Ab initio fold prediction of small helical proteins using distance geometry and knowledge-based scoring functions

The problem of protein tertiary structure prediction from primary sequence can be separated into two subproblems: generation of a library of possible folds and specification of a best fold given the library. A distance geometry procedure based on random pairwise metrization with good sampling proper...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of molecular biology 1999-07, Vol.290 (1), p.267-281
Hauptverfasser: Huang, E S, Samudrala, R, Ponder, J W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 281
container_issue 1
container_start_page 267
container_title Journal of molecular biology
container_volume 290
creator Huang, E S
Samudrala, R
Ponder, J W
description The problem of protein tertiary structure prediction from primary sequence can be separated into two subproblems: generation of a library of possible folds and specification of a best fold given the library. A distance geometry procedure based on random pairwise metrization with good sampling properties was used to generate a library of 500 possible structures for each of 11 small helical proteins. The input to distance geometry consisted of sets of restraints to enforce predicted helical secondary structure and a generic range of 5 to 11 A between predicted contact residues on all pairs of helices. For each of the 11 targets, the resulting library contained structures with low RMSD versus the native structure. Near-native sampling was enhanced by at least three orders of magnitude compared to a random sampling of compact folds. All library members were scored with a combination of an all-atom distance-dependent function, a residue pair-potential, and a hydrophobicity function. In six of the 11 cases, the best-ranking fold was considered to be near native. Each library was also reduced to a final ab initio prediction via consensus distance geometry performed over the 50 best-ranking structures from the full set of 500. The consensus results were of generally higher quality, yielding six predictions within 6.5 A of the native fold. These favorable predictions corresponded to those for which the correlation between the RMSD and the scoring function were highest. The advantage of the reported methodology is its extreme simplicity and potential for including other types of structural restraints.
doi_str_mv 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2861
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69865057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69865057</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p207t-50a04e97e602a7b97242f6845a480ef7c335d2f0ea5c2c815a74235eff6924a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kD1PwzAYhD2AaCmsjMgTW4pjxx8Zq4ovqRILzJFjvy4ujt3GiVD_PQHKdDrdo9PpELopybIkRNzvutYvy7qul1SJ8gzNCaG0oIqJGbrMeUcI4axSF2hWEqYUl3SODqsW--gHn7BLweJ9D9abyUacHM6dDgF_QPBGhylLA_iY8Zh93GLr86CjAbyF1MHQH7GOFn_G9BXAbqFodQaLs0n9D-3G-Fubr9C50yHD9UkX6P3x4W39XGxen17Wq02xp0QOBSeaVFBLEIRq2daSVtQJVXFdKQJOGsa4pY6A5oYaVXItK8o4OCdqWmnKFujur3eafRghD03ns4EQdIQ05kbUSnDC5QTensCx7cA2-953uj82_yexbybkaSc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69865057</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ab initio fold prediction of small helical proteins using distance geometry and knowledge-based scoring functions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Huang, E S ; Samudrala, R ; Ponder, J W</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, E S ; Samudrala, R ; Ponder, J W</creatorcontrib><description>The problem of protein tertiary structure prediction from primary sequence can be separated into two subproblems: generation of a library of possible folds and specification of a best fold given the library. A distance geometry procedure based on random pairwise metrization with good sampling properties was used to generate a library of 500 possible structures for each of 11 small helical proteins. The input to distance geometry consisted of sets of restraints to enforce predicted helical secondary structure and a generic range of 5 to 11 A between predicted contact residues on all pairs of helices. For each of the 11 targets, the resulting library contained structures with low RMSD versus the native structure. Near-native sampling was enhanced by at least three orders of magnitude compared to a random sampling of compact folds. All library members were scored with a combination of an all-atom distance-dependent function, a residue pair-potential, and a hydrophobicity function. In six of the 11 cases, the best-ranking fold was considered to be near native. Each library was also reduced to a final ab initio prediction via consensus distance geometry performed over the 50 best-ranking structures from the full set of 500. The consensus results were of generally higher quality, yielding six predictions within 6.5 A of the native fold. These favorable predictions corresponded to those for which the correlation between the RMSD and the scoring function were highest. The advantage of the reported methodology is its extreme simplicity and potential for including other types of structural restraints.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2836</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2861</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10388572</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Protein Folding ; Protein Structure, Secondary ; Protein Structure, Tertiary ; Proteins - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Journal of molecular biology, 1999-07, Vol.290 (1), p.267-281</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1999 Academic Press.