MRI appearances of the axilla in treated breast cancer

Differentiation between recurrent axillary disease and changes due to radiotherapy or surgery has major implications for management in patients following breast cancer treatment, but clinical examination of the axilla may be difficult. This study was undertaken to correlate the MRI appearances of th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of radiology 1999-03, Vol.72 (855), p.250-257
Hauptverfasser: Potterton, A J, Yuille, F, Tinkler, S, Chippindale, A J, Wilsdon, J B, Lucraft, H H, Dawes, P J, Coulthard, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 257
container_issue 855
container_start_page 250
container_title British journal of radiology
container_volume 72
creator Potterton, A J
Yuille, F
Tinkler, S
Chippindale, A J
Wilsdon, J B
Lucraft, H H
Dawes, P J
Coulthard, A
description Differentiation between recurrent axillary disease and changes due to radiotherapy or surgery has major implications for management in patients following breast cancer treatment, but clinical examination of the axilla may be difficult. This study was undertaken to correlate the MRI appearances of the axilla following breast cancer treatment with clinical outcome. 74 women with treated breast cancer were evaluated by MRI (0.5 T) and the appearances defined by consensus. Outcome was assessed by long-term clinical follow-up. 62 women had symptoms related to the axilla while 12 were scanned to stage the axilla. None of the axillary staging group had abnormal MRI appearances and none of these subsequently developed recurrence. The 62 symptomatic women were subdivided according to MRI appearances. 22 had normal axillary appearances, 18 had an axillary mass and 22 women had abnormal axillary appearances (rated mild, moderate and severe) in the absence of a mass. Normal axillary appearances on MRI excluded recurrent disease as the cause of symptoms with a specificity of 94.7% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 95.5%. The presence of an axillary mass was commonly but not exclusively due to recurrent disease (sensitivity 68.4%, specificity 88.4%, PPV 72.2%). Sensitivity for diagnosis of axillary recurrence was increased to 89.5% with a specificity of 76.7% if the criteria for recurrent disease were taken as either the presence of an axillary mass or severe axillary changes in the absence of a mass lesion.
doi_str_mv 10.1259/bjr.72.855.10396214
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69874243</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69874243</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c251t-2fa6838a7008ebca48efc4cf5972d231dae94e2a6d9e3887750b093b386c8e3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-AkFm5S5xnpk7Syk-ChVBFNwNk8kNprRNnElB_70JbcHV4cB3DvceQq45y7nQ9q5cxdyIHLTOOZO2EFydkCk3CjIA9nlKpowxk3EBekIuUlqNVlt2TiZHfkqKl7cF9V2HPvptwETbmvZfSP1Ps1572mxpH9H3WNFy0NTTMGLxkpzVfp3w6qAz8vH48D5_zpavT4v5_TILQvM-E7UvQII3jAGWwSvAOqhQa2tEJSSvPFqFwheVRQlgjGYls7KUUATAQWfkdt_bxfZ7h6l3myYFHE7bYrtLrrBglFByAOUeDLFNKWLtuthsfPx1nLlxLjfM5Yxww1zu-P6QujnU78oNVv8yB-APZdFlfA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69874243</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MRI appearances of the axilla in treated breast cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Potterton, A J ; Yuille, F ; Tinkler, S ; Chippindale, A J ; Wilsdon, J B ; Lucraft, H H ; Dawes, P J ; Coulthard, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Potterton, A J ; Yuille, F ; Tinkler, S ; Chippindale, A J ; Wilsdon, J B ; Lucraft, H H ; Dawes, P J ; Coulthard, A</creatorcontrib><description>Differentiation between recurrent axillary disease and changes due to radiotherapy or surgery has major implications for management in patients following breast cancer treatment, but clinical examination of the axilla may be difficult. This study was undertaken to correlate the MRI appearances of the axilla following breast cancer treatment with clinical outcome. 74 women with treated breast cancer were evaluated by MRI (0.5 T) and the appearances defined by consensus. Outcome was assessed by long-term clinical follow-up. 62 women had symptoms related to the axilla while 12 were scanned to stage the axilla. None of the axillary staging group had abnormal MRI appearances and none of these subsequently developed recurrence. The 62 symptomatic women were subdivided according to MRI appearances. 22 had normal axillary appearances, 18 had an axillary mass and 22 women had abnormal axillary appearances (rated mild, moderate and severe) in the absence of a mass. Normal axillary appearances on MRI excluded recurrent disease as the cause of symptoms with a specificity of 94.7% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 95.5%. The presence of an axillary mass was commonly but not exclusively due to recurrent disease (sensitivity 68.4%, specificity 88.4%, PPV 72.2%). Sensitivity for diagnosis of axillary recurrence was increased to 89.5% with a specificity of 76.7% if the criteria for recurrent disease were taken as either the presence of an axillary mass or severe axillary changes in the absence of a mass lesion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1285</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-880X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1259/bjr.72.855.10396214</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10396214</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Axilla - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - therapy ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnosis ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Mastectomy ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Single-Blind Method</subject><ispartof>British journal of radiology, 1999-03, Vol.72 (855), p.250-257</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c251t-2fa6838a7008ebca48efc4cf5972d231dae94e2a6d9e3887750b093b386c8e3b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10396214$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Potterton, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuille, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinkler, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chippindale, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilsdon, J B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucraft, H H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawes, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coulthard, A</creatorcontrib><title>MRI appearances of the axilla in treated breast cancer</title><title>British journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><description>Differentiation between recurrent axillary disease and changes due to radiotherapy or surgery has major implications for management in patients following breast cancer treatment, but clinical examination of the axilla may be difficult. This study was undertaken to correlate the MRI appearances of the axilla following breast cancer treatment with clinical outcome. 