Analyzing Complicity in Risk
When risks generate anger rather than fear, there is at least someone who regards the imposition of those risks as wrongdoing; and it then makes sense to speak of the involvement in producing those risks as complicity. It is particularly relevant to examine the complicity of risk bearers, because th...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Risk analysis 2008-12, Vol.28 (6), p.1571-1582 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1582 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 1571 |
| container_title | Risk analysis |
| container_volume | 28 |
| creator | Busby, Jerry |
| description | When risks generate anger rather than fear, there is at least someone who regards the imposition of those risks as wrongdoing; and it then makes sense to speak of the involvement in producing those risks as complicity. It is particularly relevant to examine the complicity of risk bearers, because this is likely to have a strong influence on how far other actors should go in providing them with protection. This article makes a case for analyzing complicity explicitly, in parallel with normal processes of risk assessment, and proposes a framework for this analysis. It shows how it can be applied in a case study of maritime transportation, and examines the practical and theoretical difficulties of this kind of analysis. The conclusion is that the analysis has to be formative rather than summative, but that it could provide a useful way of exposing differences in the assumptions of different actors about agency and responsibility. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01111.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69870374</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1589975511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4841-769d2c4b46ed2196d7437c68acc8b03960d751fca19e2c22b7435c1d1d0f87763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1vEzEQhi0EoqHwDxBEHLjtMrZ3PfYFKaygrVQB6hfHkeP1Vk432bBORMKvx9uNisSl-GLL88yj0TuMTTnkPJ0Pi5yX0mTKiCIXADqH4TvfPWGTh8JTNgGBIiukFEfsRYwLAA5Q4nN2xDWa0hicsNezlW33v8Pqdlp1y3UbXNjsp2E1vQjx7iV71tg2-leH-5hdf_l8VZ1m599OzqrZeeYKXfAMlamFK-aF8rXgRtVYSHRKW-f0HKRRUGPJG2e58cIJMU_10vGa19BoRCWP2fvRu-67n1sfN7QM0fm2tSvfbSMpoxFk6noMlMgVGA2PgmlKqbkQCXz3D7jotn3KJJIAVKgLgQnSI-T6LsbeN7Tuw9L2e-JAQ_K0oCF3GnKnYSF0vxDapdY3B_92vvT138bDBhLwcQR-hdbv_1tMF2eXs-GZBNkoCHHjdw8C29-RQokl_fh6Qp9ubk6rSnynq8S_HfnGdmRv-xDp-lIAl8BLdW_8A6Xwrgc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>207678427</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analyzing Complicity in Risk</title><source>Wiley Blackwell Single Titles</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Busby, Jerry</creator><creatorcontrib>Busby, Jerry</creatorcontrib><description>When risks generate anger rather than fear, there is at least someone who regards the imposition of those risks as wrongdoing; and it then makes sense to speak of the involvement in producing those risks as complicity. It is particularly relevant to examine the complicity of risk bearers, because this is likely to have a strong influence on how far other actors should go in providing them with protection. This article makes a case for analyzing complicity explicitly, in parallel with normal processes of risk assessment, and proposes a framework for this analysis. It shows how it can be applied in a case study of maritime transportation, and examines the practical and theoretical difficulties of this kind of analysis. The conclusion is that the analysis has to be formative rather than summative, but that it could provide a useful way of exposing differences in the assumptions of different actors about agency and responsibility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-4332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-6924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01111.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18795997</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Agency ; Agency theory ; benefit ; Case studies ; causation ; Complicity ; Emotions ; Risk ; Risk assessment ; Risk management ; Sea transport ; Studies ; voluntarism ; Voluntary work</subject><ispartof>Risk analysis, 2008-12, Vol.28 (6), p.1571-1582</ispartof><rights>2008 Society for Risk Analysis</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4841-769d2c4b46ed2196d7437c68acc8b03960d751fca19e2c22b7435c1d1d0f87763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4841-769d2c4b46ed2196d7437c68acc8b03960d751fca19e2c22b7435c1d1d0f87763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1539-6924.2008.01111.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1539-6924.2008.01111.