Ab initio fold prediction of small helical proteins using distance geometry and knowledge-based scoring functions
The problem of protein tertiary structure prediction from primary sequence can be separated into two subproblems: generation of a library of possible folds and specification of a best fold given the library. A distance geometry procedure based on random pairwise metrization with good sampling proper...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of molecular biology 1999-07, Vol.290 (1), p.267-281 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 281 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 267 |
container_title | Journal of molecular biology |
container_volume | 290 |
creator | Huang, E S Samudrala, R Ponder, J W |
description | The problem of protein tertiary structure prediction from primary sequence can be separated into two subproblems: generation of a library of possible folds and specification of a best fold given the library. A distance geometry procedure based on random pairwise metrization with good sampling properties was used to generate a library of 500 possible structures for each of 11 small helical proteins. The input to distance geometry consisted of sets of restraints to enforce predicted helical secondary structure and a generic range of 5 to 11 A between predicted contact residues on all pairs of helices. For each of the 11 targets, the resulting library contained structures with low RMSD versus the native structure. Near-native sampling was enhanced by at least three orders of magnitude compared to a random sampling of compact folds. All library members were scored with a combination of an all-atom distance-dependent function, a residue pair-potential, and a hydrophobicity function. In six of the 11 cases, the best-ranking fold was considered to be near native. Each library was also reduced to a final ab initio prediction via consensus distance geometry performed over the 50 best-ranking structures from the full set of 500. The consensus results were of generally higher quality, yielding six predictions within 6.5 A of the native fold. These favorable predictions corresponded to those for which the correlation between the RMSD and the scoring function were highest. The advantage of the reported methodology is its extreme simplicity and potential for including other types of structural restraints. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2861 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69865057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69865057</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p207t-50a04e97e602a7b97242f6845a480ef7c335d2f0ea5c2c815a74235eff6924a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kD1PwzAYhD2AaCmsjMgTW4pjxx8Zq4ovqRILzJFjvy4ujt3GiVD_PQHKdDrdo9PpELopybIkRNzvutYvy7qul1SJ8gzNCaG0oIqJGbrMeUcI4axSF2hWEqYUl3SODqsW--gHn7BLweJ9D9abyUacHM6dDgF_QPBGhylLA_iY8Zh93GLr86CjAbyF1MHQH7GOFn_G9BXAbqFodQaLs0n9D-3G-Fubr9C50yHD9UkX6P3x4W39XGxen17Wq02xp0QOBSeaVFBLEIRq2daSVtQJVXFdKQJOGsa4pY6A5oYaVXItK8o4OCdqWmnKFujur3eafRghD03ns4EQdIQ05kbUSnDC5QTensCx7cA2-953uj82_yexbybkaSc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69865057</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ab initio fold prediction of small helical proteins using distance geometry and knowledge-based scoring functions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Huang, E S ; Samudrala, R ; Ponder, J W</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, E S ; Samudrala, R ; Ponder, J W</creatorcontrib><description>The problem of protein tertiary structure prediction from primary sequence can be separated into two subproblems: generation of a library of possible folds and specification of a best fold given the library. A distance geometry procedure based on random pairwise metrization with good sampling properties was used to generate a library of 500 possible structures for each of 11 small helical proteins. The input to distance geometry consisted of sets of restraints to enforce predicted helical secondary structure and a generic range of 5 to 11 A between predicted contact residues on all pairs of helices. For each of the 11 targets, the resulting library contained structures with low RMSD versus the native structure. Near-native sampling was enhanced by at least three orders of magnitude compared to a random sampling of compact folds. All library members were scored with a combination of an all-atom distance-dependent function, a residue pair-potential, and a hydrophobicity function. In six of the 11 cases, the best-ranking fold was considered to be near native. Each library was also reduced to a final ab initio prediction via consensus distance geometry performed over the 50 best-ranking structures from the full set of 500. The consensus results were of generally higher quality, yielding six predictions within 6.5 A of the native fold. These favorable predictions corresponded to those for which the correlation between the RMSD and the scoring function were highest. The advantage of the reported methodology is its extreme simplicity and potential for including other types of structural restraints.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2836</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2861</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10388572</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Protein Folding ; Protein Structure, Secondary ; Protein Structure, Tertiary ; Proteins - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Journal of molecular biology, 1999-07, Vol.290 (1), p.267-281</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1999 Academic Press.