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10388572$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, E S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samudrala, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponder, J W</creatorcontrib><title>Ab initio fold prediction of small helical proteins using distance geometry and knowledge-based scoring functions</title><title>Journal of molecular biology</title><addtitle>J Mol Biol</addtitle><description>The problem of protein tertiary structure prediction from primary sequence can be separated into two subproblems: generation of a library of possible folds and specification of a best fold given the library. A distance geometry procedure based on random pairwise metrization with good sampling properties was used to generate a library of 500 possible structures for each of 11 small helical proteins. The input to distance geometry consisted of sets of restraints to enforce predicted helical secondary structure and a generic range of 5 to 11 A between predicted contact residues on all pairs of helices. For each of the 11 targets, the resulting library contained structures with low RMSD versus the native structure. Near-native sampling was enhanced by at least three orders of magnitude compared to a random sampling of compact folds. All library members were scored with a combination of an all-atom distance-dependent function, a residue pair-potential, and a hydrophobicity function. In six of the 11 cases, the best-ranking fold was considered to be near native. Each library was also reduced to a final ab initio prediction via consensus distance geometry performed over the 50 best-ranking structures from the full set of 500. The consensus results were of generally higher quality, yielding six predictions within 6.5 A of the native fold. These favorable predictions corresponded to those for which the correlation between the RMSD and the scoring function were highest. The advantage of the reported methodology is its extreme simplicity and potential for including other types of structural restraints.</description><subject>Protein Folding</subject><subject>Protein Structure, Secondary</subject><subject>Protein Structure, Tertiary</subject><subject>Proteins - chemistry</subject><issn>0022-2836</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kD1PwzAYhD2AaCmsjMgTW4pjxx8Zq4ovqRILzJFjvy4ujt3GiVD_PQHKdDrdo9PpELopybIkRNzvutYvy7qul1SJ8gzNCaG0oIqJGbrMeUcI4axSF2hWEqYUl3SODqsW--gHn7BLweJ9D9abyUacHM6dDgF_QPBGhylLA_iY8Zh93GLr86CjAbyF1MHQH7GOFn_G9BXAbqFodQaLs0n9D-3G-Fubr9C50yHD9UkX6P3x4W39XGxen17Wq02xp0QOBSeaVFBLEIRq2daSVtQJVXFdKQJOGsa4pY6A5oYaVXItK8o4OCdqWmnKFujur3eafRghD03ns4EQdIQ05kbUSnDC5QTensCx7cA2-953uj82_yexbybkaSc</recordid><startdate>19990702</startdate><enddate>19990702</enddate><creator>Huang, E S</creator><creator>Samudrala, R</creator><creator>Ponder, J W</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990702</creationdate><title>Ab initio fold prediction of small helical proteins using distance geometry and knowledge-based scoring functions</title><author>Huang, E S ; Samudrala, R ; Ponder, J W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p207t-50a04e97e602a7b97242f6845a480ef7c335d2f0ea5c2c815a74235eff6924a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Protein Folding</topic><topic>Protein Structure, Secondary</topic><topic>Protein Structure, Tertiary</topic><topic>Proteins - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, E S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samudrala, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponder, J W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of molecular biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, E S</au><au>Samudrala, R</au><au>Ponder, J W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ab initio fold prediction of small helical proteins using distance geometry and knowledge-based scoring functions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of molecular biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Mol Biol</addtitle><date>1999-07-02</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>290</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>267</spage><epage>281</epage><pages>267-281</pages><issn>0022-2836</issn><abstract>The problem of protein tertiary structure prediction from primary sequence can be separated into two subproblems: generation of a library of possible folds and specification of a best fold given the library. A distance geometry procedure based on random pairwise metrization with good sampling properties was used to generate a library of 500 possible structures for each of 11 small helical proteins. The input to distance geometry consisted of sets of restraints to enforce predicted helical secondary structure and a generic range of 5 to 11 A between predicted contact residues on all pairs of helices. For each of the 11 targets, the resulting library contained structures with low RMSD versus the native structure. Near-native sampling was enhanced by at least three orders of magnitude compared to a random sampling of compact folds. All library members were scored with a combination of an all-atom distance-dependent function, a residue pair-potential, and a hydrophobicity function. In six of the 11 cases, the best-ranking fold was considered to be near native. Each library was also reduced to a final ab initio prediction via consensus distance geometry performed over the 50 best-ranking structures from the full set of 500. The consensus results were of generally higher quality, yielding six predictions within 6.5 A of the native fold. These favorable predictions corresponded to those for which the correlation between the RMSD and the scoring function were highest. The advantage of the reported methodology is its extreme simplicity and potential for including other types of structural restraints.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>10388572</pmid><doi>10.1006/jmbi.1999.2861</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2836
ispartof Journal of molecular biology, 1999-07, Vol.290 (1), p.267-281
issn 0022-2836
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69865057
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Protein Folding
Protein Structure, Secondary
Protein Structure, Tertiary
Proteins - chemistry
title Ab initio fold prediction of small helical proteins using distance geometry and knowledge-based scoring functions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T06%3A58%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ab%20initio%20fold%20prediction%20of%20small%20helical%20proteins%20using%20distance%20geometry%20and%20knowledge-based%20scoring%20functions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20molecular%20biology&rft.au=Huang,%20E%20S&rft.date=1999-07-02&rft.volume=290&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=267&rft.epage=281&rft.pages=267-281&rft.issn=0022-2836&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/jmbi.1999.2861&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69865057%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69865057&rft_id=info:pmid/10388572&rfr_iscdi=true