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18795997$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Busby, Jerry</creatorcontrib><title>Analyzing Complicity in Risk</title><title>Risk analysis</title><addtitle>Risk Anal</addtitle><description>When risks generate anger rather than fear, there is at least someone who regards the imposition of those risks as wrongdoing; and it then makes sense to speak of the involvement in producing those risks as complicity. It is particularly relevant to examine the complicity of risk bearers, because this is likely to have a strong influence on how far other actors should go in providing them with protection. This article makes a case for analyzing complicity explicitly, in parallel with normal processes of risk assessment, and proposes a framework for this analysis. It shows how it can be applied in a case study of maritime transportation, and examines the practical and theoretical difficulties of this kind of analysis. The conclusion is that the analysis has to be formative rather than summative, but that it could provide a useful way of exposing differences in the assumptions of different actors about agency and responsibility.</description><subject>Agency</subject><subject>Agency theory</subject><subject>benefit</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>causation</subject><subject>Complicity</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Sea transport</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>voluntarism</subject><subject>Voluntary work</subject><issn>0272-4332</issn><issn>1539-6924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU1vEzEQhi0EoqHwDxBEHLjtMrZ3PfYFKaygrVQB6hfHkeP1Vk432bBORMKvx9uNisSl-GLL88yj0TuMTTnkPJ0Pi5yX0mTKiCIXADqH4TvfPWGTh8JTNgGBIiukFEfsRYwLAA5Q4nN2xDWa0hicsNezlW33v8Pqdlp1y3UbXNjsp2E1vQjx7iV71tg2-leH-5hdf_l8VZ1m599OzqrZeeYKXfAMlamFK-aF8rXgRtVYSHRKW-f0HKRRUGPJG2e58cIJMU_10vGa19BoRCWP2fvRu-67n1sfN7QM0fm2tSvfbSMpoxFk6noMlMgVGA2PgmlKqbkQCXz3D7jotn3KJJIAVKgLgQnSI-T6LsbeN7Tuw9L2e-JAQ_K0oCF3GnKnYSF0vxDapdY3B_92vvT138bDBhLwcQR-hdbv_1tMF2eXs-GZBNkoCHHjdw8C29-RQokl_fh6Qp9ubk6rSnynq8S_HfnGdmRv-xDp-lIAl8BLdW_8A6Xwrgc</recordid><startdate>200812</startdate><enddate>200812</enddate><creator>Busby, Jerry</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200812</creationdate><title>Analyzing Complicity in Risk</title><author>Busby, Jerry</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4841-769d2c4b46ed2196d7437c68acc8b03960d751fca19e2c22b7435c1d1d0f87763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agency</topic><topic>Agency theory</topic><topic>benefit</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>causation</topic><topic>Complicity</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Sea transport</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>voluntarism</topic><topic>Voluntary work</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Busby, Jerry</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Risk analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Busby, Jerry</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analyzing Complicity in Risk</atitle><jtitle>Risk analysis</jtitle><addtitle>Risk Anal</addtitle><date>2008-12</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1571</spage><epage>1582</epage><pages>1571-1582</pages><issn>0272-4332</issn><eissn>1539-6924</eissn><abstract>When risks generate anger rather than fear, there is at least someone who regards the imposition of those risks as wrongdoing; and it then makes sense to speak of the involvement in producing those risks as complicity. It is particularly relevant to examine the complicity of risk bearers, because this is likely to have a strong influence on how far other actors should go in providing them with protection. This article makes a case for analyzing complicity explicitly, in parallel with normal processes of risk assessment, and proposes a framework for this analysis. It shows how it can be applied in a case study of maritime transportation, and examines the practical and theoretical difficulties of this kind of analysis. The conclusion is that the analysis has to be formative rather than summative, but that it could provide a useful way of exposing differences in the assumptions of different actors about agency and responsibility.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>18795997</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01111.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0272-4332 |
| ispartof | Risk analysis, 2008-12, Vol.28 (6), p.1571-1582 |
| issn | 0272-4332 1539-6924 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69870374 |
| source | Wiley Blackwell Single Titles; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Agency Agency theory benefit Case studies causation Complicity Emotions Risk Risk assessment Risk management Sea transport Studies voluntarism Voluntary work |
| title | Analyzing Complicity in Risk |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T16%3A23%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analyzing%20Complicity%20in%20Risk&rft.jtitle=Risk%20analysis&rft.au=Busby,%20Jerry&rft.date=2008-12&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1571&rft.epage=1582&rft.pages=1571-1582&rft.issn=0272-4332&rft.eissn=1539-6924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01111.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1589975511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=207678427&rft_id=info:pmid/18795997&rfr_iscdi=true |