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10388572$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, E S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samudrala, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponder, J W</creatorcontrib><title>Ab initio fold prediction of small helical proteins using distance geometry and knowledge-based scoring functions</title><title>Journal of molecular biology</title><addtitle>J Mol Biol</addtitle><description>The problem of protein tertiary structure prediction from primary sequence can be separated into two subproblems: generation of a library of possible folds and specification of a best fold given the library. A distance geometry procedure based on random pairwise metrization with good sampling properties was used to generate a library of 500 possible structures for each of 11 small helical proteins. The input to distance geometry consisted of sets of restraints to enforce predicted helical secondary structure and a generic range of 5 to 11 A between predicted contact residues on all pairs of helices. For each of the 11 targets, the resulting library contained structures with low RMSD versus the native structure. Near-native sampling was enhanced by at least three orders of magnitude compared to a random sampling of compact folds. All library members were scored with a combination of an all-atom distance-dependent function, a residue pair-potential, and a hydrophobicity function. In six of the 11 cases, the best-ranking fold was considered to be near native. Each library was also reduced to a final ab initio prediction via consensus distance geometry performed over the 50 best-ranking structures from the full set of 500. The consensus results were of generally higher quality, yielding six predictions within 6.5 A of the native fold. These favorable predictions corresponded to those for which the correlation between the RMSD and the scoring function were highest. The advantage of the reported methodology is its extreme simplicity and potential for including other types of structural restraints.</description><subject>Protein Folding</subject><subject>Protein Structure, Secondary</subject><subject>Protein Structure, Tertiary</subject><subject>Proteins - chemistry</subject><issn>0022-2836</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kD1PwzAYhD2AaCmsjMgTW4pjxx8Zq4ovqRILzJFjvy4ujt3GiVD_PQHKdDrdo9PpELopybIkRNzvutYvy7qul1SJ8gzNCaG0oIqJGbrMeUcI4axSF2hWEqYUl3SODqsW--gHn7BLweJ9D9abyUacHM6dDgF_QPBGhylLA_iY8Zh93GLr86CjAbyF1MHQH7GOFn_G9BXAbqFodQaLs0n9D-3G-Fubr9C50yHD9UkX6P3x4W39XGxen17Wq02xp0QOBSeaVFBLEIRq2daSVtQJVXFdKQJOGsa4pY6A5oYaVXItK8o4OCdqWmnKFujur3eafRghD03ns4EQdIQ05kbUSnDC5QTensCx7cA2-953uj82_yexbybkaSc</recordid><startdate>19990702</startdate><enddate>19990702</enddate><creator>Huang, E S</creator><creator>Samudrala, R</creator><creator>Ponder, J W</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990702</creationdate><title>Ab initio fold prediction of small helical proteins using distance geometry and knowledge-based scoring functions</title><author>Huang, E S ; Samudrala, R ; Ponder, J W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p207t-50a04e97e602a7b97242f6845a480ef7c335d2f0ea5c2c815a74235eff6924a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Protein Folding</topic><topic>Protein Structure, Secondary</topic><topic>Protein Structure, Tertiary</topic><topic>Proteins - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, E S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samudrala, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponder, J W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of molecular biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, E S</au><au>Samudrala, R</au><au>Ponder, J W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ab initio fold prediction of small helical proteins using distance geometry and knowledge-based scoring functions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of molecular biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Mol Biol</addtitle><date>1999-07-02</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>290</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>267</spage><epage>281</epage><pages>267-281</pages><issn>0022-2836</issn><abstract>The problem of protein tertiary structure prediction from primary sequence can be separated into two subproblems: generation of a library of possible folds and specification of a best fold given the library. A distance geometry procedure based on random pairwise metrization with good sampling properties was used to generate a library of 500 possible structures for each of 11 small helical proteins. The input to distance geometry consisted of sets of restraints to enforce predicted helical secondary structure and a generic range of 5 to 11 A between predicted contact residues on all pairs of helices. For each of the 11 targets, the resulting library contained structures with low RMSD versus the native structure. Near-native sampling was enhanced by at least three orders of magnitude compared to a random sampling of compact folds. All library members were scored with a combination of an all-atom distance-dependent function, a residue pair-potential, and a hydrophobicity function. In six of the 11 cases, the best-ranking fold was considered to be near native. Each library was also reduced to a final ab initio prediction via consensus distance geometry performed over the 50 best-ranking structures from the full set of 500. The consensus results were of generally higher quality, yielding six predictions within 6.5 A of the native fold. These favorable predictions corresponded to those for which the correlation between the RMSD and the scoring function were highest. The advantage of the reported methodology is its extreme simplicity and potential for including other types of structural restraints.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>10388572</pmid><doi>10.1006/jmbi.1999.2861</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-2836 |
ispartof | Journal of molecular biology, 1999-07, Vol.290 (1), p.267-281 |
issn | 0022-2836 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69865057 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Protein Folding Protein Structure, Secondary Protein Structure, Tertiary Proteins - chemistry |
title | Ab initio fold prediction of small helical proteins using distance geometry and knowledge-based scoring functions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T06%3A58%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ab%20initio%20fold%20prediction%20of%20small%20helical%20proteins%20using%20distance%20geometry%20and%20knowledge-based%20scoring%20functions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20molecular%20biology&rft.au=Huang,%20E%20S&rft.date=1999-07-02&rft.volume=290&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=267&rft.epage=281&rft.pages=267-281&rft.issn=0022-2836&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/jmbi.1999.2861&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69865057%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69865057&rft_id=info:pmid/10388572&rfr_iscdi=true |