appearances and none of these subsequently developed recurrence. The 62 symptomatic women were subdivided according to MRI appearances. 22 had normal axillary appearances, 18 had an axillary mass and 22 women had abnormal axillary appearances (rated mild, moderate and severe) in the absence of a mass. Normal axillary appearances on MRI excluded recurrent disease as the cause of symptoms with a specificity of 94.7% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 95.5%. The presence of an axillary mass was commonly but not exclusively due to recurrent disease (sensitivity 68.4%, specificity 88.4%, PPV 72.2%). Sensitivity for diagnosis of axillary recurrence was increased to 89.5% with a specificity of 76.7% if the criteria for recurrent disease were taken as either the presence of an axillary mass or severe axillary changes in the absence of a mass lesion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1285</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-880X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1259/bjr.72.855.10396214</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10396214</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Axilla - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - therapy ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnosis ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Mastectomy ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Single-Blind Method</subject><ispartof>British journal of radiology, 1999-03, Vol.72 (855), p.250-257</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c251t-2fa6838a7008ebca48efc4cf5972d231dae94e2a6d9e3887750b093b386c8e3b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10396214$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Potterton, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuille, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinkler, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chippindale, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilsdon, J B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucraft, H H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawes, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coulthard, A</creatorcontrib><title>MRI appearances of the axilla in treated breast cancer</title><title>British journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><description>Differentiation between recurrent axillary disease and changes due to radiotherapy or surgery has major implications for management in patients following breast cancer treatment, but clinical examination of the axilla may be difficult. This study was undertaken to correlate the MRI appearances of the axilla following breast cancer treatment with clinical outcome. 74 women with treated breast cancer were evaluated by MRI (0.5 T) and the appearances defined by consensus. Outcome was assessed by long-term clinical follow-up. 62 women had symptoms related to the axilla while 12 were scanned to stage the axilla. None of the axillary staging group had abnormal MRI appearances and none of these subsequently developed recurrence. The 62 symptomatic women were subdivided according to MRI appearances. 22 had normal axillary appearances, 18 had an axillary mass and 22 women had abnormal axillary appearances (rated mild, moderate and severe) in the absence of a mass. Normal axillary appearances on MRI excluded recurrent disease as the cause of symptoms with a specificity of 94.7% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 95.5%. The presence of an axillary mass was commonly but not exclusively due to recurrent disease (sensitivity 68.4%, specificity 88.4%, PPV 72.2%). Sensitivity for diagnosis of axillary recurrence was increased to 89.5% with a specificity of 76.7% if the criteria for recurrent disease were taken as either the presence of an axillary mass or severe axillary changes in the absence of a mass lesion.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Axilla - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Mastectomy</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><issn>0007-1285</issn><issn>1748-880X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-AkFm5S5xnpk7Syk-ChVBFNwNk8kNprRNnElB_70JbcHV4cB3DvceQq45y7nQ9q5cxdyIHLTOOZO2EFydkCk3CjIA9nlKpowxk3EBekIuUlqNVlt2TiZHfkqKl7cF9V2HPvptwETbmvZfSP1Ps1572mxpH9H3WNFy0NTTMGLxkpzVfp3w6qAz8vH48D5_zpavT4v5_TILQvM-E7UvQII3jAGWwSvAOqhQa2tEJSSvPFqFwheVRQlgjGYls7KUUATAQWfkdt_bxfZ7h6l3myYFHE7bYrtLrrBglFByAOUeDLFNKWLtuthsfPx1nLlxLjfM5Yxww1zu-P6QujnU78oNVv8yB-APZdFlfA</recordid><startdate>19990301</startdate><enddate>19990301</enddate><creator>Potterton, A J</creator><creator>Yuille, F</creator><creator>Tinkler, S</creator><creator>Chippindale, A J</creator><creator>Wilsdon, J B</creator><creator>Lucraft, H H</creator><creator>Dawes, P J</creator><creator>Coulthard, A</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990301</creationdate><title>MRI appearances of the axilla in treated breast cancer</title><author>Potterton, A J ; Yuille, F ; Tinkler, S ; Chippindale, A J ; Wilsdon, J B ; Lucraft, H H ; Dawes, P J ; Coulthard, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c251t-2fa6838a7008ebca48efc4cf5972d231dae94e2a6d9e3887750b093b386c8e3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Axilla - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Mastectomy</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Potterton, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuille, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinkler, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chippindale, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilsdon, J B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucraft, H H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawes, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coulthard, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Potterton, A J</au><au>Yuille, F</au><au>Tinkler, S</au><au>Chippindale, A J</au><au>Wilsdon, J B</au><au>Lucraft, H H</au><au>Dawes, P J</au><au>Coulthard, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MRI appearances of the axilla in treated breast cancer</atitle><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><date>1999-03-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>855</issue><spage>250</spage><epage>257</epage><pages>250-257</pages><issn>0007-1285</issn><eissn>1748-880X</eissn><abstract>Differentiation between recurrent axillary disease and changes due to radiotherapy or surgery has major implications for management in patients following breast cancer treatment, but clinical examination of the axilla may be difficult. This study was undertaken to correlate the MRI appearances of the axilla following breast cancer treatment with clinical outcome. 74 women with treated breast cancer were evaluated by MRI (0.5 T) and the appearances defined by consensus. Outcome was assessed by long-term clinical follow-up. 62 women had symptoms related to the axilla while 12 were scanned to stage the axilla. None of the axillary staging group had abnormal MRI appearances and none of these subsequently developed recurrence. The 62 symptomatic women were subdivided according to MRI appearances. 22 had normal axillary appearances, 18 had an axillary mass and 22 women had abnormal axillary appearances (rated mild, moderate and severe) in the absence of a mass. Normal axillary appearances on MRI excluded recurrent disease as the cause of symptoms with a specificity of 94.7% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 95.5%. The presence of an axillary mass was commonly but not exclusively due to recurrent disease (sensitivity 68.4%, specificity 88.4%, PPV 72.2%). Sensitivity for diagnosis of axillary recurrence was increased to 89.5% with a specificity of 76.7% if the criteria for recurrent disease were taken as either the presence of an axillary mass or severe axillary changes in the absence of a mass lesion.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>10396214</pmid><doi>10.1259/bjr.72.855.10396214</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1285 |
ispartof | British journal of radiology, 1999-03, Vol.72 (855), p.250-257 |
issn | 0007-1285 1748-880X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69874243 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Adult Aged Axilla - pathology Breast Neoplasms - pathology Breast Neoplasms - therapy Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnosis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mastectomy Middle Aged Neoplasm Staging Predictive Value of Tests Radiotherapy, Adjuvant Sensitivity and Specificity Single-Blind Method |
title | MRI appearances of the axilla in treated breast cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T22%3A05%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MRI%20appearances%20of%20the%20axilla%20in%20treated%20breast%20cancer&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Potterton,%20A%20J&rft.date=1999-03-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=855&rft.spage=250&rft.epage=257&rft.pages=250-257&rft.issn=0007-1285&rft.eissn=1748-880X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1259/bjr.72.855.10396214&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69874243%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69874243&rft_id=info:pmid/10396214&rfr_iscdi=true |