74 women with treated breast cancer were evaluated by MRI (0.5 T) and the appearances defined by consensus. Outcome was assessed by long-term clinical follow-up. 62 women had symptoms related to the axilla while 12 were scanned to stage the axilla. None of the axillary staging group had abnormal MRI appearances and none of these subsequently developed recurrence. The 62 symptomatic women were subdivided according to MRI appearances. 22 had normal axillary appearances, 18 had an axillary mass and 22 women had abnormal axillary appearances (rated mild, moderate and severe) in the absence of a mass. Normal axillary appearances on MRI excluded recurrent disease as the cause of symptoms with a specificity of 94.7% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 95.5%. The presence of an axillary mass was commonly but not exclusively due to recurrent disease (sensitivity 68.4%, specificity 88.4%, PPV 72.2%). Sensitivity for diagnosis of axillary recurrence was increased to 89.5% with a specificity of 76.7% if the criteria for recurrent disease were taken as either the presence of an axillary mass or severe axillary changes in the absence of a mass lesion.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Axilla - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Mastectomy</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><issn>0007-1285</issn><issn>1748-880X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-AkFm5S5xnpk7Syk-ChVBFNwNk8kNprRNnElB_70JbcHV4cB3DvceQq45y7nQ9q5cxdyIHLTOOZO2EFydkCk3CjIA9nlKpowxk3EBekIuUlqNVlt2TiZHfkqKl7cF9V2HPvptwETbmvZfSP1Ps1572mxpH9H3WNFy0NTTMGLxkpzVfp3w6qAz8vH48D5_zpavT4v5_TILQvM-E7UvQII3jAGWwSvAOqhQa2tEJSSvPFqFwheVRQlgjGYls7KUUATAQWfkdt_bxfZ7h6l3myYFHE7bYrtLrrBglFByAOUeDLFNKWLtuthsfPx1nLlxLjfM5Yxww1zu-P6QujnU78oNVv8yB-APZdFlfA</recordid><startdate>19990301</startdate><enddate>19990301</enddate><creator>Potterton, A J</creator><creator>Yuille, F</creator><creator>Tinkler, S</creator><creator>Chippindale, A J</creator><creator>Wilsdon, J B</creator><creator>Lucraft, H H</creator><creator>Dawes, P J</creator><creator>Coulthard, A</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990301</creationdate><title>MRI appearances of the axilla in treated breast cancer</title><author>Potterton, A J ; Yuille, F ; Tinkler, S ; Chippindale, A J ; Wilsdon, J B ; Lucraft, H H ; Dawes, P J ; Coulthard, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c251t-2fa6838a7008ebca48efc4cf5972d231dae94e2a6d9e3887750b093b386c8e3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Axilla - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Mastectomy</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Potterton, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuille, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinkler, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chippindale, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilsdon, J B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucraft, H H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawes, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coulthard, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Potterton, A J</au><au>Yuille, F</au><au>Tinkler, S</au><au>Chippindale, A J</au><au>Wilsdon, J B</au><au>Lucraft, H H</au><au>Dawes, P J</au><au>Coulthard, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MRI appearances of the axilla in treated breast cancer</atitle><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><date>1999-03-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>855</issue><spage>250</spage><epage>257</epage><pages>250-257</pages><issn>0007-1285</issn><eissn>1748-880X</eissn><abstract>Differentiation between recurrent axillary disease and changes due to radiotherapy or surgery has major implications for management in patients following breast cancer treatment, but clinical examination of the axilla may be difficult. This study was undertaken to correlate the MRI appearances of the axilla following breast cancer treatment with clinical outcome. 74 women with treated breast cancer were evaluated by MRI (0.5 T) and the appearances defined by consensus. Outcome was assessed by long-term clinical follow-up. 62 women had symptoms related to the axilla while 12 were scanned to stage the axilla. None of the axillary staging group had abnormal MRI appearances and none of these subsequently developed recurrence. The 62 symptomatic women were subdivided according to MRI appearances. 22 had normal axillary appearances, 18 had an axillary mass and 22 women had abnormal axillary appearances (rated mild, moderate and severe) in the absence of a mass. Normal axillary appearances on MRI excluded recurrent disease as the cause of symptoms with a specificity of 94.7% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 95.5%. The presence of an axillary mass was commonly but not exclusively due to recurrent disease (sensitivity 68.4%, specificity 88.4%, PPV 72.2%). Sensitivity for diagnosis of axillary recurrence was increased to 89.5% with a specificity of 76.7% if the criteria for recurrent disease were taken as either the presence of an axillary mass or severe axillary changes in the absence of a mass lesion.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>10396214</pmid><doi>10.1259/bjr.72.855.10396214</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1285
ispartof British journal of radiology, 1999-03, Vol.72 (855), p.250-257
issn 0007-1285
1748-880X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69874243
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Adult
Aged
Axilla - pathology
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Breast Neoplasms - therapy
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnosis
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Mastectomy
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Predictive Value of Tests
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
Sensitivity and Specificity
Single-Blind Method
title MRI appearances of the axilla in treated breast cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T22%3A05%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MRI%20appearances%20of%20the%20axilla%20in%20treated%20breast%20cancer&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Potterton,%20A%20J&rft.date=1999-03-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=855&rft.spage=250&rft.epage=257&rft.pages=250-257&rft.issn=0007-1285&rft.eissn=1748-880X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1259/bjr.72.855.10396214&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69874243%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69874243&rft_id=info:pmid/10396214&rfr_iscdi=true